ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Digit. Health
Sec. Digital Mental Health
Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1634013
This article is part of the Research TopicInnovating Public Mental Health: Integrating Digital Therapeutics for Comprehensive Mood Disorder ManagementView all 3 articles
Videoconferencing psychotherapy: Determining acceptance, drivers and barriers of use
Provisionally accepted- 1Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LVR-University Hospital, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- 2Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
With increasing digitalization in psychotherapy, some healthcare interactions are transitioning to online services. This study examined the acceptance of videoconferencing psychotherapy (VCP) among patients affected by mental health disorders and healthy controls, thereby identifying drivers and barriers. A cross-sectional survey study was conducted from February to October 2024 in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. Participants were recruited via outpatient clinics, online study distribution platformsnetworks, and psychotherapy-related social media channels and blogs. Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 years, German language proficiency, and internet access. Sociodemographic, medical, psychotherapeutic anamnesis, and information and communication technologies (ICT) related data were collected. Acceptance of VCP was assessed using an extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model. Of N = 483 participants, 47.6% (n = 230) reported high, 34.2% (n = 165) moderate and 18.2% (n = 88) low acceptance. Significant Influencing factorspredictors were included digital overload (β = .14, p = .006), depressive symptoms (β = .11, p = .033), current psychotherapy: outpatient (β = -.34, p = .003), concern: effectiveness (β = -.47, p < .001), concern: emotional expression (β = -.25, p < .001), and the UTAUT predictors: social influence (β = .28, p < .001), performance expectancy (β = .32, p < .001) and effort expectancy (β = .15, p = .001). Explained variance of the final model was 72.9%. The moderate to high acceptance indicates that VCP could supplement psychotherapeutic care addressing the global treatment gap. Identified drivers and barriers highlight factors that should be considered to enable broader implementation. Moderate to high VCP acceptance highlights the need for patient-centered approaches addressing identified drivers and barriers. Given the increasing demand for psychotherapeutic care, digital solutions like VCP should be considered.
Keywords: eHealth, Telemedicine, Remote Consultation, UTAUT, Mental Health
Received: 23 May 2025; Accepted: 12 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Nurtsch, Jahre, Krakowczyk, Robitzsch, Teufel and Bäuerle. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Alexander Bäuerle, Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LVR-University Hospital, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.