Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

CASE REPORT article

Front. Genet., 11 December 2025

Sec. Neurogenomics

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2025.1674158

Case Report: Synergistic effects of an ASXL3 mutation and a 15q11.2 BP1-BP2 microdeletion in a severe neurodevelopmental phenotype

Mingkai Yang,Mingkai Yang1,2Yanfang XiaoYanfang Xiao1Chanjuan ChenChanjuan Chen1Zhou ChuZhou Chu1Guohong Hu,
Guohong Hu1,2*
  • 1Department of Pediatrics, Zhuzhou Clinical College, Jishou University, Zhuzhou, Hunan, China
  • 2Department of Pediatrics, Zhuzhou Central Hospital, Zhuzhou, Hunan, China

Background: Bainbridge–Ropers syndrome (BRPS, OMIM #615485) and the 15q11.2 BP1-BP2 microdeletion syndrome (OMIM #615656) are distinct genetic aetiologies of neurodevelopmental disorder Dual diagnosis of both entities in a single patient is extremely rare, and the underlying synergistic pathogenesis remains poorly understood.

Methods: We report a 7-month-old boy presenting with severe global developmental delay, hypotonia, feeding difficulties, microcephaly and recurrent respiratory infections. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed and a protein–protein-interaction (PPI) network was constructed using the STRING database to aid molecular diagnosis. Clinical management and 7-month outcome are described.

Results: WES identified a de novo nonsense mutation in ASXL3 (c.1094C>G, p. Ser365*) and a 1.22-Mb 15q11.2 microdeletion (BP1-BP2) inherited from the asymptomatic father, establishing a dual diagnosis. The PPI network revealed no direct or high-confidence (>0.4) interactions between ASXL3 and the 15q11.2 BP1-BP2 microdeletion-encoded proteins CYFIP1, NIPA1, NIPA2 or TUBGCP5, indicating convergence at the pathway rather than the complex level.

Conclusion: The 15q11.2 BP1-BP2 microdeletion acts as a genetic modifier that may amplify the phenotypic expression caused by the core mutation in the ASXL3 gene. Haploinsufficiency of CYFIP1, NIPA1, NIPA2, and TUBGCP5 increases neurodevelopmental susceptibility, while the de novo truncating mutation in ASXL3 drives severe epigenetic dysregulation. Together, they precipitate the profound phenotype observed here. This case suggests that multilocus pathogenic variation can generate a blended, severe phenotype and underscores the need to consider polygenic burden plus gene–environment interactions in complex NDD. We proposed a “core mutation - gene regulator - environment” synergy hypothesis model, which is of significant guidance value for genetic counseling and personalized clinical management.

Introduction

Bainbridge–Ropers syndrome (BRPS, OMIM #615485) is a rare autosomal-dominant neurodevelopmental disorder caused by de novo heterozygous mutations in ASXL3. Core features include profound developmental delay, intellectual disability, hypotonia, feeding difficulties, a characteristic facial gestalt and autistic-like behaviours (Siu Xiao et al., 2022) (Table 1).

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Comparison of clinical features between typical Bainbridge-Ropers syndrome, 15q11.2 BP1-BP2 microdeletion syndrome, and the current proband.

The 15q11.2 BP1-BP2 microdeletion syndrome (OMIM #615656) is a distinct genomic disorder encompassing four highly conserved genes—CYFIP1, NIPA1, NIPA2 and TUBGCP5 (Rafi and Butler, 2020). The deletion exhibits incomplete penetrance and variable expressivity; most carriers are clinically asymptomatic, yet the microdeletion is recognised to confer increased susceptibility to neurodevelopmental conditions such as intellectual disability, schizophrenia and epilepsy (Cox and Butler, 2015) (Table 1).

In 2018, Karaca et al. (2018) cited an individual harbouring both an ASXL3 mutation and the 15q11.2 BP1-BP2 microdeletion who manifested a more complex phenotype—developmental delay/intellectual disability, epilepsy, microcephaly, diffuse cortical atrophy and gastro-oesophageal reflux—and presented this case as key support for the “multilocus pathogenic variation” hypothesis. However, no systematic clinical report of such a dual diagnosis has been published. Whether the two lesions functionally interact or simply additively combine remains unresolved.

Here we describe a 7-month-old boy in whom whole-exome sequencing (WES) simultaneously identified a de novo ASXL3 nonsense mutation and the 15q11.2 BP1-BP2 microdeletion. By delineating his severe blended phenotype and reviewing the molecular literature, we explore the potential synergistic interaction between these variants, emphasise the impact of multilocus pathogenic burden and gene–environment interplay in complex neurodevelopmental disorders, and provide practical insights for genetic counselling and clinical management of similarly rare dual diagnoses.

Case information

The proband, a boy aged 7 months and 3 days, was admitted for the ninth time with a 1-day history of cough and 1 h of fever (Figure 1). From the neonatal period he exhibited progressively worsening feeding difficulties and discoordinated swallowing accompanied by severe gastro-oesophageal reflux, necessitating nasogastric tube feeding. Concomitant tracheomalacia (aryepiglottic and soft-palate collapse) caused airway obstruction and retention of secretions, predisposing him to recurrent severe respiratory infections that had already prompted multiple previous hospitalisations.

Figure 1
Timeline chart showing a series of medical events and evaluations. Events include admissions for symptoms like vomiting, cough, and fever, nasogastric tube insertion, genetic testing confirming a deletion, and evaluations such as Bayley-III. Events are plotted at various time intervals, marked by dots.

Figure 1. The main timeline of the proband.

On prenatal and family history, G2P2, cesarean section for scar uterus; birth weight 3.4 kg at 39+3 weeks. Parents non-consanguineous, advanced age (father 42 years, mother 38 years). Mother had ovarian cystectomy, hypothyroidism, gestational diabetes and candidal vaginitis; no regular folic acid. Healthy 16-year-old sister; no family history of neurodevelopmental disorders.

Birth parameters were unremarkable (gestational age 39+3 weeks, birth weight 3,400 g), but subsequent growth indices fell substantially below the norm (Figure 2). At 7 months his weight was 6.67 kg (Z = −2.13), length 68 cm (Z = −0.74), and occipito-frontal circumference 39.7 cm (Z = −3.64, < −3 SD), fulfilling the criteria for microcephaly (A Z-score < -3 SD meets the WHO definition of microcephaly, indicating that the occipito-frontal circumference is more than three standard deviations below the age- and sex-specific mean). At 3 months of age, Gesell Developmental Diagnosis showed a Developmental Quotient (DQ) of 70 in adaptive behavior, 63 in gross motor, 63 in fine motor, 55 in language, and 63 in personal-social skills.

Figure 2
Four pediatric growth charts display WHO standards. Chart a shows head circumference versus age, with z-score -3.64 at 8 months. Chart b plots weight against age, with z-score -2.13 at 8 months. Chart c displays length versus age, with z-score -3.74 at 8 months. Chart d illustrates weight in relation to length, showing a z-score -2.31 at 8 months. Each chart includes lines for median and standard deviations.

Figure 2. At 7 months the infant exhibited generalized growth failure: (a) Head circumference was markedly reduced (Z-score −3.64). (b) Weight was moderately low (Z-score −2.13). (c) Length bordered the lower limit of normal (Z-score −0.74). (d) Weight for length was reduced (Z-score −2.31).

On physical examination, dysmorphic face (broad forehead, hypertelorism, high-arched palate, low-set ears, anteverted nares), mild retractions, inspiratory stridor and bilateral crackles. Neurology: generalized hypotonia, limb strength 4/5, absent knee jerks, no head control, no rolling or eye contact.

Ancillary investigations revealed moderate hydronephrosis and mild transaminase elevation in the neonatal period; perinatal CMV-IgM was positive. At 1 month 30 days, amplitude-integrated EEG (aEEG) was abnormal, showing sporadic low-to medium-amplitude spikes and sharp-and-slow waves over the right central region during wakefulness. Non-contrast brain MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) disclosed no structural or restricted-diffusion lesions. No clinical seizures had been observed by 7 months of age.

Genetic analyses

Methods: With parental informed consent, peripheral blood samples (2 mL) were collected from the proband and both parents for trio-based whole-exome sequencing (WES). Genomic DNA extracted from peripheral blood was fragmented and used for library preparation. Target enrichment of exonic regions and flanking splice sites was performed using the Roche KAPA HyperExome kit. Sequencing was carried out on the MGISEQ-2000 or DNBSEQ-T7 platform. Quality control metrics: mean target depth ≥200×, with >98.5% of target bases covered at ≥20×. Reads were aligned to the UCSC hg19 reference genome using BWA. Duplicate reads were removed. SNVs and indels were called using GATK after base quality recalibration. CNVs were detected at the exon level using ExomeDepth. Variant annotation and filtering were performed based on the patient’s clinical phenotype, population databases, and predictive tools. Variant pathogenicity was classified according to the ACMG/AMP guidelines.

1. A de novo nonsense mutation in ASXL3: A heterozygous nonsense mutation in ASXL3 (chr18:31,318,462; c.1094C>G, p. Ser365*) was identified and confirmed by Sanger sequencing; the variant was absent in both parents (Figure 3), consistent with a de novo origin. With a population frequency of 0 and fulfilling ACMG criteria (PVS1 + PS2 + PM2), it is classified as pathogenic and fully explains the clinical diagnosis of Bainbridge–Ropers syndrome.

2. 15q11.2 microdeletion: an ∼1.22-Mb loss at chr15:22,382 472–23 604,356 (BP1-BP2) inherited from the asymptomatic father. The segment is a ClinGen-level 3 dosage-sensitive region (HI:3) encompassing TUBGCP5, CYFIP1, NIPA1 and NIPA2. This deletion is a recognised susceptibility locus for neurodevelopmental impairment (intellectual disability, language delay, ASD) and is classified as pathogenic on in the context of this patient’s dual diagnosis the basis of increased risk and phenotypic fit.

3. Additional variants: LPIN1 (NM_145693.2:c.2162dupA) and TMEM63A (NM_014698.2:c.1571G>C) were rated VUS. LPIN1 is predicted likely pathogenic (PVS1 + PM2) and TMEM63A VUS (PM2 + PP3); however, both are heterozygous, incompatible with the patient’s phenotype, and their associated disorders (acute myoglobinuria, leukodystrophy) are not represented. They are therefore considered secondary findings.

Figure 3
DNA sequencing chromatograms for three individuals: (a) Proband, (b) Father, and (c) Mother. Each chromatogram displays color-coded peaks representing nucleotide sequences. The sequences identify specific genetic markers, with the proband's sequence highlighted and an arrow indicating a variation point.

Figure 3. Sanger sequencing of the ASXL3 variant in the patient and his parents. (a) The ASXL3 variant (NM_030632.1: c.1094C>G, p. Ser365*) at chr18:31 318 462 is detected in the patient, The variant sites are marked with arrows in the figure. (b) The variant is absent in the father. (c) The variant is absent in the monther (wild-type sequence on the reverse-complementary strand; the actual genomic sequence is identical to the father).

Protein–protein interaction analysis

ASXL3, TUBGCP5, CYFIP1, NIPA1 and NIPA2 were queried in the STRING database (confidence threshold >0.4). As illustrated in Figure 4, no direct or high-confidence interactions were detected between the nuclear epigenetic regulator ASXL3 and the predominantly cytoplasmic/membrane proteins encoded within the 15q11.2 region, indicating that synergism is mediated at the pathway level rather than through shared physical complexes.

Figure 4
A protein interaction network diagram with nodes representing proteins and edges illustrating protein associations. Nodes are color-coded: red for query proteins, green, blue, and yellow for interactors. Node content signifies known or unknown 3D structures. Edges denote known interactions from databases (blue) or experiments (pink), and predicted interactions such as gene neighborhood (green), gene fusions (red), and gene co-occurrence (blue). Other methods include text mining (yellow), co-expression (black), and protein homology (purple). Descriptive panels explain node and edge meanings.

Figure 4. Analysis with the STRING database (https://string-db.org) confirmed the absence of any experimentally validated or high-confidence predicted protein–protein interactions (PPIs) among ASXL3 and the 15q11.2 BP1-BP2-encoded proteins TUBGCP5, CYFIP1, and NIPA1/NIPA2.

Long-term management and prognosis

A personalised, multidisciplinary care plan was established for the patient’s severe neurodevelopmental delay, feeding difficulties, EEG abnormalities and recurrent infections; the regimen will be adjusted as the child grows.

Neurodevelopmental delay

Intensive, individualised physiotherapy, occupational therapy and speech-language intervention are ongoing. At 7 months the infant still cannot hold his head steady, roll over or fixate, indicating minimal response to date. Outcome remains guarded; formal scales (Gesell/Bayley-III) will be repeated every 6–12 months to recalibrate goals.

Feeding difficulty and gastro-oesophageal reflux

A multidisciplinary team (paediatric gastroenterology, nutrition, rehabilitation) supervises swallowing rehabilitation and nutritional optimisation; nasogastric feeding is still required. If aspiration persists despite thickened feeds and proton-pump inhibition, we will reassess for gastrostomy ± fundoplication to reduce recurrent pneumonias.

Recurrent infections

When planning the next hospitalization, we will complete the tests for quantitative immunoglobulins, lymphocyte subgroups, and vaccine-specific antibody titers after obtaining the consent of the family members. If deficits are found, prophylactic antibiotics or immunomodulation (IVIG/SCIG) will be considered, together with strict adherence to the routine and additional (influenza, pneumococcal, COVID-19, RSV monoclonal) vaccination schedule.

EEG abnormality

Current tracing shows rare right-central spikes below the anticonvulsant threshold; therefore no medication is started. Repeat EEG is scheduled every 6 months and parents have been trained to recognise possible seizures.

Future directions

The family will be followed in our neurogenetics clinic with annual multidisciplinary review. We will monitor emerging literature on BRPS and 15q11.2 BP1-BP2-related therapies and consider enrolment in relevant trials to explore potential therapeutic options.

Discussion

We report an infant with profound neurodevelopmental impairment in whom trio-based WES simultaneously uncovered a pathogenic, de novo ASXL3 nonsense mutation and a hemizygous 15q11.2 BP1-BP2 microdeletion. This rare “dual diagnosis” is not a simple additive combination of two independent entities; rather, it might be suggesting how a fully penetrant “core” variant and an incompletely penetrant “modifier” allele interact to generate a severe blended phenotype (Posey et al., 2017). The findings may furnish in-vivo evidence for the multilocus pathogenic variation hypothesis, implying that cumulative genetic burden can yield a phenotype markedly more severe than that produced by either lesion alone (Karaca et al., 2018).

The disease caused by ASXL3 mutation is called Bainbridge–Ropers syndrome—also known as ASXL3-related disorder—it is an autosomal dominant genetic disorder caused by a mutation in the ASXL3 gene at the 18q12.1 region. BRPS is characterised by speech delay, intellectual disability, behavioural anomalies, feeding difficulty, hypotonia, dysmorphism, strabismus and epilepsy (Wang et al., 2022); the patient’s severe feeding problems, hypotonia and global developmental failure map precisely onto this phenotype, establishing ASXL3 loss-of-function as the primary pathogenic driver.

Superimposed on core ASXL3 mutation is a 1.22-Mb microdeletion at 15q11.2 BP1-BP2 inherited from the asymptomatic father. This copy-number variant could impair a dosage-sensitive interval (HI:3) that defines Burnside-Butler syndrome and is associated with developmental/language delay, ear/palate malformations, memory and literacy deficits (VIQ ≤75), abnormal neuro-imaging, epilepsy, ASD, ADHD, psychosis and motor delay (Butler, 2023). As Cox and Butler (2015) emphasised, this deletion constitutes a low-penetrance susceptibility locus with incomplete penetrance and variable expressivity: 51% of clinically affected carriers inherit the copy-number variant from a phenotypically normal parent, indicating that most individuals possess genetic or environmental buffering capacity that compensates for haplo-insufficiency. However, when additional factors—such as polygenic variants that reduce buffering capacity or adverse environmental exposures—are present, both penetrance and expressivity may shift accordingly (Kingdom and Wright, 2022).

Genotype-phenotype relationships are not simple one-to-one correspondences but are driven by a complex interplay of layered and interdependent gene-environment interactions (Eberhart et al., 2017). Although their individual contributions cannot be quantified in a single case, it is reasonable to postulate that environmental factors—including advanced parental age, maternal metabolic conditions such as gestational diabetes and hypothyroidism, and a potentially adverse intrauterine inflammatory milieu—may also have exacerbated the phenotypic severity.

Thus, we propose a hypothetical “core-mutation–genetic-modifier–environment” synergistic model: the de novo ASXL3 truncation serves as the “core hit,” the 15q11.2 BP1-BP2 microdeletion may act as a “genetic modifier” that potentially amplifies the phenotype, and a sub-optimal intrauterine environment constitutes the “third strike.” This synergistic combination may contribute to epigenetic dysregulation based on the known function of ASXL3, consistent with gene-environment interaction paradigms (Beames and Lipinski, 2020). The clinical validity of this model is supported by persistent developmental milestone delays at 2 months of age and prominent developmental regression—such as the inability to maintain head control, roll over, or establish eye contact by 7 months. This finding may suggest that neurological function continues to decline progressively despite ongoing rehabilitation interventions and long-term management.

ASXL3 is highly expressed in human white matter, insula, cingulate gyrus and amygdala (Wu and Cong, 2021). The p. Ser365* nonsense allele creates a truncated protein that can no longer scaffold BAP1 to chromatin (Lichtig et al., 2020). BAP1 is the catalytic sub-unit of the PR-DUB complex that removes ubiquitin from H2AK119; its displacement therefore is predicted to leave H2AK119ub1 enriched at bivalent promoters (Figure 5). Persistent H2AK119ub1 recruits PRC1-mediated silencers, condenses chromatin and inappropriately locks neurogenesis-, differentiation- and synaptic-plasticity-related genes into transcriptional repression (Zhang et al., 2025). Based on the preclinical studies on the loss of ASXL3 function, it can be inferred that the global genomic aberration patterns of these loci may lead to the early-onset and global developmental failure characteristics of Bainbridge-Ropers syndrome.

Figure 5
Flowchart illustrating the interaction between PR-DUB (BAP1) and PRC1 in gene regulation. PR-DUB detaches from chromatin due to ASXL3 gene mutation. PRC1 function is inhibited by negative feedback, impacting H2AK119ub1, which is involved in catalytic ubiquitination modification. This alteration affects the gene promoter region by erasing silencing signals through the hydrolysis of ubiquitin chains.

Figure 5. Schematic of how truncating mutations in ASXL3 disrupts gene expression.

The 1.22 Mb 15q11.2 BP1-BP2 microdeletion removes four highly conserved, dosage-sensitive genes whose products converge on neurodevelopmental “execution” pathways.

CYFIP1 binds FMRP and eIF4E to cap-dependent mRNAs, transiently repressing their translation; it also transmits RAC1-GTP signals to the WAVE-regulatory complex, driving Arp2/3-mediated actin polymerisation. Haplo-insufficiency reduces dendritic-spine density, shortens spine necks and destabilises activity-dependent structural plasticity (Ne et al., 2020; Yan et al., 2016).

NIPA1/NIPA2 integral membrane proteins mediate Mg2+ influx at synapses and in the distal nephron. Loss-of-function alleles cause ER retention of the transporter, trigger unfolded-protein-response-mediated apoptosis, and downregulate BMP signalling necessary for axonal maintenance (Fang et al., 2023; Zhang et al., 2025). Reduced extracellular Mg2+ further disinhibits NMDA receptors, heightening excitotoxic vulnerability.

TUBGCP5 nucleates γ-tubulin ring complexes on centrosomes and is essential for symmetric division of neural progenitors. Haplo-insufficiency prolongs G2/M transition, decreases the neuronal precursor pool and impairs radial-glial scaffold orientation, compounding the neurogenesis defect already imposed by ASXL3-mediated epigenetic repression (Maver et al., 2019; Rafi and Butler, 2020).

Although PPI analysis revealed no direct physical interaction, the ASXL3 truncating mutation and the 15q11.2 BP1-BP2 microdeletion may exert their effects through functionally convergent pathways in neurodevelopment. We propose that their synergistic action on convergent neurodevelopmental pathways may potentially underlie the patient’s severe phenotype based on the known functions of the involved genes.

The novel truncating mutation of ASXL3 may contribute to extensive transcriptional dysregulation by affecting the expression of key genes involved in neural development, neurogenesis, differentiation and synaptic function; the 15q11.2 BP1-BP2 microdeletion interferes with cytoskeletal dynamics, local protein translation and ionic homeostasis, and disrupts the critical “executive system”. This dual insult—epigenetic mis-regulation upstream and failure of cytoskeletal and homeostatic processes downstream—could try to explain the global neurological collapse.

The proband’s congenital CMV infection, together with nine hospital admissions for acute respiratory infections between birth and 7 months—each characterized by poor response and prolonged course—constitutes one of the classic warning signs of primary immunodeficiency (PID). This pattern strongly suggests a possible underlying, inborn defect in immune defence that prevents effective clearance of common respiratory pathogens. Likely a major contributing factor of the patient’s recurrent infections is the severe neurodevelopmental impairment—hypotonia and discoordinated swallowing—that produces feeding difficulties and persistent gastro-esophageal reflux, thereby greatly increasing the risk of aspiration pneumonia. However, a multi-factorial overlay is likely: because actin-cytoskeletal remodelling underlies chemotaxis, phagocytosis and migration in neutrophils and macrophages, CYFIP1 haplo-insufficiency may compromise these basic immune-cell functions by disturbing cytoskeletal dynamics (Rafi and Butler, 2020; Ronzier et al., 2022). We hypothesize that, given the clinical correlation between these variants and the phenotypic features, secondary aspiration (possibly related to ASXL3 mutations) and primary immune dysregulation (mediated by the 15q11.2 BP1-BP2 microdeletion) are pathogenically linked. Based on this hypothesis, we propose that their combined effect may account for the extremely severe respiratory infection phenotype observed in this infant. Functional studies (e.g., neutrophil chemotaxis assays) will be required to confirm this assumption in the future.

Although the “core-mutation–genetic-modifier–environment” model provides a compelling framework for the proband’s severe phenotype, several limitations must be acknowledged. First, the proposed synergistic pathogenesis, while consistent with the clinical severity, remains a mechanistic hypothesis. The precise molecular crosstalk among the disrupted pathways—epigenetic regulation, cytoskeletal dynamics, and ion homeostasis—is inferred from established literature rather than demonstrated in this patient.

Second, direct experimental evidence is lacking. Most notably, the assertion of ASXL3-mediated epigenetic dysregulation is based on protein function; no genome-wide profiling (e.g., ChIP-seq for H2AK119ub1) was performed to confirm widespread chromatin perturbation.

Third, with only a single reported case, we cannot determine whether this combination represents a recurrent pathogenic entity or a rare coincidence. The incomplete assessment of gene-environment interactions also precludes definitive conclusions about the contribution of adverse prenatal factors.

Therefore, our model should be viewed as hypothesis-generating. Future work should include functional assays in patient-derived neurons and expanded cohort screening to statistically validate this synergy and establish its clinical generalizability.

Conclusion

We describe a single infant with a dual molecular diagnosis of Bainbridge–Ropers syndrome and the 15q11.2 BP1-BP2 microdeletion whose severe, early-onset neurodevelopmental failure exceeds the expected spectrum of either lesion alone. Our hypothetical “core-mutation–genetic-modifier–environment” model—anchored on a de novo ASXL3 truncating allele, a paternally inherited 15q11.2 BP1-BP2 microdeletion, and adverse prenatal factors—provides a testable framework for this exaggerated phenotype, but remains unsupported by direct functional or epigenomic data. With only one patient, we cannot determine whether the observed synergy represents a recurrent pathogenic entity or a rare stochastic coincidence. Large-scale cohorts, patient-derived neuronal models, and murine knock-in/knock-out systems will be required to validate the proposed molecular crosstalk, quantify the contribution of each “hit,” and establish whether this combination constitutes a clinically actionable syndrome rather than an anecdotal coexistence.

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this article are not readily available because of ethical and privacy restrictions. Requests to access the data that support the findings of this study should be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by The Ethics Committee of Zhuzhou Central Hospital. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation in this study was provided by the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin. Written informed consent was obtained from the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author contributions

MY: Writing – original draft. YX: Writing – review and editing. CC: Writing – review and editing. ZC: Writing – review and editing. GH: Writing – review and editing.

Funding

The authors declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The authors declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Balasubramanian, M., Willoughby, J., Fry, A. E., Weber, A., Firth, H. V., Deshpande, C., et al. (2017). Delineating the phenotypic spectrum of Bainbridge-Ropers syndrome: 12 new patients with de novo, heterozygous, loss-of-function mutations in ASXL3 and review of published literature. J. Med. Genet. 54, 537–543. doi:10.1136/jmedgenet-2016-104360

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Beames, T. G., and Lipinski, R. J. (2020). Gene-environment interactions: aligning birth defects research with complex etiology. Development 147, dev191064. doi:10.1242/dev.191064

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Butler, M. G. (2023). Prader-willi syndrome and chromosome 15q11.2 BP1-BP2 region: a review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24, 4271. doi:10.3390/ijms24054271

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cox, D. M., and Butler, M. G. (2015). The 15q11.2 BP1-BP2 microdeletion syndrome: a review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 16, 4068–4082. doi:10.3390/ijms16024068

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Eberhart, J., Lovely, C., Rampersad, M., and Fernandes, Y. (2017). Gene-environment interactions in development and disease. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Dev. Biol. 6, e247. doi:10.1002/wdev.247

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fang, S., Chou, Y., Hsu, K., Hsu, S., Yu, K., Tsai, Y., et al. (2023). Clinical and genetic characterization of NIPA1 mutations in a Taiwanese cohort with hereditary spastic paraplegia. Ann. Clin. Transl. Neurol. 10, 353–362. doi:10.1002/acn3.51724

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Karaca, E., Posey, J. E., Akdemir, Z. C., Pehlivan, D., Harel, T., Jhangiani, S. N., et al. (2018). Phenotypic expansion illuminates multilocus pathogenic variation. Genet. Med. 20, 1528–1537. doi:10.1038/gim.2018.33

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kingdom, R., and Wright, C. F. (2022). Incomplete penetrance and variable expressivity: from clinical studies to population cohorts. Front. Genet. 13, 920390. doi:10.3389/fgene.2022.920390

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lichtig, H., Artamonov, A., Polevoy, H., Reid, C. D., Bielas, S. L., and Frank, D. (2020). Modeling bainbridge-ropers syndrome in Xenopus laevis embryos. Front. Physiol. 11, 75. doi:10.3389/fphys.2020.00075

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ling, S., Zhang, Y., Li, N., Tian, S., Hu, R., Zhang, D., et al. (2024). Four heterozygous de novo variants in ASXL3 identified with Bainbridge–Ropers syndrome and further dissecting published genotype–phenotype spectrum. Front. Neurosci. 18, 1456433. doi:10.3389/fnins.2024.1456433

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Maver, A., Čuturilo, G., Kovanda, A., Miletić, A., and Peterlin, B. (2019). Rare missense TUBGCP5 gene variant in a patient with primary microcephaly. Eur. J. Med. Genet. 62, 103598. doi:10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.12.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ne, C., Kl, T., Ls, W., J, H., and S, T. (2020). FMRP and CYFIP1 at the synapse and their role in psychiatric vulnerability. Complex Psychiatry 6, 5–19. doi:10.1159/000506858

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Posey, J. E., Harel, T., Liu, P., Rosenfeld, J. A., James, R. A., Coban Akdemir, Z. H., et al. (2017). Resolution of disease phenotypes resulting from multilocus genomic variation. N. Engl. J. Med. 376, 21–31. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1516767

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rafi, S. K., and Butler, M. G. (2020). The 15q11.2 BP1-BP2 microdeletion (Burnside-Butler) syndrome: in silico analyses of the four coding genes reveal functional associations with neurodevelopmental phenotypes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 3296. doi:10.3390/ijms21093296

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ronzier, E., Laurenson, A. J., Manickam, R., Liu, S., Saintilma, I. M., Schrock, D. C., et al. (2022). The actin cytoskeleton responds to inflammatory cues and alters macrophage activation. Cells 11, 1806. doi:10.3390/cells11111806

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Siu Xiao, T., Colombari Arce, G., Rojas Marron, A., Benitez, G. A., and Schwanecke, R. (2022). Bainbridge-ropers syndrome in a Texan boy: a case report and review of the literature. Cureus 14, e32902. doi:10.7759/cureus.32902

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Q., Zhang, J., Jiang, N., Xie, J., Yang, J., and Zhao, X. (2022). De novo nonsense variant in ASXL3 in a Chinese girl causing Bainbridge-Ropers syndrome: a case report and review of literature. Mol. Genet. Genomic Med. 10, e1924. doi:10.1002/mgg3.1924

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, K., and Cong, Y. (2021). Case report: a novel ASXL3 gene variant in a Sudanese boy. BMC Pediatr. 21, 557. doi:10.1186/s12887-021-03038-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yan, Z., Kim, E., Datta, D., Lewis, D. A., and Soderling, S. H. (2016). Synaptic actin dysregulation, a convergent mechanism of mental disorders? J. Neuroscience 36, 11411–11417. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2360-16.2016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Y., Xu, K., Zhang, K., Chen, C., and Gu, Y. (2025). Regulation, functions and therapeutic strategies of H2AK119ub1. Biochem. Pharmacol. 240, 117122. doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2025.117122

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: dual molecular diagnosis, ASXL3, 15q11.2 BP1-BP2 microdeletion, multilocus pathogenic variation, neurodevelopmental disorder

Citation: Yang M, Xiao Y, Chen C, Chu Z and Hu G (2025) Case Report: Synergistic effects of an ASXL3 mutation and a 15q11.2 BP1-BP2 microdeletion in a severe neurodevelopmental phenotype. Front. Genet. 16:1674158. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2025.1674158

Received: 27 July 2025; Accepted: 18 November 2025;
Published: 11 December 2025.

Edited by:

Liena Elbaghir Omer Elsayed, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Saudi Arabia

Reviewed by:

Ramachandran Prakasam, Washington University in St. Louis, United States
Nadir Aman, MedGenome Labs Private Limited, India

Copyright © 2025 Yang, Xiao, Chen, Chu and Hu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Guohong Hu, MjkwMTcxMjE5QHFxLmNvbQ==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.