ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Glob. Women’s Health
Sec. Quality of Life
Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2025.1533060
This article is part of the Research TopicData to Action – Advancing Research on Violence Against Trans Women Around the GlobeView all articles
Relationship Stigma Negatively Impacts Trans Women's Relationship Quality
Provisionally accepted- 1Vanderbilt University, Nashville, United States
- 2Department of Medicine, Health, and Society, College of Arts and Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
- 3Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
- 4Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
- 5Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, United States
- 6University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States
- 7Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
- 8Department of Biology, School of Humanities and Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States
- 9San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, California, United States
- 10Department of Health, Society, and Behavior, Program in Public Health, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, United States
- 11Institute for Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Trans women face negative health outcomes due to multiple types of anti-trans stigma. Relationship stigma, or when people experience stigma because their romantic partnerships are devalued by society, can negatively impact trans women's experiences in relationships. Relationships and their quality are important predictors of wellness across populations, but little is known about relationship quality for trans women. This study was conducted to determine if relationship stigma is associated with relationship quality for trans women with main partners. Methods: This is a secondary analysis of data from 89 trans women with main partners enrolled in the 2020 Partners Study, an online, interviewer-administered, cross-sectional survey of trans women in the San Francisco Bay Area. Multivariate logistic was used to test for an association between relationship stigma and relationship quality among trans women with main partners. Results: Trans women surveyed were White (29.2%), Latinx (24.7%), or multiracial (23.6%), with the majority having never been married (65.2%). Those who often felt they must hide their partnerships had significantly lower odds of reporting satisfaction with intimacy and closeness in their relationships (OR 0.07; 95% CI 0.01-0.68, p = 0.02) and of reporting satisfaction with their overall relationship (OR 0.02; 95% CI 0.02-0.34, p < 0.01). Those whose families were not supportive of their partnerships had significantly lower odds of reporting relationship satisfaction, intimacy and closeness with their main partners (OR 0.08; 95% CI 0.01-0.85, p = 0.04) and of reporting satisfaction with their overall relationship (OR 0.08; 95% CI 0.00, 0.51, p = 0.01). Relationship stigma was negatively associated with relationship quality for trans women with main partners in this study. Stigma from family also had a significant negative impact on relationship quality, suggesting the important influence of family on trans women's relationships. Efforts to boost family support may foster intimacy and improve relationship satisfaction for trans women in main partnerships.
Keywords: trans women1, couples2, relationship quality3, stigma4, relationship stigma5
Received: 23 Nov 2024; Accepted: 20 May 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Schuler, Sharp, Fasan, Mcneal, Zajkowski, Saxena, Xu, Suprasert, Arayasirikul, Marr, Taylor, McFarland and Wilson. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Emmy S Schuler, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.