ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Hum. Dyn.
Sec. Digital Impacts
Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fhumd.2025.1549325
This article is part of the Research TopicEthical Dilemmas of Digitalisation of Mental HealthView all 5 articles
Data-Driven Ethical Guidelines for Digitised Mental Health Services: Principal Components Analysis
Provisionally accepted- Department of Psychology, SVKM's Mithibai College of Arts, Chauhan Institute of Science & Amrutben Jivanlal College of Commerce and Economics (Empowered Autonomous), Mumbai, India
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Various regulatory bodies have published ethical principles, codes, and/or guidelines for mental health practice globally. Although such guidelines may lend themselves equally relevant, there seems a paucity of directives specific to digital platforms such as apps utilizing AI-assisted chatbots, etc. in providing aid for mental health concerns. Exploring data-driven ethical principles for all stakeholders including the practitioners/facilitators, potential consumers, and developers of such platforms is crucial given the rapid expansion of digitised mental health support. A novel approach is proposed undertaking gap-analysis by identifying the themes of ethical concerns from practitioners' and consumers' perspectives.Thematic analysis of literature on ethics in both conventional psychotherapy and digital mental health interventions was conducted to develop a comprehensive thematic framework of ethical principles for digitised mental health care. Based on these foundational themes, a content-valid 30-item research measure was developed to administer on samples of potential consumers as well as practitioners/trainees. In order to reduce the items to meaningful components of ethical considerations, rooted in the participants' responses, separate principal components analyses were conducted on this primary data from consumers and practitioners respectively.Principal components analysis on consumers' data revealed a single component solution, i.e. the consumers perceived a variety of ethical concerns in a unidimensional manner, suggesting that more awareness is needed for them to make better and more informed choices about their mental health care. Principal components analysis on practitioners/trainees' data found two meaningful components. In other words, practitioners/trainees on the other hand emphasized two aspects of ethical concerns: the competency, design, accountability of a mental health app, and the rights and security that it needs to provide for its consumers.Current research aimed to bridge the gap in literature with a data-driven, empirical approach to formulate ethical regulations for digitised mental health services, specifically the mental health apps. Findings from the study are proposed to benefit the developers of digital mental health apps, and organizations offering such services in ensuring ethical standards as well as effectively communicating them to the potential consumers.
Keywords: Mental health apps, App developers, Ethical concerns, data-driven guidelines, principal components
Received: 20 Dec 2024; Accepted: 25 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Bapat and Jog. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Chinmay Bapat, Department of Psychology, SVKM's Mithibai College of Arts, Chauhan Institute of Science & Amrutben Jivanlal College of Commerce and Economics (Empowered Autonomous), Mumbai, India
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.