ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Glob. Women’s Health

Sec. Contraception and Family Planning

Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2025.1538455

U.S. young adults’ family-building intentions in the event of infertility and knowledge of associated costs

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Ball State University, Muncie, United States
  • 2Chapman University, Orange, California, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Infertility affects approximately 8.5% of married women in the United States, yet little is known about how young adults anticipate and prepare for potential barriers to biological parenthood. This study investigates college students' childbearing intentions, openness to non-traditional family-building options, and awareness of the financial costs associated with these alternatives. Participants were undergraduate students (mean age = 20) at a Midwestern public university who had largely not previously attempted to conceive. Using a cross-sectional survey, respondents provided information on fertility awareness, family-building preferences in the context of infertility, and cost estimations for various non-traditional options. Findings indicate that 86% of participants desired biological children, with an average intended family size of 2.3 children. Among non-traditional options, private domestic adoption was the most preferred (58.3%), followed by public adoption (53.0%) and in vitro fertilization (42.2%). Surrogacy using donor gametes was the least preferred (9.7%). Cost awareness was limited: only 16.7% of estimates for domestic adoption and 48% for international adoption fell within 75-125% of actual cost ranges. Women demonstrated greater openness to alternative family-building methods and had more accurate cost perceptions than men, though men reported greater confidence in their reproductive planning. These findings highlight the need for education to improve young adults' fertility literacy and financial preparedness for non-traditional family-building options, which may support more informed and realistic family planning decisions.

Keywords: Infertility, cost, IVF, Adoption, fertility awareness, Intentions

Received: 04 Dec 2024; Accepted: 09 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Place, Horowitz, Nguyen, Guinn and Peterson. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Jean Marie Place, Ball State University, Muncie, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.