Abstract
Introduction:
Violence is a major global public health issue that threatens the physical and mental health of victims. Of particular concern is the increasing evidence which suggests that violence is strongly associated with suicidal behavior including ideation.
Methods:
This study uses data from the 2015 Violence Against Children Survey (VACS). This study seeks to highlight the relationship between lifetime violence and suicidal ideation using a nationally representative sample of 1,795 young women (18–24 years) in Uganda.
Results:
Results indicate that respondents who experienced lifetime sexual violence (aOR = 1.726; 95%CI = 1.304–2.287), physical violence (aOR = 1.930; 95%CI = 1.293–2.882) or emotional violence (aOR = 2.623; 95%CI = 1.988–3.459) were more likely to experience suicidal ideation. Respondents who were not married (aOR = 1.607; 95%CI = 1.040–2.484), not having too much trust with community members (aOR = 1.542; 95%CI = 1.024–2.320) or not having a close relationship with biological parents (aOR = 1.614; 95%CI = 1.230–2.119) were more likely to experience suicidal ideation. Respondents who did not engage in work in the past 12 months prior to the survey (aOR = 0.629; 95%CI = 0.433–0.913) were less likely to experience suicidal ideation.
Conclusion:
The results can be used to inform policy and programming and for integration of mental health and psychosocial support in programming for prevention and response to violence against young women.
Background
Violence is a major global public health issue that threatens the physical and mental health of victims (). Every year, 1 billion children are affected by a range of forms of violence including physical, sexual and emotional violence (). Childhood violence is associated with lifelong impact on the individual including increased risk of injury, infectious diseases, mental health problems, reproductive health problems, and non-communicable diseases, as well as damage to the body's nervous, endocrine, circulatory, musculoskeletal, reproductive, respiratory, and immune systems ().
Studies have established that childhood violence potentially has adverse effects on the mental wellbeing of victims (, ). Of particular concern is the increasing evidence which suggests that violence is strongly associated with suicidal behavior including ideation (, ). Suicidal behavior is a global public health problem that affects 700,000 people annually (). In 2019, 1.3% of all deaths were by suicide and 77% of these were in low-and-middle income countries (LMIC) (). Suicide is the leading cause of death among the population aged 15 to 24 years old globally (). In Uganda studies on suicide among young people are based on community, clinical and school samples. The prevalence of suicidal ideation was 6.3% in a sample of university students (); another study found that the prevalence of suicidal ideation among adolescents was as high as 30.6% (). Among the refugees hosted in Uganda, the prevalence of suicidal ideation is 5% (). A range of factors are associated with suicidal ideation including financial difficulties (), family breakdown or conflicts (), and trauma (), unemployment ().
A recent systematic review and meta-analysis found that sexual abuse, physical abuse, emotional abuse, emotional neglect, physical neglect, and combined abuse were significantly associated with higher rates of suicide attempts (). Moreover, young women in Uganda have been observed to experience violence more than their male counterparts (). Yet, there is limited research on the effect of violence on suicidal ideation among vulnerable young women in developing countries (). This study therefore seeks to highlight the relationship between lifetime violence and suicidal ideation among young women (18–24 years) in Uganda, using a nationally representative dataset. While the main focus is to highlight the relationship between lifetime violence and suicidal ideation, the analysis also controlled for other key variables to see how the effect changes. We focus on young women (18–24 years) because it is the age group that responded to questions on lifetime violence (ever experienced any form of violence). We focus on suicidal ideation because it is more common than attempted or completed suicide (). Moreover, suicidal ideation is often a precursor to attempted or completed suicide (–). The results from such analyses can help design strategic and integrated programs that address the risks that occur simultaneously, related to violence and suicidal ideation among vulnerable women.
Data and methods
Source of data
This study uses data from the 2015 Violence Against Children Survey (VACS). We use the 2015 survey data because it is the latest publicly available nationally representative dataset. The VACS is a nationally representative cross-sectional population-based household survey that targeted adolescents and young people in the age group 13–24. Information from respondents that were aged 18–24 years was used to compute lifetime violence. For the purpose of this study, the analyses are restricted to only female respondents that were aged 18–24 years at the time of the survey.
Sample size, sampling and data collection
The sample included in the analyses is 1,795 female respondents aged 18–24 years. A three-stage cluster sampling design was employed. The first stage involved selecting primary sampling units which were used as a sampling frame. The second stage of sampling involved listing all households in the selected primary sampling unit. Twenty-five households were selected from each sampling unit using probability systematic sampling method. The third stage involved randomly selecting an individual for interview from the selected household. A split sampling approach was used to select female and male respondents. This was intended to protect the confidentiality of respondents and eliminate the chance of the perpetrator and the one sexually assaulted being both interviewed. Data were collected using a face-to-face structured questionnaire programmed on a tablet by well-trained interviewers. Interviewers were trained on the research protocol procedures and ethics in research. During data collection, same-sex interviews were conducted: where female interviewers interviewed female respondents and male interviewers interviewed male respondents ().
Research ethics
The Makerere University College of Health Sciences ethics review committee and The Uganda National Council for Science and Technology and the Centre for Disease Control (CDC) Institutional Review Board independently reviewed and provided approval to conduct the study. All respondents provided informed consent to participate in the study. However, the data used in this study is publicly available and approval was not required for its re-use.
Measurement of variables
Dependent variable
Measurement of suicidal ideation was measured using the question: “Have you ever thought about killing yourself?”. Response options for the question were “yes” or “no”.
Independent variables
Table 1 summarizes the independent variables and measures included in this study.
Table 1
| Variables | Measures |
|---|---|
| Sexual violence | Experience of unwanted sexual touching (fondling, pinching, grabbing, or touching on or around your sexual body parts, attempted unwanted sexual intercourse (perpetrator attempted intercourse through harassment, threats, and trick but penetration did not occur), pressured intercourse (unwanted sex was completed through use of threats or non-physical pressure), or physically forced sex (unwanted intercourse completed through physical force). Respondents who experienced any of these events were categorized as having experienced lifetime sexual violence, otherwise no. |
| Physical violence | Experience of being punched, kicked, whipped, or beaten with an object, choked, suffocated, tried to drown, or burned intentionally or used or threatened with knife, gun or other weapon on them. Respondents who experienced any of these events were categorized as having experienced lifetime physical violence, otherwise no. |
| Emotional violence | Experience of being told that you were not loved, or did not deserve to be loved, being told that they wished you had never been born or were dead or ridiculed or put down. Respondents who experienced any of these events were categorized as having experienced lifetime emotional violence, otherwise no. |
| Highest level of education | Less than primary, primary, secondary, higher than secondary, not stated |
| Religion | Catholic, Protestant, Muslim, Pentecostal, Seventh Day Adventist, other |
| Orphan status | Not orphaned, one parent dead, both parents dead |
| Engaged in work in the last 12 months | Yes, no, not stated |
| How much the respondent talked to their friends | A lot, a little, not very much, not at all, not stated |
| Current marital status | Currently married, not currently married, not stated |
| Justified gender-based physical violence (whether it is right for a man to hit his wife) | If she goes out without telling him, if she does not take care of the children, if she argues with him, if she refuses to have sex with him, if she burns the food. A response to each of this is yes, no, or not stated. Respondents who answered yes to any of the statements were categorized as having justified physical violence, otherwise no. |
| Trust people living in your community | A lot, some, not too much, not at all, not stated |
| Nature of the relationship with biological parents | Close relationship, no relationship, not stated |
Independent variables and measures.
Data analysis
Data analysis was performed using the Stata software version 15 (). Three models were run. The first model (Model 1) only controlled for violence (sexual, physical, and emotional) on suicidal ideation. The second model (Model 2) generated unadjusted odds ratios for all variables included in the study. Model 3 generated adjusted odds ratios for all variables included in the study.
Results
Characteristics of respondents
Table 2 shows the characteristics of young women (18–24 years). About four out of every ten respondents (45.6%) had primary level of education. Most respondents (37.1%) were Catholic. Slightly more than half of the respondents (52.8%) had engaged in work in the past 12 months prior to the survey or were currently married at the time of the survey (53.5%). Table 2 shows that 56.5% of respondents justified violence (husbands physically abusing their partners). About sixty-five percent of respondents reported to have a close relationship with their biological parents.
Table 2
| Variable | Frequency | Percent | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Highest level of education | |||
| Less than primary | 84 | 4.7 | 3.2–6.8 |
| Primary | 818 | 45.6 | 40.0–51.2 |
| Secondary | 463 | 25.8 | 21.7–30.3 |
| Higher than secondary | 65 | 3.6 | 2.2–5.9 |
| Not stated | 364 | 20.3 | 16.9–24.2 |
| Religion | |||
| Catholic | 667 | 37.1 | 31.5–43.2 |
| Protestant | 568 | 31.6 | 27.0–36.7 |
| Muslim | 249 | 13.9 | 10.0–19.0 |
| Pentecostal | 257 | 14.3 | 10.5–19.2 |
| Seventh Day Adventist | 52 | 2.9 | 0.9–8.7 |
| Other | 3 | 0.2 | 0.0–0.8 |
| Orphan status | |||
| Not orphan | 681 | 38.0 | 34.0–42.1 |
| One parent died | 70 | 3.9 | 2.6–5.8 |
| Both parents died | 2 | 0.1 | 0.0–0.4 |
| Not stated | 1042 | 58.1 | 53.6–62.4 |
| Engaged in work (past 12 months) | |||
| Yes | 948 | 52.8 | 47.6–58.0 |
| No | 425 | 23.7 | 18.7–29.5 |
| Not stated | 422 | 23.5 | 19.3–28.3 |
| Talk to friends | |||
| A lot | 359 | 20.0 | 16.7–23.8 |
| A little | 637 | 35.5 | 31.3–39.9 |
| Not very much | 467 | 26.0 | 21.9–30.6 |
| Not at all | 328 | 18.3 | 14.6–22.6 |
| Not stated | 3 | 0.2 | 0.0–1.0 |
| Current marital status | |||
| Currently married | 960 | 53.5 | 48.0–58.9 |
| Not currently married | 153 | 8.5 | 6.4–11.2 |
| Not stated | 682 | 38.0 | 32.2–44.1 |
| Justification of physical violence | |||
| Yes | 1,014 | 56.5 | 51.1–61.7 |
| No | 747 | 41.6 | 36.7–46.7 |
| Not stated | 34 | 1.9 | 1.0–3.6 |
| Trust community members | |||
| A lot | 278 | 15.5 | 11.9–19.9 |
| Some | 464 | 25.8 | 21.9–30.2 |
| Not too much | 652 | 36.3 | 32.7–40.1 |
| Not at all | 393 | 21.9 | 18.2–26.0 |
| Not stated | 9 | 0.5 | 0.2–1.6 |
| Relationship to biological parents | |||
| Close relationship | 1,171 | 65.2 | 61.0–69.2 |
| No close relationship | 509 | 28.4 | 24.8–32.2 |
| Not stated | 115 | 6.4 | 4.7–8.8 |
| Total | 1,795 | 100 | |
Distribution of respondents.
CI, Confidence Interval.
Experience of lifetime violence among young women (18-24 years)
Overall, 72.1% of respondents reported to have experienced physical violence. Slightly more than half (52.0%) of respondents experienced sexual violence and 42.6% reported to have experienced emotional violence. Figure 1 shows that experience of violence (sexual, physical, or emotional) was associated with experience of suicidal ideation. Respondents who experienced sexual violence (22.63% vs. 9.4%), physical violence (19.2% vs. 10.5%) or emotional violence (27.5% vs. 8.1%) were more likely to report higher rates of lifetime suicidal ideation than respondents who did not experience such violence The results in Figure 1 show that suicidal ideation was observed more among respondents who experienced emotional violence (27.5%) compared to other forms of violence: sexual (22.6%) or physical (19.2%).
Figure 1
Factors associated with suicidal ideation
The results in Table 3 show results from a model (Model 1) that controlled for only sexual, physical, and emotional violence. The results indicate that sexual (OR = 1.959; 95%CI = 1.492–2.575), physical (OR = 1.842; 95%CI = 1.238–2.741), and emotional violence (OR = 3.054; 95%CI = 2.328–4.007) were all significantly associated with suicidal ideation. This means that respondents who experienced lifetime sexual, physical, or emotional violence were more likely to experience suicidal ideation than respondents who did not experience any lifetime violence. However, the results indicate that the risk of experiencing suicidal ideation is higher among respondents who experienced emotional violence than other forms of violence (sexual and physical).
Table 3
| Variable | Unadjusted odds (95%CI) |
|---|---|
| Sexual violence (RC = No) | |
| Yes | 1.959 (1.492–2.575)*** |
| Physical violence (RC = No) | |
| Yes | 1.842 (1.238–2.741)** |
| Emotional violence (RC = No) | |
| Yes | 3.054 (2.328–4.007)*** |
The relationship between lifetime violence and suicidal ideation (model 1).
= p < 0.01.
= p < 0.001.
RC, Reference categories.
Table 4 shows results from Model 2 (unadjusted odds) and Model 3 (adjusted odds). The results from Model 2 and Model 3 point to the same pattern and direction. After controlling for all background variables (adjusted odds) in the model (Model 3) other than those that measure violence, the results indicate that respondents who experienced lifetime sexual violence (aOR = 1.726; 95%CI = 1.304–2.287), physical violence (aOR = 1.930; 95%CI = 1.293–2.882) or emotional violence (aOR = 2.623; 95%CI = 1.988–3.459) were more likely to experience suicidal ideation than respondents who did not experience sexual, physical or emotional violence.
Table 4
| Variable | Unadjusted odds (95%CI) | Adjusted odds (95%CI) |
|---|---|---|
| Model 2 | Model 3 | |
| Sexual violence (RC = No) | ||
| Yes | 1.959 (1.492–2.575)*** | 1.726 (1.304–2.287)*** |
| Physical violence (RC = No) | ||
| Yes | 1.842 (1.238–2.741)** | 1.930 (1.293–2.882)** |
| Emotional violence (RC = No) | ||
| Yes | 3.054 (2.328–4.007)*** | 2.623 (1.988–3.459)*** |
| Highest level of education (RC = Less than Primary) | ||
| Primary | 1.052 (0.635–1.746) | 1.257 (0.748–2.111) |
| Secondary | 1.150 (0.676–1.959) | 1.234 (0.712–2.136) |
| Higher than secondary | 1.541 (0.747–3.177) | 2.118 (0.985–4.553) |
| Not stated | 0.703 (0.396–1.249) | 0.802 (0.439–1.468) |
| Religion (RC = Catholic) | ||
| Protestant | 1.102 (0.832–1.462) | 1.111 (0.833–1.482) |
| Muslim | 0.769 (0.479–1.235) | 0.656 (0.398–1.079) |
| Pentecostal | 1.165 (0.808–1.679) | 1.102 (0.759–1.602) |
| SDA | 1.556 (0.684–3.540) | 1.721 (0.741–3.994) |
| Other | 2.171 (0.533–8.841) | 2.073 (0.490–8.770) |
| Orphan status (RC = Not orphan) | ||
| One parent died | 1.481 (0.803–2.732) | 1.521 (0.807–2.864) |
| Both parents died | - | - |
| Not stated | 1.409 (1.073–1.851)* | 1.338 (0.991–1.807) |
| Engaged in work (past 12 months) (RC = Yes) | ||
| No | 0.531 (0.371–0.759)** | 0.629 (0.433–0.913)* |
| Not stated | 1.168 (0.884–1.544) | 1.103 (0.819–1.486) |
| Talk to friends (RC = A lot) | ||
| A little | 0.954 (0.677–1.346) | 0.953 (0.669–1.359) |
| Not very much | 1.293 (0.915–1.826) | 1.067 (0.746–1.524) |
| Not at all | 1.001 (0.656–1.529) | 1.092 (0.701–1.701) |
| Not stated | 1.900 (0.261–13.843) | 3.380 (0.406–28.115) |
| Current marital status (RC = currently married) | ||
| Not currently married | 2.039 (1.355–3.068)** | 1.607 (1.040–2.484)* |
| Not stated | 1.444 (1.119–1.865)** | 1.378 (1.031–1.841)* |
| Justification of physical violence (RC = No) | ||
| Yes | 1.296 (0.996–1.687) | 1.214 (0.922–1.597) |
| Not stated | 2.140 (0.864–5.298) | 1.827 (0.713–4.682) |
| Trust community members (RC = A lot) | ||
| Some | 1.450 (0.940–2.237) | 1.301 (0.830–2.039) |
| Not too much | 2.272 (1.548–3.332)*** | 1.542 (1.024–2.320)* |
| Not at all | 2.101 (1.358–3.251)** | 1.433 (0.901–2.279) |
| Not stated | 1.150 (0.157–8.417) | 0.943 (0.123–7.258) |
| Relationship to biological parents (RC = Close relationship) | ||
| No close relationship | 2.199 (1.695–2.854)*** | 1.614 (1.230–2.119)** |
| Not stated | 2.869 (2.001–4.115)*** | 2.015 (1.371–2.961)*** |
Factors associated with suicidal ideation.
= p < 0.05.
= p < 0.01.
= p < 0.001.
The results in Table 4 show that respondents who did not engage in work in the past 12 months prior to the survey (aOR = 0.629; 95%CI = 0.433–0.913) were less likely to experience suicidal ideation than respondents who engaged in work in the past 12 months. Not being married (aOR = 1.607; 95%CI = 1.040–2.484) was associated with a more likelihood to experience suicidal ideation than being married. Respondents who reported not to have too much trust with community members (aOR = 1.542; 95%CI = 1.024–2.320) were more likely to experience suicidal ideation than respondents who reported to have a lot of trust with community members. The results from Model 3 indicate that young women (18-24 years) who reported not to have a close relationship with their biological parents (aOR = 1.614; 95%CI = 1.230–2.119) were more likely to experience suicidal ideation than respondents who reported to have a close relationship.
Discussion
Our results demonstrate that lifetime violence among young women is high with physical and sexual violence being the most prevalent. These findings are in line with results reported elsewhere (, ). Our results demonstrate a significant association between the different forms of violence (physical, emotional, and sexual violence) and suicidal ideation. These results are in line with several studies that have demonstrated a significant relationship between violence and psychosocial distress (, ) including suicidal ideation. The reality that young women who experience lifetime sexual, physical, or emotional violence are more likely to experience suicidal ideation underscores the risk violence poses to mental health and psychosocial wellbeing of young women (, ). It also underscores the need to integrate mental health and psychosocial support interventions in policy and programming addressing prevention and response to violence against women ().
The results indicate that the risk of experiencing suicidal ideation is highest among those that experienced emotional violence, followed by sexual violence and the risk is lowest among those that experienced physical violence. This finding resonates with previous findings that report a strong relationship between emotional violence and suicidal ideation (–). Emotional abuse can often lead to trauma (), with lasting consequences which may lead to mental distress especially among young people (). The results show that being engaged in work was associated with a likelihood to experience suicidal ideation. This may contradict some of the findings that associate access to employment and positive psychosocial outcomes. However, this needs to be understood in the context in which our respondents work. In some of these contexts the workplace could also be one of the sites of violence involving working under hazardous conditions and lack of protective workplace policies (, ). Particularly for young women, balancing work pressure and gender roles at home—that has been described as unpaid care work—could also contribute to stress more so in some work settings where childcare services are not well developed (). Results show that the risk of experiencing suicidal ideation was higher among those who were not currently married. Evidence on the relationship between marriage and suicidal ideation is not conclusive in the literature; some studies have shown that marriage has no influence on suicidal ideation (). However, it could be that having a companion or spouse (depending on the quality of the relationship) is more likely to build resilience and positive coping mechanisms, but this may be dependent on the context of the relationship between a couple and its quality. Social capital in the form of having a network of community members young women trust was associated with a less likelihood to experience suicidal ideation. Similar findings about the relationship between trust and suicidal ideation have been reported elsewhere (–). This further emphasizes the importance of social capital, particularly social networks, in facilitating better coping and mental health for young women (, ).
The results show that a positive quality of relationships (close relationships) between young women and their biological parents is associated with a decreased risk of developing suicidal ideations. This is similar to other studies that underscore the contribution of attachment and relationships with family members (especially parents) in facilitating mental health and psychosocial wellbeing ().
This study has four major limitations. First, this paper uses a single measure of suicidal ideation; yet, there could be a diversity in the measurement scales of suicidal ideation. Second, we are unable to infer causality from the cross-sectional research design: we note the possibility of suicidal ideation occurring either before or after experiencing violence—which we cannot ascertain. Third, the data used in this study may not be free from recall bias; it is possible that those with a history of suicidal ideation may be more likely to recall experiences of violence in their lifetime, or, may have a heightened memory of such events, or may attribute greater salience to past instances of violence. Fourth, although we use the most recent nationally representative dataset available, we recognize the fact that the data were collected 8 years ago, and rates of violence and suicidal ideation could have changed since then.
The results reported in this study demonstrate that young people experience psychosocial problems that may be caused by violence. These results demonstrate the importance of ensuring that policy and programming for prevention and mitigation of violence should integrate strong elements of mental health and psychosocial support especially among young people. Programmes working with young people should endeavor to conduct risk and needs assessments for psychosocial problems. The results of this study further highlight the need to integrate mental health and psychosocial programming in all projects targeting young people.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.
Ethics statement
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by The Makerere University College of Health Sciences Ethics review Committee and The Uganda National Council for Science and Technology. The Centre for Disease Control (CDC) Institutional Review Board independently reviewed and provided approval to conduct the study. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author contributions
Conceptualization: PK and AK. Data curation: PK. Formal analysis: PK. Investigation: AK, PB and PK. Methodology: AK and PK. Resources: PB, AK and PK. Writing—original draft: PK, AK and PB. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Acknowledgments
We thank the AfriChild Centre for aiding access to the data used in this study (from the Ministry of Gender, Labour, and Social Development) through the “Together for Girls” fellowship—awarded to Agatha Kafuko.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1.
StubbsASzoekeC. The effect of intimate partner violence on the physical health and health-related behaviors of women: a systematic review of the literature. Trauma Violence Abuse 2. (2022) 3(4):1157–72. 10.1177/1524838020985541
2.
HillisSMercyJAmobiAKressH. Global prevalence of past-year violence against children: a systematic review and minimum estimates. Pediatrics. (2016) 137(3):e20154079. 10.1542/peds.2015-4079
3.
HillisSDMercyJASaulJR. The enduring impact of violence against children. Psychol Health Med. (2017) 22(4):393–405. 10.1080/13548506.2016.1153679
4.
NormanREByambaaMDeRButchartAScottJVosT. The long-term health consequences of child physical abuse, emotional abuse, and neglect: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. (2012) 9(11):e1001349. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001349
5.
MillerABEsposito-SmythersCWeismooreJTRenshawKD. The relation between child maltreatment and adolescent suicidal behavior: a systematic review and critical examination of the literature. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. (2013) 16(2):146–72. 10.1007/s10567-013-0131-5
6.
HughesKBellisMAHardcastleKASethiDButchartAMiktonCet alThe effect of multiple adverse childhood experiences on health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Public Health. (2017) 2(8):e356–66. 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30118-4
7.
AngelakisIGillespieELPanagiotiM. Childhood maltreatment and adult suicidality: a comprehensive systematic review with meta-analysis. Psychol Med. (2019) 49(7):1057–78. 10.1017/S0033291718003823
8.
World Health Organization. Suicide worldwide in 2019. (2021) Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240026643(Accessed October 7 2022).
9.
World Health Organization. Mental Health. (2022) Available at: https://www.who.int/health-topics/mental-health#tab=tab_1(Accessed October 7 2022).
10.
WesongaSOsingadaCNabisereANkemijikaSOlwitC. Suicidal tendencies and its association with psychoactive use predictors among university students in Uganda: a cross-sectional study. Afr Health Sci. (2021) 21(3):1418–27. 10.4314/ahs.v21i3.53
11.
BukulukiPWandiembeSKisaakyePBesigwaSKasiryeR. Suicidal ideations and attempts among adolescents in Kampala urban settlements in Uganda: a case study of adolescents receiving care from the Uganda youth development link. Front Soc. (2021) 58:1–8. 10.3389/fsoc.2021.646854
12.
BukulukiPKisaakyePWandiembeSPBesigwaS. Suicide ideation and psychosocial distress among refugee adolescents in bidibidi settlement in west Nile, Uganda. Discover Psychol. (2021) 1(1):3. 10.1007/s44202-021-00003-5
13.
KaggwaMMArinaitweIMuwanguziMNduhuuraEKajjimuJKuleMet alSuicidal behaviours among Ugandan university students: a cross-sectional study. BMC Psychiatry. (2022) 22(1):234. 10.1186/s12888-022-03858-7
14.
KinyandaEKizzaRLevinJNdyanabangiSAbboC. Adolescent suicidality as seen in rural northeastern Uganda: prevalence and risk factors. Crisis. (2011) 32:43–51. 10.1027/0227-5910/a000059
15.
BlackEWorthHClarkeSObolJHAkeraPAworAet alPrevalence and correlates of intimate partner violence against women in conflict affected northern Uganda: a cross-sectional study. Confl Health. (2019) 13(1):35. 10.1186/s13031-019-0219-8
16.
Jiwatram-NegrónTMeinhartMPrimbetovaSTerlikbayevaAEl-BasselN. Examining the association between intimate partner violence and suicidal ideation among women living with HIV in a low- and middle-income country. J Aggress Maltreat Trauma. (2021) 30(9):1148–66. 10.1080/10926771.2020.1853297
17.
OvugaEBoardmanJWassermannD. Prevalence of suicide ideation in two districts of Uganda. Arch Suicide Res. (2005) 9(4):321–32. 10.1080/13811110500182018
18.
GouldMSKingRGreenwaldSFisherPSchwab-StoneMKramerRet alPsychopathology associated with suicidal ideation and attempts among children and adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. (1998) 37(9):915–23. 10.1097/00004583-199809000-00011
19.
KlonskyEDMayAMSafferBY. Suicide, suicide attempts, and suicidal ideation. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. (2016) 12(1):307–30. 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-093204
20.
HubersAAMMoaddineSPeersmannSHMStijnenTvan DuijnEvan der MastRCet alSuicidal ideation and subsequent completed suicide in both psychiatric and non-psychiatric populations: a meta-analysis. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. (2018) 27(2):186–98. 10.1017/S2045796016001049
21.
Ministry of Gender Labour and Social Development. Violence against children in Uganda: Findings from a national survey. Kampala, Uganda: UNICEF (2017). Available at: https://www.togetherforgirls.org/wp-content/uploads/VACS-REPORT-FINAL-LORES-2-1.pdf(Accessed October 7 2022).
22.
StataCorp. Stata statistical software: release 15. College station, TX: StataCorp LLC (2017).
23.
Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS) and ICF. Uganda Demographic and health survey 2016. Kampala, Uganda and Rockville, Maryland, USA: UBOS and ICF (2018).
24.
Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS) and UN Women. National Survey on Violence in Uganda. (2021) Available at: https://africa.unwomen.org/en/digital-library/publications/2021/12/national-survey-on-violence-in-uganda—violence-againstwomen-and-girls(Accessed October 7 2022).
25.
MastersonRJ UstaAGuptaJEttingerAS. Assessment of reproductive health and violence against women among displaced Syrians in Lebanon. BMC Women's Health. (2014) 14(1):25. 10.1186/1472-6874-14-25
26.
BukulukiPKisaakyePEttiBOcircanMBevR-R. Tolerance of violence against women and the risk of psychosocial distress in humanitarian settings in northern Uganda. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2021aa) 18(15):8103. 10.3390/ijerph18158103
27.
EllsbergMEmmelinM. Intimate partner violence and mental health. Glob Health Action. (2014) 7(1):25658. 10.3402/gha.v7.25658
28.
TolWAStavrouVGreeneMCMergenthalerCGarcia-MorenoCvan OmmerenM. Mental health and psychosocial support interventions for survivors of sexual and gender-based violence during armed conflict: a systematic review. World Psychiatry. (2013) 12(2):179–80. 10.1002/wps.20054
29.
PuziaMEKrainesMALiuRTKleimanEM. Early life stressors and suicidal ideation: mediation by interpersonal risk factors. Pers Individ Dif. (2014) 56:68–72. 10.1016/j.paid.2013.08.027
30.
BahkY-CJangS-KChoiK-HLeeS-H. The relationship between childhood trauma and suicidal ideation: role of maltreatment and potential mediators. Psychiatry Investig. (2017) 14(1):37. 10.4306/pi.2017.14.1.37
31.
AllbaughLJMackSACulmoneHDHoseyAMDunnSEKaslowNJ. Relational factors critical in the link between childhood emotional abuse and suicidal ideation. Psychol Serv. (2018) 15:298–304. 10.1037/ser0000214
32.
SeffIStarkL. A sex-disaggregated analysis of how emotional violence relates to suicide ideation in low- and middle-income countries. Child Abuse Negl. (2019) 93:222–7. 10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.05.008
33.
WooJ-MPostolacheTΤ. The impact of work environment on mood disorders and suicide: evidence and implications. Int J Disabil Human Dev. (2008) 7(2):185–200. 10.1515/IJDHD.2008.7.2.185
34.
ChinW-SChenY-CHoJ-JChengN-YWuH-CShiaoJSC. Psychological work environment and suicidal ideation among nurses in Taiwan. J Nurs Scholarsh. (2019) 51(1):106–13. 10.1111/jnu.12441
35.
JolingKJten HaveMde GraafRO’DwyerST. Risk factors for suicidal thoughts in informal caregivers: results from the population-based Netherlands mental health survey and incidence study-2 (NEMESIS-2). BMC Psychiatry. (2019) 19(1):320. 10.1186/s12888-019-2317-y
36.
BrezoJParisJTremblayRVitaroFZoccolilloMHÉBertMet alPersonality traits as correlates of suicide attempts and suicidal ideation in young adults. Psychol Med. (2006) 36(2):191–202. 10.1017/S0033291705006719
37.
YamamuraE. Comparison of social Trust's Effect on suicide ideation between urban and non-urban areas: the case of Japanese adults in 2006. Soc Sci Med. (2015) 140:118–26. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.07.001
38.
SmithARKinkel-RamSGrunwaldWGeorgeTSRavalV. A pilot feasibility study of reconnecting to internal sensations and experiences (RISE), a mindfulness-informed intervention to reduce interoceptive dysfunction and suicidal ideation, among university students in India. Brain Sci. (2022) 12(2):237. 10.3390/brainsci12020237
39.
SivaramSZelayaCSrikrishnanALatkinCGoVSolomonSet alAssociations between social capital and HIV stigma in chennai, India: considerations for prevention intervention design. AIDS Educ Prev. (2009) 21(3):233–50. 10.1521/aeap.2009.21.3.233
40.
VerduinFSmidGEWindTRScholteWF. In search of links between social capital, mental health and sociotherapy: a longitudinal study in Rwanda. Soc Sci Med. (2014) 121:1–9. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.09.054
41.
CohenFSeffISsewamalaFOpoboTStarkL. Intimate partner violence and mental health: sex-disaggregated associations among adolescents and young adults in Uganda. J Interpers Violence. (2022) 37(5-6):2399–415. 10.1177/0886260520938508
Summary
Keywords
lifetime violence, suicidal ideation, young women, Uganda, population-based survey
Citation
Kisaakye P, Kafuko A and Bukuluki P (2023) Lifetime violence and suicidal ideation among young women (18–24 years) in Uganda: Results from a population-based survey. Front. Glob. Womens Health 4:1063846. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2023.1063846
Received
07 October 2022
Accepted
28 March 2023
Published
17 April 2023
Volume
4 - 2023
Edited by
S. M. Yasir Arafat, Enam Medical College, Bangladesh
Reviewed by
Huynh-Nhu Le, George Washington University, United States Joël Djatche Miafo, Uni-Psy et Bien-Être, Cameroon
Updates
Copyright
© 2023 Kisaakye, Kafuko and Bukuluki.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Peter Kisaakye pkisaakye@gmail.com
Daniel Nzebou, UNIPSY, Cameroon, in collaboration with reviewer JDM
†ORCID Peter Kisaakye orcid.org/0000-0003-1859-2078 Agatha Kafuko orcid.org/0000-0001-5142-6907 Paul Bukuluki orcid.org/0000-0002-5388-5469
Specialty Section: This article was submitted to Women's Mental Health, a section of the journal Frontiers in Global Women's Health
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.