ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Glob. Women’s Health

Sec. Quality of Life

Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2025.1605612

This article is part of the Research TopicSexual and Gender-Based Violence among Adolescents and Young Women: New Evidence and Call for ActionView all 4 articles

Positioning Justice: A Legal Cascade of Sexual Violence Cases in Mombasa, Kenya

Provisionally accepted
Melanie  OlumMelanie Olum1*Gerald  GithinjiGerald Githinji1Abigael  SidiAbigael Sidi1Abel  MokuaAbel Mokua1Morris  KiioMorris Kiio1Nawal  AliyanNawal Aliyan2Iqbal  KhandwalaIqbal Khandwala2Celina  KithinjiCelina Kithinji3Saida  WanjikuSaida Wanjiku1Griffins  ManguroGriffins Manguro4Marleen  TemmermanMarleen Temmerman1,4,5
  • 1International Centre for Reproductive Health Kenya, Mombasa, Kenya
  • 2Coast General Teaching and Referral Hospital, Mombasa, Kenya
  • 3Mombasa County Department of Health, Mombasa, Kenya
  • 4Ghent University, Ghent, East Flanders, Belgium
  • 5Aga Khan University (Kenya), Nairobi, Kenya

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Seeking legal redress for sexual violence (SV) is a daunting process for survivors. They must navigate their personal trauma societal stigma, and flawed systems, creating an arduous path to justice. This study was conducted to assess patterns of SV within Mombasa County, Kenya, and details the legal follow-up post-SV care. A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted using data from SV survivors attending the Gender-Based Violence and Recovery Centre (GBVRC) at the Coast General Teaching and Referral Hospital (CGTRH) between 2017 and 2023. Data sources include post-rape care (PRC) forms, clinician notes, quarterly reports, police reports, counsellor reports, and paralegal follow-up records. A legal cascade for SV cases was created detailing SV survivors' referral patterns between police and GBVRC attendees who proceeded to court, and judgments rendered. The total number of survivors at GBVRC between 2017 and 2023 was 3122; 2738 girls/women and 384 boys/men, with the majority of perpetrators known to the survivors, 2764/3122 (89%). The median age for survivors was 15 years, ranging from less than one year to 63 years with a male median age of 9 and a female median age of 15. Fewer males reported their cases, with 238 out of 384 males (62%) and 2,020 out of 2,738 females (74%). Ninety-three per cent (2906/3122) of cases referred from GBVRC arrived at the police station, though 62% (1864/3022) of these cases were successfully recorded and filed at the police station after follow-up. Additionally, 29% (535/1864) of cases reported did not proceed with investigation. Overall, of the 3022 cases that were referred to and reported, 1746 (57.7%) proceeded to court. Among these, judgments were pronounced in 372 cases (21%) and 85 out of these 372 cases (23%) were either withdrawn or acquitted. Lack of evidence, poor witness testimonies, or failure of witnesses to present themselves in court were likely causes for withdrawal and acquittal of cases. Sexual violence remains a prevalent concern and should be prioritized as a national agenda. Systems should be strengthened to enhance access to justice while exploring alternatives for legal support, such as paralegal networks that can improve case follow-up.

Keywords: Sexual violence1, defilement2, legal outcomes3, paralegals4, gender-based violence5, gender-based violence recovery centre6

Received: 03 Apr 2025; Accepted: 19 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Olum, Githinji, Sidi, Mokua, Kiio, Aliyan, Khandwala, Kithinji, Wanjiku, Manguro and Temmerman. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Melanie Olum, International Centre for Reproductive Health Kenya, Mombasa, Kenya

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.