Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Glob. Women’s Health

Sec. Maternal Health

Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2025.1532500

Risk factors for maternal pyrexia, infection and sepsis in four hospitals providing maternity care in New South Wales, Australia: a cohort study

Provisionally accepted
  • 1George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Newtown, Australia
  • 2Central Coast Local Health District, NSW, Gosford, Australia
  • 3Nepean and Blue Mountains Local Health District, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia
  • 4Global Women's Health Program, George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Newtown, New South Wales, Australia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Introduction: Maternal sepsis is a leading cause of maternal mortality. In Australia, it is the third most common cause of maternal death despite a low overall maternal death rate (5.8 per 100,000 births).The objective of this study was to examine risk factors for maternal pyrexia, infection and sepsis, adherence to WHO maternal antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines and resistance patterns in women with Group B Streptococcus (GBS).We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study using routinely collected data from four hospitals providing maternity care in New South Wales, Australia, including pathology data from one hospital. Women who gave birth between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2020, were included.Definitions for pyrexia, infection, and sepsis were based on medical notes and the obstetrically modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment criteria. We used multivariable logistic regression to identify risk factors and descriptive statistics to evaluate antibiotic prophylaxis adherence and resistance.Results: Out of 23,016 women, 2,650 (11.5%) experienced pyrexia, infection, or sepsis. Women with pyrexia, infection, or sepsis were more likely to report a history of substance use and less likely to receive influenza vaccination. Hospital-based (non-continuity) midwifery care, nulliparity, and emergency Caesarean section and instrumental vaginal birth were associated with increased risk of pyrexia, infection, or sepsis. Documented adherence to antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines was suboptimal, with 35% of Caesarean sections and 29% of severe perineal tear cases documented as receiving antibiotics. In the subset of women with available pathology data, GBS screening was performed in 72.6% of cases, with 19.4% testing positive. Resistance to erythromycin (33.4%) and clindamycin (30.9%) was high, though no resistance to penicillin or ampicillin was observed.Demographic and labour/birth factors conveying an increased risk of pyrexia, infection or sepsis were broadly in line with previous studies. Adherence to WHO prophylaxis guidelines was poorly documented and increased rates of antibiotic resistance to erythromycin and clindamycin were observed. Ongoing monitoring of resistance patterns and improving guideline adherence is important to optimise care.

Keywords: maternal sepsis, Maternal infection, maternal, Sepsis, Infection, Risk factors, antimicrobial resistance

Received: 22 Nov 2024; Accepted: 27 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Thompson, Yan, Low and Henry. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Kelly Jane Thompson, George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Newtown, Australia

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.