Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

BRIEF RESEARCH REPORT article

Front. Genet.

Sec. ELSI in Science and Genetics

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fgene.2025.1692703

Building capability for clinician-led genomic change: insights from use and nonuse of a theory-informed model for change

Provisionally accepted
Melissa  MartynMelissa Martyn1,2,3*Amy  ClarkeAmy Clarke1,2Trang  DoTrang Do2Belinda  Dawson-McClarenBelinda Dawson-McClaren1,2,3Clara  GaffClara Gaff1,2,3
  • 1Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance, Parkville, Australia
  • 2Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
  • 3The University of Melbourne Department of Paediatrics, Parkville, Australia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Genomics is relevant to the practice of diverse medical specialties. However, integrating genomics into these specialties requires complex interventions to promote adoption by clinicians and organizational (service and hospital) re-design. Clinicians wanting to 'champion' use of genomics rarely have experience in leading complex interventions. A practical evidence-and theory-informed model for change (M4C) designed for clinicians could increase likelihood of success of clinician-led complex practice change interventions. No such model could be identified, so we drew on three existing frameworks which collectively met our selection criteria to develop one. A case study approach was chosen to understand use of the M4C by clinicians leading three clinical change projects across hospitals. Informed by the COM-B system, we provided a toolkit and expert coaching to support use of the M4C. Mixed-methods data was collected: toolkit access; review of expert team notes; evaluation reports; focus groups and interviews. Coaching in all aspects of the M4C was provided, with clinicians particularly valuing coaching in action research and community engagement. Despite theoretical alignment of our strategies to promote adoption of the M4C, only 5/37 team members accessed the toolkit. Although clinicians did not independently engage with the M4C, they did embrace the concepts within it through coaching, with the expert team noting behavior change e.g. in engagement, leading to changes in project implementation. Access to expert support embedded within organizational (hospital) structures is needed to support clinicians to lead the system re-design required to incorporate innovations like genomics in healthcare.

Keywords: Genomics, behavior change, physician, coaching, Qualitative, complex intervention, change

Received: 26 Aug 2025; Accepted: 22 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Martyn, Clarke, Do, Dawson-McClaren and Gaff. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Melissa Martyn, melissa.martyn@mcri.edu.au

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.