Abstract
Background:
Heart failure (HF) represents the end stage of cardiovascular disease and is the leading cause of mortality. The objective of this study was to identify potential biomarkers and elucidate the mechanisms underlying the development of HF across diverse populations and among different genders.
Methods:
This study strictly included five datasets of HF with dilated cardiomyopathy: GSE141910 (African American and Caucasian), GSE57345 (USA), GSE21610 (Germany), GSE17800 (Germany), and GSE42955 (Spain). These datasets were merged and normalized as the validation set. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified through differential expression analysis, and module genes were identified using weighted gene co-expression network analysis. Subsequent stratification by gender and ethnicity (African American, Caucasian, German, and Spanish) was performed, followed by immune infiltration analysis. Finally, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, support vector machine-recursive feature elimination (SVM-REF), and random forest (RF) models were used to screen for Hub genes and to construct a nomogram predicting the occurrence of HF in different populations based on these Hub genes. Additionally, GSE3585, GSE120895, GSE5406, and GSE1145 serve as the validation set.
Results:
A total of 650 samples were included (323 controls and 327 HF samples), including 122 African American samples (44 controls and 78 HF samples), 238 Caucasian samples (122 controls and 116 HF samples), 55 German samples (16 controls and 39 HF samples), and 17 Spanish samples (5 controls and 12 HF samples). Functional enrichment analysis demonstrated that the pathogenesis of HF is closely related to the inflammatory response, immune response, vascular regulation, the Wnt signaling pathway, glutathione metabolism, sphingolipid metabolism, and apoptosis. Immune infiltration analysis showed that HF patients exhibited a high abundance of resting mast cells, resting NK cells, CD8T cells, resting memory CD4 T cells, activated memory CD4 T cells, M1 Macrophages, naive CD4 T cells, M0 Macrophages, regulatory T cells (Tregs), follicular helper T cells, Monocytes, and activated NK cells, and a lower abundance of plasma cells, neutrophils, and eosinophils. Multiple machine learning analyses identified MYH6, ASPN, and COL14A1 as Hub genes, NAP1L3, PLEKHH2, MOXD1, CCDC80, CA14, and SERPINE2 as male-specific, CX3CR1, SYN2, and SLC25A18 as female-specific, and NQO1, KAZALD1, and UBASH3A as African American male-specific, SYN2 as African American female-specific, CD83, C1QTNF3, GRB14, and MOXD1 as Caucasian male-specific, CD83, VIT, and PODXL2 as Caucasian female-specific, LSAMP and C14orf132 as German male-specific, and LSAMP and BMP4 as German female-specific, CIART and SNORA80E as Spanish-specific DEGs. Hub genes are strongly associated with M1 macrophages.
Conclusion:
The biomarkers of HF vary significantly across different populations and genders. MYH6, ASPN, and COL14A1 may be potential biomarkers for HF in dilated cardiomyopathy.
1 Introduction
Heart failure (HF) is a clinical syndrome recognized as a global epidemic, representing the end stage of most cardiovascular diseases, and is one of the leading causes of death and disability. Over the past few decades, the incidence of HF has gradually reached a stable and decreasing trend in developed countries. For instance, the incidence rates are 6.5 per 1,000 in Germany, 2.9–3.9 per 1,000 in Spain, 2.2–3.2 per 1,000 in America, and 0.7 per 1,000 in Hong Kong (Conrad et al., 2018; Savarese et al., 2023). Despite this slight decline in incidence, the prevalence of HF is gradually increasing and varies considerably across countries and regions. The highest prevalence in 2017 was noted in Central Europe, North Africa, and the Middle East, while lower rates were observed in Eastern Europe and Southeast Asia. The prevalence rates range from 0.9% to 6.8% in Spain, 3.9% in Germany, 2.4%–3.0% in America, and 0.4% in Thailand (Savarese et al., 2023). Furthermore, HF imposes a significant economic burden on healthcare systems worldwide, with the total cost of treating HF in the United States projected to rise from $31 billion to $70 billion between 2012 and 2030 (Savarese and Lund, 2017; Heidenreich et al., 2013). This escalation undoubtedly places a substantial strain on healthcare expenditures.
The diagnosis of HF primarily relies on electrocardiograms, imaging, laboratory tests, and biomarker assessments. B-type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) and N-terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) are widely regarded as the most effective biomarkers for diagnosing HF due to their significant roles in diagnosis and prognostic evaluation (Castiglione et al., 2022). The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) endorses the use of BNP and NT-proBNP to assist in diagnosing HF (Yancy et al., 2017). However, the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines advocate for the use of these biomarkers to rule out HF, considering the impact of gender, age, and comorbidities (Ponikowski et al., 2016). Consequently, many guidelines suggest that thresholds for biomarkers should be determined with consideration for age, gender, and ethnic region stratification (Kavsak et al., 2019). In terms of treatment, HF therapeutic strategies have evolved from the traditional “Golden Triangle”- comprising angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor antagonists, beta-blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists-to the “New Quadruple Combination,” which adds sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (McDonagh et al., 2021). The approach has further advanced to the current “Five Golden Flowers,” with the addition of soluble guanylate cyclase stimulators, such as vericiguat (Metra et al., 2023). This progression is due to the residual risk of HF exacerbation and death that persists even with the “New Quadruple Combination” therapy (Docherty et al., 2020). It highlights that, despite ongoing advancements in HF drug development, the diagnosis and treatment of HF continue to face numerous challenges. These challenges stem from the complexity and refractory nature of HF, as well as its poor prognosis, and include individual differences, comorbidity management, medication side effects, and economic burdens.
Significant gender differences exist in HF, encompassing symptoms, susceptibility, risk factors, pathophysiology, and response to treatment. Studies have shown that women are more likely to present with severe symptoms, with dyspnea being more predominant in women and peripheral edema in men (Maidana et al., 2023). Risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes, smoking, and obesity make women more susceptible to HF than men. Additionally, women face unique risk factors, including those related to menopause, breast cancer treatments, and pregnancy (Maidana et al., 2023; Lala et al., 2022). Biomarkers, including NT-proBNP, CA125, high-sensitivity troponin, galectin-3, and osteopontin, also exhibit gender-specific differences (Maidana et al., 2023). Racial differences are equally important factors influencing the diagnosis and prognosis of HF. Research published in the Journal of the American Medical Association indicates that African American individuals have nearly twice the incidence of HF, experience an earlier onset of the disease, present with higher severity at diagnosis, and have a higher mortality rate among younger individuals (45–64 years) (Yancy, 2024). Age is also a key risk factor for HF, with significant variations in incidence, progression, and biomarker expression across different age groups. Global Burden of Disease database analysis indicates that the number of HF cases increases significantly with age, particularly among individuals over 65 years old (Ran et al., 2025; Kang et al., 2025). Multiple studies have demonstrated that NT-proBNP levels, a marker for HF, exhibit significant variations across different age groups and genders, with elevated levels being more common in the general middle-aged population (Welsh et al., 2022; Mu et al., 2023). Therefore, studies focusing on gender, age, and racial differences may offer insights to improve the diagnosis of HF and potentially contribute to the development of new drugs targeting HF.
Due to database limitations, specifically the lack of basic age information, this study focused on four distinct populations: African American, Caucasian, German, and Spain. Differential expression analysis was employed to identify gender-specific differentially expressed genes (DEGs) within these populations. Enrichment analysis was utilized to explore the potential pathogenesis of HF, while immune infiltration analysis was applied to investigate the microenvironment of immune infiltration across populations. Additionally, Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) was applied to identify the most relevant gene modules associated with HF in different populations. Finally, three machine learning models were applied to screen for gender-specific Hub genes in different populations: the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, support vector machine-recursive feature elimination (SVM-REF), and random forest (RF). These models were used to construct nomograms to predict the risk of HF.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Dataset acquisition
Five HF-related datasets were obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus database (GEO, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) (Clough and Barrett, 2016), including the GSE141910 (Tan et al., 2020) and GSE57345 (Jia et al., 2015) databases from the America, the GSE21610 (Schwientek et al., 2010) and GSE17800 (Ameling et al., 2013) databases from the Germany, and the GSE42955 (Molina-Navarro et al., 2013) from the Spain. In addition, the German related datasets GSE3585 (Barth et al., 2006) and GSE120895 (Witt et al., 2019) and the American related datasets GSE5406 (Hannenhalli et al., 2006) and GSE1145 were used for external validation (Table 1). This study, the validation cohort strictly included HF samples with dilated cardiomyopathy and excluded those with HF secondary to ischemic cardiomyopathy. Regarding ethnicity and population issues, the GSE141910 dataset provided detailed information on population ethnicity (African American and Caucasian). The GSE21610 and GSE17800 datasets were sourced from Germany, and the GSE42955 dataset was from Spain.
TABLE 1
| Role | Dataset | Platform | Race | Source | Disease | Sample size | Sample information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Training Set | GSE141910 | GPL16791 | United States (African American and Caucasian) | Left Ventricle | Dilated Cardiomyopathy | 360 | 122 African American 44 control (23 female and 21 male) 78 HF (37 female and 41 male) 238 Caucasian 122 control (66 female and 56 male) 116 HF (40 female and 76 male) |
| Training Set | GSE57345 | GPL9052 | United States | Left Ventricle | Idiopathic Dilated Cardiomyopathy | 218 | 136 control (63 female and 73 male) 82 HF (19 female and 63 male) |
| Training Set | GSE21610 | GPL570 | Germany | Left Ventricle | Dilated Cardiomyopathy | 29 | 8 control (2 female and 6 male) 21 HF (2 female and 19 male) |
| Training Set | GSE17800 | GPL570 | Germany | Endocardial Myocardium | Dilated Cardiomyopathy | 26 | 8 control (2 female and 6 male) 18 HF (5 female and 13 male) |
| Training Set | GSE42955 | GPL6244 | Spain | Left Ventricle | Dilated Cardiomyopathy | 17 | 5 control (0 female and 5 male) 12 HF (0 female and 12 male) |
| Validation Set | GSE3585 | GPL96 | Germany | Left Ventricle | Dilated Cardiomyopathy | 12 | 5 control and 7 HF. |
| Validation Set | GSE120895 | GPL570 | Germany | Endocardial Myocardium | Dilated Cardiomyopathy | 55 | 8 control and 47 HF. |
| Validation Set | GSE5406 | GPL96 | United States | Myocardium | Dilated Cardiomyopathy | 102 | 18 control and 86 HF. |
| Validation Set | GSE1145 | GPL570 | United States | Left Ventricle | Dilated Cardiomyopathy | 55 | 37 control and 18 HF. |
Dataset information of dilated cardiomyopathy heart failure.
2.2 Identification of DEGs
In this study, different datasets were merged and normalized using the “Affy” R package (Gautier et al., 2004). To address batch effects arising from different platforms and studies, cross-platform batch effect correction was performed using the ComBat algorithm from the “SVA” R package (Leek et al., 2012). A model matrix incorporating the biological condition (disease vs control) was included as a covariate to preserve biological variance while removing technical artifacts. The effectiveness of batch correction was visually assessed through both Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) plots before and after correction. DEGs were identified using the “limma” R package with a linear modeling approach with a threshold of |log2 fold change| >1 (2-fold differential expression) and P < 0.05 (Ritchie et al., 2015).
2.3 Functional enrichment analysis and construction of protein-protein interaction network
The genes were imported into the DAVID database (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/home.jsp) for analysis of Biological Process, Cellular Component, Molecular Function, and Pathway. Subsequently, the genes were imported into the STRING database (https://cn.string-db.org/) to construct protein-protein interaction networks.
2.4 Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA)
The “GSEA” R package is used to calculate the correlation between Hub genes and other genes, and then all genes are ranked according to the correlation from the highest to the lowest, and the enriched set of genes at the bottom of the ranking is detected and analyzed (Subramanian et al., 2005).
2.5 Immune infiltration analysis and correlation analysis
The relative abundance of 22 immune cell types was estimated using the CIBERSORT deconvolution algorithm with the LM22 signature matrix (Chen et al., 2018). To ensure robust results, the number of permutations was set to 1000 and quantile normalization (QN = TRUE) was applied to the input data. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used for intergroup comparisons, with FDR correction applied using the Benjamini-Hochberg method. Subsequently, Spearman correlation analysis was employed to reveal the relationship between Hub genes and immune cells.
2.6 WGCNA
The “WGCNA” R package is used to remove the outlier samples and construct a co-expression network of gene expression matrices for the remaining samples. The soft threshold corresponding to fit R2 = 0.8 was chosen for the construction of gene modules, while the minimum number of module genes (minSize) was specified to be 10, and the most relevant module for the trait was selected (Langfelder and Horvath, 2008).
2.7 Single-gene analysis of variance
Candidate Hub genes were further screened for Hub genes in the external validation set using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for single-gene difference analysis.
2.8 Machine learning models
The “glmnet” “e1071” “kernlab” “caret” “randomForest” R packages R packages were used to establish machine learning models screening for the Hub genes, including the LASSO regression, SVM-REF, and RF model (Engebretsen and Bohlin, 2019; Van Essen, 2012). The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was visualized using the “pROC” R package (Robin et al., 2011).
2.9 Construction and validation of a nomogram model
A nomogram model was established using the “rms” R package to predict the probability of the occurrence of AS, and its predictive power was estimated by using calibration curves and decision curve analysis.
2.10 Gene-drug/chemical interaction
DGIdb 5.0 integrates drug-gene interactions from multiple databases including DrugBank, Drug Target Commons, and TTD. Its core methodology involves associative analysis of drugs and genes, establishing an interaction network through the integration of public data and experimental validation (Cannon et al., 2024). However, its predictive results contain numerous correlations that have not been experimentally verified and should be treated with caution. CoreMine Database is a literature-based precision data mining service platform. The Hub genes were imported into the DGIdb database (https://dgidb.org/) and CoreMine database (https://coremine.com/medical/#search) to predict the corresponding Drug, Chemical, and Food.
3 Results
3.1 Identification of DEGs in different HF populations
After merging and standardizing the five datasets to eliminate batch effects, evaluate the merging effect using PCA and UMAP plots (Figures 1A–D). Differential expression analyses were first conducted on a total of 650 samples, comprising 323 normal and 327 HF samples, resulting in the identification of 129 DEGs (Figure 1E). Subsequently, differential expression was analyzed separately for samples from different regions: among African American samples, there were 122 (44 normal and 78 HF), yielding 506 DEGs (Figure 1F); amongst American Caucasian samples, there were 238 (122 normal and 116 HF), yielding 556 DEGs (Figure 1G); amongst German samples, there were 55 (16 normal and 39 HF), yielding 55 DEGs (Figure 1H); amongst Spanish samples, there were 17 (5 normal and 12 HF), yielding 41 DEGs (Figure 1I). A Venn diagram analysis identified 2 common DEGs among all populations (NPPB, STAT4), as well as 97 African American-specific, 139 American Caucasian-specific, 12 German-specific, and 24 Spanish-specific DEGs (Figures 1J,K) (Supplementary Material 1).
FIGURE 1
Functional enrichment of 129 DEGs from the all sample suggests that the biological processes of HF are related to inflammatory response (interleukin-1 receptor activity, positive regulation of monocyte chemotaxis, response to bacterium, cellular response to lipopolysaccharide), immune response (negative regulation of T cell proliferation, type 2 immune response), vascular regulation (regulation of blood pressure, blood vessel diameter maintenance, cardiac muscle contraction), the Wnt signaling pathway (Wnt-protein binding, negative regulation of Wnt signaling pathway, canonical and non-canonical Wnt signaling pathway), cell adhesion, migration, and proliferation (extracellular matrix organization, collagen fibril organization, cell adhesion, negative regulation of cell population proliferation, negative regulation of cell growth), metabolic process (thyroid hormone metabolic process, protein processing, peptide metabolic process, negative regulation of endopeptidase activity, metalloendopeptidase activity), ion binding and transfer (negative regulation of sodium ion transport, iron ion binding, calcium ion binding), and are also closely related to glutathione metabolism, cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction, and the Wnt signaling pathway (Figures 2A–C). GSEA also highlights the role of type I diabetes mellitus, antigen processing and presentation, cell adhesion molecules, complement and coagulation cascades, viral myocarditis, Parkinson’s disease, sphingolipid metabolism, and apoptosis in HF (Figure 2D) (Supplementary Material 2).
FIGURE 2
Immune infiltration analysis revealed that HF patients exhibited a higher abundance of resting mast cells, resting NK cells, CD8T cells, resting memory CD4 T cells, activated memory CD4 T cells, M1 Macrophages, naive CD4 T cells, M0 Macrophages, regulatory T cells (Tregs), follicular helper T cells, Monocytes, and activated NK cells, and a lower abundance of plasma cells, neutrophils, and eosinophils (P < 0.05 and FDR<0.05). Among African Americans, HF patients had a higher abundance of naïve B cells and CD8 T cells, and a lower abundance of resting memory CD4 T cells, M2 macrophages, and eosinophils (P < 0.05 and FDR<0.05). In Caucasians, HF patients showed a higher abundance of naïve CD4 T cells (P < 0.05 and FDR>0.05), naïve B cells, CD8 T cells, regulatory T cells, M1 macrophages, and resting dendritic cells, and a lower abundance of resting memory CD4 T cells, M2 macrophages, and eosinophils (P < 0.05 and FDR<0.05). In the German population, HF patients demonstrated a higher abundance of resting mast cells and follicular helper T cells, and a lower abundance of resting memory CD4 T cells (P < 0.05 and FDR>0.05). In contrast, there were no significant differences in immune cell infiltration observed in the Spanish population (P > 0.05) (Figures 3A,B) (Supplementary Material 3). These results suggest that HF patients from different populations have distinct immune infiltration microenvironments.
FIGURE 3
3.2 Identification of candidate hub genes in different HF populations
WGCNA was conducted on these samples to identify the gene modules most strongly associated with HF. When the soft threshold was set to 14, the blue module (r = 0.77) was significantly and positively associated with HF across all samples, comprising 200 genes. For African American samples, when the soft threshold was set to 3, the turquoise module (r = 0.28) showed a significant positive association with HF and included a total of 3138 genes. At the same soft threshold, both the brown module (r = 0.9) and the yellow module (r = 0.87) were significantly positively associated with HF in American Caucasian samples, together containing 740 genes. In German samples, when the soft threshold was set to 2, the turquoise module (r = 0.7) was significantly positively associated with HF and contained 2099 genes. In Spanish samples, when the soft threshold was set to 14, 7 modules were produced, but none of the modules most relevant to HF (Figures 3C–E).
The samples were then analyzed for differential expression after gender stratification. A total of 374 male samples, comprising 162 normal and 212 HF samples, yielded 147 DEGs (Figure 4A); 259 female samples, including 156 normal and 163 HF samples, yielded 176 DEGs (Figure 4B). Among African American males, 62 samples (21 normal and 41 HF) yielded 542 DEGs (Figure 4C); among African American females, 60 samples (23 normal and 37 HF) yielded 558 DEGs (Figure 4D). Among American Caucasian males, 132 samples (56 normal and 76 HF) yielded 583 DEGs (Figure 4E); among American Caucasian females, 106 samples (66 normal and 40 HF) yielded 594 DEGs (Figure 4F). Among German males, 45 samples (13 normal and 32 HF) yielded 63 DEGs (Figure 4G); among German females, 10 samples (3 normal and 7 HF) yielded 233 DEGs (Figure 4H).
FIGURE 4
After intersecting with region-specific DEGs, the Venn diagram revealed 81 HF candidate Hub genes, along with 6 male-specific and 3 female-specific modular DEGs (Figure 4I). In the African American samples, there were 35 specific DEGs and 21 male-specific and 38 female-specific modular DEGs (Figure 4J). In the American Caucasian samples, there were 65 specific DEGs and 22 male-specific and 20 female-specific modular DEGs (Figure 4K). In the German samples, there were 2 specific DEGs and 6 male-specific and 1 female-specific modular DEGs (Figure 4L).
To enhance the screening of candidate Hub genes, external validation was performed in the German datasets GSE3585 and GSE120895, as well as the American datasets GSE5406 and GSE1145. Initially, 81 common HF candidate Hub genes were analyzed by single-gene differential analysis across these datasets, which led to the identification of three DEGs: ASPN, COL14A1, and MYH6, of which ASPN and COL14A1 were upregulated in HF, while MYH6 was downregulated (Figure 5A). Subsequently, to further validate the differential expression of region-specific DEGs. Specifically, American- and Spain-specific DEGs were validated in the German dataset, and German- and Spain-specific DEGs were validated in the American dataset, and genes with differential expression were removed. Ultimately, 33 population-specific, 19 male-specific, and 35 female-specific DEGs were identified in the African American population; 54 population-specific, 19 male-specific, and 17 female-specific DEGs were identified in the American Caucasian population; 1 population-specific, 5 male-specific, and 1 female-specific DEG in the German population; and 20 Spain-specific DEGs were identified.
FIGURE 5
Correlation analysis of immune infiltration showed that ASPN and COL14A1 were significantly positively correlated with M1 macrophages, whereas MYH6 was negatively correlated with M0 macrophages (Figure 3B).
3.3 Machine learning models screening for hub genes
LASSO regression, SVM-REF, and RF algorithms were employed to further screen for Hub genes and mitigate the risk of overfitting. The results indicated that across all samples, male samples, female samples, African American samples, African American male samples, African American female samples, Caucasian samples, Caucasian male samples, Caucasian female samples, German male samples, and Spanish samples, LASSO regression identified 3, 6, 3, 17, 14, 13, 23, 11, 10, 4, and 2 genes, respectively; SVM-REF identified 3, 6, 3, 6, 16, 8, 16, 6, 10, 2, and 20 genes, respectively; RF identified 3, 6, 3, 12, 5, 4, 19, 10, 12, 4, and 5 genes, respectively. Ultimately, a total of 3, 6, 3, 4, 5, 3, 11, 5, 7, 2, and 2 Hub genes were identified, respectively (Figures 5B, 6A).
FIGURE 6
In summary, DEGs were identified across various populations and genders: 3 Hub genes (MYH6, ASPN, COL14A1), 6 male-specific (NAP1L3, MOXD1, PLEKHH2, SERPINE2, CA14, CCDC80), and 3 female-specific (CX3CR1, SYN2, SLC25A18) DEGs. In addition, 4 African American-specific Hub genes (PPL, KYNU, NQO1, KAZALD1), 5 African American male-specific (NGEF, UBASH3A, HYAL4, EGR1, LRRN4CL), and 3 African American female-specific (TSPAN11, HPSE, WASF1) DEGs; 11 Caucasian-specific Hub genes (CD83, GNA14, ANTXR1, C1QTNF3, TRAF3IP3, MEG3, MARVELD2, EDN2, VIT, GRB14, CPAMD8), 5 Caucasian male-specific (DLGAP1, COL12A1, GLYATL2, GRAP2, ETNK2), and 7 Caucasian female-specific (BCL6B, CD1E. PODXL2, CERCAM, MS4A1, TIGIT, SLC5A1) DEGs; 1 German-specific Hub gene (LSAMP), 2 German male-specific (C14orf132, NECAB1), and 1 German female-specific (BMP4) DEGs; and 2 Spanish-specific Hub genes (SNORA80E, CIART). In total, 3 HF Hub genes, 18 male-specific DEGs in the African American population, 13 female-specific DEGs in the African American population, 25 male-specific DEGs in the Caucasian population, 24 female-specific DEGs in the Caucasian population, 12 male-specific DEGs in the German population, 8 female-specific DEGs in the German population, and 5 DEGs specific to the Spanish population were identified (Figure 6B).
However, to further refine the identification of specific DEGs for African American males, African American females, Caucasian males, Caucasian females, German males, and German females, machine learning techniques were again employed to reduce the risk of overfitting. LASSO identified 9, 8, 15, 12, 5, and 3 genes for each group, respectively; SVM-REF identified 15, 10, 16, 21, 4, and 2 genes for each group, respectively; RF identified 4, 1, 8, 7, 3, and 3 genes for each group, respectively. Ultimately, 3 African American males (NQO1, KAZALD1, UBASH3A), 1 African American female (SYN2), 4 Caucasian males (CD83, C1QTNF3, GRB14, MOXD1), 3 Caucasian females (CD83, VIT, PODXL2), 2 German males (LSAMP, C14orf132), and 2 German females (LSAMP, BMP4)-specific DEGs were identified (Figure 7).
FIGURE 7
3.4 Construction and assessment of nomogram
Therefore, a nomogram was constructed based on 3 Hub genes (ASPN, COL14A1, MYH6) to predict the incidence of HF in the population, and decision curve and calibration curve analyses both indicated that the nomogram effectively distinguished HF patients from the normal population (Figure 8A). Additionally, nomograms were constructed separately based on the Hub genes and population-specific DEGs for males (ASPN, AUC = 0.942; COL14A1, AUC = 0.913; MYH6, AUC = 0.935; NAP1L3, AUC = 0.880; PLEKHH2, AUC = 0.851; MOXD1, AUC = 0.853; CCDC80, AUC = 0.809; CA14, AUC = 0.791; SERPINE2, AUC = 0.803) (Figure 8B), females (ASPN, AUC = 0.911; COL14A1, AUC = 0.837; MYH6, AUC = 0.917; SYN2, AUC = 0.816; SLC25A18, AUC = 0.808; CX3CR1, AUC = 0.821) (Figure 8C), African American males (ASPN, AUC = 0.890; COL14A1, AUC = 0.930; MYH6, AUC = 0.956; NQO1, AUC = 0.873; KAZALD1, AUC = 0.891; UBASH3A, AUC = 0.907) (Figure 8D), African American females (ASPN, AUC = 0.893; COL14A1, AUC = 0.825; MYH6, AUC = 0.914; SYN2, AUC = 0.919) (Figure 8E), Caucasian males (ASPN, AUC = 0.969; COL14A1, AUC = 0.969; MYH6, AUC = 0.979; CD83, AUC = 0.941; C1QTNF3, AUC = 0.947; GRB14, AUC = 0.964; MOXD1, AUC = 0.938) (Figure 8F), Caucasian females (ASPN, AUC = 0.959; COL14A1, AUC = 0.931; MYH6, AUC = 0.951; CD83, AUC = 0.956; VIT, AUC = 0.880; PODXL2, AUC = 0.928) (Figure 8G), German males (ASPN, AUC = 0.776; COL14A1, AUC = 0.659; MYH6, AUC = 0.855; LSAMP, AUC = 0.961; C14orf132, AUC = 0.943) (Figure 8H), German females (ASPN, AUC = 0.857; COL14A1, AUC = 0.750; MYH6, AUC = 1.000; LSAMP, AUC = 1.000; BMP4, AUC = 0.929) (Figure 8I), and Spanish (MYH6, AUC = 0.733; ASPN, AUC = 0.667; COL14A1, AUC = 0.717; SNORA80E, AUC = 0.833; CIART, AUC = 0.933) (Figure 8J) to identify the incidence of HF in different regions and genders. The results similarly indicated that these nomograms effectively distinguished HF patients from the normal population. However, ROC curves for the Spanish population showed low AUC values for ASPN, and a nomogram based on the MYH6, COL14A1, SNORA80E, and CIART genes was reconstructed to predict the incidence of HF in the Spanish population. Both the decision curve and calibration curve indicated that the model effectively distinguished between HF patients and normal individuals (Figure 8K).
FIGURE 8
In addition, OMECAMTIV MECARBIL, DANICAMTIV, and MAVACAMTEN were identified through the database as potential drugs for the treatment of HF, and Collagen Alpha-1(I) Chain, Latent TGF Beta Binding Protein 2, Transforming Growth Factor-Beta Superfamily, Transforming Growth Factor Beta-1, Fibronectin, and Morpholino are common chemicals of the 3 Hub genes. Database prediction suggests OMECAMTIV MECARBIL, DANICAMTIV, and MAVACAMTEN may be associated with MYH6.
Moreover, this study also stratified HF samples from different regions by gender, identifying 9 DEGs between males and females in all HF samples, 6 in African American HF samples, 11 in Caucasian HF samples, and 24 in German HF samples, and ultimately identifying 5 common DEGs that were significantly different by gender, namely, DDX3Y, KDM5D, USP9Y, RPS4Y1, and EIF1AY (Figures 9A,B). However, single-gene differential analyses across multiple groups indicated that these genes were upregulated only in female samples, both in the control and disease groups (Figure 9C).
FIGURE 9
4 Discussion
Symptoms, pathogenesis, and biomarkers of HF are influenced by multiple factors, particularly gender, age, and race. Several scholars have emphasized the importance of linking HF biomarkers to gender (Maidana et al., 2023; Blumer et al., 2023). Studies have shown that baseline NT-proBNP levels are higher in women than in men, especially in premenopausal women, and that other HF biomarkers, such as the soluble isoform of suppression of tumorigenesis-2 (sST2), are higher in men than in women (Maidana et al., 2023). Racial disparities also play a significant role in the development of HF. Despite improvements in HF treatments and overall survival, the mortality disparity for African American patients continues to widen over time (Lewsey and Breathett, 2021). Hale suggests that future HF research should be grounded in understanding these racial disparities (Hale and Yancy, 2023). Therefore, this study focused on race and gender to identify HF-specific biomarkers.
Enrichment analyses in this study highlight the importance of the wnt signaling pathway in the pathogenesis of HF. The Wnt signaling pathway is a fundamental cellular communication system comprising the β-linker classical pathway and the nonclassical pathways, namely, the planar cell polarity and the calcium-dependent pathways. It has been shown that the classical Wnt signaling promotes inflammation and fibrosis in the context of cardiac hypertrophy and HF (Horitani and Shiojima, 2024); non-classical WNT signaling produces contractile dysfunction by affecting myocardial oxidative stress, inflammation, reparative capacity, energetics, and remodeling, including fibrosis or fatty infiltration of the myocardium (Akoumianakis et al., 2022).
Several studies have investigated biomarkers for HF. For instance, Fan’s research identified core genes such as EIF1AY, RPS4Y1, USP9Y, KDM5D, DDX3Y, NPPA, HBB, TSIX, LOC28556, and XIST through protein-protein interaction networks (Fan and Hu, 2022). Zhu’s study identified NPPA, OMD, and PRELP as biomarkers for dilated cardiomyopathy and HF using random forests (Zhu et al., 2022). Chen’s research identified 16 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) for HF using random forests, which included ECM2, LUM, ISLR, ASPN, PTN, SFRP4, GLT8D2, FRZB, FCN3, TEAD4, NPTX2, LAD1, ALOX5AP, RNASE2, IL1RL1, and CD163 (Chen et al., 2023). Additionally, Chen identified NSG1, NPPB, PHLDA1, and SERPINE2 using LASSO and SVM-REF (Chen et al., 2022). These genes were also addressed in this study. For example, five of the ten genes identified by Fan (EIF1AY, RPS4Y1, USP9Y, KDM5D, DDX3Y) were found to be upregulated exclusively in males, in both control and disease groups; NPPA identified by Zhu did not differ in this study in the Spanish population (P > 0.05); Chen similarly identified ASPN as DEGs for HF; and ASERPINE2 identified by Chen was considered as male-specific DEGs in this study. In conclusion, this study encompassed datasets from multiple regions, stratified by gender, and employed three machine learning models (LASSO, SVM-REF, and RF) to identify Hub genes. First, analysis of 650 samples through differential expression analysis, DEGs, WGCNA, gender stratification, external validation across four datasets, and machine learning identified three Hub genes: MYH6, ASPN, and COL14A1.
ASPN is a member of the small leucine-rich proteoglycan family, specifically class I. Multiple bioinformatics analyses have identified ASPN as a potential biomarker for HF (Boyang et al., 2022; Guo et al., 2022; Wang et al., 2019; Huang et al., 2024). ASPN primarily encodes the asporin protein, which acts as an inhibitor of transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) and is considered a beneficial regulator of cardiac remodeling (Huang et al., 2022). In the ASPN knockout (Aspn−/−) mouse model, increased fibrosis and reduced cardiac function were observed following pressure overload (Huang et al., 2022). The TGFβ superfamily is one of the most important families of profibrotic cytokines in the regulation of myocardial fibrosis. Studies have shown that while inhibiting TGF-β1 may exacerbate early cardiac dysfunction, it can prevent late remodeling post-infarction, and inhibiting TGF-β1 is a significant factor in protecting the myocardium from fibrosis (Ikeuchi et al., 2004). Huang’s research found that asporin, released by cardiac fibroblasts, was able to attenuate TGFβ signaling, thereby inhibiting the progression of myocardial fibrosis (Huang et al., 2022). However, other studies have indicated that asporin plays a key role in glycated low-density lipoprotein (gly-LDL)-induced apoptosis of cardiomyocytes, increasing H9C2 cardiomyocyte apoptosis by downregulating Bcl-2, upregulating TGF-β1, Bax, type III collagen, fibronectin, and the phosphorylation of smad2 and smad3 (Li et al., 2020). On the other hand, Medzikovic’s research found that miR-129-5p expression was reduced and ASPN expression was enhanced in cardiac fibrosis and calcified human heart fibroblasts. Overexpression of miR-129-5p was able to downregulate ASPN expression, and targeting the miR-129-5p/ASPN signaling axis in cardiac fibroblasts attenuated myocardial fibrosis and calcification and restored cardiac function in mice (Medzikovic et al., 2023). In conclusion, the role of ASPN in HF is complex, but it is considered a promising potential biomarker for HF, and its specific role in HF still needs to be further investigated to clarify (Zhang et al., 2021).
COL14A1 is a major fibrillar collagen produced by fibroblasts and plays a crucial role in regulating the extracellular matrix component of the cardiac remodeling process in HF (Frangogiannis, 2019). Portokallidou has identified COL14A1 as a key gene in both dilated and ischemic cardiomyopathy through transcriptomic and proteomic analyses (Portokallidou et al., 2023). COL14A1-deficient mouse ventricles exhibit morphological defects and disorganization of collagen fibers (Tao et al., 2012). COL14A1 functions as a regulator of tissue differences, particularly during the early stages of collagen fiber formation, which is crucial for myocardial growth and structural integrity (Tao et al., 2012; Ansorge et al., 2009).
Myosin is a hexamer composed of two heavy chain subunits, two light chain subunits, and two regulatory subunits, possessing ATPase activity and the ability to bind actin. Among these components, the myosin heavy chain (MyHC) is an essential part of myocardial structure and function, playing a vital role in cardiac contractile function (Toepfer et al., 2020). The MYH6 and MYH7 genes encode the α-MyHC subunit and the β-MyHC subunit, respectively. In the human heart, α-MyHC is predominant in the atria, while β-MyHC is predominant in the ventricles (Walklate et al., 2021). The content of α-MyHC varies among different mammalian hearts: it is 100%/100% in mouse ventricles/atria, 90%/99% in rats, and 5%/75% in humans (Walklate et al., 2021). In pathological states such as HF, myosin genes may undergo “return to the fetal gene program,” where α-MyHC expression decreases and β-MyHC expression increases, leading to a reduced α-MyHC/β-MyHC ratio. This change may help maintain myocardial contractility and compensate for cardiac function in the short term, but if it persists, it can adversely affect energy metabolism (Rajabi et al., 2007; Taegtmeyer et al., 2010; Papait et al., 2013; Herron and McDonald, 2002). Several studies have shown that mRNA and protein expression levels of α-MyHC are significantly downregulated in patients with HF or cardiac hypertrophy, as well as in various animal models of HF (Reiser et al., 2001; Miyata et al., 2000; Lowes et al., 1997; Nakao et al., 1997). Furthermore, the expression of the MYH6 gene changes with the improvement of clinical symptoms during the treatment of cardiomyopathy or HF. Before treatment, MYH6 gene expression is downregulated, but it is upregulated during many therapeutic measures aimed at improving cardiac function. For instance, β-blockers can lead to upregulation of MYH6 gene expression and downregulation of MYH7 gene expression while improving ejection fraction and cardiac function. Among patients treated with β-blockers, those with improved ejection fraction exhibit an increase in α-MyHC mRNA and a decrease in β-MyHC mRNA compared to non-responders (Lowes et al., 2002).
In addition, this study identified Omecamtiv Mecarbil, Danicamtiv, and Mavacamten as potential drugs for the treatment of HF through database screening. Omecamtiv Mecarbil and Danicamtiv act as cardiac myosin activators (Nanasi et al., 2018; Kooiker et al., 2023), while Mavacamten is a cardiac-specific myosin inhibitor (Braunwald et al., 2023). Omecamtiv Mecarbil enhances myocardial contractility by specifically binding to the catalytic S1 structural domain of cardiac myosin, thereby improving cardiac function, reducing ventricular wall stress, reversing ventricular remodeling, and promoting sympathetic regression for the treatment of HF (Teerlink et al., 2020; Teerlink et al., 2021). Danicamtiv potentially enhances myocardial force and calcium sensitivity by increasing myosin recruitment and slowing cross-bridge turnover (Kooiker et al., 2023). However, Danicamtiv is still in clinical trials, and although it improves cardiac systolic function, it may limit diastolic function at high concentrations (Voors et al., 2020; Ráduly et al., 2022). Mavacamten reduces contractility by normalizing cross-bridging between myosin and actin and is commonly used to treat obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (Schenk and Fields, 2023). A meta-analysis showed that Mavacamten reduced New York Heart Association (NYHA) class and post-exercise left ventricular outflow tract gradient, and increased mixed venous oxygen pressure in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, but it may also cause adverse effects such as atrial fibrillation and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (Bishev et al., 2023). The DGIdb database indicates that Omecamtiv Mecarbil, Danicamtiv, and Mavacamten may act on MYH6. However, there have been an absence of studies confirming the targeted effects of these drugs on MYH6, and these findings must be validated through subsequent in-depth in vitro and in vivo experiments.
This study also identified gender-specific DEGs across different regions. After stratifying by gender, differential expression analysis, WGCNA, and machine learning were performed to identify race- and gender-specific DEGs. Subsequently, a nomogram was constructed based on Hub genes (MYH6, ASPN, and COL14A1) and combined with specific DEGs to predict the risk of HF onset. Exercise stimulation induced cardiac-specific expression of the C-terminal domain of CCDC80, which prevented angiotensin II-induced cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis in mice (Yin et al., 2022). CX3CR1 has been suggested to be a prerequisite for the development of cardiac hypertrophy and left ventricular dysfunction in mice upon transverse aortic constriction (Weisheit et al., 2021). Furthermore, the activation of the cardiac CX3CL1/CX3CR1 signaling axis delays β-adrenergic-induced HF (Flamant et al., 2021). C1QTNF3 has been found to be decreased in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction in the Xi’an population of China and is strongly associated with increased morbidity and mortality (Gao et al., 2019). However, this study found that C1QTNF3 was upregulated in Caucasian males, which contrasts with another study that found C1QTNF3 upregulated in mouse hypertrophied hearts and in human hearts with HF, derived from cardiomyocytes and induced by the production of reactive oxygen species during the hypertrophic response. Additionally, CTRP3 facilitates pressure-overload-induced cardiac hypertrophy through activation of the TAK1-JNK axis (Ma et al., 2019). Yu identified m6A-modified C14orf132 as a potential diagnostic gene for idiopathic cardiomyopathy (Yu et al., 2024). The relationship between other genes and HF remains unclear and requires further investigation.
In conclusion, this study utilized bioinformatics to identify the pathogenesis and potential biomarkers of HF associated with dilated cardiomyopathy. First, three Hub genes (MYH6, ASPN, and COL14A1) associated with dilated cardiomyopathy-related HF were identified using a large-scale training dataset. External validation confirmed the differential expression of these genes. The research underscores that the pathogenesis of HF is closely related to inflammatory responses, immune responses, vascular regulation, the Wnt signaling pathways, glutathione metabolism, and apoptosis. The myocardial immune infiltrate microenvironment in HF patients is dysregulated and exhibits significant differences across distinct patient populations. The myocardial immune infiltrate microenvironment is dysregulated in patients with HF, characterized by a high abundance of naïve B cells and CD8 T cells, and a lower abundance of resting memory CD4 T cells, M2 macrophages, and eosinophils. Differential analyses were conducted to pinpoint population-specific DEGs, and gender-specific Hub genes were identified using three machine learning models: LASSO, SVM-REF, and RF. This study is innovative in its focus on race and gender, identifying HF-specific DEGs across different races and genders, thereby reflecting the principles of precision and individuality in medicine. Furthermore, the study identified Hub genes using multiple machine learning models, which were then validated in four external validation sets. Additionally, the study identified five genes that were upregulated only in male and not associated with HF.
However, there are limitations to this study. Although efforts were made to include HF datasets from various regions, database limitations precluded the inclusion of more HF-related datasets from other countries. The Japanese-related dataset GSE8331 was also not considered for inclusion due to its small sample size. While many specific DEGs were identified in this study, the relationship between many of these genes and HF remains unclear, necessitating further experimental validation.
However, this study has several limitations. First, the large number of datasets included in this study were sourced from various platforms and countries. Despite batch effect correction, differences in platforms, processing pipelines, and sample demographics may still introduce confounding effects that are difficult to completely eliminate. Second, although efforts were made to include HF datasets from different regions, limitations of the databases restricted the inclusion of more HF-related datasets from other countries. Moreover, there was significant variation in sample sizes across different datasets, with the Spanish cohort having a particularly small sample size, which may have reduced the reliability of the results. Additionally, while the US datasets provided detailed racial information, the population information for the other datasets was inferred based on the country of origin. However, the included populations may not have had strictly defined racial information sources, which could have affected the reliability of the results. Furthermore, although CIBERSORT has been widely applied across various tissue types, it is important to acknowledge that its reference matrix was primarily developed using peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Potential differences in gene expression profiles between blood and heart cells may have affected the accuracy of immune cell estimation. Future studies incorporating heart-specific signature matrices will help to validate and refine these findings. Age is also an important factor associated with HF. However, many of the included datasets did not provide patient age information, and thus, this study did not perform subgroup analyses based on age. This is a key aspect that needs to be addressed in future research. In addition, this study predicted drug interactions for Hub genes based on databases. However, such drug repositioning predictions are merely preliminary hypothesis-generating tools, and the reliability of their results must be verified through subsequent in-depth in vitro and in vivo experiments. Finally, although this study identified many specific DEGs, these computational results lack experimental validation. The relationships between many genes and HF remain unclear, and they have not been independently verified in patient samples or experimental models (such as qRT-PCR, Western blot, and immunohistochemistry). The biological reliability and translational applicability of the proposed biomarkers remain uncertain and require further experimental validation.
5 Conclusion
The biomarkers of HF vary significantly across different populations and genders. MYH6, ASPN, and COL14A1 may be potential biomarkers for HF in dilated cardiomyopathy.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
Author contributions
YY: Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Software, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. CX: Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. DJ: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Software, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. WS: Formal Analysis, Methodology, Writing – review and editing. XG: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Project administration, Writing – review and editing. XW: Formal Analysis, Resources, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. CW: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Writing – review and editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. Nantong Science and Technology Bureau (Nos MS12021036 and JC2024068).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2025.1618390/full#supplementary-material
Abbreviations
AUC, Area Under the Curve; BNP, B-type Natriuretic Peptide; DEGs, Differentially Expressed Genes; GEO, Gene Expression Omnibus; GSEA, Gene Set Enrichment Analysis; HF, Heart Failure; LASSO, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator; MyHC, Myosin Heavy Chain; NT-proBNP, N-terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide; RF, Random Forest; ROC, Receiver Operating Characteristic; SVM-REF, Support Vector Machine-Recursive Feature Elimination; TGF-β, transforming growth factor-β; WGCNA, Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis.
References
1
AkoumianakisI.PolkinghorneM.AntoniadesC. (2022). Non-canonical WNT signalling in cardiovascular disease: mechanisms and therapeutic implications. Nat. Rev. Cardiol.19 (12), 783–797. 10.1038/s41569-022-00718-5
2
AmelingS.HerdaL. R.HammerE.SteilL.TeumerA.TrimpertC.et al (2013). Myocardial gene expression profiles and cardiodepressant autoantibodies predict response of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy to immunoadsorption therapy. Eur. Heart J.34 (9), 666–675. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs330
3
AnsorgeH. L.MengX.ZhangG.VeitG.SunM.KlementJ. F.et al (2009). Type XIV collagen regulates fibrillogenesis: premature collagen fibril growth and tissue dysfunction in null mice. J. Biol. Chem.284 (13), 8427–8438. 10.1074/jbc.M805582200
4
BarthA. S.KunerR.BunessA.RuschhauptM.MerkS.ZwermannL.et al (2006). Identification of a common gene expression signature in dilated cardiomyopathy across independent microarray studies. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.48 (8), 1610–1617. 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.07.026
5
BishevD.FabaraS.LosekeI.AlokA.Al-AniH.BazikianY. (2023). Efficacy and safety of mavacamten in the treatment of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a systematic review. Heart Lung Circ.32 (9), 1049–1056. 10.1016/j.hlc.2023.05.019
6
BlumerV.TrubyL. K.ZierothS. (2023). Sex differences in heart failure: the evolving use of biomarkers. Eur. J. Heart Fail25 (4), 448–449. 10.1002/ejhf.2817
7
BoyangC.YuexingL.YipingY.HaiyangY.XufeiZ.LianchengG.et al (2022). Construction and analysis of heart failure diagnosis model based on random forest and artificial neural network. Med. Baltim.101 (41), e31097. 10.1097/md.0000000000031097
8
BraunwaldE.SaberiS.AbrahamT. P.ElliottP. M.OlivottoI. (2023). Mavacamten: a first-in-class myosin inhibitor for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Eur. Heart J.44 (44), 4622–4633. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad637
9
CannonM.StevensonJ.StahlK.BasuR.CoffmanA.KiwalaS.et al (2024). DGIdb 5.0: rebuilding the drug-gene interaction database for precision medicine and drug discovery platforms. Nucleic Acids Res.52 (D1), D1227–D1235. 10.1093/nar/gkad1040
10
CastiglioneV.AimoA.VergaroG.SaccaroL.PassinoC.EmdinM. (2022). Biomarkers for the diagnosis and management of heart failure. Heart Fail Rev.27 (2), 625–643. 10.1007/s10741-021-10105-w
11
ChenB.KhodadoustM. S.LiuC. L.NewmanA. M.AlizadehA. A. (2018). Profiling tumor infiltrating immune cells with CIBERSORT. Methods Mol. Biol.1711, 243–259. 10.1007/978-1-4939-7493-1_12
12
ChenX.ZhangQ.ZhangQ. (2022). Predicting potential biomarkers and immune infiltration characteristics in heart failure. Math. Biosci. Eng.19 (9), 8671–8688. 10.3934/mbe.2022402
13
ChenY.XueJ.YanX.FangD. G.LiF.TianX.et al (2023). Identification of crucial genes related to heart failure based on GEO database. BMC Cardiovasc Disord.23 (1), 376. 10.1186/s12872-023-03400-x
14
CloughE.BarrettT. (2016). The gene expression omnibus database. Methods Mol. Biol.1418, 93–110. 10.1007/978-1-4939-3578-9_5
15
ConradN.JudgeA.TranJ.MohseniH.HedgecottD.CrespilloA. P.et al (2018). Temporal trends and patterns in heart failure incidence: a population-based study of 4 million individuals. Lancet391 (10120), 572–580. 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32520-5
16
DochertyK. F.JhundP. S.InzucchiS. E.KøberL.KosiborodM. N.MartinezF. A.et al (2020). Effects of dapagliflozin in DAPA-HF according to background heart failure therapy. Eur. Heart J.41 (25), 2379–2392. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa183
17
EngebretsenS.BohlinJ. (2019). Statistical predictions with glmnet. Clin. Epigenetics11 (1), 123. 10.1186/s13148-019-0730-1
18
FanS.HuY. (2022). Integrative analyses of biomarkers and pathways for heart failure. BMC Med. Genomics15 (1), 72. 10.1186/s12920-022-01221-z
19
FlamantM.MougenotN.BalseE.Le FèvreL.AtassiF.GautierE. L.et al (2021). Early activation of the cardiac CX3CL1/CX3CR1 axis delays β-adrenergic-induced heart failure. Sci. Rep.11 (1), 17982. 10.1038/s41598-021-97493-z
20
FrangogiannisN. G. (2019). The extracellular matrix in ischemic and nonischemic heart failure. Circ. Res.125 (1), 117–146. 10.1161/circresaha.119.311148
21
GaoC.ZhaoS.LianK.MiB.SiR.TanZ.et al (2019). C1q/TNF-related protein 3 (CTRP3) and 9 (CTRP9) concentrations are decreased in patients with heart failure and are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. BMC Cardiovasc Disord.19 (1), 139. 10.1186/s12872-019-1117-0
22
GautierL.CopeL.BolstadB. M.IrizarryR. A. (2004). affy--analysis of affymetrix GeneChip data at the probe level. Bioinformatics20 (3), 307–315. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg405
23
GuoY.NingB.ZhangQ.MaJ.ZhaoL.LuQ.et al (2022). Identification of hub diagnostic biomarkers and candidate therapeutic drugs in heart failure. Int. J. Gen. Med.15, 623–635. 10.2147/ijgm.S349235
24
HaleS.YancyC. W. (2023). Race-based analyses in heart failure clinical trials: what makes them informative?JACC Heart Fail11 (5), 580–582. 10.1016/j.jchf.2023.01.014
25
HannenhalliS.PuttM. E.GilmoreJ. M.WangJ.ParmacekM. S.EpsteinJ. A.et al (2006). Transcriptional genomics associates FOX transcription factors with human heart failure. Circulation114 (12), 1269–1276. 10.1161/circulationaha.106.632430
26
HeidenreichP. A.AlbertN. M.AllenL. A.BluemkeD. A.ButlerJ.FonarowG. C.et al (2013). Forecasting the impact of heart failure in the United States: a policy statement from the American Heart Association. Circ. Heart Fail6 (3), 606–619. 10.1161/HHF.0b013e318291329a
27
HerronT. J.McDonaldK. S. (2002). Small amounts of alpha-myosin heavy chain isoform expression significantly increase power output of rat cardiac myocyte fragments. Circ. Res.90 (11), 1150–1152. 10.1161/01.res.0000022879.57270.11
28
HoritaniK.ShiojimaI. (2024). Wnt signaling in cardiac development and heart diseases. Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. Anim.60 (5), 482–488. 10.1007/s11626-024-00917-z
29
HuangC.SharmaA.ThakurR.RaiD.KatikiM.GermanoJ. F.et al (2022). Asporin, an extracellular matrix protein, is a beneficial regulator of cardiac remodeling. Matrix Biol.110, 40–59. 10.1016/j.matbio.2022.04.005
30
HuangX.ZhaoX.LiY.FengY.ZhangG.WangQ.et al (2024). Combining bulk and single cell RNA-Sequencing data to identify hub genes of fibroblasts in dilated cardiomyopathy. J. Inflamm. Res.17, 5375–5388. 10.2147/jir.S470860
31
IkeuchiM.TsutsuiH.ShiomiT.MatsusakaH.MatsushimaS.WenJ.et al (2004). Inhibition of TGF-beta signaling exacerbates early cardiac dysfunction but prevents late remodeling after infarction. Cardiovasc Res.64 (3), 526–535. 10.1016/j.cardiores.2004.07.017
32
JiaC.GuanW.YangA.XiaoR.TangW. H.MoravecC. S.et al (2015). MetaDiff: differential isoform expression analysis using random-effects meta-regression. BMC Bioinforma.16, 208. 10.1186/s12859-015-0623-z
33
KangK.WangQ.LiY.LiuC.YuH.LiN. (2025). Global and Chinese perspectives on the growing burden of heart failure: trends, gender, and age-related differences (1990-2021) based on GBD 2021 data. BMC Cardiovasc Disord.25 (1), 510. 10.1186/s12872-025-04954-8
34
KavsakP. A.LamC. S. P.SaengerA. K.JaffeA. S.CollinsonP.PulkkiK.et al (2019). Educational recommendations on selected analytical and clinical aspects of natriuretic peptides with a focus on heart failure: a Report from the IFCC Committee on clinical applications of cardiac bio-markers. Clin. Chem.65 (10), 1221–1227. 10.1373/clinchem.2019.306621
35
KooikerK. B.MohranS.TurnerK. L.MaW.MartinsonA.FlintG.et al (2023). Danicamtiv increases myosin recruitment and alters cross-bridge cycling in cardiac muscle. Circ. Res.133 (5), 430–443. 10.1161/circresaha.123.322629
36
LalaA.TayalU.HamoC. E.YoumansQ.Al-KhatibS. M.BozkurtB.et al (2022). Sex differences in heart failure. J. Card. Fail28 (3), 477–498. 10.1016/j.cardfail.2021.10.006
37
LangfelderP.HorvathS. (2008). WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinforma.9, 559. 10.1186/1471-2105-9-559
38
LeekJ. T.JohnsonW. E.ParkerH. S.JaffeA. E.StoreyJ. D. (2012). The sva package for removing batch effects and other unwanted variation in high-throughput experiments. Bioinformatics28 (6), 882–883. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts034
39
LewseyS. C.BreathettK. (2021). Racial and ethnic disparities in heart failure: current state and future directions. Curr. Opin. Cardiol.36 (3), 320–328. 10.1097/hco.0000000000000855
40
LiX. L.YuF.LiB. Y.FuC. L.YuX.XuM.et al (2020). The protective effects of grape seed procyanidin B2 against asporin mediates glycated low-density lipoprotein induced-cardiomyocyte apoptosis and fibrosis. Cell Biol. Int.44 (1), 268–277. 10.1002/cbin.11229
41
LowesB. D.MinobeW.AbrahamW. T.RizeqM. N.BohlmeyerT. J.QuaifeR. A.et al (1997). Changes in gene expression in the intact human heart. Downregulation of alpha-myosin heavy chain in hypertrophied, failing ventricular myocardium. J. Clin. Invest100 (9), 2315–2324. 10.1172/jci119770
42
LowesB. D.GilbertE. M.AbrahamW. T.MinobeW. A.LarrabeeP.FergusonD.et al (2002). Myocardial gene expression in dilated cardiomyopathy treated with beta-blocking agents. N. Engl. J. Med.346 (18), 1357–1365. 10.1056/NEJMoa012630
43
MaZ. G.YuanY. P.ZhangX.XuS. C.KongC. Y.SongP.et al (2019). C1q-tumour necrosis factor-related protein-3 exacerbates cardiac hypertrophy in mice. Cardiovasc Res.115 (6), 1067–1077. 10.1093/cvr/cvy279
44
MaidanaD.BonanadC.Ortiz-CortésC.Arroyo-ÁlvarezA.Barreres-MartínG.Muñoz-AlfonsoC.et al (2023). Sex-Related differences in heart failure diagnosis. Curr. Heart Fail Rep.20 (4), 254–262. 10.1007/s11897-023-00609-x
45
McDonaghT. A.MetraM.AdamoM.GardnerR. S.BaumbachA.BöhmM.et al (2021). 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur. Heart J.42 (36), 3599–3726. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab368
46
MedzikovicL.AryanL.RuffenachG.LiM.SavalliN.SunW.et al (2023). Myocardial fibrosis and calcification are attenuated by microRNA-129-5p targeting Asporin and Sox9 in cardiac fibroblasts. JCI Insight8 (9), e168655. 10.1172/jci.insight.168655
47
MetraM.TomasoniD.AdamoM.Bayes-GenisA.FilippatosG.AbdelhamidM.et al (2023). Worsening of chronic heart failure: definition, epidemiology, management and prevention. A clinical consensus statement by the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur. J. Heart Fail25 (6), 776–791. 10.1002/ejhf.2874
48
MiyataS.MinobeW.BristowM. R.LeinwandL. A. (2000). Myosin heavy chain isoform expression in the failing and nonfailing human heart. Circ. Res.86 (4), 386–390. 10.1161/01.res.86.4.386
49
Molina-NavarroM. M.Roselló-LletíE.OrtegaA.TarazónE.OteroM.Martínez-DolzL.et al (2013). Differential gene expression of cardiac ion channels in human dilated cardiomyopathy. PLoS One8 (12), e79792. 10.1371/journal.pone.0079792
50
MuS.Echouffo-TcheuguiJ. B.NdumeleC. E.CoreshJ.JuraschekS.BradyT.et al (2023). NT-proBNP reference intervals in healthy U.S. children, adolescents, and adults. J. Appl. Lab. Med.8 (4), 700–712. 10.1093/jalm/jfad024
51
NakaoK.MinobeW.RodenR.BristowM. R.LeinwandL. A. (1997). Myosin heavy chain gene expression in human heart failure. J. Clin. Invest100 (9), 2362–2370. 10.1172/jci119776
52
NanasiP.KomaromiI.GaburjakovaM.AlmassyJ. (2018). Omecamtiv mecarbil: a myosin motor Activator agent with promising clinical performance and new in vitro results. Curr. Med. Chem.25 (15), 1720–1728. 10.2174/0929867325666171222164320
53
PapaitR.GrecoC.KunderfrancoP.LatronicoM. V.CondorelliG. (2013). Epigenetics: a new mechanism of regulation of heart failure?Basic Res. Cardiol.108 (4), 361. 10.1007/s00395-013-0361-1
54
PonikowskiP.VoorsA. A.AnkerS. D.BuenoH.ClelandJ. G.CoatsA. J.et al (2016). 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: the Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur. J. Heart Fail18 (8), 891–975. 10.1002/ejhf.592
55
PortokallidouK.DovrolisN.RagiaG.AtzemianN.KoliosG.ManolopoulosV. G. (2023). Multi-omics integration to identify the genetic expression and protein signature of dilated and ischemic cardiomyopathy. Front. Cardiovasc Med.10, 1115623. 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1115623
56
RádulyA. P.SárkányF.KovácsM. B.BernátB.JuhászB.SzilvássyZ.et al (2022). The novel Cardiac Myosin activator Danicamtiv Improves Cardiac systolic function at the expense of diastolic dysfunction in vitro and in vivo: implications for clinical applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci.24 (1), 446. 10.3390/ijms24010446
57
RajabiM.KassiotisC.RazeghiP.TaegtmeyerH. (2007). Return to the fetal gene program protects the stressed heart: a strong hypothesis. Heart Fail Rev.12 (3-4), 331–343. 10.1007/s10741-007-9034-1
58
RanJ.ZhouP.WangJ.ZhaoX.HuangY.ZhouQ.et al (2025). Global, regional, and national burden of heart failure and its underlying causes, 1990-2021: results from the global burden of disease study 2021. Biomark. Res.13 (1), 16. 10.1186/s40364-025-00728-8
59
ReiserP. J.PortmanM. A.NingX. H.Schomisch MoravecC. (2001). Human cardiac myosin heavy chain isoforms in fetal and failing adult atria and ventricles. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.280 (4), H1814–H1820. 10.1152/ajpheart.2001.280.4.H1814
60
RitchieM. E.PhipsonB.WuD.HuY.LawC. W.ShiW.et al (2015). Limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res.43 (7), e47. 10.1093/nar/gkv007
61
RobinX.TurckN.HainardA.TibertiN.LisacekF.SanchezJ. C.et al (2011). pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinforma.12, 77. 10.1186/1471-2105-12-77
62
SavareseG.LundL. H. (2017). Global public health burden of heart failure. Card. Fail Rev.3 (1), 7–11. 10.15420/cfr.2016:25:2
63
SavareseG.BecherP. M.LundL. H.SeferovicP.RosanoG. M. C.CoatsA. J. S. (2023). Global burden of heart failure: a comprehensive and updated review of epidemiology. Cardiovasc Res.118 (17), 3272–3287. 10.1093/cvr/cvac013
64
SchenkA.FieldsN. (2023). Mavacamten-A targeted therapy for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J. Cardiovasc Pharmacol.81 (5), 317–326. 10.1097/fjc.0000000000001416
65
SchwientekP.EllinghausP.SteppanS.D'UrsoD.SeewaldM.KassnerA.et al (2010). Global gene expression analysis in nonfailing and failing myocardium pre- and postpulsatile and nonpulsatile ventricular assist device support. Physiol. Genomics42 (3), 397–405. 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00030.2010
66
SubramanianA.TamayoP.MoothaV. K.MukherjeeS.EbertB. L.GilletteM. A.et al (2005). Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.102 (43), 15545–15550. 10.1073/pnas.0506580102
67
TaegtmeyerH.SenS.VelaD. (2010). Return to the fetal gene program: a suggested metabolic link to gene expression in the heart. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.1188, 191–198. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05100.x
68
TanW. L. W.Anene-NzeluC. G.WongE.LeeC. J. M.TanH. S.TangS. J.et al (2020). Epigenomes of human hearts reveal new genetic variants relevant for cardiac disease and phenotype. Circ. Res.127 (6), 761–777. 10.1161/circresaha.120.317254
69
TaoG.LevayA. K.PeacockJ. D.HukD. J.BothS. N.PurcellN. H.et al (2012). Collagen XIV is important for growth and structural integrity of the myocardium. J. Mol. Cell Cardiol.53 (5), 626–638. 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2012.08.002
70
TeerlinkJ. R.DiazR.FelkerG. M.McMurrayJ. J. V.MetraM.SolomonS. D.et al (2020). Omecamtiv mecarbil in chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: rationale and design of GALACTIC-HF. JACC Heart Fail8 (4), 329–340. 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.12.001
71
TeerlinkJ. R.DiazR.FelkerG. M.McMurrayJ. J. V.MetraM.SolomonS. D.et al (2021). Cardiac myosin activation with Omecamtiv Mecarbil in systolic heart failure. N. Engl. J. Med.384 (2), 105–116. 10.1056/NEJMoa2025797
72
ToepferC. N.GarfinkelA. C.VenturiniG.WakimotoH.RepettiG.AlamoL.et al (2020). Myosin sequestration regulates sarcomere function, cardiomyocyte energetics, and metabolism, informing the pathogenesis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circulation141 (10), 828–842. 10.1161/circulationaha.119.042339
73
Van EssenD. C. (2012). Cortical cartography and Caret software. Neuroimage.62 (2), 757–764. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.077
74
VoorsA. A.TambyJ. F.ClelandJ. G.KorenM.ForgoshL. B.GuptaD.et al (2020). Effects of danicamtiv, a novel cardiac myosin activator, in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: experimental data and clinical results from a phase 2a trial. Eur. J. Heart Fail22 (9), 1649–1658. 10.1002/ejhf.1933
75
WalklateJ.FerrantiniC.JohnsonC. A.TesiC.PoggesiC.GeevesM. A. (2021). Alpha and beta myosin isoforms and human atrial and ventricular contraction. Cell Mol. Life Sci.78 (23), 7309–7337. 10.1007/s00018-021-03971-y
76
WangH. B.HuangR.YangK.XuM.FanD.LiuM. X.et al (2019). Identification of differentially expressed genes and preliminary validations in cardiac pathological remodeling induced by transverse aortic constriction. Int. J. Mol. Med.44 (4), 1447–1461. 10.3892/ijmm.2019.4291
77
WeisheitC. K.KleinerJ. L.RodrigoM. B.NiepmannS. T.ZimmerS.DuerrG. D.et al (2021). CX3CR1 is a prerequisite for the development of cardiac hypertrophy and left ventricular dysfunction in mice upon transverse aortic constriction. PLoS One16 (1), e0243788. 10.1371/journal.pone.0243788
78
WelshP.CampbellR. T.MooneyL.KimenaiD. M.HaywardC.CampbellA.et al (2022). Reference Ranges for NT-proBNP (N-Terminal Pro-B-Type natriuretic peptide) and risk factors for higher NT-proBNP concentrations in a large general population cohort. Circ. Heart Fail15 (10), e009427. 10.1161/circheartfailure.121.009427
79
WittE.HammerE.DörrM.WeitmannK.BeugD.LehnertK.et al (2019). Correlation of gene expression and clinical parameters identifies a set of genes reflecting LV systolic dysfunction and morphological alterations. Physiol. Genomics51 (8), 356–367. 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00111.2018
80
YancyC. W. (2024). Heart Failure in African American Individuals, Version 2.0. Jama331 (21), 1807–1808. 10.1001/jama.2024.5217
81
YancyC. W.JessupM.BozkurtB.ButlerJ.CaseyD. E.Jr.ColvinM. M.et al (2017). 2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA focused update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American college of Cardiology/American heart Association task force on clinical practice Guidelines and the heart failure Society of America. Circulation136 (6), e137–e161. 10.1161/cir.0000000000000509
82
YinA.YuanR.XiaoQ.ZhangW.XuK.YangX.et al (2022). Exercise-derived peptide protects against pathological cardiac remodeling. EBioMedicine82, 104164. 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104164
83
YuL.CaiS.GuoX. (2024). m6A RNA methylation modification is involved in the disease course of heart failure. Biotechnol. Genet. Eng. Rev.40 (2), 961–975. 10.1080/02648725.2023.2191086
84
ZhangK.WuM.QinX.WenP.WuY.ZhuangJ. (2021). Asporin is a potential promising biomarker for common heart failure. DNA Cell Biol.40 (2), 303–315. 10.1089/dna.2020.5995
85
ZhuY.YangX.ZuY. (2022). Integrated analysis of WGCNA and machine learning identified diagnostic biomarkers in dilated cardiomyopathy with heart failure. Front. Cell Dev. Biol.10, 1089915. 10.3389/fcell.2022.1089915
Summary
Keywords
dilated cardiomyopathy, heart failure, bioinformatics, machine learning models, genes
Citation
Yu Y, Xue C, Ji D, Sheng W, Gao X, Wu X and Wu C (2025) Identification of key genes for heart failure in dilated cardiomyopathy in different populations. Front. Genet. 16:1618390. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2025.1618390
Received
29 April 2025
Accepted
29 September 2025
Published
14 October 2025
Volume
16 - 2025
Edited by
Nitish Kumar Mishra, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, United States
Reviewed by
Ilaria Massaiu, Monzino Cardiology Center (IRCCS), Italy
Zixun Yuan, University of Michigan, United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2025 Yu, Xue, Ji, Sheng, Gao, Wu and Wu.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Xiang Gao, ntgx1964@163.com; Xize Wu, 953935269@qq.com; Chengyan Wu, chengyanwu1999@163.com
† These authors have contributed equally to this work
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.