PERSPECTIVE article
Front. Digit. Health
Sec. Connected Health
Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1664213
This article is part of the Research TopicUnlocking the Potential of Health Data: Interoperability, Security, and Emerging Challenges in AI, LLM, Precision Medicine, and Their Impact on Healthcare and ResearchView all 7 articles
Beyond the numbers: the importance of contextual data when reusing blood pressure data from Electronic Health Records
Provisionally accepted- 1Central Diagnostic Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
- 2Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Wilhelmina’s Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
- 3Intensive Care Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
- 4Cardiovascular and Respiratory Physiology, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
- 5Siemens Healthcare Private Limited, Bangalore, India
- 6Department of Nephrology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
- 7Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
- 8Directorate Information Technology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
With the digitization of health records, the reuse of Electronic Health Record (EHR) data has become increasingly prevalent in research. Using blood pressure as a case study, this paper examines the complexities and practical realities of reusing EHR data, emphasizing the importance of contextual information for accurate interpretation. Although blood pressure data derived from EHR systems may appear straightforward—often captured by machines or derived from standardized workflows— their reuse is frequently complicated by variability in measurement methods and clinical contexts, which can produce seemingly similar but clinically distinct blood pressure readings. The paper begins with the physiology of blood pressure and the various techniques used to measure it. This is followed by an analysis of different clinical settings—i.e. the different pathophysiological situations—that may affect both measurement practices and data interpretation. The paper then explores how these measurements are recorded in EHR systems and concludes with practical guidance to support researchers in identifying blood pressure data that are truly fit for the intended research purpose. By acknowledging the inherent complexities of healthcare data and making informed data selection decisions, researchers can better harness the potential of EHRs to generate meaningful insights that ultimately improve patient care.
Keywords: Electronic Health Records, Data reuse, EHDs, Semantic interoperability, Blood Pressure, Fit for purpose, contextual data
Received: 11 Jul 2025; Accepted: 19 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Grünewald, Koomen, van Loon, Gupta, Vernooij, van Solinge, Kappen and Haitjema. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Saskia Haitjema, Central Diagnostic Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.