ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Genet., 18 June 2021

Sec. Livestock Genomics

Volume 12 - 2021 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.666897

Scale Drop Disease Virus (SDDV) and Lates calcarifer Herpes Virus (LCHV) Coinfection Downregulate Immune-Relevant Pathways and Cause Splenic and Kidney Necrosis in Barramundi Under Commercial Farming Conditions

  • 1. Tropical Futures Institute, James Cook University, Singapore, Singapore

  • 2. Centre for Sustainable Tropical Fisheries and Aquaculture, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia

  • 3. Faculty of Science, Fish Health Platform, Center of Excellence for Shrimp Molecular Biology and Biotechnology (Centex Shrimp), Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand

  • 4. National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC), National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), Pathumthani, Thailand

  • 5. Faculty of Science and Technology, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University, Bangkok, Thailand

  • 6. School of Applied Science (SAS), Republic Polytechnic, Singapore, Singapore

Abstract

Marine farming of barramundi (Lates calcarifer) in Southeast Asia is currently severely affected by viral diseases. To better understand the biological implications and gene expression response of barramundi in commercial farming conditions during a disease outbreak, the presence of pathogens, comparative RNAseq, and histopathology targeting multiple organs of clinically “sick” and “healthy” juveniles were investigated. Coinfection of scale drop disease virus (SDDV) and L. calcarifer herpes virus (LCHV) were detected in all sampled fish, with higher SDDV viral loads in sick than in healthy fish. Histopathology showed that livers in sick fish often had moderate to severe abnormal fat accumulation (hepatic lipidosis), whereas the predominant pathology in the kidneys shows moderate to severe inflammation and glomerular necrosis. The spleen was the most severely affected organ, with sick fish presenting severe multifocal and coalescing necrosis. Principal component analysis (PC1 and PC2) explained 70.3% of the observed variance and strongly associated the above histopathological findings with SDDV loads and with the sick phenotypes, supporting a primary diagnosis of the fish being impacted by scale drop disease (SDD). Extracted RNA from kidney and spleen of the sick fish were also severely degraded likely due to severe inflammation and tissue necrosis, indicating failure of these organs in advanced stages of SDD. RNAseq of sick vs. healthy barramundi identified 2,810 and 556 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the liver and muscle, respectively. Eleven significantly enriched pathways (e.g., phagosome, cytokine-cytokine-receptor interaction, ECM-receptor interaction, neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction, calcium signaling, MAPK, CAMs, etc.) and gene families (e.g., tool-like receptor, TNF, lectin, complement, interleukin, chemokine, MHC, B and T cells, CD molecules, etc.) relevant to homeostasis and innate and adaptive immunity were mostly downregulated in sick fish. These DEGs and pathways, also previously identified in L. calcarifer as general immune responses to other pathogens and environmental stressors, suggest a failure of the clinically sick fish to cope and overcome the systemic inflammatory responses and tissue degeneration caused by SDD.

Introduction

Barramundi (Lates calcarifer), also known as Asian seabass, is an important tropical aquaculture food fish and a species that is receiving increased global attention due to its good attributes for aquaculture and consumer attractiveness (). As the barramundi industry grows and production intensifies, commercial farmers have seen the occurrence of several emerging viral and bacterial diseases that affects the survival of farmed stocks (; ; ,; ; ; ). Emerging diseases are a particular threat to intensive barramundi aquaculture, where fish are directly exposed to the natural environment. In these open systems, it is impractical, due to the unavailability of efficacious commercial vaccines.

Scale drop disease virus (SDDV), a novel Megalocytivirus of the Iridoviridae family, has had devastating consequences on the production of barramundi in Southeast Asia, particularly during early juvenile phases (∼50–500 g) reared in sea cages. SDDV is often associated with mortalities ranging from 40 to 50% of cultured stock (; ; ). While initial reports of the disease were from farms in Singapore (; ), SDDV has been reported in other Southeast Asian producing countries, such as Malaysia (), Thailand (), and Indonesia (). SDD was also recently reported in barramundi farmed in freshwater ponds in Thailand, suggesting this disease is not confined to marine aquaculture (). Clinically affected fish show darkened bodies, scale loss, fin and tail erosion, and occasionally, cloudy eyes and red bellies (; ; ; ). Many of these gross abnormalities observed are similar to that caused by opportunistic bacterial infections, such that SDD was initially misdiagnosed as tenacibaculosis (). Affected fish show systemic vasculitis and resulting tissue necrosis in all major organs, particularly in the spleen and kidney (; ).

Other emerging pathogens in cultured barramundi include L. calcarifer herpes virus (LCHV) (; ), infectious spleen and kidney necrosis virus (ISKNV) (), Vibrio harveyi causing scale drop and muscle necrosis (Vh-SDMND) (), L. calcarifer birnavirus (LCBV) (), and red sea bream iridovirus (RSIV) (). SDDV and LCHV infections in barramundi reportedly caused similar gross signs of scale loss (), reiterating the need to use more specific diagnostic tests. PCR-based diagnostic methods have been established for these pathogens (; ; ; ). However, epidemiological studies characterizing the prevalence of these pathogens in farming sites have not yet been carried out. In fact, coinfections, rather than a single pathogen are commonly responsible for mortalities and production losses (; ; ; ). In some cases, such interactions might change how the host responds to a secondary infection in a counterintuitive manner, as for instance persistently nervous necrosis virus (NNV)-infected barramundi were shown to exhibit resistance to RSIV coinfection ().

Recent genomic studies in barramundi have resulted in the development of linkage maps (, ), molecular markers (; ), transcriptomes (; ), and whole genome assemblies (; ). These studies have contributed to a better understanding of the biology of wild barramundi (; ; ) and in aquaculture production (, ,, , ; , ; ; ; ). A number of studies have employed “omics” approaches targeted to better understand molecular pathways and genes involved in L. calcarifer’s adaptive stress response (; ; ; ). Other studies investigated immune functions (; , ; ; ), QTLs () and disease resistance genes (, ; ). Laboratory challenge trials have been carried out to understand the genetic basis of immune response and survival in barramundi associated with V. harveyi (; , ), Photobacterium damselae (), Streptococcus iniae (), iridovirus (; ), and NNV (). Transcriptome analyses based on RNAseq have proven to be a powerful tool to understand pathogenicity and fish immunity ().

To better understand recurring mortalities experienced during the early phases of sea cage culture of barramundi, this study investigated the transcriptional changes and associated histopathology in fish sampled during a major disease outbreak event. Tissues of clinically healthy and sick fish were collected, and histological analyses, qPCR, and PCR for significant pathogens and RNAseq methodologies were carried out. Our results showed significant changes in pathogen loads of SDDV but not LCHV, pathology, and differential gene expression between clinically healthy and sick barramundi.

Materials and Methods

Sample Collection

Juvenile barramundi were collected in a sea cage with a history of recent mortalities from a commercial farm in Singapore, in June 2019. Eight apparently diseased fish (hereafter termed “sick” fish—length, 26.5 ± 3.0 cm; weight, 231.3.1 ± 67.4 g) displaying lethargy (slow swimming at the surface), fin and body rot, and scale loss (or which scales were easily removed) were sampled for tissue collection, along with eight clinically healthy fish (hereafter termed “healthy”—length, 28.0 ± 2.5 cm; weight, 290.1 ± 71.6 g) exhibiting active swimming patterns, smooth body and skin, and clear eyes. Fish were euthanized in buckets containing 15 L of seawater and 15 ml of 10% clove oil (100 ppm), and immediately dissected after decapitation to collect the kidney, muscle, spleen, and liver (∼0.5 cm3). Tissues were subsampled and preserved either in RNAlater (Ambion, Austin, TX, United States) for RNA sequencing and pathogen screening by PCR and/or qPCR or 10% phosphate-buffered formalin for histology. Tissue samples in RNA later were kept on ice and transferred to a –20°C freezer on the same day for storage until processed for analyses. Formalin-fixed tissues were processed into 5 μm hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained tissue sections at the Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology (IMCB) histology laboratory in Singapore. H&E-stained tissue sections were viewed under bright field microscopy, and images were captured using the Olympus Research Microscope BX53, Digital Camera DP74, and CellSensTM Standard Imaging System (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).”

Screening of Five Putative Fish Pathogens by PCR Methods

The presence and load of pathogens in fish was identified via PCR/qPCR methods (Table 1). Firstly, genomic DNA was extracted from kidney and liver tissues of healthy (n = 8) and sick (n = 8) barramundi using a conventional phenol/chloroform and ethanol precipitation method. From this extract, 200 ng of DNA template was then used in each PCR reaction. Along with all tests for the target pathogen, amplification of the cytochrome c oxidase gene (COI) was included () to ensure quality of the DNA template. PCR diagnosis were conducted for three viral pathogens namely SDDV, LCHV, Megalocytivirus, and two bacterial pathogens Tenacibaculum maritimum and Vibrio harveyi causing scale drop and muscle necrosis (Vh-SDMND), as per Table 1.

TABLE 1

PathogenMethodTargetReactionCycling conditionsPositive controlsReferences
Scale drop disease virus (SDDV)SYBR qPCRSDDV ATPase geneA 20-μl qPCR reaction contained the DNA template, 150 nM of each primer and 2 × KAPA SYBR FAST master mix (Kapa Biosystems, Inc., Wilmington, WA, United States)95°C for 3 min and 40 cycles of 95°C for 3 s and 63°C for 30 s followed by melt curve analysisDNA from SDDV-infected barramundi ()
Lates calcarifer herpes virus (LCHV)SYBR qPCRLCHV major envelop protein geneA 20-μl qPCR reaction contained the DNA template, 200 nM of each primer and 1x iTaq Universal SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, United States)95°C for 10 min and 40 cycles of 95°C for 10 s and 63°C for 30 s followed by melt curve analysisDNA from LCHV-infected barramundi
MegalocytivirusSingle PCRMegalocytivirus major capsid protein geneA 25-μl PCR reaction contained the DNA template, 200 nM of each primer, 200 μM dNTP, 1.25 units of Taq DNA polymerase enzyme (RBC Bioscience, New Taipei City, Taiwan) and 1 × supplied buffer94°C for 5 min and 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 60°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 30 s, and a final extension step at 72°C for 5 minDNA from Megalocytivirus-infected Asian sea bass ()
Vibrio harveyi causing scale drop and muscle necrosis (Vh-SDMND)Duplex PCRVh-SDMND hypothetical protein gene and SDDV ATPase geneA 25-μl PCR reaction contained the DNA template, 200 nM of each primer, and 1 × AccuStart II GelTrack PCR SuperMix (Quantabio, Beverly, MA, United States)94°C for 3 min and 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 60°C for 30 s and 72°C for 30 s, and an extension step at 72°C for 5 minPlasmid harboring dual targets for both Vh-SDMND and SDDVTaengphu et al., unpublished
Tenacibaculum maritimumSingle PCR16S rDNA geneA 20-μl PCR reaction contained the DNA template, 200 nM of each primer, 2 units of Taq polymerase (PCR Biosystems), and 1 × supplied buffer94°C for 1 min and 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 50°C for 30 s and 72°C for 1 min, and an extension step at 72°C for 5 minPlasmid containing the T. maritimum insert target

Summary of molecular tests employed to detect and/or quantify pathogens present in kidney and liver of barramundi.

Copy numbers of SDDV and LCHV were calculated from respective standard graphs generated by qPCR amplifications of serially diluted plasmid containing corresponding viral insert target as previously described (; ).

Statistical Analyses

Assessment of statistical differences between sick and healthy fish viral loads in kidney and liver was performed with a Mann-Whitney U-test at a significance level of 0.05. The association between the viral loads and the observed histopathological scores (hepatic reserves, lipidosis, glomerulonephritis, and splenitis) was explored using PCA with Spearman rank metrics in Xlstat® software (Addinsoft, Paris, France). The original set of eight variables of interest was reduced into two components of eigenvalues of 4.72 and 1.61 and represented as a two-dimensional plot.

RNA Extraction, Library Preparation, and Sequencing

Total RNA was extracted from three immune competent tissues (liver, spleen, and kidney) and muscle from all 16 fish using an RNeasy® Mini kit (Qiagen 74104, Qiagen, Frankfurt, Germany). All RNA samples were treated with RNase free DNase-I (M610A, Promega, Madison, WI, United States) to remove genomic DNA contamination. The quality and the quantity of the total RNA was determined with an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (RNA 6000 Nano Chip Assay, Agilent, Böblingen, Germany) and a Qubit 3.0 (Quant-It dsRNA BR Assay, ThermoFischer Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States).

For the cDNA library preparations, 1 μg RNA was used as an input material for each sample. VAHTS mRNA-seq V3 Library Prep Kit for Illumina (NR611, Vazyme; San Diego, CA, United States) was used to generate sequencing libraries. In brief, mRNA with poly(A) was enriched by mRNA Capture Beads and fragmented by heating. Short mRNA was reverse-transcribed with random hexamer primers to generate the first cDNA, and then the second cDNA was synthesized. The cDNA fragments then went through an end repair process, the addition of a single “A” base to the 3′ end and then ligation of the adapters. The products were then purified and size selected (350 bp range). At the end, fragments were enriched by PCR and purified using VAHTSTM DNA Clean Beads. The quality and quantity of PCR product was determined by the Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 and Qubit 2.0 (ThermoFisher). Finally, sequencing was undertaken on an Illumina Novaseq 6000 platform generating 150 bp paired-end reads.

RNA-Seq Data Mapping, Gene Differential Expression, and Enrichment Analysis

To obtain high-quality clean data for downstream analyses, raw reads of FASTQ format were firstly processed through in-house perl scripts. In this step, the low-quality reads and reads containing adaptors or poly-N were removed. At the same time, Q20, Q30, GC content, and sequence duplication level of the clean data were calculated.

Reference genome and gene model annotation files of L. calcarifer were downloaded from the NCBI1 genome website directly. Index of the reference genome was built using Bowtie v2.2.3 (), and paired-end clean reads were aligned to the reference genome using TopHat v2.0.12 (). The process of genetic quantification of gene expression level was carried out by HTSeq v0.6.1 by counting the read numbers mapped to each gene (), and then the expected number of fragments per kilobase of transcript sequence per millions base pairs sequenced (FPKM) of each gene was calculated based on the length of the gene and reads count mapped to this gene.

Differential expression statistical analysis between organs from sick and healthy fish was performed using the DESeq R package (1.18.0) (). The resulting P-values were adjusted using the Benjamini and Hochberg’s approach for controlling the false-discovery rate. Genes with an adjusted P-value < 0.05 found by DESeq were assigned as the threshold for indicating significantly differential expression. Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes was implemented by the GOseq R package, in which gene length bias was corrected (). GO terms with corrected P-values < 0.05 were considered significantly enriched by differentially expressed genes. KOBAS software () was utilized to test the statistical enrichment of those differential expression genes in KEGG2 pathways.

Results

Pathogen Screening Using PCR and qPCR

While histopathology strongly suggested a primary infection with scale drop virus in both sick and clinically healthy fish, qualitative molecular tests (PCR) were carried out to rule out other possible concurrent infections that could cause the scale loss observed (Vh-SDMND, T. maritimum), or other viral diseases that could cause the occasional inclusion bodies observed in renal glomeruli or connective tissues within skeletal muscles in sick fish (Megalocytivirus). Based on PCR, liver and kidney samples returned negative for the presence of Megalocytivirus, Vh-SDMND, and T. maritimum in both sick and healthy fish, while all fish sampled were positive for SDDV and LCHV, with exception of two sick fish liver samples (out of seven) (Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary Figure 1). SDDV and LCHV loads in the healthy fish ranged from 1 to 1,853 copies and 17 to 475 copies/qPCR reaction, respectively. SDDV and LCHV loads were higher in the sick fish, from 131 to 22,549 and 0 to 4,045 copies/qPCR reaction, respectively (Supplementary Table 2 and Figure 1A). SDDV overall loads were seven times higher than those for LCHV. SDDV loads in kidney and liver of sick fish were 8.4 and 3.6 times higher than those of healthy fish (Figure 1A). However, differences in loads between the two groups were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The kidneys of sick fish had 3.6 times higher LCHV loads than those of healthy fish. Comparatively, LCHV loads in the liver were one magnitude lower than those in the kidney and two orders of magnitude lower than that of SDDV (Figure 1A, right). Amplicons from selected positive test samples (marked with an asterisk in Supplementary Table 1) were subjected to DNA sequence analysis and found to show one (99.3%) to zero nucleotide change (100% identity) among the SDDV product sequences. In contrast, two (97.85%) to no nucleotide differences (100% identity) were observed among the LCHV product sequences (Supplementary Figure 2).

FIGURE 1

Histopathology

Raw data on individual viral loads and histopathology scores are presented in Supplementary Table 2. Overall, clinically sick fish showed a greater degree of abnormalities, often related to inflammatory processes (Figure 1B). The wispy cytoplasmic appearance of H&E-stained livers with good hepatocellular reserves in healthy fish, differs from the more homogenous, basophilic cytoplasm in sick fish, with depleted hepatic reserves (Figures 2A,B). Moderate (score 2) to good (score 3) hepatocellular lipid and glycogen reserves were observed in most of the livers of clinically healthy barramundi (Figures 1B, 2A), in contrast to low hepatic reserves observed in all sick fish (Figures 1B, 2B). Moderate to severe, accumulation of large, round, lipid vacuoles or macrovesicles in liver cells (lipidosis), was observed in most sick barramundi (Figures 1B, 2C). Lipidosis is either not observed or mild in healthy fish, with the exception of one individual which had the highest SDDV loads within this group (Figure 1A and Supplementary Table 2).

FIGURE 2

Moderate to severe splenic inflammation (splenitis) were observed in both healthy and sick fish (Figure 1B). Moderate splenitis is characterized by multifocal necrosis (Figure 2D), while severe splenitis has multifocal to coalescing necrosis, affecting extensive areas of the spleen. Spleens with multifocal infarcts, or tissue deaths (necrosis), had occluded blood vessels, due to marked inflammatory response in the endothelium (obliterative endarteritis) (Figure 2D). While there was splenitis in a significant number of both clinically healthy and sick fish, moderate to severe kidney inflammation (glomerulonephritis) was observed only in all sick fish. The kidneys of diseased barramundi showed glomerular necrosis, protein effusion, and mixed infiltration of macrophages and lymphocytes into the Bowman’s space (protein loosing, necrotizing glomerulonephritis) (Figures 2E,F).

Mild multifocal interstitial myositis was observed in both healthy (H02, H04, and H05) and sick fish (S07), and occasionally in association with the presence of inclusion bodies (Figure 2H). Moderate, diffuse dermatitis was observed where skin was intact in tissue sections examined, in both healthy (H01, H02, H04, and H06) and sick fish (S02 and S04). In addition, severe thinning of epidermis was observed in the sick fish S04, lymphocytic-monocytic infiltration surrounding dermal blood vessels (perivasculitis) and occluded dermal blood vessels with obliterative endarteritis was observed in sick fish S06 (Figure 2I).

Two principal components derived from PCA explained 70.3% of the variance among SDDV and LCHV viral loads and histopathological findings (Figure 3). A positive association was observed between SDDV loads (both in the liver and in the kidney) and the major negative histopathological findings (glomerulonephritis, splenitis, and lipidosis) (component F1 > 2), which were inversely related to lipid score (component F1 < –2). In contrast, the PCA revealed no direct association of LCHV loads with any of the histopathological findings (and neither with SDDV loads). Although all healthy individuals were positive for both viruses (albeit with lower loads than sick individuals) and did present some of the histopathological alterations (most notably on the spleen, Figure 1B), the PCA revealed a marked difference in grouping of sick (F1 > 0) and healthy (F1 < 0) fish, with exception of S08 and H05 individuals, which respectively had the lowest and the highest SDDV loads within their groups (Supplementary Table 2).

FIGURE 3

Severe RNA Degradation Observed in Spleen and Kidney of Sick Fish

Major differences were observed in the quality of RNA extracted from spleen and kidney of healthy vs. sick fish and between different organs in sick fish, as assessed with an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Figure 4). RNA integrity number (RIN, mean ± S.D.) for extracts from spleen and kidney of sick fish were 2.50 ± 0.55 and 3.39 ± 1.15, respectively. This contrasts with RIN of 9.93 ± 0.09 for liver, and 8.86 ± 1.03 for muscle RNA extracts for sick fish, and 9.37 ± 0.11 for RNA derived from all organs of healthy fish. As RNA in spleen and kidney samples of sick fish were degraded and did not pass quality control for sequencing, only liver and muscle tissues were used for transcriptomic comparisons between the two groups.

FIGURE 4

Liver and Muscle RNA Sequencing, Mapping, and Analysis of Differentially Expressed Genes

RNA sequencing performed on eight sick and eight healthy fish generated a total of 1,426.10 and 1,831.68 million clean reads, from the liver and muscle tissues, respectively. An average of 101.80 million clean reads (ranging from 82.48 to 167.31 million) was obtained from each sample. The Q30 (i.e., probability of an incorrect base call of 1 in 1,000) and GC percentages of the reads were 92.84 and 50.08%, respectively. All the filtered clean reads were mapped individually against the annotated genome of L. calcarifer. In total, 2,504.23 million reads were successfully mapped, with approximately 2,306.56 million reads (92.1%) uniquely mapped (i.e., mapped to a single locus in the genome). Detailed sequencing and mapping results are summarized in Supplementary Table 3. RNAseq data (32 trancriptomes) have been deposited in NCBI under the accession number PRJNA713978.

To identify gene expression changes between liver (or between muscle) of sick and healthy fish, the FPKM method was used to calculate the expression levels of genes (Figure 5). For liver tissues, the average Pearson correlation coefficient (R2 values) for gene expression values was 0.92 (0.89–0.97) in healthy fish and 0.95 (0.93–0.98) in sick fish, indicating the high repeatability of biological replicates. For muscle tissues, the average R2 values was 0.82 (0.71–0.94) in healthy fish and 0.80 (0.51–0.95) in sick fish, which suggested less similarity in the gene expression patterns of muscle relative to liver between sick and healthy fish. Given the high number of biological samples randomly sampled within each group (n = 8) for a transcriptomic study, but still limited in relation to the farmed population subjected to the disease outbreak, all samples were utilized in the analysis. Comparison between liver of two groups (sick vs. healthy fish) revealed 2,810 significantly differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Among them, 1,083 were upregulated and 1,727 were downregulated in the liver of sick fish (Figure 5 and Supplementary Table 4). In the muscle, a total of 556 significantly DEGs were discovered, with 144 genes upregulated and the rest downregulated in sick fish (Figure 5 and Supplementary Table 5). To illustrate the DEGs detected in sick and healthy fish, heatmaps were generated for both liver and muscle separately (Supplementary Figures 3A,B). The transcriptomic profile in the livers of healthy fish was obviously different from that of the sick fish, with all eight samples from each group contained within two main clusters (Supplementary Figure 3A). Whereas in muscle, the expression pattern of the DEGs showed a less distinct clustering between the two groups compared with that of liver, with some sample overlap between muscle of sick and healthy animals between the two main clusters (Supplementary Figure 3B), probably because muscle is not an immune-related organ like liver and is thus is less affected by the disease. About 32% of the DEGs found in the muscle (n = 176) were also differentially expressed in the liver, whereby a 97% in concordance between up- or downregulation was observed. In terms of gene ontology, DEGs in both tissues were primarily classified within “cellular component,” followed by “biological processes” and then “molecular function” (Supplementary Figure 4).

FIGURE 5

The top 20 significantly up− or downregulated DEGs identified in liver and muscle are listed in Tables 2, 3, respectively. A number of these genes were related to inflammatory and immune responses of juvenile barramundi to viral infections. Upregulated gene expression in liver of sick fish included interleukin-1 receptor type 2-like (il-1r2l), cytokine-like protein 1 (cytl1), toll-like receptor 13 (tlr13), hepatitis A virus cellular receptor 1 homolog (havcr-1), and leucine-rich repeat-containing protein 52-like (lrrc52), whereas the complement C1q-like protein 4 (c1ql4), complement C1q tumor necrosis factor-related protein 1-like (ctrp1), phospholipase A2-like (pla2s), and retinol-binding protein 2 (rbp2) were downregulated (Table 2). In muscle of sick fish, vital components of innate immunity, including toll-like receptor 13 (tlr13) and toll-like receptor 5 (tlr5), Fc receptor-like protein 5 (fcrl5), and interleukin-1 receptor type 2-like (il-1r2) were significantly upregulated. In contrast, interferon-induced protein 44-like (ifi44l), E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase TRIM21-like (trim21), complement C1q tumor necrosis factor-related protein 1-like (ctrp1), golgi-associated plant pathogenesis-related protein 1-like (gapr-1), and G protein-coupled receptor 17 (gpr17), associated to immune response were downregulated in the muscle of sick fish (Table 3).

TABLE 2

Gene ID/nameLog2 fold changeP (adj)Up/downregulationGene description
LOC1088802469.211.44E-09UpExcitatory amino acid transporter 5-like
LOC1088844047.941.26E-06UpFibroblast growth factor 21
slc7a117.941.03E-06UpSolute carrier family 7 member 11
LOC1088970187.743.82E-20UpInterleukin-1 receptor type 2-like
LOC1088932497.200.00550UpCytokine-like protein 1
LOC1088748787.176.74E-09UpSolute carrier family 1 member 8b
LOC1088854706.953.63E-07UpHepatitis A virus cellular receptor 1 homolog
LOC1088796126.741.95E-05UpInsulin-like growth factor binding protein 1a
LOC1088790146.550.00090UpLeucine-rich repeat-containing protein 52-like
LOC1088970165.916.64E-05UpInterleukin-1 receptor type 2-like
LOC1088878245.800.02790UpHepcidin-like
LOC1088851005.805.26E-24UpToll-like receptor 13
LOC1089020395.740.00060UpPolycystic kidney disease 1b
LOC1088907935.740.00550UpIgGFc-binding protein-like
LOC1088747265.721.68E-17UpNeoverrucotoxin subunit alpha-like
LOC1088895065.606.07E-09UpCytosolic sulfotransferase 3-like
nim1k5.573.70E-07UpNIM1 serine/threonine protein kinase
LOC1088858375.541.27E-09UpProtein NDRG1-like
Tub5.530.00389UpTUB bipartite transcription factor
LOC1089023485.503.15E-10UpLadderlectin-like
LOC108891007–6.219.61E-09DownComplement C1q-like protein 4
LOC108890805–6.250.01456DownProtein jagged-1a-like
LOC108881856–6.283.94E-10DownP17/29C-like protein DDB_G0287399
abcg4–6.340.00404DownATP-binding cassette, subfamily G (WHITE), member 4a
paqr5–6.410.03062DownProgestin and adipoQ receptor family member Vb
LOC108891005–6.454.60E-09DownComplement C1q-like protein 4
LOC108878005–6.490.04627DownNeuropeptide Y receptor Y8b
LOC108887476–6.541.73E-10DownCytochrome P450 2K1-like
LOC108879156–6.701.65E-15DownGranzyme E-like
LOC108893889–6.848.61E-11DownHigh choriolytic enzyme 1-like
LOC108890833–6.853.83E-14DownSolute carrier family 12 member 3-like
LOC108882788–6.973.75E-05DownGlutamate receptor, ionotropic, AMPA 1a
LOC108899398–6.981.96E-07DownFatty acid binding protein 10a, liver basic
LOC108881836–7.070.00086DownSemaphorin 5A
LOC108878838–7.632.81E-08DownChymotrypsin-like elastase family member 3B
LOC108880291–7.887.82E-09DownPhospholipase A2-like
LOC108890739–7.914.23E-17DownComplement C1q tumor necrosis factor-related protein 1-like
LOC108876188–8.350.01616DownMid1-interacting protein 1-B-like
LOC108899606–9.420.01790DownL-Rhamnose-binding lectin SML-like
rbp2–9.530.00918DownRetinol-binding protein 2

The top 20 significantly up- or downregulated genes in liver of sick barramundi.

Given in descending order of log2 fold change.

TABLE 3

Gene ID/nameLog2 fold changeP (adj)Up/downregulationGene description
LOC1088851009.149.88E-10UpToll-like receptor 13
acod18.210.01243UpAconitate decarboxylase 1
LOC1088747267.771.16E-05UpNeoverrucotoxin subunit alpha-like
donson7.550.00698UpDNA replication fork stabilization factor DONSON
LOC1088732507.520.00011UpGranulocyte colony-stimulating factor-like
LOC1088889127.500.00171UpToll-like receptor 5
chrng7.400.02103UpCholinergic receptor, nicotinic, gamma
LOC1088805577.350.00275UpFc receptor-like protein 5
LOC1088937227.150.00854UpMucin-5AC-like
LOC1088970187.040.00344UpInterleukin-1 receptor type 2-like
LOC1088840017.010.01199UpProtein OSCP1-like
LOC1088908096.550.00172UpHydroxycarboxylic acid receptor 2-like
LOC1088807026.540.00167UpCarcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 20-like
LOC1088940656.290.02952UpMatrix metallopeptidase 13a
gadl16.091.56E-06UpGlutamate decarboxylase like 1
LOC1088843325.740.00011UpAcyl-coenzyme A thioesterase 2, mitochondrial-like
lrriq15.720.01210UpLeucine-rich repeats and IQ motif containing 1
LOC1088861225.541.40E-05UpArginase 1
LOC1088837385.4330.00090UpCarboxypeptidase N subunit 2
alpl5.3355.08E-05UpAlkaline phosphatase, biomineralization associated
lhx8–6.400.04081DownLIM homeobox 8
foxe1–6.420.00211DownForkhead box E1
cd248–6.500.00630DownCD248 molecule
dlx6–6.520.03813DownDistal-less homeobox 6a
LOC108900437–6.550.00378DownTissue alpha-L-fucosidase-like
LOC108890438–6.610.00038DownNuclear factor 7, ovary-like
folh1b–6.670.00124DownFolate hydrolase 1B
LOC108877493–6.870.00073DownEF-hand and coiled-coil domain-containing protein 1-like
LOC108892256–6.950.00378Downdickkopf-related protein 2-like
LOC108890833–6.970.02433DownSolute carrier family 12 member 3-like
LOC108893465–7.230.00627Downvon Willebrand factor A domain-containing protein 7-like
LOC108874532–7.230.00811DownInterferon-induced protein 44-like
gpr17–7.350.00062DownG protein-coupled receptor 17
LOC108889688–7.680.00657DownGrowth arrest-specific 2b
LOC108890725–7.710.00162DownE3 ubiquitin-protein ligase TRIM21-like
mei1–8.390.03185DownMeiotic double-stranded break formation protein 1
LOC108896482–8.640.02613DownSecretory calcium-binding phosphoprotein 7
LOC108878074–8.920.04369DownGolgi-associated plant pathogenesis-related protein 1-like
LOC108897956–9.830.01199DownCalpain-2 catalytic subunit-like
LOC108890739–10.120.038363DownComplement C1q tumor necrosis factor-related protein 1-like

The top 20 significantly up- or downregulated genes in muscle of sick barramundi.

Given in descending order of log2 fold-change.

Immune-Relevant Pathways Identified in Liver and Muscle of Farmed Barramundi

Based on the DEG findings in sick vs. healthy fish, we performed KEGG pathway classification and functional enrichment analysis. Liver DEGs were classified into a total of 141 pathways, whereby 42 pathways showed statistical significance (corrected P-value < 0.05) (Supplementary Table 6). Muscle DEGs were classified into 69 pathways, whereby four pathways were statistically significant (corrected P-value < 0.05) (Supplementary Table 7). The top 20 enriched KEGG pathways in the liver and muscle in relation to their rich factor (i.e., the ratio of DEG numbers to all gene numbers annotated in a pathway) are shown in Supplementary Figures 5, 6, respectively.

Furthermore, a total of 27 pathways relevant to innate and adaptive immunity function were identified based on 525 DEGs in the liver, whereby 10 pathways were significantly enriched. Out of those 27 immune-related pathways, 22 were also shared by 127 DEGs in the muscle, whereby four of those pathways were significantly enriched (Table 4). Based on the significance value, the phagosome was the most enriched pathway in the liver, whereas the shared ECM-receptor interaction was the most enriched pathway in the muscle. Most of these immune relevant pathways (16) were classified under environmental information processing, including cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction, calcium signaling pathway, ECM-receptor interaction, cell adhesion molecules (CAMs), neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction, and MAPK signaling pathways. According to the KEGG organismal immune system, five pathways were identified: intestinal immune network for IgA production, Toll-like receptor, cytosolic DNA-sensing, NOD-like receptor, and RIG-I-like receptor signaling pathways. In addition, DEGs were also classified under the broader pathways of endocrine and metabolic disease, infectious diseases (viral and bacterial), cell growth and death, and xenobiotics biodegradation and metabolism (Table 4).

TABLE 4

KEGG pathwayLiver
Muscle
Pathway IDPathway subclass
DEGCorr. P-valueDEGCorr. P-value
Phagosome415.39E-084*Ko04145Transport and catabolism
Cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction353.06E-056*Ko04060Signaling molecules and interaction
Calcium signaling pathway463.92E-0510*Ko04020Signal transduction
ECM-receptor interaction210.000141131.41E-07Ko04512Signaling molecules and interaction
Cell adhesion molecules (CAMs)290.0001417*Ko04514Signaling molecules and interaction
Focal adhesion380.001475172.81E-05Ko04510Cellular community
Neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction530.003021200.000240Ko04080Signaling molecules and interaction
AGE-RAGE signaling pathway in diabetic complications220.0051434*Ko04933Endocrine and metabolic disease
Intestinal immune network for IgA production110.0051722*Ko04672Immune system
Insulin signaling pathway250.0198971*Ko04910Endocrine system
MAPK signaling pathway35*130.033187Ko04010Signal transduction
Wnt signaling pathway18*7*Ko04310Signal transduction
Herpes simplex infection21*1*Ko05168Infectious diseases: Viral
mTOR signaling pathway21*4*Ko04150Signal transduction
Apoptosis15*3*Ko04210Cell growth and death
Lysosome14*3*Ko04142Transport and catabolism
PPAR signaling pathway13*1*Ko03320Endocrine system
TGF-beta signaling pathway11*2*Ko04210Signal transduction
Ubiquitin mediated proteolysis10*1*Ko04120Folding, sorting and degradation
Toll-like receptor signaling pathway10*1*Ko04620Immune system
Salmonella infection10*1*Ko05132Infectious disease: bacterial
p53 signaling pathway6*3*Ko04115Cell growth and death
Drug metabolism—other enzymes6*0*Ko00983Xenobiotics biodegradation and metabolism
Drug metabolism—cytochrome P4506*0*Ko00982Xenobiotics biodegradation and metabolism
Cytosolic DNA-sensing pathway2*0*Ko04623Immune system
NOD-like receptor signaling pathway4*0*Ko04621Immune system
RIG-I-like receptor signaling pathway2*0*Ko04622Immune system

Distribution of the differentially expressed genes in immune-relevant pathways in sick (vs. healthy) barramundi.

* Corr. P-value > 0.05.

Key DEGs Related to Immune Responses Are Mostly Downregulated in Liver and Muscle of Sick Barramundi

DEGs associated to immune-relevant pathways are listed in Supplementary Table 8 (liver) and Supplementary Table 7 (muscle), whereas DEGs, further classified by immune relevant gene families, are presented in Table 5. About 65 and 89% of these DEGs were downregulated in the liver and in the muscle, respectively. Most genes in Table 5 are related to innate immunity: pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) including Toll-like receptors (tlr5, tlr13) and C-type lectin receptors (cl-11l, colec12, and selp); inflammatory cytokines and receptors including interleukins (il-1β, irak4, and il11a) and interleukin receptors (il13rα1, il17ra, and il1r1l), TNF including (tnfrsf11a, tnfaip3, tnfsf10l, and tnfsf12); chemokines (ccl4, ccl25b, and c-x-cl12a) and chemokines receptors (ccr7, cxcr3l, ccr6b, and ackr3b); complement factors (C3l and C1q); collagen (col4a5, col6a6, col6a3, col1a1a, col1a1b, and col2a1b); and myd88 as innate immune signal transduction adaptor CD molecules. In addition, gene families related to the adaptive immune response, identified only in the liver, such as B cell receptor CD22-like (down), and T cell tcirg1 (up) and nfatc1 (down), and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) such as h2-aa, h2-eb1, and hla-dap1 were significantly downregulated (except for tcirg1) in sick barramundi.

TABLE 5

Gene familyGene nameLiver
Muscle
Gene descriptionGene ID
Log2 fold changeP (adj)Up/downregulatedLog2 fold changeP (adj)Up/downregulated
Toll-like receptortlr52.830.012439Up7.500.00171UpToll-like receptor 5LOC108888912
tlr135.805.26E-24Up9.149.88E-10UpToll-like receptor 13LOC108885100
Lectincl-11l–1.330.004857DownaaaCollectin-11-likeLOC108889727
colec122.600.00014UpaaaCollectin subfamily member 12LOC108883269
selp2.762.82E-06UpaaaSelectin PLOC108877420
ComplementC1ql4–6.219.61E-09DownaaaComplement C1q-like protein 4LOC108891007
C3–2.510.001909DownaaaComplement C3-likeLOC108885851
C51.590.001243UpaaaComplement C5C5
C63.241.41E-13UpaaaComplement C6C6
CTRPctrp1–7.914.23E-17Down–10.120.038363DownComplement C1q tumor necrosis factor-related protein 1-likeLOC108890739
Chemokineccl4–3.150.000577DownaaaC-C motif chemokine 4 homologLOC108890197
ccl25b0.920.04234UpaaaChemokine (C–C motif) ligand 25bLOC108881384
c-x-cl12a0.990.031141UpaaaChemokine (C–X–C motif) ligand 12a (stromal cell-derived factor 1)LOC108888279
ccr7aaa–2.930.046610DownChemokine (C–C motif) receptor 7ccr7
cxcr3l1.230.007315UpaaaC–X–C chemokine receptor type 3-likeLOC108880701
ackr3b1.090.015943UpaaaAtypical chemokine receptor 3backr3
ccr6b–1.770.000066DownaaaChemokine (C–C motif) receptor 6bLOC108896100
Interleukinil-1β3.915.09E-06UpaaaInterleukin-1 beta-likeLOC108878374
irak41.240.007064UpaaaInterleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 4irak4
il11a3.080.000064UpaaaInterleukin 11aLOC108887322
il13rα11.750.000044UpaaaInterleukin 13 receptor, alpha 1LOC108882024
il1r1l1.020.031425UpaaaInterleukin-1 receptor type 1-likeLOC108897039
il17ra–1.330.031206DownaaaInterleukin-17 receptor A-likeLOC108888530
Il7R-αl–1.370.002399DownaaaInterleukin-7 receptor subunit alpha-likeLOC108892301
Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)tnfrsf11a1.890.013310UpaaaTumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 11a, NFKB activatorLOC108900798
tnfaip31.780.000031UpaaaTumor necrosis factor, alpha-induced protein 3tnfaip3
tnfsf10l–2.050.003045DownaaaTumor necrosis factor ligand superfamily member 10-likeLOC108885067
tnfsf12–2.540.000000Down–3.860.002753DownTNF superfamily member 12LOC108902465
Collagencol4a5–3.781.87E-08DownaaDownCollagen alpha-5 (IV) chain-likeLOC108883501
col6a6–1.780.046855Down–5.040.000399DownCollagen alpha-6 (VI) chain-likeLOC108881847
col6a6–3.930.000086Down–4.430.001080DownCollagen alpha-6 (VI) chain-likeLOC108881842
col6a3–1.520.027935DownaaDownCollagen type VI alpha 3 chaincol6a3
col1a1b–3.320.000073Down–3.630.004069DownCollagen, type I, alpha 1bLOC108876589
col1a2–3.800.000046Down–3.690.003305DownCollagen, type I, alpha 2col1a2
col6a1–1.750.000495Down–3.790.001714DownCollagen, type VI, alpha 1col6a1
col6a2–2.181.56E-06Down–2.810.046610DownCollagen, type VI, alpha 2LOC108883902
col2a1baaDown–2.960.036736DownCollagen type II alpha 1bLOC108884852
col1a1a–3.940.000021Down–4.670.007110DownCollagen, type I, alpha 1aLOC108898561
col6a6aaDown–3.820.005404DownCollagen, type VI, alpha 6col6a6
Glutathione S-transferase (gst)gstm3l–1.220.004676DownaaaGlutathione S-transferase Mu 3-likeLOC108876447
gsta.1–1.960.038464DownaaaGlutathione S-transferase, alpha tandem duplicate 1LOC108891126
mgst3a–1.280.002452DownaaaMicrosomal glutathione S-transferase 3amgst3a
CD moleculesmyd881.150.010149UpaaaMYD88 innate immune signal transduction adaptormyd88
cd2761.270.008465UpaaaCD276 moleculecd276
cd74–1.640.000159DownaaaCD74 moleculecd74
cd276–1.050.038810DownaaaCD276 antigen-likeLOC108886627
cd34aaa–3.890.018911DownCD34 moleculecd34
cd166aaa–2.950.021215DownCD166 antigen homolog A-likeLOC108899782
cd248aaa–6.500.00630DownCD248 moleculecd248
B cellcd22–1.150.017344DownaaaB-Cell receptor CD22-likeLOC108880790
T celltcirg11.250.006142UpaaaT-Cell immune regulator 1tcirg1
nfatc1–1.970.010264DownaaaNuclear factor of activated T cells 1LOC108899182
Major histocompatibility complex (MHC)h2-aa–2.370.027046DownaaaH-2 class II histocompatibility antigen, A-U alpha chain-likeLOC108892329
h2-eb1–1.600.016974DownaaaH-2 class II histocompatibility antigen, E-D beta chain-likeLOC108890468
h2-eb1–1.970.008825DownaaaH-2 class II histocompatibility antigen, E-S beta chain-likeLOC108892328
h2-eb1–2.626.93E-06DownaaaH-2 class II histocompatibility antigen, E-S beta chain-likeLOC108882204
h2-eb1–3.020.000078DownaaaH-2 class II histocompatibility antigen, E-S beta chain-likeLOC108882336
hla-dap1–1.670.000442DownaaaHLA class II histocompatibility antigen, DP alpha 1 chain-likeLOC108882210

Summary of immune-relevant genes characterized from sick (vs. healthy) barramundi based on KEGG functional analysis.

aNo differential expression of the gene in liver or muscle.

Discussion

Barramundi farming in Southeast Asia has been severely affected by disease outbreaks. In Singapore, where this particular study has taken place, farmers have reported mass mortalities of juveniles during the transition between nursery phases (∼50 to 500 g) and the final grow out period as a recurring phenomenon over the last few years. Although several novel viral pathogens (SDDV, LCHV, LCBV) affecting barramundi have been first reported and identified in Singaporean farms (; ; ; ), their occurrence is now known to extend throughout Southeast Asia (; ; ), affecting the industry as a whole. To better understand what is happening to the biology of barramundi in commercial farming conditions during one such disease outbreak, the presence of five putative pathogens was investigated using a comparative RNAseq and histological approach targeting multiple organs of affected and non-affected juveniles. This study for the first time identified a concurrent infection of SDDV and LCHV in all barramundi samples (including all those apparently healthy), while ruling out infection of Megalocytivirus ISKNV/RSIV and two bacteria, T. maritimum and Vh-SDMN, which were associated with scale drop and muscle necrosis disease events in Vietnam (). Although lower LCHV detection in all samples were indicative of an underlying herpes viral coinfection, LCHV presence, or loading was not associated to any of the histopathological findings, or to clinical disease expression (sick/healthy groups) in the PCA. In contrast, kidney and liver SDDV loads were strongly associated with the severity of histopathological alterations observed in several organs, and sick individuals. Clinical disease, severity of pathology observed in the kidney and spleen, and viral loads support the diagnosis of primary scale drop disease, whereby apparently healthy fish were in subclinical stages while sick fish were in advanced disease stages of SDD. Furthermore, this study unveiled 2,810 and 556 differentially expressed genes in the liver and muscle respectively of sick and healthy fish, and importantly, identified immune-related pathways and genes which where predominantly downregulated in sick juveniles, thus contributing to broaden our understanding of the effects of SDD in barramundi farmed under commercial culture conditions.

The severity of tissue inflammation and necrosis in spleen and kidney of sick fish may explain why the RNA extracted from these organs were too degraded for further transcriptomic analyses. Severe and extensive tissue necrosis during the later clinical phase of SDD progression is expected to cause disruption of cellular, tissue, and organ functions. RNA is highly susceptible to degradation by reactive oxygen species (ROS), and oxidative RNA damage has been recently found to be involved in the pathogenesis of several chronic degenerative diseases (). Barramundi spleen was the most affected organ by SDDV (and where RNA was most degraded in sick fish), followed by the kidney, liver, and muscle. In addition, histological observations from apparently healthy, but subclinically infected fish indicated that spleens are likely the first organ to be compromised by SDDV. The spleen stores erythrocytes (red pulp) and lymphocytes (white pulp) (). The importance of spleen in modulating barramundi immune response and the severe damage observed in this organ may somewhat explain the inability of barramundi to fight against SDD and high mortality rates observed in farmed animals. Vaccination trials in barramundi against S. iniae revealed that spleen (but not the kidney) responded transcriptomically at 25–29 h postchallenge to activate NFK-B, chemokine, and toll-like receptor genes, whereby vaccinated fish had increased survival and reduced pathogen shedding (). Occlusion of splenic arteries from chronic obliterative endarteritis and subsequent multifocal splenic necrosis from infarcts are further evidence of strong non-specific innate inflammatory response and failure to control the SDDV infection. Pathology observed suggests that SDD is a chronic viral disease that develops over time (potentially weeks), before presenting as clinically diseased fish. The severe necrotizing glomerulonephritis in sick fish may be directly as a result of prolonged inflammation because of release of chemokines, interleukins, and tumor necrosis factors (TNF).

In this study, the KEGG metabolic pathway was the most enriched and significant pathway with 208 DEGs. Insulin signaling and AGE-RAGE signaling pathway in diabetic complications (among 27 immune-relevant pathways) were identified based on DEGs in sick vs. healthy fish, suggesting a disease-induced endocrine and metabolic disorder. In barramundi subjected to various stressors (LPS, V. harveyi, high salinity and fasting), DEGs associated with metabolic pathways were also notably downregulated (). It is expected that genes associated with cellular processes and/or homeostasis will be affected by severe tissue damage during the advance stages of disease. It is likely that SDDV and underlying LCHV infections contributed to depletion of energy stores in liver from disease, when fish are stressed and stop feeding. Cortisol is known to cause insulin resistance which disrupts glucose metabolism (), and stress-related cortisol spikes are well described in fish (). Starvation stage can cause abnormal fat accumulation in liver, from a disorder of glucose metabolism and energy for processing fat (). There was consistently abnormal accumulation of fat macrovesicles in the liver (lipidosis) in all sick fish, in which functional hepatic genes (e.g., insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1a; progestin and adipoQ receptor family member Vb; glutamate receptor, ionotropic, AMPA 1a; fatty acid-binding protein 10a; phospholipase A2-like; etc.) were differentially expressed. Dietary fat is processed in the livers of fish very similarly to that in mammals, via lipoprotein conjugation and subsequent storage in adipose tissues throughout the body (). In fact, ctrp1, a C1q/TNF-related adipokine strongly implicated in pathogenesis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), a human chronic liver disease associated with several metabolic-related disorders including insulin resistance (diabetes) and inflammation (), was one of the most significantly downregulated genes both in the liver and in the muscle of sick animals.

Genes associated with the adaptive immune system, in particular those involved in immune effector process, such as T cells, B cells, and the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) were also predominantly downregulated in SDD barramundi. SDDV differs from other systemic iridoviral disease, where infected cells are filled with large numbers of virions in crystalline array (). In contrast, few mature virions are observed in fish with SDD using transmission electron microscopy (TEM), suggesting that SDDV infection results in the continual release of mature viral particles (). It is also likely that continual viral shedding results in a prolonged inflammatory host immune response that causes severe tissue damage but fails to overcome SDDV infections. This is consistent with the observed involvement of a number of cytokines (e.g., chemokines, interleukins, and TNFs) and toll-like receptors, predominantly upregulated in SDD fish, which suggest an ongoing strong response by the innate immune system of fish in advance stages of SDD. Cytokines such as interleukins stimulate T cells, and TNF activates macrophages (). Toll-like receptors recognize viral infections and trigger the release of cytokines and chemokines (), a general mechanism which has also been previously observed in transcriptomic studies of barramundi infected by other pathogens such as V. harveyi (), S. iniae (), and NNV (). In the giant grouper (Epinephelus lanceolatus) infected with Vibrio alginolyticus, upregulation of the tlr5 gene leading to cytokine regulation has been suggested to induce proinflammatory and/or chemotactic effects (). Here, tlr5 and tlr13 were significantly upregulated in both liver (8- and 33-fold) and muscle (56- and 83-fold) of sick fish, respectively. Similarly to what was observed in our study, tlr5 was upregulated by over 150-fold in spleen of barramundi challenged with S. iniae but not in vaccinated challenged fish (). Moreover, TLR signaling pathway has been shown ubiquitously upregulated in the intestines of barramundi after exposure to LPS, V. harveyi challenge, high salinity, and fasting (). Taken together, these studies suggest that there is a coordinated response among several organs upregulating the TLR signaling pathway in response to pathogens, whereby our study suggests that tlr5 and tlr13 are key markers in SDD barramundi.

Lectins such as ladderlectin, L-rhamnose-binding lectin, and collectins were among the most differentially expressed genes in the livers of SDD barramundi. Lectins were identified as part of the barramundi immune response to foreign antigens (LPS) as early as 35 days posthatch (). Lectins are assumed to mediate pathogen recognition, cell adhesion, the activation of complement pathway, and facilitate pathogen clearance by phagocytosis, thus playing an important role in innate immunity and disease resistance in fish (). While the phagosome was the most enriched immune-related pathway in the livers of SDD barramundi, there was an overall downregulation of C3 and C1q, key complement proinflammatory genes in sick fish. Differential regulation of complement genes was observed in barramundi intestine, whereby LPS challenge upregulated C3 and downregulated C1q; the latter also downregulated at 40 h post-V. harveyi challenge (). Complement genes coordinate the communication between the innate and the adaptive immune system (). Their activity is tightly regulated to avoid immune dysregulation and tissue damage as a consequence of excessive expression and inflammation (). In giant grouper, V. alginolyticus challenge had time-dependent effects on several genes related to the complement pathway, with expression levels of most genes (including C3 and C1q) peaking between 4 and 8 h postinfection and returning to basal (preinfection) levels at 48 h postinfection (). It is hypothesized here that the observed downregulation of C1q and C3 genes in SDD barramundi might be due to the fact that organs had already reached advanced inflammatory stages thus precluding further activation, which is not the case of apparently healthy, but subclinically SDDV- and LCHV-coinfected fish. However, the observed upregulation of C5 and C6 genes in sick fish might indicate that complement genes may be differentially activated in different phases in the animal’s immune response and disease progression.

Like in humans and other animals, collagen plays an important role in strengthening skin and its elasticity in the fish. If downregulation of collagen gene clusters in both liver and muscle of sick fish would also occur in skin tissue (not assessed in this study), it might possibly explain the observed damage in the epidermis and reduction of scale adhesion, which results in obvious scale detachment in clinically sick fish (for which SDD is known for). Systemic iridoviruses of fish target fibroblasts in connective tissues surrounding blood vessels (). The inflammation in skeletal muscles involved mainly the connective tissues and not muscles, with the occasional presence of viral inclusion bodies. This is consistent with the lower number of DEGs, lower Pearson R2 values, and less evident heatmap clustering of muscle samples when compared with liver tissues between clinically sick and healthy L. calcarifer. This is also consistent with tissue predilection of systemic iridoviruses, targeting fibroblasts of mesothelial origin in all organs (). The inflammation in dermis of skin is centered on the fibroblastic connective tissues of tunica adventitia of blood vessels. The marked occlusion of blood vessels would further explain infarct of epidermis of skin and scale loss characteristic of SDD, and the multifocal infarcts in spleen ().

Finally, it is important to note that the transcriptomic comparison (and DEGs) between the healthy and sick fish groups evaluated in this field outbreak would likely be different if the comparison were made between the sick group and an “uninfected control group.” Such comparison would likely reveal more immune genes be identified as differentially regulated between sick and uninfected groups. Further studies investigating transcriptome of uninfected fish under laboratory conditions may be required to clarify this uncertainty. However, the data provided in this study might be an indication that SDDV (and LCHV) is currently endemic in sea-caged farmed barramundi juveniles within this site, which should also be confirmed by follow-up epidemiological surveys. This is not unlikely because in recent years, all batches farmed in the area get ubiquitously affected with SDD mortalities during the juvenile stages, whereby some animals get clinically sick and succumb to the disease, whereas others with mild infection and which look “apparently healthy” survive. Therefore, also of importance, future studies should evaluate when animals become infected after stocking, with time-series sampling plan over the course of multiple outbreaks (e.g., prior, during, and after) to better understand transcriptomic responses over the progression of disease.

In conclusion, SDDV infection (and to a lesser but unknown extent of LCHV coinfection) resulted in upregulation of genes associated with innate immunity, downregulation of genes associated with adaptive immunity and homeostatic regulation of cellular and tissue function, and severe inflammatory response that resulted in destruction of spleen followed by the kidney. Research to understand why SDD viral infection is not brought under control by the host immunity may be key to developing effective vaccines and/or immunostimulants to alleviate the effects of SDD in farmed barramundi.

Statements

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: NCBI SRA (Accession: PRJNA713978).”

Ethics statement

The animal study was reviewed and approved by the James Cook University Singapore, Animal Ethics Committee (Approval No. 2019-A07).

Author contributions

JD and DJ contributed to conception and design of the study. CT and MT collected specimens and organized the database. SS and HD performed the molecular diagnostics. XS and JD performed the RNAseq statistical analysis. SG-K performed the histopathology analysis. JD wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed to manuscript writing, revision, read, and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This study was funded by the Singapore Food Agency project Breeding for scale drop resistance in Barramundi Lates calcarifer—Understanding the genetic architecture of resistance to enable efficient breeding programs.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2021.666897/full#supplementary-material

References

  • 1

    AndersS.PylP. T.HuberW. (2015). HTSeq—a python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data.Bioinformatics31166169. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638

  • 2

    Bastos GomesG.HutsonK. S.DomingosJ. A.Infante VillamilS.HuerlimannR.MillerT. L.et al (2019). Parasitic protozoan interactions with bacterial microbiome in a tropical fish farm.Aquaculture502196201.

  • 3

    BergmanI. M. (2011). Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and mannan-binding lectin (MBL): on constant alert in a hostile environment.Ups. J. Med. Sci.1169099.

  • 4

    ChangS. F.NgK. S.GrisezL.de GroofA.VogelsW.van der HoekL.et al (2018). Novel Fish Pathogenic Virus. International publication number WO 2018/029301 A1. Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau.

  • 5

    ChenJ.TohX.OngJ.WangY.TeoX.-H.LeeB.et al (2019). Detection and characterization of a novel marine birnavirus isolated from Asian seabass in Singapore.Virol. J.16:71. 10.1186/s12985-019-1174-0

  • 6

    de GroofA.GuelenL.DeijsM.van der WalY.MiyataM.NgK. S.et al (2015). A novel virus causes scale drop disease in lates calcarifer.PLoS Pathog.11:e1005074. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005074

  • 7

    DomingosJ.ZengerK.JerryD. (2015). Whole-genome shotgun sequence assembly enables rapid gene characterization in the tropical fish barramundi, Lates calcarifer.Anim. Genet.46468469. 10.1111/age.12312

  • 8

    DomingosJ. A.BuddA. M.BanhQ. Q.GoldsburyJ. A.ZengerK. R.JerryD. R. (2018). Sex-specific dmrt1 and cyp19a1 methylation and alternative splicing in gonads of the protandrous hermaphrodite barramundi.PLoS One13:e0204182. 10.1371/journal.pone.0204182

  • 9

    DomingosJ. A.GoldsburyJ. A.Bastos GomesG.SmithB. G.TomlinsonC.BadeT.et al (2021). Genotype by environment interactions of harvest growth traits for barramundi (Lates calcarifer) commercially farmed in marine vs. freshwater conditions.Aquaculture532:735989. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.735989

  • 10

    DomingosJ. A.Smith-KeuneC.HarrisonP.JerryD. R. (2014a). Early prediction of long-term family growth performance based on cellular processes — a tool to expedite the establishment of superior foundation broodstock in breeding programs.Aquaculture428–4298896. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.02.037

  • 11

    DomingosJ. A.Smith-KeuneC.JerryD. R. (2014b). Fate of genetic diversity within and between generations and implications for DNA parentage analysis in selective breeding of mass spawners: a case study of commercially farmed barramundi, Lates calcarifer.Aquaculture424–425174182. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.01.004

  • 12

    DomingosJ. A.Smith-KeuneC.RobinsonN.LoughnanS.HarrisonP.JerryD. R. (2013). Heritability of harvest growth traits and genotype–environment interactions in barramundi, Lates calcarifer (Bloch).Aquaculture402–4036675. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.03.029

  • 13

    DongH.JitrakornS.KayansamruajP.PiraratN.RodkhumC.RattanarojpongT.et al (2017a). Infectious spleen and kidney necrosis disease (ISKND) outbreaks in farmed barramundi (Lates calcarifer) in Vietnam.Fish Shellfish Immunol.686573. 10.1016/j.fsi.2017.06.054

  • 14

    DongH. T.NguyenV. V.LeH. D.SangsuriyaP.JitrakornS.SaksmerpromeV.et al (2015). Naturally concurrent infections of bacterial and viral pathogens in disease outbreaks in cultured Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) farms.Aquaculture448427435. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2015.06.027

  • 15

    DongH. T.TaengphuS.SangsuriyaP.CharoensapsriW.PhiwsaiyaK.SornwatanaT.et al (2017b). Recovery of Vibrio harveyi from scale drop and muscle necrosis disease in farmed barramundi, Lates calcarifer in Vietnam.Aquaculture4738996. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2017.02.005

  • 16

    ElumalaiP.RubeenaA. S.ArockiarajJ.WongpanyaR.CammarataM.RingøE.et al (2019). The role of lectins in finfish: a review.Rev. Fish. Sci. Aquac.27152169. 10.1080/23308249.2018.1520191

  • 17

    FimognariC. (2015). Role of oxidative RNA damage in chronic-degenerative diseases.Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev.2015:358713. 10.1155/2015/358713

  • 18

    FuG.BaiZ.XiaJ.LiuX.LiuF.WanZ.et al (2014). Characterization of the LECT2 gene and its associations with resistance to the big belly disease in Asian seabass.Fish Shellfish Immunol.37131138. 10.1016/j.fsi.2014.01.019

  • 19

    FuG. H.BaiZ. Y.XiaJ. H.LiuF.LiuP.YueG. H. (2013). Analysis of two lysozyme genes and antimicrobial functions of their recombinant proteins in asian seabass.PLoS One8:e79743. 10.1371/journal.pone.0079743

  • 20

    GiasE.JohnstonC.KeelingS.SpenceR.McDonaldW. (2011). Development of real-time PCR assays for detection of megalocytiviruses in imported ornamental fish.J. Fish Dis.34609618. 10.1111/j.1365-2761.2011.01274.x

  • 21

    Gibson-KuehS.CheeD.ChenJ.WangY. H.TayS.LeongL. N.et al (2012). The pathology of ‘scale drop syndrome’ in Asian seabass, Lates calcarifer Bloch, a first description.J. Fish Dis.351927. 10.1111/j.1365-2761.2011.01319.x

  • 22

    Gibson-KuehS.NettoP.Ngoh-LimG. H.ChangS. F.HoL. L.QinQ. W.et al (2003). The pathology of systemic iridoviral disease in fish.J. Comp. Pathol.129111119. 10.1016/s0021-9975(03)00010-0

  • 23

    GirishaS. K.PuneethT. G.NithinM. S.Naveen KumarB. T.AjayS. K.VinayT. N.et al (2020). Red sea bream iridovirus disease (RSIVD) outbreak in Asian seabass (Lates calcarifer) cultured in open estuarine cages along the west coast of India: first report.Aquaculture520:734712. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.734712

  • 24

    HookS. E.KroonF. J.GreenfieldP. A.WarneM. S. J.SmithR. A.TurnerR. D. (2017). Hepatic transcriptomic profiles from barramundi, Lates calcarifer, as a means of assessing organism health and identifying stressors in rivers in northern Queensland.Mar. Environ. Res.129166179. 10.1016/j.marenvres.2017.05.006

  • 25

    IvanovaN.ZemlakT.HannerR.HebertP.IvanovaN. V.ZemlakT. S.et al (2007). Universal primer cocktails for fish DNA barcoding.Mol. Ecol. Notes7544548. 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01748.x

  • 26

    JerryD. R. (2013). Biology and Culture of Asian Seabass Lates Calcarifer.Baton Rouge, LA: Taylor & Francis Group, 326.

  • 27

    JiangJ.MiyataM.ChanC.NgohS. Y.LiewW. C.SajuJ. M.et al (2014). Differential transcriptomic response in the spleen and head kidney following vaccination and infection of asian seabass with Streptococcus iniae.PLoS One9:e99128. 10.1371/journal.pone.0099128

  • 28

    KambaA.DaimonM.MurakamiH.OtakaH.MatsukiK.SatoE.et al (2016). Association between higher serum cortisol levels and decreased insulin secretion in a general population.PLoS One11:e0166077. 10.1371/journal.pone.0166077

  • 29

    KerddeeP.DongH. T.ChokmangmeepisarnP.RodkhumC.SrisapoomeP.AreechonN.et al (2020). Simultaneous detection of scale drop disease virus and Flavobacterium columnare from diseased freshwater-reared barramundi Lates calcarifer.Dis. Aquat. Org.140119128. 10.3354/dao03500

  • 30

    KimD.PerteaG.TrapnellC.PimentelH.KelleyR.SalzbergS. L. (2013). TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions.Genome Biol.14:R36. 10.1186/gb-2013-14-4-r36

  • 31

    LangmeadB.SalzbergS. L. (2012). Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2.Nat. Methods9357359. 10.1038/nmeth.1923

  • 32

    LiuP.WangL.KwangJ.YueG. H.WongS.-M. (2016). Transcriptome analysis of genes responding to NNV infection in Asian seabass epithelial cells.Fish Shellfish Immunol.54342352. 10.1016/j.fsi.2016.04.029

  • 33

    LoughnanS. R.DomingosJ. A.Smith-KeuneC.ForresterJ. P.JerryD. R.BeheregarayL. B.et al (2013). Broodstock contribution after mass spawning and size grading in barramundi (Lates calcarifer, Bloch).Aquaculture404–405139149. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.04.014

  • 34

    LoughnanS. R.Smith-KeuneC.BeheregarayL. B.RobinsonN. A.JerryD. R. (2019). Population genetic structure of barramundi (Lates calcarifer) across the natural distribution range in Australia informs fishery management and aquaculture practices.Mar. Freshw. Res.7015331542. 10.1071/MF18330

  • 35

    LoughnanS. R.Smith-KeuneC.JerryD. R.BeheregarayL. B.RobinsonN. A. (2016). Genetic diversity and relatedness estimates for captive barramundi (Lates calcarifer, Bloch) broodstock informs efforts to form a base population for selective breeding.Aquac. Res.4735703584. 10.1111/are.12807

  • 36

    MaZ.ZhengX.FuZ.LinS.YuG.QinJ. (2020). Transcriptional analysis reveals physiological response to acute acidification stress of barramundi Lates calcarifer (Bloch) in coastal areas.Fish Physiol. Biochem.4617291741. 10.1007/s10695-020-00824-6

  • 37

    MaoX.CaiT.OlyarchukJ. G.WeiL. (2005). Automated genome annotation and pathway identification using the KEGG Orthology (KO) as a controlled vocabulary.Bioinformatics2137873793. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti430

  • 38

    MeemettaW.DomingosJ. A.DongH. T.SenapinS. (2020). Development of a SYBR Green quantitative PCR assay for detection of Lates calcarifer herpesvirus (LCHV) in farmed barramundi.J. Virol. Methods285:113920. 10.1016/j.jviromet.2020.113920

  • 39

    NewtonJ. R.ZengerK. R.JerryD. R. (2013). Next-generation transcriptome profiling reveals insights into genetic factors contributing to growth differences and temperature adaptation in Australian populations of barramundi (Lates calcarifer).Mar. Genomics114552. 10.1016/j.margen.2013.07.002

  • 40

    NgohS. Y.TanD.ShenX.KathiresanP.JiangJ.LiewW. C.et al (2015). Nutrigenomic and nutritional analyses reveal the effects of pelleted feeds on Asian Seabass (Lates calcarifer).PLoS One10:e0145456. 10.1371/journal.pone.0145456

  • 41

    NguyenV. V.RodkhumC.SenapinS.DongH. T. (2019). Retrospective diagnosis of archived marine fish experienced unexplained mortality reveals dual infections of Nocardia seriolae and Streptococcus iniae.Aquac. Int.2715031512. 10.1007/s10499-019-00403-4

  • 42

    NogaE. J. (2006). “Spleen, thymus, reticulo-endothelial system, blood,” in Systemic Pathology of Fish: A Text and Atlas of Normal Tissues in Teleosts and Their Responses in Disease, ed.FergusonH. W. (London: Scotian Press), 120139. 366p.

  • 43

    NurliyanaM.LukmanB.Ina-SalwanyM. Y.Zamri-SaadM.AnnasS.DongH. T.et al (2020). First evidence of scale drop disease virus in farmed Asian seabass (Lates calcarifer) in Malaysia.Aquaculture528:735600. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.735600

  • 44

    RaviP.JiangJ.LiewW. C.OrbánL. (2014). Small-scale transcriptomics reveals differences among gonadal stages in Asian seabass (Lates calcarifer).Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol.12:5. 10.1186/1477-7827-12-5

  • 45

    RuiL. (2014). Energy metabolism in the liver.Compr. Physiol.4177197. 10.1002/cphy.c130024

  • 46

    SadoulB.GeffroyB. (2019). Measuring cortisol, the major stress hormone in fishes.J. Fish Biol.94540555. 10.1111/jfb.13904

  • 47

    SenapinS.DongH. T.MeemettaW.GangnonngiwW.SangsuriyaP.VanichviriyakitR.et al (2019). Mortality from scale drop disease in farmed Lates calcarifer in Southeast Asia.J. Fish Dis.42119127. 10.1111/jfd.12915

  • 48

    ShabaniP.EmamgholipourS.DoostiM. (2017). CTRP1 in liver disease.Adv. Clin. Chem.79123. 10.1016/bs.acc.2016.10.002

  • 49

    SriisanS.BoonchirdC.ThitamadeeS.SonthiM.Thanh DongH.SenapinS. (2020). A sensitive and specific SYBR Green-based qPCR assay for detecting scale drop disease virus (SDDV) in Asian sea bass.Dis. Aquat. Organ.139131137. 10.3354/dao03484

  • 50

    SudhagarA.KumarG.El-MatbouliM. (2018). Transcriptome analysis based on RNA-Seq in understanding pathogenic mechanisms of diseases and the immune system of fish: a comprehensive review.Int. J. Mol. Sci.19:245. 10.3390/ijms19010245

  • 51

    SunF.WenY.WangL.YueG. H. (2020). An indel in the Suv39h1 gene is associated with resistance to iridovirus in the Asian seabass.Aquaculture529:735611. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.735611

  • 52

    ThevasagayamN. M.SridattaP. S. R.JiangJ.TongA.SajuJ. M.KathiresanP.et al (2015). Transcriptome survey of a marine food fish: Asian Seabass (Lates calcarifer).J. Mar. Sci. Eng.3382400. 10.3390/jmse3020382

  • 53

    ToyamaT.Kita-TsukamotoK.WakabayashiH. (1996). Identification of Flexibacter maritimus, Flavobacterium branchiophilum and Cytophaga columnaris by PCR targeted 16S ribosomal DNA.Fish Pathol.312531. 10.3147/jsfp.31.25

  • 54

    UribeC.FolchH.EnríquezR.MoranG. (2011). Innate and adaptive immunity in teleost fish: a review.Vet. Med.56486503. 10.17221/3294-VETMED

  • 55

    VijS.KuhlH.KuznetsovaI. S.KomissarovA.YurchenkoA. A.Van HeusdenP.et al (2016). Correction: chromosomal-level assembly of the Asian seabass genome using long sequence reads and multi-layered scaffolding.PLoS Genet.12:e1005954. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005954

  • 56

    VijS.PurushothamanK.SridattaP. S.JerryD. R. (2020). Transcriptomic analysis of gill and kidney from Asian seabass (Lates calcarifer) acclimated to different salinities reveals pathways involved with euryhalinity.Genes11:733. 10.3390/genes11070733

  • 57

    WangL.BaiB.HuangS.LiuP.WanZ. Y.YeB.et al (2017a). QTL mapping for resistance to iridovirus in Asian seabass using genotyping-by-sequencing.Mar. Biotechnol.19517527. 10.1007/s10126-017-9770-8

  • 58

    WangL.BaiB.LiuP.HuangS. Q.WanZ. Y.ChuaE.et al (2017b). Construction of high-resolution recombination maps in Asian seabass.BMC Genomics18:63. 10.1186/s12864-016-3462-z

  • 59

    WangL.FengZ.WangX.WangX.ZhangX. (2010). DEGseq: an R package for identifying differentially expressed genes from RNA-seq data.Bioinformatics26136138. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp612

  • 60

    WangL.HuangS. Q.XiaJ. H.LiuP.WanZ. Y.YueG. H. (2015a). Genome-wide discovery of gene-related SNPs in Barramundi Lates calcarifer.Conserv. Genet. Resour.7605608. 10.1007/s12686-015-0444-4

  • 61

    WangL.WanZ. Y.BaiB.HuangS. Q.ChuaE.LeeM.et al (2015b). Construction of a high-density linkage map and fine mapping of QTL for growth in Asian seabass.Sci. Rep.5:16358. 10.1038/srep16358

  • 62

    WangY. D.HuangS. J.ChouH. N.LiaoW. L.GongH. Y.ChenJ. Y. (2014). Transcriptome analysis of the effect of Vibrio alginolyticus infection on the innate immunity-related complement pathway in Epinephelus coioides.BMC Genomics15:1102. 10.1186/1471-2164-15-1102

  • 63

    WangY. D.WangY. H.HuiC. F.ChenJ. Y. (2016). Transcriptome analysis of the effect of Vibrio alginolyticus infection on the innate immunity-related TLR5-mediated induction of cytokines in Epinephelus lanceolatus.Fish Shellfish Immunol.523143. 10.1016/j.fsi.2016.03.013

  • 64

    WasiakS.GilhamD.TsujikawaL. M.HallidayC.CalosingC.JahagirdarR.et al (2017). Downregulation of the complement cascade in vitro, in mice and in patients with cardiovascular disease by the BET protein inhibitor apabetalone (RVX-208).J. Cardiovasc. Transl. Res.10337347. 10.1007/s12265-017-9755-z

  • 65

    WuY. C.KaiY. H.ChiS. C. (2013). Persistently betanodavirus-infected barramundi (Lates calcarifer) exhibit resistances to red sea bream iridovirus infection.Dev. Comp. Immunol.41666674. 10.1016/j.dci.2013.06.011

  • 66

    XagorariA.ChlichliaK. (2008). Toll-like receptors and viruses: induction of innate antiviral immune responses.Open Microbiol. J.24959. 10.2174/1874285800802010049

  • 67

    XiaJ. H.HeX. P.BaiZ. Y.LinG.YueG. H. (2011). Analysis of the Asian seabass transcriptome based on expressed sequence tags.DNA Res.18513522. 10.1093/dnares/dsr036

  • 68

    XiaJ. H.LiuP.LiuF.LinG.SunF.TuR.et al (2013). Analysis of stress-responsive transcriptome in the intestine of Asian seabass (Lates calcarifer) using RNA-seq.DNA Res.20449460. 10.1093/dnares/dst022

  • 69

    XiaJ. H.YueG. H. (2010). Identification and analysis of immune-related transcriptome in Asian seabass Lates calcarifer.BMC Genomics11:356. 10.1186/1471-2164-11-356

  • 70

    YanJ.LiaoK.WangT.MaiK.XuW.AiQ. (2015). Dietary lipid levels influence lipid deposition in the liver of large yellow croaker (Larimichthys crocea) by regulating lipoprotein receptors, fatty acid uptake and triacylglycerol synthesis and catabolism at the transcriptional level.PLoS One10:e0129937. 10.1371/journal.pone.0129937

  • 71

    YoungM. D.WakefieldM. J.SmythG. K.OshlackA. (2010). Gene ontology analysis for RNA-seq: accounting for selection bias.Genome Biol.11:R14. 10.1186/gb-2010-11-2-r14

  • 72

    YueG. H.ZhuZ.LoL.WangC.LinG.FengF.et al (2009). Genetic variation and population structure of Asian seabass (Lates calcarifer) in the Asia-Pacific region.Aquaculture2932228. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2009.03.053

  • 73

    ZhuZ. Y.LinG.LoL. C.XuY. X.FengF.ChouR.et al (2006a). Genetic analyses of Asian seabass stocks using novel polymorphic microsatellites.Aquaculture256167173. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.02.033

  • 74

    ZhuZ. Y.WangC. M.LoL. C.FengF.LinG.YueG. H. (2006b). Isolation, characterization, and linkage analyses of 74 novel microsatellites in Barramundi (Lates calcarifer).Genome49969976. 10.1139/g06-080

Summary

Keywords

transcriptome (RNA-seq), Lates calcarifer herpes virus, immunity, disease outbreak, scale drop disease virus, Asian sea bass (Lates calcarifer)

Citation

Domingos JA, Shen X, Terence C, Senapin S, Dong HT, Tan MR, Gibson-Kueh S and Jerry DR (2021) Scale Drop Disease Virus (SDDV) and Lates calcarifer Herpes Virus (LCHV) Coinfection Downregulate Immune-Relevant Pathways and Cause Splenic and Kidney Necrosis in Barramundi Under Commercial Farming Conditions. Front. Genet. 12:666897. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.666897

Received

11 February 2021

Accepted

19 May 2021

Published

18 June 2021

Volume

12 - 2021

Edited by

Peng Xu, Xiamen University, China

Reviewed by

Channarong Rodkhum, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand; Shengfeng Huang, Sun Yat-sen University, China

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Jose A. Domingos,

This article was submitted to Livestock Genomics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Genetics

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics