SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Glob. Women’s Health

Sec. Maternal Health

Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2025.1507723

This article is part of the Research TopicEmbracing Human Milk Feeding ChallengesView all 4 articles

Interventions for breastfeeding-related nipple pain or injury: A meta-analysis

Provisionally accepted
Xuyan  JiaXuyan Jia1,2Cuili  ShenCuili Shen1Yuanyuan  CaiYuanyuan Cai3YiTing  XuYiTing Xu2Lina  YangLina Yang2Jiayue  JiangJiayue Jiang2Tong  SunTong Sun1Wenhui  LuWenhui Lu4*Rong  HuangRong Huang5*
  • 1Songjiang Maternal and Child Health-care Hospital, Shanghai, China
  • 2School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
  • 3Women and Children Society of Health & Education, Putuo District,, Shanghai, China
  • 4Shanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
  • 5Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University,, Shanghai, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Nipple pain or injury is one of the main reasons many mothers stop breastfeeding. We integrated existing literature and conducted a quantitative evaluation of efficacy, with the aim of identifying effective clinical interventions for alleviating breastfeeding-related nipple pain and injury, and providing evidence-based recommendations for future research and clinical practice. In our study, non-specific interventions are defined as measures that do not specifically provide breastfeeding support and are designed to exclude natural factors or induce placebo effects. Conversely, interventions that target the study outcomes and have standardized operational procedures are referred to as specialized interventions. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search across 9 databases, including MEDLINE (via Ovid), PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL (via EBSCO), EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CNKI, SinoMed, and Wanfang. Two independent reviewers screened the publications and extracted the data. We evaluated the quality of literature on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-experimental clinical trials using the Cochrane Systematic Evaluation Risk of Bias Assessment Tool and the JBI Critical Appraisal Tool. After completing the quality assessment of the literature, we performed a meta-analysis using Stata 17.0. Results: A total of 18 studies were identified in the meta-analysis. The results of the meta-analysis showed that specialized interventions were significantly better than non-specific interventions in preventing and treating nipple pain and injury associated with breastfeeding. The specialized interventions were effective in reducing the incidence of nipple pain [OR = 0.366, 95% CI (0.155, 0.862), Z = -2.301, p = 0.021 < 0.05], nipple pain scores [SMD = -0.451, 95% CI (-0.748, -0.154), Z = -2.978, p = 0.003 < 0.05], incidence of nipple injury [OR = 0.316, 95% CI (0.231, 0.433), Z = -7.177, p < 0.001], and intensity of nipple injury [SMD = -0.964, 95% CI (-1.404, -0.525), Z = -4.303, p < 0.001]. Conclusion: This study shows that specialized interventions for breastfeeding-related nipple injury and pain are significantly more effective than non-specific interventions. It also demonstrates that preventive measures initiated before nipple pain onset are more effective than post-pain interventions.

Keywords: nipple, Pain, injury, Early Medical Intervention, Breast Feeding

Received: 29 Nov 2024; Accepted: 13 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Jia, Shen, Cai, Xu, Yang, Jiang, Sun, Lu and Huang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Wenhui Lu, Shanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200071, China
Rong Huang, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University,, Shanghai, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.