Abstract
Purpose: To investigate spontaneous brain activity amplitude alterations in single and relapsing optic neuritis (sON and rON, respectively) and their relationships with clinical variables.
Methods: In total, 42 patients with sON, 35 patients with rON and 50 healthy volunteers were recruited. Resting-state functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (rs-fMRI) scans were acquired for all participants and compared to investigate the changes in the amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (ALFFs) among the three groups. The relationships between the ALFFs in regions with significant differences in the groups and clinical variables, including the logarithm of minimal angle of resolution (LogMAR), Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score and disease duration, were further explored.
Results: Compared with healthy volunteers, the sON and rON patients showed significantly decreased ALFFs in several regions of the occipital and temporal lobes (i.e., inferior occipital gyrus and superior temporal gyrus; corrected p < 0.01 using AlphaSim). The sON patients showed significantly increased ALFFs in the left caudate and certain regions in the frontal lobes (i.e., medial frontal gyrus), whereas the rON patients showed increased ALFFs in the bilateral inferior temporal gyrus and left medial frontal gyrus (corrected p < 0.01 using AlphaSim). Significantly decreased ALFFs were observed in the right inferior parietal lobule (IPL), left posterior cingulate and precuneus in the rON patients compared with those in the sON patients (corrected p < 0.01 using AlphaSim). Significant correlations were observed between the disease duration and ALFF in the left middle temporal gyrus, left inferior occipital gyrus, right lingual gyrus and right IPL (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: Functional impairment and adaptation occurred in both the sON and rON patients. Impairment mainly involved the occipital cortex, and functional adaptions predominantly occurred in the frontal lobe. Functional damage was more severe in the rON patients than in the sON patients and correlated with the disease duration.
Introduction
Optic neuritis (ON) is a demyelinating inflammatory disease of the optic nerve, and it is strongly associated with multiple sclerosis (MS; Hickman et al., 2002; Miller et al., 2005) and neuromyelitis optica (NMO, also called Devic’s disease; Wingerchuk et al., 1999). ON results in loss of vision and a conduction block (Youl et al., 1991; Guy et al., 1992; Toosy et al., 2014). As a common type of ON, single optic neuritis (sON) is considered a clinical demyelinating event that is isolated in time and could be the initial presentation of MS or NMO. Relapsing optic neuritis (rON), including relapsing inflammatory optic neuritis (RION) and chronic relapsing inflammatory optic neuritis (CRION; Benoilid et al., 2014), is more variable in both visual recovery and neurological prognosis (Toosy et al., 2014).
To date, the most valuable predictor for the development of subsequent clinically definite MS (CDMS) is the presence of white matter (WM) abnormalities on brain MRIs corresponding to demyelinating lesions (Balcer, 2006; Shams and Plant, 2009; Dooley and Foroozan, 2010; Menon et al., 2011). However, most ON patients, particularly clinically isolated ON patients, do not present evidence of brain lesions in conventional brain MRI scans. Thus, a new method that can be used to evaluate brain changes will have a tremendous impact on patient healthcare. Resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) can reflect the baseline brain activity (Biswal, 2012). Previous fMRI studies have revealed decreased functional connectivity in the visual system after acute ON (Wu et al., 2015) and dysfunction in the default-mode network, cerebellum, and limbic system in ON (Huang et al., 2015). Low-frequency fluctuation (LFF) could reflect low-frequency neural oscillation both for spontaneous and evoked brain activity. For example, steady-state BOLD responses (SSBRs) has been investigated to reflect the evoked fluctuation by cognitive task, which is independent of the neurovascular coupling and represents the underlying process of neural oscillation (Wang et al., 2014, 2015, 2016, 2018). As to the resting state, the amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (ALFF), an alternative index in which the square root of power spectrum was integrated in a low-frequency range, has been suggested to reflect the intensity of regional spontaneous brain activity (Kiviniemi et al., 2000; Zang et al., 2007), thus, it is considered as a measurement of the amplitude of regional spontaneous brain activity. Recently, it has already been applied in several areas of neuroscience and neurological diseases (Liu et al., 2011a,b, 2012; Kwak et al., 2012; Turner et al., 2013). Abnormal brain ALFF has been found in MS (Liu et al., 2011b) and NMO (Liu et al., 2011a) and even in clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) patients (Liu et al., 2012). However, the mechanisms underlying the baseline brain activity changes in sON and rON have not been clarified. This study aimed to investigate the brain activity changes of sON and rON patients and correlate the functional changes with clinical variables.
Subjects and Methods
Subjects
We recruited 77 patients with ON, including 42 patients with sON (7 males, 35 females; mean age 36.0, age range 15–58 years) and 35 patients with rON (11 males, 24 females; mean age 34.4, age range 16–58 years), and 50 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (HCs; 16 males, 34 females; mean age 33.7, age range 19–55 years). The main demographic and clinical characteristics are reported in Table 1. A diagnosis of ON was performed by an experienced neurologist according to the standard clinical criteria (Beck et al., 1992). Inclusion criteria were: (1) acute vision loss with or without eye pain; (2) different types of visual field defects; (3) normal or swollen optic nerve head; (4) no deterioration in vision after steroid discontinuation; (5) no previous history of MS or NMO and no previous neurological symptoms; (6) no other diseases causing vision loss, such as vascular problems, optic space-occupying lesions, etc.; (7) fat-suppressed orbital MRI showing lesions or atrophy of the optic nerve; and (8) no typical demyelinating lesions in the brain. In the sON group, 34 patients had unilateral ON and eight patients had bilateral ON. The standardization logarithm of minimal angle of resolution (LogMAR) visual score of the affected eye was 0.92 ± 0.96 (mean ± SD). In the rON group, 21 patients suffered from unilateral ON and 14 presented bilateral ON. The range of relapsing times were from 2 to 12, with an average of 3.1 (±2.3) relapses. The standardization LogMAR visual score of an affected eye on MRI scan was 0.77 ± 0.90 (mean ± SD). The subjects were all right-handed as measured by the Edinburgh inventory (Oldfield, 1971). The HCs were free of any history of neurological disease and presented a normal ophthalmologic examination, naked eye or corrected visual acuity (VA) of 1.0 and normal findings on conventional MRI examination. The institutional review board of Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University approved the study, and written informed consent was obtained from each participant.
Table 1
| sON | rON | Controls | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of subjects | 42 | 35 | 50 | |
| Mean age (range) [years] | 36.0 (15–58) | 34.4 (16–58) | 33.7 (19–55) | 0.221a |
| Sex (M/F) | 7/35 | 11/24 | 16/34 | 0.195b |
| Median disease duration (range) [months] | 1.3 (0.2–4) | 45.2 (1–240) | – | <0.001c |
| EDSS (Visual function) | 3.14 ± 1.32 | 3.94 ± 1.77 | – | 0.030c |
| LogMAR scores | 0.92 ± 0.96 | 0.77 ± 0.90 | – | 0.479c |
Descriptive data of the study groups.
sON, single optic neuritis; rON, relapsing optic neuritis; EDSS, Expanded Disability Status Scale. ax2 test. bMain effect of group in the analysis of variance. cTwo-sample t-test.
Data Acquisition
All MR measurements were performed with a 3.0-T MR system (Magnetom Trio Tim; Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) using an 8-channel head coil in the Radiology Department of Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University. During the rs-fMRI, subjects were instructed to keep their eyes closed and not to move or think of anything in particular. A standard head coil was used with foam padding to restrict head motion. All axial slices were positioned parallel to a line that joins the AC-PC line of the corpus callosum. Axial T2-weighted turbo spin-echo and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequences were performed for WM lesion detection (35 axial slices, TR/TE = 5000 ms/87 ms; field of view (FOV) = 256 mm × 256 mm; voxel size = 1 mm × 1 mm × 4 mm, slice thickness = 4 mm). Functional data were acquired with a gradient-echo echo-planar sequence (GRE-EPI) sensitive to Blood Oxygen Level Dependent (BOLD) contrast to acquire 180 functional images (TR/TE = 2000 ms/30 ms; flip angle = 90°; field of view (FOV) = 220 mm × 220 mm; voxel size = 3.4 mm × 3.4 mm × 3 mm; slice thickness = 3 mm; gap = 1 mm).
Data Preprocessing
Image preprocessing was conducted using Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM51). The data for each fMRI scan contained 180-time points. The first 10 volumes of the functional images were discarded for signal equilibration. The remaining fMRI images were corrected for the acquisition delay between slices and for head motion. All participants had less than 1.5 mm maximum displacement in the x, y, or z plane and 1.5° of angular motion during the whole fMRI scan. Then, images were normalized to the standard SPM5 echo-planar imaging template and resampled to 3 mm cubic voxels. Next, the Resting-State fMRI Data Analysis Toolkit2 was used to remove the linear trend of time courses and perform temporal bandpass filtering (0.01–0.08 Hz). The resulting data were spatially smoothed (4 mm FWHM Gaussian kernel).
ALFF Analysis
An ALFF analysis was performed using the Resting-State fMRI Data Analysis Toolkit2. The procedure for calculating the ALFF is similar to that described in previous studies (Liu et al., 2011a,b, 2012). The filtered time series was transformed to a frequency domain with a fast Fourier transform (FFT; parameters: taper percent = 0, FFT length = shortest), and the power spectrum was then obtained. The square root was thus calculated at each frequency of the power spectrum, and the averaged square root was obtained across 0.01–0.08 Hz at each voxel. According to Zang et al. (2007), in the present study, the ALFF of each voxel was divided by the individual global mean of ALFF within a brain-mask which is obtained by removing the tissues outside the brain.
Statistical Analysis
We performed an analyses of variance (ANOVA) to investigate the ALFF differences between the two groups of ON patients and HCs using the SPM Toolbox, with age and gender included as covariates. The voxels with a combined threshold of p < 0.005 and cluster size ≥270 mm3 (10 voxels) were considered to show a significant difference between the two groups. A corrected threshold of p < 0.01 was determined by Monte Carlo simulations using the AlphaSim program (Parameters were a FWHM = 4 mm and a mask of the whole brain gray matter tissue)3. The significantly different brain regions were superimposed on the standard T1-weighted imaging of the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI). Correlative analyses via MATLAB were performed to explore the relationships between the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores, disease duration, LogMAR and ALFF values presenting significant group differences.
Results
Demographic and Clinical Characteristics
As shown in Table 1, no significant differences were observed in age and gender among the three groups (HCs, sON and rON). The rON patients showed higher EDSS than sON patients (P = 0.03). The sON and rON patient group had an average disease duration of 1.3 (range from 0.2 to 4) months and 45.2 (range from 1 to 240) months, respectively.
Differences in ALFFs Between ON Patients and HCs
Compared with the HCs, the sON patients showed significantly decreased ALFFs in the bilateral cuneus/precuneus, bilateral fusiform gyrus, bilateral inferior occipital gyrus, right posterior cingulate, right parahippocampal gyrus/hippocampus, right postcentral gyrus and left superior temporal gyrus (corrected p < 0.01 using AlphaSim). The sON patients showed a significant increase in ALFFs in the left middle frontal gyrus, right superior frontal gyrus, right middle cingulate gyrus, left medial frontal gyrus, left precentral gyrus and left caudate (corrected p < 0.01 using AlphaSim; Table 2, Figures 1A,B). The rON patients demonstrated significantly decreased ALFFs in the left cuneus/precuneus, bilateral inferior temporal gyrus, bilateral lingual gyrus, right middle occipital gyrus, and left superior temporal gyrus (corrected p < 0.01 using AlphaSim) and increased ALFFs in the bilateral inferior gyrus and left medial frontal gyrus compared to normal controls (corrected p < 0.01 using AlphaSim; Table 2, Figures 2A,B). A significant decrease in ALFFs was observed in the right inferior parietal lobule (IPL), left posterior cingulate, and bilateral precuneus in the rON patients compared with the sON patients (Table 2, Figures 3A,B).
Table 2
| Anatomic area (gray matter) | MNI Coordinates | Cluster size | T-score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| x | y | z | |||
| NC-sON | |||||
| Left Middle Frontal Gyrus | −42 | 30 | 33 | 1202 | −5.469 |
| Right Superior Frontal Gyrus | 21 | 24 | 57 | 858 | −5.377 |
| Right Middle Cingulate Gyrus | 0 | −33 | 39 | 70 | −4.492 |
| Left Medial Frontal Gyrus | −6 | 54 | 12 | 45 | −4.073 |
| Left Precentral Gyrus | −45 | −12 | 33 | 38 | −4.192 |
| Left Caudate | −9 | 3 | 9 | 26 | −3.846 |
| Bilateral Cuneus/Precuneus | 0 | −90 | 33 | 240 | 6.217 |
| −3 | −66 | 60 | 3.584 | ||
| Left Fusiform Gyrus | −45 | −51 | −27 | 150 | 4.807 |
| Right Fusiform Gyrus | 33 | −36 | −18 | 37 | 3.559 |
| Right Inferior Occipital Gyrus | 48 | −81 | −15 | 126 | 4.900 |
| Left Inferior Occipital Gyrus | −24 | −90 | −3 | 103 | 4.457 |
| Right Posterior Cingulate | 3 | −60 | 12 | 65 | 4.669 |
| Right Parahippocampal Gyrus/Hippocampus | 21 | −9 | −15 | 28 | 3.312 |
| Right Postcentral Gyrus | 39 | −42 | 63 | 25 | 4.665 |
| Left Superior Temporal Gyrus | −45 | −33 | 9 | 22 | 3.994 |
| NC-rON | |||||
| Right Inferior Frontal Gyrus | −45 | 39 | 0 | 1146 | −4.579 |
| Left Inferior Frontal Gyrus | −51 | 24 | 12 | 45 | −3.965 |
| Left Medial Frontal Gyrus | −6 | 45 | −18 | 183 | −4.234 |
| −6 | 54 | 18 | 73 | −4.960 | |
| Left Cuneus/Precuneus | −12 | −96 | 15 | 862 | 5.965 |
| Right Inferior Temporal Gyrus | 48 | −69 | −3 | 106 | 4.611 |
| Left Inferior Temporal Gyrus | −57 | −66 | −6 | 53 | 5.058 |
| Left Lingual Gyrus | −15 | −60 | −12 | 105 | 4.577 |
| Right Lingual Gyrus | 9 | −84 | 0 | 27 | 3.879 |
| Right Middle Occipital Gyrus | 27 | −93 | 0 | 56 | 4.032 |
| Left Superior Temporal Gyrus | −57 | −60 | 12 | 47 | 4.338 |
| −57 | −27 | 9 | 34 | 4.174 | |
| Right Inferior Temporal Gyrus | 63 | −39 | −27 | 21 | 4.251 |
| sON-rON | |||||
| Right Inferior Parietal Lobule | 39 | −48 | 42 | 23 | 4.017 |
| Left Posterior Cingulate | −6 | −51 | 24 | 20 | 4.674 |
| Left Precuneus | −6 | −69 | 30 | 20 | 3.405 |
| Right Precuneus | 3 | −72 | 42 | 17 | 3.296 |
Brain areas showing significant amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (ALFF) differences among the single optic neuritis (sON), relapsing optic neuritis (rON) and normal control groups (corrected p < 0.01 using AlphaSim).
T-scores > 0 represent lower ALFF brain regions; T-scores < 0 represent higher ALFF brain regions.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Correlations Between ALFF and Clinical Data
We examined the relationships between the EDSS scores, disease duration, LogMAR scores and ALFFs. Correlations between the disease duration and ALFFs were identified in the left middle temporal gyrus, left inferior occipital gyrus, right lingual gyrus and right IPL. Significant correlations were not observed between the ALFF values and LogMAR or EDSS scores (Table 3).
Table 3
| Anatomic area (gray matter) | TAL Coordinates | Cluster size | T-score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| x | y | z | ||||
| Disease duration & ALFF | Left Middle Temporal Gyrus | −48 | −9 | −21 | 20 | 0.403 |
| Left Inferior Occipital Gyrus | −39 | −81 | −9 | 17 | 0.478 | |
| Right Lingual Gyrus | 6 | −93 | 0 | 23 | 0.472 | |
| Right Inferior Parietal Lobule | 69 | −42 | 21 | 17 | 0.459 | |
Correlation between disease duration and ALFF (corrected p < 0.05).
Discussion
Baseline brain activity alterations are reported in many neurological diseases, including CIS, MS and NMO (Liu et al., 2011a,b, 2012). The current study focused on evaluating the brain activity change patterns in sON and rON patients via rs-fMRI.
In the present study, we found a common pattern of decreased ALFFs in several regions of the occipital and temporal lobes in both the sON and rON patients. Wang et al. (2008) used fMRI to investigate whether spontaneous activity occurred in the primary visual areas (PVAs) of normal-sighted subjects and found that the PVA-related spontaneous activity consisted of the visual association areas including the middle occipital gyrus, cuneus and lingual gyrus, the precuneus, the precentral/postcentral gyrus, the middle frontal gyrus, the fusiform gyrus, the inferior/middle temporal gyrus and the parahippocampal gyrus. In our study, the areas with decreased ALFFs in the ON patients mainly involved the PVAs, which may be associated with memory-related mental imagery and/or visual memory consolidation processes. These changes were likely caused by axonal degeneration secondary to lesions in the optic nerves, which led to an abnormal visual pathway and impaired optic radiations related to the PVA. Both the sON and rON patients had lower ALFF values in the precuneus, which represents a key hub in the default mode network (DMN). Strong interactions have been observed between the PCC/precuneus and the IPL and medial prefrontal cortex (Buckner et al., 2008; Fransson and Marrelec, 2008). Huang et al. (2015) also found that patients with ON had lower ALFF values in the bilateral precuneus. Liu et al. demonstrated decreased ALFF values in the precuneus in CIS (Liu et al., 2012) and NMO (Liu et al., 2011a).
Compared with the HCs, significantly increased ALFFs were observed in the sON patients in the left middle frontal gyrus, right superior frontal gyrus, right middle cingulate gyrus, left medial frontal gyrus, left precentral gyrus and left caudate. The rON patients showed increased ALFFs in the bilateral inferior gyrus and left medial frontal gyrus. Previous publications revealed that visual cortical areas that selectively process relevant information are functionally connected with the frontal-parietal network, whereas those that process irrelevant information are simultaneously coupled with the default network (Chadick and Gazzaley, 2011). Our findings implied that the functional adaptations in ON occurred mainly in areas within the frontal-parietal network.
The ALFFs were also increased in the left caudate in single attack patients, and they might be involved in the control of voluntary movement, learning and memory, particularly regarding feedback processing (Packard and Knowlton, 2002). Activation of the left caudate may play important roles in adaptive neural responses after damage to both the motor and visual systems in the early stages of ON. Moreover, the inferior frontal gyrus presents increased activity in rON because it has an inverse association with the DMN (Greicius et al., 2003). The medial frontal gyrus is part of the DMN, which has a higher ALFF value in both sON and rON patients, which may reflect compensation by the DMN when patients experience visual impairment.
Interestingly, the activity of the right IPL, left posterior cingulate and bilateral precuneus were significantly lower in the rON patients compared with the sON patients, whereas regions with increased ALFFs were not identified, which demonstrated that recurrent attacks cause more severe dysfunction of the PVA. A longitudinal study found that progressive damage occurs to the optic radiations in ON (Tur et al., 2016), and this finding is consistent with the results our study, which implied both structural and functional damage progression during ON relapse.
We found positive correlations between the ALFF values and disease duration in several regions, such as the left middle temporal gyrus and inferior occipital gyrus, and these results suggest that dynamic functional plasticity changes might occur in the temporal and occipital lobes during disease progression. No other significant correlations were identified between the ALFF values and the LogMAR or EDSS scores.
Limitations
Certain limitations were observed in this study. First, the AQP4 antibody was not observed and the ON patients were not subject to follow-up evaluations. Second, longitudinal studies must be performed to explore the brain functional alterations in the different clinical outcomes of ON patients and dynamic analysis should be done to reflect the functional plasticity. Third, the relationship between brain functional and structural changes remains unclear.
Conclusion
In summary, functional impairments and adaptions occurred in both the sON and rON patients; however, the impairments mainly involved visual areas and functional adaptions predominantly occurred in the frontal lobe. More severe functional impairments were observed in the rON patients without any adaption compared with sON. Furthermore, the alterations in rON were correlated with the disease duration.
Statements
Author contributions
YL, KL and ZR: guarantor of integrity of the entire study. YL and KL: study concepts. ZR: literature research. BM and XZ: clinical studies. ZR, YD, HJ and ZS: performed the experiments. PL: data analysis and statistical analysis. ZR: manuscript preparation. ZR and YL: manuscript editing.
Funding
This work was supported by the ECTRIMS-MAGNMIS Fellowship from ECTRIMS (YL), the National Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 81101038, 81401377, 81471221 and 81230028), the National Basic Research Program of China (2013CB966900), the Beijing Natural Science fund (Grant No. 7133244), the Beijing Nova Programme (xx2013045), Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospital Clinical Medicine Development of Special Funding Support (code: ZYLX201609), and Key Projects in the National Science & Technology Pillar Program during the Twelfth Five-year Plan Period (2012BAI10B04).
Acknowledgments
We thank the patients and volunteers for participating in this study.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Footnotes
1.^http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm
2.^http://resting-fmri.sourceforge.net
3.^http://afni.nimh.nih.gov/pub/dist/doc/manual/AlphaSim.pdf
References
1
BalcerL. J. (2006). Clinical practice. Optic neuritis. N. Engl. J. Med.354, 1273–1280. 10.1056/NEJMcp053247
2
BeckR. W.ClearyP. A.AndersonM. M.KeltnerJ. L.ShultsW. T.KaufmanD. I.et al. (1992). A randomized, controlled trial of corticosteroids in the treatment of acute optic neuritis. The optic neuritis study group. N. Engl. J. Med.326, 581–588. 10.1056/NEJM199202273260901
3
BenoilidA.TiliketeC.CollonguesN.ArndtC.VighettoA.VignalC.et al. (2014). Relapsing optic neuritis: a multicentre study of 62 patients. Mult. Scler.20, 848–853. 10.1177/1352458513510223
4
BiswalB. B. (2012). Resting state fMRI: a personal history. Neuroimage62, 938–944. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.090
5
BucknerR. L.Andrews-HannaJ. R.SchacterD. L. (2008). The brain’s default network: anatomy, function and relevance to disease. Ann. N Y Acad. Sci.1124, 1–38. 10.1196/annals.1440.011
6
ChadickJ. Z.GazzaleyA. (2011). Differential coupling of visual cortex with default or frontal-parietal network based on goals. Nat. Neurosci.14, 830–832. 10.1038/nn.2823
7
DooleyM. C.ForoozanR. (2010). Optic neuritis. J. Ophthalmic Vis. Res.5, 182–187.
8
FranssonP.MarrelecG. (2008). The precuneus/posterior cingulate cortex plays a pivotal role in the default mode network: evidence from a partial correlation network analysis. Neuroimage42, 1178–1184. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.05.059
9
GreiciusM. D.KrasnowB.ReissA. L.MenonV. (2003). Functional connectivity in the resting brain: a network analysis of the default mode hypothesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A100, 253–258. 10.1073/pnas.0135058100
10
GuyJ.FitzsimmonsJ.EllisE. A.BeckB.MancusoA. (1992). Intraorbital optic nerve and experimental optic neuritis. Correlation of fat suppression magnetic resonance imaging and electron microscopy. Ophthalmology99, 720–725. 10.1016/S0161-6420(92)31905-0
11
HickmanS. J.DaltonC. M.MillerD. H.PlantG. T. (2002). Management of acute optic neuritis. Lancet360, 1953–1962. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11919-2
12
HuangX.CaiF. Q.HuP. H.ZhongY. L.ZhangY.WeiR.et al. (2015). Disturbed spontaneous brain-activity pattern in patients with optic neuritis using amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat.11, 3075–3083. 10.2147/ndt.s92497
13
KiviniemiV.JauhiainenJ.TervonenO.PaakkoE.OikarinenJ.VainionpaaV.et al. (2000). Slow vasomotor fluctuation in fMRI of anesthetized child brain. Magn. Reson. Med.44, 373–378. 10.1002/1522-2594(200009)44:3<373::aid-mrm5>3.3.co;2-g
14
KwakY.PeltierS. J.BohnenN. I.MüllerM. L.DayaluP.SeidlerR. D. (2012). L-DOPA changes spontaneous low-frequency BOLD signal oscillations in Parkinson’s disease: a resting state fMRI study. Front. Syst. Neurosci.6:52. 10.3389/fnsys.2012.00052
15
LiuY.DuanY.LiangP.JiaX.YuC.YeJ.et al. (2012). Baseline brain activity changes in patients with clinically isolated syndrome revealed by resting-state functional MRI. Acta Radiol.53, 1073–1078. 10.1258/ar.2012.120269
16
LiuY.LiangP.DuanY.JiaX.WangF.YuC.et al. (2011a). Abnormal baseline brain activity in patients with neuromyelitis optica: a resting-state fMRI study. Eur. J. Radiol.80, 407–411. 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.05.002
17
LiuY.LiangP.DuanY.JiaX.YuC.ZhangM.et al. (2011b). Brain plasticity in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: evidence from resting-state fMRI. J. Neurol. Sci.304, 127–131. 10.1016/j.jns.2011.01.023
18
MenonV.SaxenaR.MisraR.PhuljheleS. (2011). Management of optic neuritis. Indian J. Ophthalmol.59, 117–122. 10.4103/0301-4738.77020
19
MillerD.BarkhofF.MontalbanX.ThompsonA.FilippiM. (2005). Clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis, part I: natural history, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and prognosis. Lancet Neurol.4, 281–288. 10.1016/s1474-4422(05)70071-5
20
OldfieldR. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia9, 97–113. 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
21
PackardM. G.KnowltonB. J. (2002). Learning and memory functions of the basal ganglia. Annu. Rev. Neurosci.25, 563–593. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.25.112701.142937
22
ShamsP. N.PlantG. T. (2009). Optic neuritis: a review. Int. MS J.16, 82–89.
23
ToosyA. T.MasonD. F.MillerD. H. (2014). Optic neuritis. Lancet Neurol.13, 83–99. 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70259-X
24
TurC.GoodkinO.AltmannD. R.JenkinsT. M.MiszkielK.MiriglianiA.et al. (2016). Longitudinal evidence for anterograde trans-synaptic degeneration after optic neuritis. Brain139, 816–828. 10.1093/brain/awv396
25
TurnerJ. A.DamarajuE.van ErpT. G.MathalonD. H.FordJ. M.VoyvodicJ.et al. (2013). A multi-site resting state fMRI study on the amplitude of low frequency fluctuations in schizophrenia. Front. Neurosci.7:137. 10.3389/fnins.2013.00137
26
WangY.ChenW.YeL.BiswalB.YangX.ZouQ.et al. (2018). Multiscale energy reallocation during low-frequency steady-state brain response. Hum. Brain Mapp. [Epub ahead of print]. 10.1002/hbm.23992
27
WangY.DaiG.LiuF.LongZ.YanJ.ChenH. F. (2015). Steady-state BOLD response to higher-order cognition modulates low-frequency neural oscillations. J. Cogn. Neurosci.27, 2406–2415. 10.1162/jocn_a_00864
28
WangK.JiangT.YuC.TianL.LiJ.LiuY.et al. (2008). Spontaneous activity associated with primary visual cortex: a resting-state FMRI study. Cereb. Cortex18, 697–704. 10.1093/cercor/bhm105
29
WangY.LiuF.LongZ.DuanX.CuiQ.YanJ. H.et al. (2014). Steady-state BOLD response modulates low frequency neural oscillations. Sci. Rep.4:7376. 10.1038/srep07376
30
WangY.LongZ.CuiQ.LiuF.JingX.ChenH.et al. (2016). Low frequency steady-state brain responses modulate large scale functional networks in a frequency-specific means. Hum. Brain Mapp.37, 381–394. 10.1002/hbm.23037
31
WingerchukD. M.HogancampW. F.O’BrienP. C.WeinshenkerB. G. (1999). The clinical course of neuromyelitis optica (Devic’s syndrome). Neurology53, 1107–1114. 10.1212/WNL.53.5.1107
32
WuG. F.BrierM. R.ParksC. A.AncesB. M.Van StavernG. P. (2015). An eye on brain integrity: acute optic neuritis affects resting state functional connectivity. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.56, 2541–2546. 10.1167/iovs.14-16315
33
YoulB. D.TuranoG.MillerD. H.TowellA. D.MacManusD. G.MooreS. G.et al. (1991). The pathophysiology of acute optic neuritis. An association of gadolinium leakage with clinical and electrophysiological deficits. Brain114, 2437–2450. 10.1093/brain/114.6.2437
34
ZangY.HeY.ZhuC.CaoQ.SuiM.LiangM.et al. (2007). Altered baseline brain activity in children with ADHD revealed by resting-state functional MRI. Brain Dev.29, 83–91. 10.1016/j.braindev.2006.07.002
Summary
Keywords
resting-state, fMRI, ALFF, optic neuritis, spontaneous activity
Citation
Ren Z, Liu Y, Li K, Duan Y, Jing H, Liang P, Sun Z, Zhang X and Mao B (2018) Baseline Brain Activity Changes in Patients With Single and Relapsing Optic Neuritis. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 12:144. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00144
Received
14 November 2017
Accepted
03 April 2018
Published
20 April 2018
Volume
12 - 2018
Edited by
Muthuraman Muthuraman, Universität Mainz, Germany
Reviewed by
Yifeng Wang, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, China; Amgad Droby, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2018 Ren, Liu, Li, Duan, Jing, Liang, Sun, Zhang and Mao.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Yaou Liu yaouliu80@163.com Kuncheng Li kunchengli55@gmail.com
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.