ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Glob. Women’s Health
Sec. Maternal Health
Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2025.1555547
This article is part of the Research TopicMaternal Health Services Utilization in Sub-Saharan Africa Vol. IIView all articles
Routine antenatal ultrasound by nurse-midwives in rural Kenya: A pragmatic trial assessing feasibility and effects and of the Mimba Yangu (My Pregnancy) project
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet (KI), Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
- 2Centre of Excellence for Women and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya
- 3Department of imaging & diagnostic Radiology, Aga Khan University, Nairobi,, Kenya
- 4The Health Associates GmbH, Berlin, Germany
- 5Philips East Africa Limited, Nairobi,, Kenya
- 6Philips Foundation, Nairobi, Kenya
- 7Philips Foundation, Nairobi,, Kenya
- 8School of Arts and Social Science, Moi University, Eldoret, Kenya
- 9Aga Khan University (Kenya), Nairobi, Kenya
- 10Dept of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Task-sharing of obstetric ultrasound between nurse-midwives and doctors has the potential to operationalise the World Health Organizations recommendation of one ultrasound below 24 weeks of gestational age for every pregnant woman. Here we report on the feasibility, acceptability and the effects of the Mimba Yangu (My Pregnancy) task-sharing approach in rural Kenya.We conducted a pragmatic trial including 28 primary care facilities between April 2021 and March 2022, assigned based on feasibility criteria. Fourteen facilities received the ultrasound intervention composed of i) task-sharing with nurse-midwives ii) using portable ultrasound devices (Lumify TM ) connected to a tablet and iii) a digital platform facilitating distant support. Hybrid training of 32 nurse-midwives was provided based on a nationally derived curriculum including theoretical and hands-on components by an academic team.We used i) in-depth interviews with nurse-midwives and health care managers, ii) exit interviews using a quantitative questionnaire with pregnant and recently delivered women, and iii) data abstraction from the health facility records. We descriptively analyzed data and used a difference-indifference analysis based on a generalized linear model to assess the effect of the intervention on the number of antenatal visits.The intervention was successfully and consistently implemented during a nine-month period in all 14 health facilities providing ultrasound to 2,799 pregnant women. Interviews with trained nursemidwives indicated that the intervention was relevant, feasible and acceptable. In intervention facilities, 50.4% of women received at least one ultrasound compared to 19.2% in the comparison facilities, where women were referred to other facilities for their ultrasound based on obstetrical risk factors.Our analysis provides evidence of the feasibility, acceptance and positive effects on service availability of providing ultrasound at primary care level delivered by nurse-midwives. Scalability and feasibility of such an intervention are critical to global health but will demand policy reforms to allow task-sharing at national and sub-national levels.
Keywords: ultrasound in early pregnancy, Task sharing, Antenatal care, Primary Health Care, Positive pregnancy experience, Maternal and newborn health
Received: 04 Jan 2025; Accepted: 11 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Hanson, Nyaga, Leekha, Mantel, Kedenge, Gitonga, Naanyu, Shah and Temmerman. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Claudia Hanson, Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet (KI), Stockholm, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.