Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Hum. Dyn.

Sec. Institutions and Collective Action

Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fhumd.2025.1651430

This article is part of the Research TopicMarketplace Exchange across History: Transcending Theoretical DividesView all 8 articles

What Makes a Market in Preindustrial Societies? A Comparative, Spectrum-Based Analysis of Byzantium and the Prehispanic Andes

Provisionally accepted
Katerina  RagkouKaterina Ragkou1*Christian  MaderChristian Mader2
  • 1Phillips University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
  • 2Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universitat Bonn, Bonn, Germany

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

This article reconsiders the nature of marketplace exchange in premodern economies by comparing two distinct cases: the monetized system of the Byzantine Empire and the exchange networks of the prehispanic central Andes. We compare these two contrasting cases to explore the applicability of a spectrum-based approach to markets. Drawing on theories from institutional economics, economic anthropology, and political economy, the paper challenges the traditional market/non-market dichotomy that has long dominated the field. By adopting a comparative and interdisciplinary methodology, we argue for a more flexible and integrated framework that recognizes the diversity and embeddedness of exchange systems across cultures. Using archaeological and historical evidence, we examine how coin-based markets in Byzantium coexisted with legal institutions and state infrastructure, while Andean exchange, though largely lacking formal currency or marketplaces, often relied on socially embedded networks. Our study demonstrates that market-like behavior does not require monetization or formal institutions and that both regions offer valuable insights into the resilience and variability of preindustrial markets and economic systems. This analysis contributes to broader debates in economic archaeology and history by reframing what 1 constitutes a "market" and advocating for a spectrum-based understanding of exchange mechanisms across time and space.

Keywords: Premodern economies, Marketplace exchange, Byzantine Empire, prehispanic Andes, Economic anthropology, Archaeological theory, Institutional diversity, Comparative economic history

Received: 21 Jun 2025; Accepted: 29 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Ragkou and Mader. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Katerina Ragkou, Phillips University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.