Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

PERSPECTIVE article

Front. Glob. Women’s Health, 17 July 2025

Sec. Maternal Health

Volume 6 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2025.1599249

This article is part of the Research TopicEmotionally-centred Perinatal Care, Practices and ExperiencesView all 12 articles

The importance of promoting positive childbirth experiences for women: a perspective paper


Sigfridur Inga Karlsdottir
&#x;Sigfridur Inga Karlsdottir1*Nicky Leap
Nicky Leap2
  • 1Faculty of Nursing, University of Akureyri, Akureyri, Iceland
  • 2School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

Childbirth can be a profound and transformative experience, one that embodies complex emotional challenges. Childbirth experiences can have profound and lasting consequences, both positive and negative, shaping a woman's physical, emotional, and psychological well-being. A positive childbirth experience often fosters feelings of empowerment and birth may carry a sense of accomplishment and strength into motherhood. This can enhance bonding with the baby, reduce the likelihood of postpartum depression, and contribute to an overall positive transition into parenting. Supportive environments, effective pain management, and respectful care from healthcare providers play critical roles in creating such experiences. In contrast, a negative childbirth experience can have significant adverse effects. Negative childbirth experiences caused by, for example, a lack of control, disrespectful treatment, or traumatic events during childbirth may lead to feelings of failure, fear, or even post-traumatic stress disorder. These can undermine maternal self-esteem, strain relationships, and hinder the mother-baby bond. Addressing both women's positive and negative childbirth experiences requires providing compassionate, individualised care, fostering open communication, and ensuring that all women feel heard, valued, and supported throughout their childbirth journey. When planning care for women and their families through the childbirth process, it is crucial for health care providers to understand women's perspectives and know how to maximise the likelihood of a positive childbirth experience. This paper explores the significant impact of a positive childbirth experience on a woman's life. It offers perspectives on the importance of recognising and measuring women's childbirth experiences in the ongoing development of maternity service provision.

Introduction

Childbirth is a profoundly transformative experience that can encompass a range of emotions, from joy and empowerment to vulnerability and fear. A positive childbirth experience can enhance a woman's confidence, emotional well-being, and physical recovery, fostering a strong bond with her baby. On the other hand, negative experiences, arising, for example, from a lack of control, disrespectful treatment, or traumatic events, can lead to psychological distress, including postpartum depression or post-traumatic stress disorder.

The World Health Organization (WHO) emphasises the importance of fostering a positive childbirth experience for all women, regardless of the type or setting of the birth. Various WHO publications identify that healthcare providers, and midwives in particular, can play a vital role in shaping positive childbirth experiences by delivering supportive, respectful, and personalised care (13).

This perspective paper explores the impact of women's childbirth experiences on their lives and highlights the importance of recognising and measuring these experiences in the planning of maternity services. We argue that features of professionalism in midwifery care that are potentially associated with the promotion of empowerment for new mothers (3) should be incorporated into maternity care planning in an effort to ensure that all women feel heard and valued during this significant period of their lives.

The importance of measuring and fostering positive childbirth experiences in maternity care systems

It is widely acknowledged that childbirth is challenging and demanding for women, with potential implications for both positive and negative experiences, but this has not necessarily been captured in the measures that are chosen to define the outcomes of childbirth. Birth outcomes tend to be measured by a range of physical outcomes in categories related to the type of labour and birth, for example: spontaneous onset or induction of labour, acceleration of labour, vaginal birth, birth assisted with vacuum extraction or forceps, birth by caesarean section as well as neonatal outcomes. Women's experiences are often not included in these routine outcome measures of childbirth.

In 2018, the WHO published new recommendations for labour care, Intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience (1), followed in 2020 by the WHO Labour Care Guide User's Manual (2). In both these documents, a positive childbirth experience is identified as an essential outcome that contributes to the health and well-being of the mother and child (3). The importance of fostering a positive childbirth experience is also a major theme in WHO publications highlighting the imperative to provide “respectful maternity care”: healthcare providers should provide care “to all women in a manner that maintains their dignity, privacy and confidentiality, ensures freedom from harm and mistreatment, and enables informed choice and continuous support during labour and childbirth” (1).

The humanisation of childbirth movement has, among other things, emphasised the importance of a positive childbirth experience to promote women's psychological health after childbirth (4). This has included highlighting the essential role of effective communication between maternity care providers and women in labour, using simple and culturally acceptable methods. Other strategies that have been shown to promote emotional, psychological and physical health for women include systems that facilitate a companion of choice throughout labour and childbirth, continuous midwifery support in labour and in specific contexts, midwifery-led continuity of care throughout antenatal, intrapartum, and postnatal care in settings with well-functioning midwifery programmes (57).

Definitions of a positive childbirth experience

Clear definitions are an important starting point when focussing on which factors may contribute to both positive and negative childbirth experiences (8). A positive childbirth experience has been defined as: “ … an experience that refers to a woman's experience of interactions and events directly related to childbirth that made her feel supported, in control, safe, and respected; a positive childbirth can make women feel joy, confident, and/or accomplished and may have short and/or long-term positive impacts on a woman's psychosocial well-being” (8). On the other hand, a traumatic childbirth experience has been identified as: “ … a woman's experience of interactions and/or events directly related to childbirth that caused overwhelming distressing emotions and reactions, leading to short and/or long-term negative impacts on a woman's health and wellbeing” (9). By using these definitions, it becomes possible to identify and validate positive childbirth experiences, as well as guide improvements in practice, education, research, advocacy, and policymaking (8).

Why promoting positive childbirth experiences for women matters

People tend to focus more on negative childbirth experiences than positive ones, whether in personal stories, audit, or research. Given the number of women who report negative childbirth experiences and the long-term effects such experiences can have on their health and wellbeing, it is crucial to promote positive childbirth experiences. The prevalence of negative childbirth experiences varies, but studies have suggested that between 6%–44% of women experience childbirth as traumatic (10). A negative experience of childbirth can have a profound effect on a woman's life (11, 12): for example, the identified increase in the likelihood of postnatal depression, stress and anxiety (13, 14) can directly affect postnatal mother-child attachment and negatively influence children's cognitive development (15, 16).

A positive experience of childbirth can also have long-term implications for women's health and well-being, as identified in a qualitative study conducted in Sweden (17). Women who had a very positive birth experience described an increase in their feelings of confidence, ability and strength. A trustful and supportive relationship with their midwife was crucial in promoting this, particularly where the midwife worked as an active guide through pregnancy and labour, helping the woman with physical and mental preparation for birth and techniques to manage labour. A supportive environment for labour, including teamwork between parents and all staff, plus a sense of trust and support from the father of the child, were also important factors in enabling a sense of control and safety. Other studies have also highlighted women's similar views that feeling supported, in control, safe, respected and involved in decision-making during pregnancy, labour and birth were important factors that contributed to their positive birth experiences, including a sense of increased strength and the capacity to cope with new motherhood and other life challenges (6, 7, 18, 19). Women have described their self-esteem increasing as a result of coping with the challenges of labour and birth and that this increased their feeling that they could cope with life overall and an increased responsibility to their family. Women have described becoming more confident in the role following a positive birth experience and are also more likely to choose vaginal birth in subsequent births (20). In contrast, according to Swift et al. (21), women's low birth satisfaction was independently associated with higher symptoms of childbirth-related post-traumatic stress disorder (CB-PTSD); this emphasises the potential effect that a negative birth experience can have on women's lives and how vital a positive childbirth experience is for women's health after childbirth.

For many years, studies have explored the powerful impact a positive birth experience can have on women's lives for years after childbirth in terms of empowerment (17, 22, 23). Empowerment is a complex and multidimensional concept defined by Lafrance and Mailbot (24) as a process of action and reflection that builds parents' confidence, knowledge, and capacity for decision-making. Two processes have been described related to childbirth empowerment: the strengthening of parental skills, and appropriation, which enhances parents' sense of control (20). Positive childbirth experiences can boost women's self-esteem and confidence in their parental role (17) and strengthen women's attachment to their children (15).

Factors that contribute to positive experiences of childbirth

Women have highly different needs during childbirth as identified in a systematic review of over 40 qualitative studies of women's and their partner's experiences of childbirth in different settings in low, middle and high-income countries (25). Whilst bringing to light the complexity and multidimensionality of the birth experience, the review suggested that what women experience as positive and meaningful for them is surprisingly similar. Parents want support in preparing for birth and facing the challenges of uncertainty around pregnancy, labour and birth; they want sensitive and supportive care during labour. Positive experiences of childbirth are directly related to feeling these needs are met (25), suggesting that support from caregivers and birth attendants is arguably the most crucial ingredient women need during labour and birth (7). According to a Cochrane systematic review, continuous support during labour can lead to several positive outcomes, including: increased spontaneous vaginal birth, shorter duration of labour, and decreased caesarean birth, instrumental vaginal birth, use of any analgesia, use of regional analgesia, low Apgar score and negative feelings about childbirth experiences (6).

Women's childbirth experiences have been studied from many different perspectives, focusing on different outcomes. Positive experiences have been associated with satisfaction with antenatal care and choice of maternity service or provider (22, 26); factors related to personal ability and women's psychological experience of childbirth (27); the predictors of positive childbirth experiences, including the various actors; and positive experiences of managing pain in labour (28).

Recent studies have argued that neurobiological processes induced by the release of oxytocin may contribute to positive experiences of birth and promote an optimal transition to motherhood. The case is made for midwifery one-to-one support in labour and maternity care that optimises the function of neuroendocrine processes, even when birth interventions are used; the importance of providing physical, emotional and social support for women through the intense and transformative psychological experience of birth has the potential to be transformative, particularly where women are encouraged to believe in their ability to give birth and where physiology is not disturbed (29).

The importance of women's experiences fulfilling or exceeding their prior personal and social-cultural beliefs and expectations of childbirth has been identified (30). In a narrative literature review of 20 studies of a positive birth experience of first-time mothers, five themes emerged: women's experiences of personal strength and their ability to give birth, including a sense of pride in how they managed pain and challenges during labour; the support and guidance they received from midwives and obstetricians; physical and mental preparation for the birth; feelings of trust and support from their midwives and partners; involvement in decision-making; and prayers and spiritual support from family and healthcare providers (31).

Maternity service development to measure and optimise positive experiences for women

There is an imperative to recognise that women's experiences of childbirth are a crucial aspect of measuring and informing high-quality care, offering insight into what truly matters to them, and enabling service planning that aligns with their needs (3, 15). This involvement of women in service development should also be incorporated into midwifery education and staff training (32).

In many countries, women's experiences are not measured or studied. Indeed, in many low-income countries, the maternal mortality rate is almost the only measure available (2). Several different questionnaires have been developed to measure women's childbirth experience. For example, in Sweden (33) the childbirth experience questionnaire consists of four domains: own capacity, professional support, perceived safety and participation. This questionnaire has been translated, tested and validated, for example, in Iceland (5) and the UK (34). The widely used Birth Satisfaction Scale Indicator (BSS-RI) has also recently been revised (BSS-RI) (35).

Midwifery models of care and theories are essential when planning services for childbearing women, as many of them focus on the midwife–woman relationship, woman-centeredness, and a salutogenic approach, factors that women have identified as important in the kind of care they need from midwives (32). The PRIME theory of professionalism in midwifery draws on women's perspectives regarding the competencies and characteristics a midwife needs upon graduation to promote a sense of safety and well-being for women. It defines essential qualities and skills needed to support women and their partners effectively and foster a sense of safety, comfort, and confidence (32). The definition of a positive childbirth experience by Leinweber et al. (8) emphasises the critical role of healthcare providers in facilitating a positive childbirth experience by seeing each woman as unique and responding to her individual needs (25, 26, 30, 36). Where women are treated with respect, and where they have formed trusting relationships with caregivers who have facilitated a relaxing and welcoming atmosphere, they are more likely to have a positive experience of childbirth (31).

During pregnancy, birth and post-partum, it is essential that healthcare providers know how they can strengthen women's self-esteem to deal with childbirth in every possible way to increase the likelihood of a positive childbirth experience and the potential for empowerment. Measuring empowerment is not simple, and in a scoping review of 23 studies including 13 instruments to measure empowerment during pregnancy, the overall findings were that focusing on facilitating women's choice and decision making, women's belief in their abilities and control over situation, self and others is of importance. The instruments included five main components: facilitation of women's choice and decisions, women's belief in their abilities, control over situations, self and others, gender equality and access and control of resources. Under each component are many other components, such as decision-making, self-determination, support and assurance from others, financial authority, self-efficacy, autonomy, and legal dimensions (37).

Some scales are available to measure empowerment, such as the pregnancy-related empowerment scale (PRES) (38) and an empowerment questionnaire (EQ) which focuses on empowerment among pregnant and postpartum women (39). PRES scale has four dimensions: provider connectedness (relationship that minimised the power differential and created with respect and trust), with six statements, skilful decision making (process by which women come to evaluate and choose a direction that will impact their health), with three statements, peer connectedness (a bond between women that develops from the evolution of caring and supportive relationship) with two statements and gaining voice (to be knowledgeable about their health and advocate for their health care options for self and family) with five statements. That tool is a valid and reliable measure of women's health-related empowerment during pregnancy (38). In a scoping review measuring women's empowerment during the perinatal period in high-income countries (40) 21 instruments were identified, and 11 were validated among women during the perinatal period. However, no instrument has been specifically designed for women during the perinatal period that encompasses all dimensions of empowerment and its defining attributes.

Discussion

It is well established that childbirth experiences can have a significant positive or negative impact on both women and their families. Strategies for enhancing a positive childbirth experience are important in efforts to promote a sense of control, self-efficacy and self-esteem for women (41).

We argue that measuring women's childbirth experiences is essential and should be recognised as a fundamental part of childbirth outcomes. In many high-income countries with well-developed healthcare systems that adhere to international standards and evidence-based practice guidelines, there is no routine measurement of women's childbirth experiences. This underscores a deficiency in data concerning how women perceive childbirth and its effects on their own lives as well as those of their family's following childbirth. In recent years, validated questionnaires have been developed to measure women's childbirth experiences, although many place greater emphasis on negative aspects rather than positive ones. While both perspectives are important, shifting the focus beyond negative experiences can assist healthcare providers in understanding the factors that contribute to a positive birth experience and integrate elements that foster positivity in their daily care of women and their families during childbirth.

Midwives have the unique privilege of supporting families during one of life's most transformative moments when bringing new life into the world. This responsibility must be approached with care, as the quality of services can significantly affect a mother and her family's well-being for years to come. We suggest that the PRIME theory can also be used in the educating and training of midwives so that women's views on what they think are the most important characteristics of a midwife can contribute to optimising the potential for positive childbirth experiences Every midwife and midwifery student should recognise the enduring effects of their care and strive to provide the best possible service to maximise the likelihood of a positive childbirth experience. This aligns with the International Code of Ethics for Midwives, which emphasises human rights, justice, and equal access to care, along with mutual relationships of respect and dignity (42). In their position statement, Heritage and Culture in Childbearing (43) the International Confederation of Midwives urges their member associations to work with midwives, women, policy makers and the community to promote positive birth experiences by implementing culturally safe health services. For individual midwives across the world, working in ways that promote cultural safety involves an ongoing process of learning to be open to other people's cultural ways of being, knowing, and doing, whilst acknowledging power dynamics and being open to challenging their own individual culture, attitudes and beliefs (44).

The WHO emphasises respectful maternity care, which refers to care organised and provided for all women that upholds their dignity, privacy, and confidentiality, ensuring freedom from harm and mistreatment while allowing informed choice and continuous support during labour and childbirth. Routinely measuring women's experiences of childbirth and empowerment is crucial and should be valued as an important outcome of childbirth. There is an imperative to continue to develop studies that enable women's voices to contribute to education and maternity service development; this should include qualitative research that enables in-depth exploration of individual women's experiences (45).

Conclusion

When planning maternity care for women and their families, there is an imperative for health care providers to understand women's perspectives and know about factors that maximise the likelihood of a positive childbirth experience. All maternity care systems should consistently utilise validated questionnaires and research methods to engage in discussions with women about their childbirth experiences. Women's perspectives should inform the development and analysis of outcome measures as well as educational activities, with an aim to provide high quality care and promote positive birth experiences for women and their families. Improved health outcomes and wellbeing can include the strengthening of parental skills and attachment and for women, a sense of empowerment related to self-esteem and increased confidence.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author contributions

SK: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. NL: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. World Health Organization. WHO Recommendations Intrapartum Care for a Positive Childbirth Experience. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization (2018).

Google Scholar

2. World Health Organization. WHO labour care guide: user’s manual 2020.

Google Scholar

3. Oladapo OT, Tunçalp Ö, Bonet M, Lawrie TA, Portela A, Downe S, et al. WHO Model of intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience: transforming care of women and babies for improved health and wellbeing. BJOG. (2018) 125:918–22. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15237

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Newnham E, McKellar L, Pincombe J. Towards the Humanisation of Birth: A Study of Epidural Analgesia and Hospital Birth Culture. 1st ed. Cham: Springer International Publishing (2018).

Google Scholar

5. Sigurðardóttir VL, Mangindin EL, Stoll K, Swift EM. Childbirth experience questionnaire 2—Icelandic translation and validation. Sex Reprod Healthc. (2023) 37:100882. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2023.100882

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Bohren MA, Hofmeyr GJ, Sakala C, Fukuzawa RK, Cuthbert A. Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2017) 2017:CD003766. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub6

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Leap N, Hunter B. Supporting Women for Labour and Birth. 2nd ed. United Kingdom: Routledge (2022).

Google Scholar

8. Leinweber J, Fontein-Kuipers Y, Karlsdottir SI, Ekström-Bergström A, Nilsson C, Stramrood C, et al. Developing a woman-centered, inclusive definition of positive childbirth experiences: a discussion paper. Birth. (2023) 50:362–83. doi: 10.1111/birt.12666

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Leinweber J, Fontein-Kuipers Y, Thomson G, Karlsdottir SI, Nilsson C, Ekström-Bergström A, et al. Developing a woman-centered, inclusive definition of traumatic childbirth experiences: a discussion paper. Birth. (2022) 49:687–96. doi: 10.1111/birt.12634

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Tabaghdehi M H, Kolahdozan S, Keramat A, Shahhossein Z, Moosazadeh M, Motaghi Z. Prevalence and factors affecting the negative childbirth experiences: a systematic review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. (2020) 33:3849–56. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1583740

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Webb R, Ayers S, Bogaerts A, Jeličić L, Pawlicka P, Haeken SV, et al. When birth is not as expected: a systematic review of the impact of a mismatch between expectations and experiences. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. (2021) 21:1–475. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03898-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Ayers S, Horsch A, Garthus-Niegel S, Nieuwenhuijze M, Bogaerts A, Hartmann K, et al. Traumatic birth and childbirth-related post-traumatic stress disorder: international expert consensus recommendations for practice, policy, and research. Women Birth. (2024) 37:362–7. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2023.11.006

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Hughes C, Foley S, Devine RT, Ribner A, Kyriakou L, Boddington L, et al. Worrying in the wings? Negative emotional birth memories in mothers and fathers show similar associations with perinatal mood disturbance and delivery mode. Arch Womens Ment Health. (2020) 23:371–7. doi: 10.1007/s00737-019-00973-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Thiel F, Berman Z, Dishy G, Chan S, Seth H, Tokala M, et al. Traumatic memories of childbirth relate to maternal postpartum posttraumatic stress disorder. J Anxiety Disord. (2021) 77:102342. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102342

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Smorti M, Ponti L, Ghinassi S, Rapisardi G. The mother-child attachment bond before and after birth: the role of maternal perception of traumatic childbirth. Early Hum Dev. (2020) 142:104956. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.104956

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Seefeld L, Weise V, Kopp M, Knappe S, Garthus-Niegel S. Birth experience mediates the association between fear of childbirth and mother-child-bonding up to 14 months postpartum: findings from the prospective cohort study DREAM. Front Psychiatry. (2022) 12:776922. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.776922

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Karlström A, Nystedt A, Hildingsson I. The meaning of a very positive birth experience: focus groups discussions with women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. (2015) 15:251. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0683-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Nieuwenhuijze M, Leahy-Warren P. Women’s empowerment in pregnancy and childbirth: a concept analysis. Midwifery. (2019) 78:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2019.07.015

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Karlsdottir SI, Sveinsdottir H, Kristjansdottir H, Aspelund T, Olafsdottir OA. Predictors of women’s positive childbirth pain experience: findings from an Icelandic national study. Women Birth. (2018) 31:e178–84. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2017.09.007

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Hosseini Tabaghdehi M, Keramat A, Kolahdozan S, Shahhosseini Z, Moosazadeh M, Motaghi Z. Positive childbirth experience: a qualitative study. Nurs Open. (2020) 7:1233–8. doi: 10.1002/nop2.499

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Swift EM, Guðmundsdóttir F, Einarsdóttir K, Sigurðardóttir VL. Birth satisfaction and symptoms of childbirth related PTSD among women in Iceland: a population-based study. Sex Reprod Healthc. (2024) 42:101037. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2024.101037

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Hildingsson I, Karlström A, Larsson B. Childbirth experience in women participating in a continuity of midwifery care project. Women Birth. (2021) 34:e255–61. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2020.04.010

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Almorbaty H, Ebert L, Dowse E, Chan SW. An integrative review of supportive relationships between child-bearing women and midwives. Nurs Open. (2023) 10:1327–39. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1447

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Lafrance J, Mailhot L. Empowerment: a concept well-suited to midwifery. CJMR. (2024) 4:16–24. doi: 10.22374/cjmrp.v4i2.167

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Benyamini Y, Delicate A, Ayers S, Dikmen-Yildiz P, Gouni O, Jonsdottir SS, et al. Key dimensions of women’s and their partners’ experiences of childbirth: a systematic review of reviews of qualitative studies. PLoS One. (2024) 19:e0299151. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299151

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Martins ACM, Giugliani ERJ, Nunes LN, Bizon AMBL, de Senna AFK, Paiz JC, et al. Factors associated with a positive childbirth experience in Brazilian women: a cross-sectional study. Women Birth. (2021) 34:e337–45. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2020.06.003

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Grundström H, Malmquist A, Nieminen K. Factors related to a positive childbirth experience—a cross-sectional study. J Reprod Infant Psychol. (2024) 20(4):1–13. doi: 10.1080/02646838.2024.2336141

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. McKelvin G, Thomson G, Downe S. The childbirth experience: a systematic review of predictors and outcomes. Women Birth. (2021) 34:407–16. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2020.09.021

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Olza I, Uvnas-Moberg K, Ekström-Bergström A, Leahy-Warren P, Karlsdottir SI, Nieuwenhuijze M, et al. Birth as a neuro-psycho-social event: an integrative model of maternal experiences and their relation to neurohormonal events during childbirth. PLoS One. (2020) 15:e0230992. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230992

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Downe S, Finlayson K, Oladapo OT, Bonet M, Gülmezoglu AM. What matters to women during childbirth: a systematic qualitative review. PLoS One. (2018) 13:e0–e0194906. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194906

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Baakeleng GB, Bam NE. Factors influencing positive childbirth experience of first time mothers in healthcare facilities: narrative literature review. Gend Behav. (2022) 20:20542–50. doi: 10.1155/2013/349124

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Karlsdottir SI, Halldorsdottir S. A theory of professionalism in midwifery for the empowerment of childbearing women. In: Lundgren I, Blix E, Olafsdottir OA, Maimburg RD, Wikberg A, Gottfredsdottir H, et al. editors. Theories and Perspectives for Midwifery: A Nordic View. Lund: Studentlitteratur (2022). p. 233–42.

Google Scholar

33. Dencker A, Taft C, Bergqvist L, Lilja H, Berg M. Childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ): development and evaluation of a multidimensional instrument. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. (2010) 10:81. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-81

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Walker KF, Dencker A, Thornton JG. Childbirth experience questionnaire 2: validating its use in the United Kingdom. Eur J Obster Gynecol Reprod Biol. (2020) 5:100097. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100097

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Martin CR, Hollins Martin C, Redshaw M. The birth satisfaction scale-revised indicator (BSS-RI). BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. (2017) 17:1–9. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1459-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Hill E, Firth A. Positive birth experiences: a systematic review of the lived experience from a birthing person’s perspective. MIDIRS Midwifery Digest. (2018) 28:71–8.

Google Scholar

37. Liu Y, Che CC, Hamdan M, Chong MC. Measuring empowerment in pregnant women: a scoping review of progress in instruments. Midwifery. (2024) 134:104002. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2024.104002

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Klima CS, Vonderheid SC, Norr KF, Park CG. Development of the pregnancy-related empowerment scale. Nurs Health. (2015) 3:120–7. doi: 10.13189/nh.2015.030503

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Kovach AC, Becker J, Worley H. The impact of community health workers on the self-determination, self-sufficiency, and decision-making ability of low-income women and mothers of young children. J Community Psychol. (2004) 32:343–56. doi: 10.1002/jcop.20006

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Leahy-Warren P, Nieuwenhuijze M. Measuring women’s empowerment during the perinatal period in high income countries: a scoping review of instruments used. Heliyon. (2023) 9:e14591. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14591

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Shahhosseini Z, Motaghi Z, Keramat A, Kolahdozan S, Hosseini Tabaghdehi L, Moosazadeh M, et al. Strategies for promoting positive childbirth experiences: delphi approach. Curr Women’s Health Rev. (2024) 20:75–81. doi: 10.2174/0115734048248371231010091102

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. International Confederation of Midwives. International Code of Ethics for Midwives. Available online at: https://internationalmidwives.org/resources/international-code-of-ethics-for-midwives/ (Accessed February 15, 2025).

Google Scholar

43. International Confederation of Midwives. Position Statement: Heritage and Culture in Childbearing. Available online at: https://internationalmidwives.org/resources/heritage-and-culture-in-childbearing/ (Accessed February 15, 2025).

Google Scholar

44. Esegbona-Adeigbe S. Cultural safety in midwifery practice—protecting the cultural identity of the woman. Pract Midwife. (2020) 23. doi: 10.55975/BMCP4601

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Thomson G, Crowther S. Phenomenology as a political position within maternity care. Nurs Philos. (2019) 20(4):e12275. doi: 10.1111/nup.12275

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: childbirth, empowerment, experience, positive, women

Citation: Karlsdottir SI and Leap N (2025) The importance of promoting positive childbirth experiences for women: a perspective paper. Front. Glob. Women's Health 6:1599249. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2025.1599249

Received: 24 March 2025; Accepted: 29 May 2025;
Published: 17 July 2025.

Edited by:

Claire Feeley, King’s College London, United Kingdom

Reviewed by:

Julia Leinweber, Institut für Hebammenwissenschaft Charite Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany

Copyright: © 2025 Karlsdottir and Leap. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Sigfridur Inga Karlsdottir, aW5nYUB1bmFrLmlz

ORCID:
Sigfridur Inga Karlsdottir
orcid.org/0000-0001-5886-9196

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.