REVIEW article
Front. Digit. Health
Sec. Human Factors and Digital Health
This article is part of the Research TopicPharmacist and patient safety: Focus on drug safetyView all 14 articles
Using Shared Clinical Decision Support to Reduce Adverse Drug Events and Improve Patient Safety
Provisionally accepted- 1Northwestern University, Evanston, United States
- 2Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
ABSTRACT Background: Medications, while essential therapeutic tools in modern healthcare, carry the inherent risk of causing adverse drug events (ADEs) that can result in significant morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Despite substantial research efforts in this domain, the majority of ADEs remain undetected due to reliance on voluntary reporting systems and inadequate surveillance mechanisms. Consequently, the true scope and impact of ADEs are likely far greater than currently recognized. Objective: To examine the role of shared clinical decision support (SCDS) in reducing adverse drug events and enhancing patient safety outcomes through systematic integration of clinical decision support systems with shared decision-making frameworks. Methods: We conducted a narrative review of literature published up to June 2025, utilizing validated patient safety frameworks to identify contextual factors, systemic challenges, and evidence-based strategies that influence adverse drug event occurrence and prevention. Results: Multiple interconnected factors contribute to ADE susceptibility, including healthcare provider competencies (inadequate monitoring, symptom recognition failures), clinical environment characteristics (technology workarounds, equipment complexity), pharmacy system factors (high-risk medication storage, limited pharmacist involvement), and patient-specific variables (polypharmacy, multimorbidity, age-related physiological changes). Critical risk determinants include provider fatigue and burnout, inadequate monitoring protocols, medication administration errors, and systemic communication failures. Successful implementations require multifaceted approaches integrating health information technology components, stakeholder engagement, customized clinical decision rules, and continuous quality improvement processes. Conclusions: Shared clinical decision support represents a paradigm shift toward patient empowerment, enabling active patient participation in healthcare decisions while leveraging technology-enhanced clinical guidance. The most promising approach to ADE elimination involves a comprehensive integration of educational initiatives, human factors engineering, robust shared clinical decision support systems, and multidisciplinary collaborative care models.
Keywords: Adverse drug events, human factors, Clinical decision support, health information technology, shared decision-making, Patient Safety, Risk Assessment, Digital Health Services
Received: 10 Sep 2025; Accepted: 10 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Ye and Bronstein. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Jiancheng Ye, jiancheng.ye@u.northwestern.edu
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
