CASE REPORT article

Front. Genet., 28 November 2025

Sec. Genetics of Common and Rare Diseases

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2025.1672214

Type 1 Bartter syndrome presenting as primary diabetes insipidus: a rare Case Report with 8-year follow-up

  • 1. Department of Nephrology, Linping Campus of Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

  • 2. Department of Nephrology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

  • 3. Division of Nephrology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

Abstract

Type 1 Bartter syndrome (BS), a rare autosomal recessive salt-losing tubulopathy, classically presents with hyponatremia, hypochloremia, hypokalemic alkalosis, and hyperreninemic hyperaldosteronism. We report a male patient with the atypical presentation of hypernatremia-hyperchloremia, initially misdiagnosed as nephrogenic diabetes insipidus (NDI). Born preterm with antenatal polyhydramnios, he exhibited persistent hypokalemia, polydipsia, and polyuria despite potassium supplementation. Seizures developed at age 9. Genetic testing revealed compound heterozygous SLC12A1 mutations, confirming type 1 BS, while excluding primary NDI (both AVPR2/AQP2 variants were negative). Indomethacin normalized electrolytes and resolved polyuria. Nonadherence to follow-up protocols was observed, including the patient’s unsupervised cessation of indomethacin therapy by the patient at age 14 years. Subsequently, following this unsupervised treatment cessation, he developed focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) with renal insufficiency by age 17, alongside intracranial calcifications. This case underscores the fact that hypernatremia-hyperchloremia in BS presenting as secondary inherited nephrogenic diabetes insipidus (siNDI) may mimic primary NDI, and refractory hypokalemia should prompt evaluation for BS. Long-term BS monitoring is critical, given the potential for secondary complications such as FSGS and renal insufficiency, particularly in the context of treatment nonadherence.

Introduction

Bartter syndrome (BS) is a rare autosomal recessive inherited salt-losing tubulopathy (SLT). BS is classified into five subtypes based on underlying genetic defects, which cause significant variations in clinical manifestations (Konrad et al., 2021). The classical clinical manifestations of both type 1 and type 2 BS include polydipsia, hyponatremia-hypochloremia, hypokalemic metabolic alkalosis, hypercalciuria, and nephrocalcinosis (Konrad et al., 2021; Seyberth and Schlingmann, 2011). In contrast, persistent hypernatremia-hyperchloremia in BS is exceedingly rare. To our knowledge, only six cases with molecular confirmation have been documented in the medical literature to date (Bettinelli et al., 2000; Bockenhauer et al., 2010; Lee et al., 2010; Chuang et al., 2016; Vergine et al., 2018; Ghosh et al., 2016) (Table 2). Nephrogenic diabetes insipidus (NDI) is characterized by the inability of the kidneys to respond to the hormone arginine vasopressin (AVP), leading to the failure of concentrating urine (Kavanagh and Uy, 2019). The development of secondary inherited nephrogenic diabetes insipidus (siNDI) in BS results from a combined failure of the kidney’s concentrating mechanism. The primary defect in BS impairs the creation of a concentrated medullary gradient. Concurrently, the classic BS features of chronic hypokalemia and hypercalciuria directly impair the final step of water reabsorption by downregulating and inhibiting the aquaporin-2 (AQP2) water channels in the collecting duct, rendering it resistant to AVP. Here, we describe a patient with siNDI due to type 1 BS, successfully managed with indomethacin and potassium supplementation. However, the subsequent unsupervised cessation of indomethacin therapy contributed to the development of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) and renal insufficiency, highlighting the critical consequence of suboptimal long-term management.

Case report

A 1-year-old boy visited the outpatient clinic because of vomiting, polydipsia and polyuria, and he was found to have hypernatremia-hyperchloremia and hypokalemia. The patient was born prematurely due to polyhydramnios beginning in the second trimester, with a birth weight of 1,300 g. His parents were healthy and nonconsanguineous. He was hospitalized at a local hospital, where laboratory investigations confirmed hypokalemia (2.83 mmol/L), hypernatremia (162.6 mmol/L), and hyperchloremia (123.2 mmol/L). Treatment with potassium chloride and spironolactone was initiated. However, after discharge, his symptoms did not significantly improve, polyuria persisted (urine volume: 4–5 L/day), and later in childhood, his growth was observed to be within the lower percentiles but followed a stable trajectory, without evidence of severe growth failure. Pubertal development was noted to have begun in early adolescence and appeared to progress normally. His academic performance was consistently poor. Although a formal neuropsychological evaluation was not conducted, the observed academic struggles likely reflect a combination of factors including chronic fatigue from polyuria/polydipsia, school absenteeism for medical appointments, and the potential neurocognitive effects of recurrent electrolyte disturbances. Seizures developed at age 9 years, prompting his visit to our outpatient clinic.

His growth was normal, his blood pressure was 115/55 mmHg, and laboratory tests revealed hypokalemia due to renal potassium wasting, hypernatremia-hyperchloremia, decreased urine osmolality and increased plasma osmolality (Table 1), findings consistent with diabetes insipidus. The 24-h urinary calcium measurement was significantly elevated at 6.21 mmol/24 h, confirming the diagnosis of hypercalciuria. Plasma renin activity and aldosterone levels were markedly elevated. Plasma renin activity was measured by radioimmunoassay. Plasma aldosterone concentration was measured by chemiluminescent immunoassay. A formal water deprivation test was contraindicated due to safety concerns, but the spontaneous biochemical profile was deemed diagnostic. Renal ultrasonography was normal. Although refractory hypokalemia is not a typical feature of primary diabetes insipidus, the presence of hypercalcinuria and hyperreninemic hyperaldosteronism (Table 1) prompted consideration of BS. Therefore, gene sequencing (targeting 98 genes, including SLC12A1, KCNJ1, CLCNKB, BSND, CASR, AQP2, and AVPR2) was performed. Gene sequencing revealed compound heterozygous mutations in SLC12A1: the patient and his mother had a heterozygote deletion in exons 3-8, while the patient and his father carried a heterozygous frameshift mutation (c.2493-2494del, p. R833Ifs*15). These findings confirmed type 1 BS. No mutations were detected in the AVPR2 and AQP2 genes. The combination of genetic findings and the clinical phenotype confirmed a final diagnosis of Type 1 BS with siNDI. Three months after treatment with indomethacin (6.25 mg twice daily) and potassium chloride (3.0 g per day), the patient’s serum sodium and chloride levels gradually normalized, and polydipsia and polyuria significantly improved. However, seizures persisted. The patient demonstrated nonadherence to the follow-up schedule and discontinued indomethacin without medical supervision at age 14 years. He returned for a follow-up visit to our hospital at age 17 years. Laboratory tests revealed hypokalemia and hypernatremia, notably accompanied by the new finding of hypocalcemia (1.98 mmol/L), along with persistent hypercalciuria. The patient also had proteinuria (7685.0 mg/24 h) and a markedly elevated serum creatinine level (214.1 μmol/L) (Table 1). A comparison of laboratory values during successful treatment at age 13 with those after treatment cessation at age 17 illustrates the consequences of nonadherence: well-controlled electrolytes and minimal polyuria gave way to hypernatremia, hypokalemia, and a marked decline in renal function. Renal biopsy was performed, revealing focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) and calcium phosphate deposition (Figure 1). In accordance with the standard of care for proteinuria, an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) was initiated as part of a comprehensive nephroprotective strategy to address the significant proteinuria and counteract the deleterious effects of chronic glomerular hyperfiltration. Additionally, a brain CT scan for seizure evaluation showed intracranial calcifications (Figure 2). The diagnostic and treatment are shown in Figure 3.

TABLE 1

Examination itemAge 9
Initial presentation
Age 13
On treatment
Age 17
Treatment discontinuation
Reference range
Serum biochemistry
  Potassium (mmol/L)2.833.343.163.50∼5.30
  Sodium (mmol/L)162.6146.0148.3137.0∼147.0
  Chloride (mmol/L)123.2103.1108.299.0∼110.0
  Calcium (mmol/L)2.182.181.982.08∼2.60
  Magnesium (mmol/L)0.870.810.850.70∼1.10
  Phosphate (mmol/L)1.271.271.820.85∼1.51
  Albumin (g/L)44.2NA34.935.0–52.0
  Creatinine (μmol/L)91.086.0214.157.0∼97.0
Upright plasma renin (uIU/mL)>500>500>5004.4∼46.1
Upright plasma aldosterone (pg/mL)640303182030.0∼353.0
Plasma osmolality (mOsm/kg H2O)317311309292–310
Urine osmolality (mOsm/kg H2O)139164209181–1,103
Arterial blood gas analysis
  PH value7.447.486NA7.350∼7.450
  Base excess (mmol/L)1.16.2NA−3.0∼3.0
  HCO3− (mmol/L)24.829.732.7322.0∼26.0
  PaCO2 (mmHg)37.139.7NA36.0∼44.0
Urine analysis
  Urine specific gravity1.0051.0051.0051.003∼1.030
24 h urine analysis
  Urine volume(L)4.55.6
  Potassium (mmol)53.1NA91.525.0–100.0
  Sodium (mmol)81NA135.2130.0–260.0
  Chloride (mmol)94.5NA153.9150.0–250.0
Calcium (mmol)6.21NA9.090.25–6.2
Proteinuria (mg/24 h)157.5134.47685.028–141

Comparison of laboratory test results before and after treatment.

FIGURE 1

FIGURE 2

FIGURE 3

Discussion

The pathognomonic features of BS types 1 and 2 comprise polydipsia, hyponatremia-hypochloremia, hypokalemic metabolic alkalosis, hypercalciuria, and nephrocalcinosis. Therefore, hypernatremia-hyperchloremia secondary to BS can lead to misdiagnosis as primary NDI. NDI is characterized by renal unresponsiveness to arginine vasopressin (AVP), which may be hereditary or acquired, resulting in impaired urine concentration (Kavanagh and Uy, 2019). In patients with an early-onset disease and no secondary causes, congenital nephrogenic diabetes insipidus (CNDI)-caused by AVPR2 or AQP2 gene mutations-should be suspected. Clinical presentations of NDI include polyuria, nocturia, polydipsia, large amount of diluted urine, and hypernatremia-hyperchloremia. As hypokalemia is a frequent etiological factor in NDI, persistent refractory hypokalemia in these patients warrants comprehensive diagnostic evaluation to elucidate underlying pathophysiological mechanisms.

Secondary NDI associated with inherited diseases can be misdiagnosed as primary NDI. Therefore, the term “secondary inherited nephrogenic diabetes insipidus” (siNDI) has been suggested (Kleta and Bockenhauer, 2018). The concurrent diagnosis of BS with siNDI remains a rare and clinically challenging entity. To our knowledge, only 6 cases have been documented in the medical literature to date (Bettinelli et al., 2000; Bockenhauer et al., 2010; Lee et al., 2010; Chuang et al., 2016; Vergine et al., 2018; Ghosh et al., 2016) (Table 2): five with SLC12A1 mutations (type 1 BS), one with a KCNJ1 mutation (type 2 BS). Common features include hypokalemia (100%), hypercalciuria/nephrocalcinosis (100%), and hypernatremia (50%). This underscores two critical points: First, hypokalemia in NDI necessitates screening for siNDI, particularly BS, especially if hypercalciuria/nephrocalcinosis coexists. Second, hypernatremia is a frequent clue indicating siNDI in BS patients.

TABLE 2

AuthorGenderAgeClinical manifestation
HypokalemiaHypernatremiaHyperchloremiaHypercalcinuriaNephrocalcinosisMetabolic alkalosisSeizuresFSGSGene
Bettinelli et al. (2000)M20 months++++++--SLC12A1
Bockenhauer et al. (2010)F4 years+NA-+++--KCNJ1
Lee et al. (2010)M21 months+--++NA--SLC12A1
Chuang et al. (2016)M5 years+--+++--SLC12A1
Vergine et al. (2018)M1 year++NA++---SLC12A1
Ghosh et al. (2016)F31 months++NA+++--SLC12A1
LuM1 year++++++++SLC12A1

Basic information of the 6 patients and the present patient.

M, male; F, female; NA, not applicable.

The mechanism of siNDI in Type 1 Bartter syndrome arises from a multifactorial disruption of urinary concentration, rooted in the primary loss of Na + -K + -2Cl- (NKCC2) function (Konrad et al., 2021). This defect not only impairs countercurrent multiplication—thereby diminishing medullary hyperosmolality—but also initiates a predictable sequence of electrolyte disturbances. The ensuing salt-wasting and volume depletion activate the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), leading to hyperaldosteronism. This, combined with increased distal sodium delivery, potently drives potassium secretion in the cortical collecting duct, establishing the profound hypokalemia characteristic of the disorder (Seyberth and Schlingmann, 2011). Concurrently, the NKCC2 defect abolishes the lumen-positive transepithelial voltage, which is critical for paracellular calcium reabsorption in the thick ascending limb, directly resulting in hypercalciuria (Himmerkus et al., 2025). Critically, these two biochemical hallmarks, hypokalemia and hypercalciuria, act synergistically to induce a functional aquaporin-2 (AQP2) deficiency in the collecting duct, which is central to the siNDI phenotype. Hypokalemia directly reduces the total abundance of AQP2 water channels by promoting their autophagic-lysosomal degradation (Khositseth et al., 2015). Simultaneously, hypercalciuria activates the calcium-sensing receptor (CaSR) in the collecting duct, which inhibits adenylate cyclase and suppresses cAMP-dependent AQP2 trafficking to the apical membrane (Procino et al., 2004; Bockenhauer and Bichet, 2015). This “dual-hit” mechanism—wherein one factor depletes the AQP2 protein pool and the other prevents its membrane insertion—completely abrogates renal water conservation. This pathophysiological sequence explains the paradoxical transition from the classic BS presentation of hyponatremia-hypochloremia to the severe water-losing state of hypernatremia-hyperchloremia that defines siNDI.

This case uniquely presents previously undocumented seizures in this specific condition. Seizures are common in patients with electrolyte disturbances, and persistent hypernatraemic dehydration can cause permanent brain damage. Intracranial calcifications represent another potential etiology for seizures onset in the patient. The mechanisms by which intracranial calcifications lead to epilepsy may involve direct cellular dysfunction, genetic/metabolic abnormalities, and secondary changes from associated pathological processes (Monfrini et al., 2023). In our patient, seizures appear to be associated with both severe long-term hypernatremia and extensive intracranial calcifications. The pathophysiological link between NDI and intracranial calcification has been increasingly recognized in clinical observations (Al-Kandari et al., 2008). Bindu et al. reported a pediatric NDI case with intracranial calcifications and white matter alterations presenting mild spastic paraparesis (Bindu and Kovoor, 2007). Intracranial calcifications in NDI may result from repeated hyperosmolar dehydration causing endothelial injury, and hypernatremia can independently contributes to pediatric neurologic injury and brain necrosis (Bindu and Kovoor, 2007). The seizures and intracranial calcifications observed in our patient, coupled with his documented academic struggles, signal significant central nervous system involvement. This case compels us to look beyond renal parameters and strongly advocate for a new standard of care in the long-term follow-up of BS patients. We propose that comprehensive monitoring must include detailed neurological imaging, preferably with MRI, to identify structural abnormalities such as calcifications, and formal quantitative neurocognitive assessment to objectively quantify any developmental delay or cognitive impairment.

The relationship between BS and FSGS is complex and multifactorial. FSGS development has been reported in some patients with BS (Lee et al., 2011). The authors proposed that the chronic renin-angiotensin system (RAS) stimulation may lead to secondary glomerular hyperfiltration. Other risk factors for renal damage in BS include recurrent dehydration episodes, long-term nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) use, and nephrocalcinosis.

The hypocalcemia (1.98 mmol/L) observed at age 17 marks a pivotal shift in calcium homeostasis, signaling advanced Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder (CKD-MBD) (Schmitt and Mehls, 2011). While early-stage BS is characterized by hypercalciuria and nephrocalcinosis, the progression to FSGS and renal insufficiency dramatically altered this balance. The decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) led to hyperphosphatemia, which complexes with calcium, and impaired renal synthesis of active vitamin D, which reduces gut calcium absorption (Wesseling-Perry and Salusky, 2013). These factors, triggering secondary hyperparathyroidism, collectively explain the late-onset hypocalcemia and underscore the severity of his end-stage renal disease.

The management of BS and primary NDI presents a therapeutic conflict. NSAIDs such as indomethacin, improve BS symptoms though prostaglandin inhibition but may exacerbate polyuria in primary NDI. Conversely, thiazides used for NDI can worsen BS-associated hypovolemia. We chose indomethacin monotherapy because we hypothesized that the siNDI in BS is mechanistically distinct from primary NDI. Rather than a fixed genetic defect in water conservation, it is a dynamic, reversible phenotype driven by prostaglandin-mediated hypokalemia and hypercalciuria, which secondarily impair AQP2 function. However, subsequent treatment nonadherence precipitated renal function decline, highlighting the critical importance of long-term monitoring and consistent therapy adherence. Our case demonstrates that secondary FSGS from chronic hyperfiltration requires a management paradigm shift in BS. In line with this, we initiated an ARB at age 17 upon detecting significant proteinuria. We therefore advocate for the proactive use of RAS blockade to reduce proteinuria, mitigate hyperfiltration, and provide ancillary hypokalemia management, which is essential for long-term renal protection.

This case report has several limitations. Cognitive impairment was not formally assessed using quantitative measures (e.g., intelligence quotient testing). Furthermore, post-seizure neuroimaging (e.g., MRI) and electroencephalogram (EEG) were not obtained due to financial and social constraints. Critically, the absence of dedicated neurological MRI and formal neurocognitive assessment precludes a definitive understanding of the impact of chronic electrolyte imbalances on brain development and structure. Furthermore, without baseline quantitative neuropsychological data, we cannot objectively quantify the extent of cognitive impairment or its progression, thereby limiting our ability to fully characterize the long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes in this patient. Future studies must include these comprehensive evaluations to fully elucidate the long-term neurological sequelae in such patients.

In conclusion, type 1 BS presenting with siNDI poses a significant diagnostic challenge, primarily due to its atypical hypernatremia-hyperchloremia. Cardinal features promoting evaluation include persistent refractory hypokalemia, hypercalciuria, and nephrocalcinosis. Therefore, clinicians managing NDI with hypokalemia should actively investigate siNDI. Additionally, long-term BS monitoring is critical, given the potential for secondary complications such as FSGS and renal insufficiency, particularly in the context of treatment nonadherence.

Statements

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Ethics statement

Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s), and minor(s)’ legal guardian/next of kin, for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author contributions

HL: Data curation, Writing – original draft. SL: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Writing – original draft. JS: Writing – original draft. LM: Resources, Supervision, Writing – review and editing.

Funding

The authors declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The authors declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  • 1

    Al-KandariS. R.PandeyT.BadawiM. H. (2008). Intracranial calcification in central diabetes insipidus. Pediatr. Radiol.38 (1), 101103. 10.1007/s00247-007-0608-9

  • 2

    BettinelliA.CiarmatoriS.CesareoL.TedeschiS.RuffaG.AppianiA.et al (2000). Phenotypic variability in Bartter syndrome type I. Pediatr. Nephrol.14 (10-11), 940945. 10.1007/pl00013418

  • 3

    BinduP. S.KovoorJ. M. (2007). Nephrogenic diabetes insipidus: a rare cause of intracranial calcification in children. J. Child. Neurol.22 (11), 13051307. 10.1177/0883073807307087

  • 4

    BockenhauerD.BichetD. G. (2015). Pathophysiology, diagnosis and management of nephrogenic diabetes insipidus. Nat. Reviews Nephrol.11 (10), 576588. 10.1038/nrneph.2015.89

  • 5

    BockenhauerD.HoffW. V. T.DattaniM.LehnhardtA.SubtireluM.HildebrandtF.et al (2010). Secondary nephrogenic diabetes insipidus as a complication of inherited renal diseases. Nephron Physiol.116 (4), p23p29. 10.1159/000320117

  • 6

    ChuangG. T.LinS. H.TsauY. K.TsaiI. J. (2016). A IJT: antenatal Bartter syndrome resembling nephrogenic diabetes insipidus in a 5-year-old boy. J. Formos. Med. Assoc.115 (5), 382383. 10.1016/j.jfma.2015.03.017

  • 7

    GhoshA.SinhaR.MajiB.AkhterS.AgrawalA. (2016). Bartter syndrome type 1 with secondary nephrogenic. Diabetes Insipidus A Case Report.

  • 8

    HimmerkusN.QuintanovaC.BhullarH.van MegenW. H.DeluqueA. L.SkjødtK.et al (2025). Calcium-sensing receptor in the thick ascending limb and renal response to hypercalcemia. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. JASN36 (6), 10281039. 10.1681/ASN.0000000612

  • 9

    KavanaghC.UyN. S. (2019). Nephrogenic diabetes insipidus. Pediatr. Clin. North Am.66 (1), 227234. 10.1016/j.pcl.2018.09.006

  • 10

    KhositsethS.UawithyaP.SomparnP.CharngkaewK.ThippamomN.HoffertJ. D.et al (2015). Autophagic degradation of aquaporin-2 is an early event in hypokalemia-induced nephrogenic diabetes insipidus. Sci. Rep.5, 18311. 10.1038/srep18311

  • 11

    KletaR.BockenhauerD. (2018). Salt-losing tubulopathies in children: what's new, what's controversial?J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.29 (3), 727739. 10.1681/ASN.2017060600

  • 12

    KonradM.NijenhuisT.AricetaG.Bertholet-ThomasA.CaloL. A.CapassoG.et al (2021). Diagnosis and management of Bartter syndrome: executive summary of the consensus and recommendations from the european rare kidney disease reference network working group for tubular disorders. Kidney International99 (2), 324335. 10.1016/j.kint.2020.10.035

  • 13

    LeeE. H.HeoJ. S.LeeH. K.HanK. H.KangH. G.HaI. S.et al (2010). A case of Bartter syndrome type I with atypical presentations. Korean J. Pediatr.53 (8), 809813. 10.3345/kjp.2010.53.8.809

  • 14

    LeeS. E.HanK. H.JungY. H.LeeH. K.KangH. G.MoonK. C.et al (2011). Renal transplantation in a patient with Bartter syndrome and glomerulosclerosis. Korean J. Pediatr.54 (1), 3639. 10.3345/kjp.2011.54.1.36

  • 15

    MonfriniE.ArientiF.RinchettiP.LottiF.RiboldiG. M. (2023). Brain calcifications: genetic, molecular, and clinical aspects. Int. Journal Molecular Sciences, 24.

  • 16

    ProcinoG.CarmosinoM.TammaG.GouraudS.LaeraA.RiccardiD.et al (2004). Extracellular calcium antagonizes forskolin-induced aquaporin 2 trafficking in collecting duct cells. Kidney International66 (6), 22452255. 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.66036.x

  • 17

    SchmittC. P.MehlsO. (2011). Mineral and bone disorders in children with chronic kidney disease. Nat. Reviews Nephrol.7 (11), 624634. 10.1038/nrneph.2011.139

  • 18

    SeyberthH. W.SchlingmannK. P. (2011). Bartter- and Gitelman-like syndromes: salt-losing tubulopathies with loop or DCT defects. Pediatr. Nephrology Berl. Ger.26 (10), 17891802. 10.1007/s00467-011-1871-4

  • 19

    VergineG.FabbriE.PediniA.TedeschiS.BorsaN. (2018). Bartter syndrome type 1 presenting as nephrogenic diabetes insipidus. Case Rep. Pediatr.2018, 9175271. 10.1155/2018/9175271

  • 20

    Wesseling-PerryK.SaluskyI. B. (2013). Phosphate binders, vitamin D and calcimimetics in the management of chronic kidney disease-mineral bone disorders (CKD-MBD) in children. Pediatr. Nephrology Berl. Ger.28 (4), 617625. 10.1007/s00467-012-2381-8

Summary

Keywords

Bartter syndrome, nephrogenic diabetes insipidus, SLC12A1 gene, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, renal insufciency

Citation

Lu H, Liu S, Sun J and Mou L (2025) Type 1 Bartter syndrome presenting as primary diabetes insipidus: a rare Case Report with 8-year follow-up. Front. Genet. 16:1672214. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2025.1672214

Received

24 July 2025

Revised

13 November 2025

Accepted

19 November 2025

Published

28 November 2025

Volume

16 - 2025

Edited by

Enrique Medina-Acosta, State University of Northern Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Reviewed by

Juan Carlo Santos E. Silva, Instituto Todos pela Saúde, Brazil

Vahid Saeedi, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Iran

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Lijun Mou,

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics