Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Digit. Health

Sec. Health Technology Implementation

This article is part of the Research TopicDigital Technology in the Management and Prevention of Diabetes: Volume IIIView all 9 articles

Voices from the Field: Healthcare Professionals' Insights on Sustaining Telemedicine for Diabetes Management in Hong Kong Primary Care

Provisionally accepted
Arkers Kwan Ching  WongArkers Kwan Ching Wong1*Luna Ziqi  LiuLuna Ziqi Liu1Frances Kam Yuet  WongFrances Kam Yuet Wong1Jun  LiangJun Liang2Danny Wah Kuen  TongDanny Wah Kuen Tong2Man Li  ChanMan Li Chan2Man Kin  WongMan Kin Wong2Bo Chu  WongBo Chu Wong2Cecilia Yeuk Sze  TangCecilia Yeuk Sze Tang2Wai Hing  HoWai Hing Ho2Sau Ching  ChiangSau Ching Chiang2
  • 1Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong, SAR China
  • 2Hospital Authority, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Diabetes mellitus is a prevalent chronic illness that imposes substantial health and financial burdens. In routine follow-up for diabetes, telemedicine offers a promising alternative to traditional face-to-face care within primary care settings, yet real-world adoption remains uneven and often discontinuous. This study explored how healthcare professionals experience the implementation of telemedicine consultations for diabetes management, identifying facilitators, barriers, and resources needed for long-term operation. We conducted a qualitative study with 21 healthcare professionals involved in a hybrid telemedicine program in public primary care. Semi-structured interviews underwent a three-stage analysis: first, inductive thematic coding; second, organization of themes using the NASSS framework (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread, Sustainability); and third, ecological mapping of each NASSS-organized theme to micro, meso, exo, macro, and chrono levels to trace cross-level pathways and temporal shifts. Thirteen themes were identified and grouped across ecological levels and NASSS domains. Key facilitators included coordinated policy and organizational support, prepared clinic infrastructure, effective training and IT support, and positive perceptions among staff and caregivers. Major barriers included staffing constraints and workflow burden, patient digital literacy challenges and environmental constraints, process complexity including identity verification and e-payment steps, limited suitability for unstable clinical presentations, and gaps in end-to-end service features such as medication delivery. Sustaining telemedicine in primary care will require addressing these barriers while reinforcing enabling conditions through aligned policy and financing, streamlined infrastructure and workflows, targeted patient and staff supports, and continued adaptation over time. The combined NASSS and ecological approach clarifies what the determinants are and where and how they operate, offering level-specific, actionable directions to strengthen the long-term delivery of diabetes care via telemedicine.

Keywords: Telemedicine, Diabetes Mellitus, primary healthcare, NASSS framework, Ecological model, implementation science

Received: 14 Jul 2025; Accepted: 17 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Wong, Liu, Wong, Liang, Tong, Chan, Wong, Wong, Tang, Ho and Chiang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Arkers Kwan Ching Wong, arkers.wong@polyu.edu.hk

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.