ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Glob. Women’s Health
Sec. Maternal Health
Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2025.1575896
Women's Health Facility Choices for Antenatal, Delivery, and Postnatal Care in Eastern Visayas, Philippines
Provisionally accepted- 1Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- 2Research Institute of Human Ecology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- 3world vision international, Tacloban City, Philippines
- 4World Vision, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- 5Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
- 6Department of Food and Nutrition, College of Human Ecology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: This study aims to identify socioeconomic factors associated with the choice of antenatal care (ANC) facilities and to analyze trends in the utilization of health facilities for delivery and postnatal care (PNC) based on the type of ANC facility in Eastern Visayas, Philippines.Methods: This secondary data analysis uses baseline and one-year follow-up survey data from a quasi-experimental study conducted in September 2023 and 2024. Data from 1,414 women with information on maternal health facility utilization was analyzed. ANC facilities were categorized into four groups: Barangay Health Station (BHS), Rural Health Unit (RHU), hospital/clinic and others. Multinomial logistic regressions were applied, adjusting for socio-economic status and Barangay location, to examine associations between socio-economic factors and ANC facility choice, as well as trends in delivery and PNC facility utilization based on ANC facility type.Results: Among 1,414 postpartum mothers, 35.6% received ANC at BHS, 34.1% at RHU, 32.7% at hospital/clinic, and 0.6% did not receive ANC. Most deliveries (83.3%) and PNC (61.4%) services occurred in hospital/clinic settings. Mothers who received ANC at a hospital/clinic were more likely to have higher education (aRRR=7.04, 95% CI: 3.97, 12.50) and be wealthier (aRRR=2.00, 95% CI: 1.09, 3.69) compared to those who received ANC at BHS. Mothers receiving ANC at RHU (aRRR=0.52, 95% CI: 0.34, 0.79) or hospital/clinic (aRRR=0.55, 95% CI: 0.38, 0.78) were less likely to be single with a partner compared to those receiving ANC at BHS. Mothers who received ANC at hospital/clinic were more likely to deliver at a hospital/clinic (aRRR=8.49, 95% CI: 3.56, 20.26) than at a RHU/BHS, and to receive PNC at a hospital/clinic (aRRR=2.07, 95% CI: 1.32, 3.24) instead of at a BHS, compared to those receiving ANC at BHS. Mothers receiving ANC at RHU were more likely to also receive PNC at an RHU (aRRR=16.13, 95% CI: 7.80, 33.36) compared to those receiving ANC at BHS.Conclusions: Socioeconomic disparities are associated with ANC facility choice, which in turn affects subsequent decisions regarding facilities for delivery and PNC in Eastern Visayas. As such, facility selection should be guided by healthcare needs rather than socioeconomic status.
Keywords: Maternal health care utilization, maternal health care facility, Antenatal care, delivery, Postnatal Care, Philippines
Received: 13 Feb 2025; Accepted: 10 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Choi, Kim, Provido, Kim, Juson, Lucas, Ji, Jeon and Kang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Yunhee Kang, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, 21205, Maryland, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.