SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Glob. Women’s Health
Sec. Contraception and Family Planning
Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2025.1478797
This article is part of the Research TopicCurrent Advances in Contraceptive Use, Technology, and PromotionView all 12 articles
Post-abortion contraceptive uptake, choices, and factors associated with it among women seeking abortion services in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Provisionally accepted- Department of Reproductive Health and Population Studies, School of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Amhara Region, Ethiopia
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
In Africa, over one-third of women experience multiple abortions, often due to inadequate access to effective modern contraceptives. This highlights a critical gap in understanding the patterns and predictors of post-abortion contraceptive (PAC) use. To address this issue, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to assess the uptake of PAC and associated factors among African women who received abortion services.Methods-Following the PRISMA guideline, all articles published between January 1, 2015, and December 30, 2023, were systematically retrieved from multiple databases. Articles reporting PAC uptake among African women were included. The pooled prevalence of Post-abortion contraceptive uptake was determined using a random effects model. The variation between the included studies was assessed using a funnel plot and I 2 heterogeneity statistics. Sources of heterogeneity: Subgroup analysis was performed by country, publication period, study design, and sub-African region.Results: From 48 articles, a total of 84,205 women who underwent abortion services were included in the analysis. The pooled prevalence of PAC uptake in Africa was 58.78% (95% CI: 52.36-65.21), with high heterogeneity (I 2 =99.8%, 95% CI: 99.2%-99.9%; P < 0.001). The subgroup analysis revealed variation by country, publication period, and sub-African region. The most widely used contraceptive methods were injectables (30.27%), followed by implants (25.13%), oral contraceptive pills (22.34%), and IUDs (10.47%). Attending formal education (OR=1.46, 95% CI=1.03, 2.07), knowing the period of fertility (OR=1.72, 95% CI=1.14, 2.59), counseling about contraceptives (OR=3.40, 95% CI=1.82, 6.35), not having a desire for pregnancy (OR=3.08, 95% CI=1.74, 5.35, 95% CI=2.55, 7.42), and possessing contraceptive knowledge (OR= 2.30, 95% CI=1.41, 3.76) had a statistically significant combined effect on PAC uptake in Africa.The uptake of PAC in Africa stands at 58.78%, which is considered low according to the World Health Organization's recommendation that all women should postpone conception for six months following an abortion. There was also a decline of 20.22% between 2020 and 2023 compared to the pooled uptake between 2015 and 2019. To address this, it is crucial to enhance women's awareness of postabortion contraception, the conception risks after abortion, and to strengthen client-centered counseling alongside women's education.
Keywords: post-abortion, Contraceptive, Family Planning (FP), Abortion, systematic review & metaanalysis, Africa
Received: 10 Aug 2024; Accepted: 30 May 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Dagnew and Asresie. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Gizachew Worku Dagnew, Department of Reproductive Health and Population Studies, School of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Amhara Region, Ethiopia
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.