Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Glob. Women’s Health

Sec. Maternal Health

Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2025.1638434

This article is part of the Research TopicAddressing the Maternity Needs of Newly Settled Migrant MothersView all articles

The Vicious Circle: How Systemic Barriers Perpetuate Maternity Interpreting Service Inadequacies for Migrant Women in the UK

Provisionally accepted
  • University of Stirling, Stirling, United Kingdom

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Introduction: Migrant women who speak languages other than English in the UK face elevated risks of adverse birth outcomes and experience significant maternal health disparities, conditions exacerbated by persistent inadequacies in interpreting service availability, quality, and costs. While video-mediated interpreting has been proposed as a solution, little is known about the systemic barriers that might limit its effectiveness in real-world settings. Methods: This study employed a transformative mixed-methods approach to investigate systemic barriers in maternity interpreting services, focusing on interpreter retention, service availability, and video-mediated interpreting implementation, specifically LanguageLine Solutions' interpreter-on-wheels (IOW). Data were collected in the UK between 2019 and 2022 from seven key stakeholder groups: Migrant women (n=24), support workers (n=10), maternity care professionals (n=46), interpreters (n=159), bilingual health advocates (n=7), language service providers (n=6) and a commissioner. Semi-structured interviews, surveys, focus groups, ethnographic observations and service provider data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis and descriptive statistics. Results: The analysis revealed three interconnected systemic barriers forming a vicious circle in interpreting service provision: (1) Constrained user agency, where migrant women prioritised basic access to any interpreting support over preferences for service quality due to systematic service failures; (2) interpreter workforce sustainability crisis, with nearly 60.4% of interpreters having decreased or stopped healthcare interpreting assignments due to poor remuneration and better opportunities elsewhere; (3) infrastructure implementation failures, with interpreter-on-wheels implementation hampered by unreliable infrastructure, achieving only 11% utilisation despite its potential benefits. This is a provisional file, not the final typeset article Discussion: These findings demonstrate how interpreting service challenges form an interconnected system where workforce issues, technical infrastructure, and institutional practices mutually reinforce one another, creating a vicious circle that perpetuates service inadequacies. This study advances understanding of the systemic nature of interpreting service challenges in maternity care for migrant women and highlights the need for coordinated interventions that address multiple interconnected barriers simultaneously, rather than isolated technological solutions.

Keywords: Vicious circle, maternity interpreting, Migrant women, complex adaptive systems, Systemic barriers, interpreter workforce sustainability, video-mediated interpreting, interpreting service inadequacies

Received: 30 May 2025; Accepted: 22 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Li Li, University of Stirling, Stirling, United Kingdom

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.