Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Genet.

Sec. Livestock Genomics

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fgene.2025.1621960

Comparative Genomic Insights into Adaptation, Selection Signatures, and Population Dynamics in Indigenous Indian Sheep and Foreign Breeds

Provisionally accepted
Malarmathi  MuthusamyMalarmathi Muthusamy1Oludayo  Michael AkinsolaOludayo Michael Akinsola1,2Pritam  PalPritam Pal3Chitra  RamasamyChitra Ramasamy1Saravanan  RamasamySaravanan Ramasamy1Abdulraheem  Arome MusaAbdulraheem Arome Musa4*Aranganoor  Kannan ThiruvenkadanAranganoor Kannan Thiruvenkadan5
  • 1Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding, Veterinary College and Research Institute, TANUVAS, Namakkal, India
  • 2Department of Theriogenology and Production, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Jos, Jos, Nigeria
  • 3Animal Genetics and Breeding Division, Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-National Dairy Research Institute (NDRI), Karnal, India
  • 4Research Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), Dummerstorf, Germany
  • 5College of Poultry Production and Management, TANUVAS, Namakkal, India

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

India's indigenous sheep breeds have evolved under extreme and diverse agro-ecological pressures, yet the genomic basis of their resilience and local adaptation remains poorly understood. This study combines genomic inbreeding estimates, runs of homozygosity (ROH), population structure analyses, and composite selection scans to investigate three native Indian breeds-Changthangi, Deccani, and Garole-within a panel of nine breeds that also includes populations from Africa (Ethiopian Menz), East and South Asia (Tibetan, Chinese Merino, Bangladesh Garole, Bangladesh East), and Europe (Suffolk). ROH and heterozygosity estimates revealed strong contrasts: Bangladesh East sheep exhibited high genomic inbreeding (𝐹 𝑅𝑂𝐻 ≈ 14.4%) and low observed heterozygosity (~30.6%), whereas Deccani sheep showed low inbreeding (𝐹 𝑅𝑂𝐻 ≈ 1.1%) and high observed heterozygosity (~35.6%), consistent with broader gene flow and larger flock sizes. Changthangi and Garole showed moderate inbreeding and distinct ROH length profiles. Population structure analyses confirmed ecological clustering and gene flow shaped by geography and husbandry practices: high-altitude breeds clustered together, while directional migration edges traced admixture from European Suffolk into Changthangi and from Chinese Merino into Ethiopian Menz. Historical effective population sizes showed sharp declines in most breeds, especially those under recent selection. Selection scans identified 118 significant genomic regions across breeds. In Changthangi, key pathways included purinergic signaling, thyrotropin-releasing hormone, and autophagy-consistent with cold and hypoxia adaptation. Deccani showed enrichment for immune adhesion and epidermal regeneration, reflecting parasite resistance and heat stress. Garole displayed signals for gap-junction communication and skeletal development, aligned with high fertility and compact stature. These findings reveal ecotypespecific adaptive nature shaped by polygenic selection, gene flow, and demography, offering actionable insights for sustainable smallholder breeding strategies.

Keywords: Indigenous sheep, genomic inbreeding, Runs of homozygosity (ROH), selection signatures, polygenic adaptation, population structure, effective population size, Livestock conservation genetics

Received: 02 May 2025; Accepted: 29 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Muthusamy, Akinsola, Pal, Ramasamy, Ramasamy, Musa and Thiruvenkadan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Abdulraheem Arome Musa, Research Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), Dummerstorf, Germany

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.