Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

EDITORIAL article

Front. Digit. Health

Sec. Ethical Digital Health

This article is part of the Research TopicSocioeconomic Inequalities in Digital HealthView all 7 articles

Editorial: Socioeconomic Inequalities in Digital Health – Towards an Inclusive and Planetized Future

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
  • 2Univerzita Palackeho v Olomouci, Olomouc, Czechia
  • 3Universidade Lusofona do Porto, Porto, Portugal
  • 4University of West Attica, Athens, Greece

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

ensure progress benefits all. As digital technologies increasingly shape the contours of healthcare, this principle demands renewed reflection. In a globally connected world, pandemics and health crises remind us that no population is truly isolated. Inequities in digital health preparedness and response in one region can have ripple effects worldwide.Thus, global cooperation and equitable digital infrastructure are essential.The research contributions in this special collection, Socioeconomic Inequalities in Digital Health, illuminate both the opportunities and the tensions at the heart of this issue. A narrative review by Awosiku et al. (2025) Crucially, digital exclusion is not confined to low-income countries. A cross-sectional study by Claudio et al. (2025) at a paediatric hospital in Canada reveals that even in high-income settings, the digital divide persists. While most caregivers had access to digital devices, 23% encountered challenges with technological familiarity and expressed concerns about data security. These findings highlight that digital readiness cannot be assumed and must be intentionally cultivated, especially among vulnerable and underserved groups. Together, these studies present a complex but hopeful picture. They remind us that digital health, if designed inclusively, can be a powerful tool for equity, but if left unchecked, it may reproduce the very injustices it seeks to overcome. These insights challenge us to see digital health not merely as a technical endeavour but as a profoundly human one. As The Promise of World Peace observes, "The process of planetization is at work, integrating peoples and cultures, reshaping institutions, and forging bonds of mutual dependence and collaboration." When guided by compassion and foresight, digital health can become a vital part of this process, promoting dignity, justice, and well-being across all levels of society.In the context of digital health, "planetization" means designing systems that transcend national, racial, and economic divides-systems grounded in ethics and shaped by the lived realities of those they aim to serve. It reminds us that innovation without purpose is insufficient. Only through equity, accessibility, and cultural humility can digital health fulfill its transformative potential. This means not only addressing disparities but reimagining health systems to reflect the unity of humanity.To realise this vision, researchers must continue to interrogate both the impacts and blind spots of digital innovation; policymakers must craft frameworks that prioritise inclusion over scale; and practitioners must advocate for solutions that are as compassionate as they are cutting-edge. The task before us is not only technical-it is moral, social, and shared.Inclusive digital health policies must prioritise the marginalised, not merely enhance convenience for the already privileged. By prioritising the needs of the most vulnerable, we strengthen the fabric of health systems for all. When guided by shared purpose, justice, and the recognition of our oneness, digital health can unite humanity, fostering solidarity instead of division. This Research Topic offers both evidence and inspiration to help guide us along that vital path.

Keywords: Digital Health, Socioeconomic inequalities and health, Socioeconomic Inequalities in Digital Health, Universal Health Coverage (UHC), Digital exclusion, digital readiness, digital marginalisation, Digital Literacy

Received: 05 Aug 2025; Accepted: 14 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Perimal-Lewis, Correia and Sakellari. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Lua Perimal-Lewis, lua.perimal-lewis@flinders.edu.au

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.