Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Genet.

Sec. Genetics of Common and Rare Diseases

This article is part of the Research TopicReviews In Genetics of Common and Rare DiseasesView all articles

Coffin–Lowry Syndrome: A Systematic Review of RPS6KA3 Confirmed Cases and Implications for Diagnosis and Counseling

Provisionally accepted
Sabyasachi  MaitySabyasachi Maity1Miranda  MontionMiranda Montion2Danielle  BootheDanielle Boothe3Mona  AttarpourMona Attarpour4Ivy  MagetoIvy Mageto5Simran  AgarwalSimran Agarwal2Rujul  PatelRujul Patel2Chloe  LarkChloe Lark2Nemesis  Cardona ValentinNemesis Cardona Valentin5Esther  Quinones BudelEsther Quinones Budel5Hafsah  ShireenHafsah Shireen6Bharathi  GadadBharathi Gadad7Nikhilesh  AnandNikhilesh Anand7Anmol  GoyalAnmol Goyal8Jaime  MendozaJaime Mendoza9SHREYA  NAUHRIASHREYA NAUHRIA10Samal  NauhriaSamal Nauhria11*
  • 1Long School of Medicine, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
  • 2Ross University School of Medicine - Barbados Campus, Bridgetown, Barbados
  • 3St Matthews University, Georgetown, Cayman Islands
  • 4Avalon University School of Medicine, Willemstad, Curaçao
  • 5University of Medicine & Health Sciences, Basseterre, Saint Kitts and Nevis
  • 6St George's University, Saint George's, Grenada
  • 7The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley School of Medicine, Edinburg, United States
  • 8RIMT University, Mandi Gobindgarh, India
  • 9San Dimas Community Hospital, San Dimas, United States
  • 10Cayman Islands Red Cross, Georgetown, Cayman Islands
  • 11Civil Service college, Cayman Islands Government, Georgetown, Cayman Islands

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Coffin–Lowry syndrome (CLS) is a rare X-linked disorder caused by pathogenic variants in RPS6KA3, presenting with intellectual disability, distinctive facial and skeletal features, and variable systemic involvement. Advances in genomic technologies have expanded the mutation spectrum, yet genotype phenotype correlations remain incompletely understood. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of published cases (n = 72) following PRISMA guidelines. Demographic, phenotypic, and genotypic data were extracted, standardized, and summarized using descriptive statistics. Associations between mutation type and key clinical features were assessed with Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests. Diagnostic approaches and global distribution were also analyzed. Results: The cohort comprised 50 males (69.4%) and 22 females (30.6%), median age 12 years (range: 1-45). Developmental delay (87.5%) and intellectual disability (66.7%) were the most frequent features, alongside musculoskeletal deformities (kyphoscoliosis 33.3%, pectus anomalies 19.4%) and neurologic involvement (SIDEs 12.5%, seizures 15.3%, spasticity 5.6%). Frameshift variants showed the strongest associations with SIDEs (35%, p = 0.009) and seizures (24%, p = 0.048), while splice-site mutations were linked to spasticity and cardiomyopathy. No consistent clustering of intellectual disability severity by mutation type was observed. Diagnostic methods varied, with most cases confirmed by sequencing approaches (e.g., Sanger, WES, NGS panels), supplemented by array-based CNV detection. Geographically, cases were reported across Asia, Europe, and North America, with the largest clusters from China (14), USA (14), and Japan (9). Conclusions: This systematic review highlights recurrent neurodevelopmental, neurologic, and skeletal phenotypes in CLS and delineates mutation-specific risks, particularly for SIDEs and seizures. The findings emphasize the value of comprehensive genomic testing, raise awareness of maternal germline mosaicism, and underscore the utility of reproductive technologies such as PGT-A/M for at-risk families. Beyond clinical and research implications, this work provides an accessible reference for affected families seeking clearer prognostic insights.

Keywords: Coffin–Lowry syndrome1, RPS6KA32, X-linked intellectual disability3, Neurodevelopmental Disorders4, Genomic diagnosis5, preimplantation genetic testing

Received: 29 Sep 2025; Accepted: 24 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Maity, Montion, Boothe, Attarpour, Mageto, Agarwal, Patel, Lark, Cardona Valentin, Budel, Shireen, Gadad, Anand, Goyal, Mendoza, NAUHRIA and Nauhria. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Samal Nauhria

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.