Abstract
Introduction:
A growing body of research has investigated how performing arts training, and more specifically, music training, impacts the brain. Recent meta-analytic work has identified multiple brain areas where activity varies as a function of levels of musical expertise gained through music training. However, research has also shown that musical sophistication may be high even without music training. Thus, we aim to extend previous work by investigating whether the functional connectivity of these areas relates to interindividual differences in musical sophistication, and to characterize differences in connectivity attributed to performing arts training.
Methods:
We analyzed resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging from n = 74 participants, of whom 37 received performing arts training, that is, including a musical instrument, singing, and/or acting, at university level. We used a validated, continuous measure of musical sophistication to further characterize our sample. Following standard pre-processing, fifteen brain areas were identified a priori based on meta-analytic work and used as seeds in separate seed-to-voxel analyses to examine the effect of musical sophistication across the sample, and between-group analyses to examine the effects of performing arts training.
Results:
Connectivity of bilateral superior temporal gyrus, bilateral precentral gyrus and cerebellum, and bilateral putamen, left insula, and left thalamus varied with different aspects of musical sophistication. By including these measures of these aspects as covariates in post hoc analyses, we found that connectivity of the right superior temporal gyrus and left precentral gyrus relate to effects of performing arts training beyond effects of individual musical sophistication.
Discussion:
Our results highlight the potential role of sensory areas in active engagement with music, the potential role of motor areas in emotion processing, and the potential role of connectivity between putamen and lingual gyrus in general musical sophistication.
1. Introduction
A growing body of research shows that training on a musical instrument may impact brain structure and function through its frequent engagement of sensory, motor, and imagery areas. For example, a recent meta-analysis of 58 studies using the anatomic/activation likelihood estimation method suggested that there are structural and functional differences between levels of musical expertise in sensory, motor, and interoceptive brain areas (). These areas are also implicated in a similar meta-analytic work investigating different types of music processing tasks, including tasks of music perception, music performance, and music imagery ().
However, these differences may not be specific to music training but due to training in the performing arts in general. Performing arts include a variety of forms but share the experience of being overtly performed, mostly in front of an audience on a stage. A recent study of the insular connectivity assessed with resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) revealed significant differences between performing artists and a control group of participants, but not between the musicians and dancers (). Similarly, there are reports of structural changes and functional changes in sensory, motor, and interoceptive areas after dance training (; ), between participants and non-participants in a theater acting intervention (), and between traditional Chinese opera actors and control participants ().
Because past work largely used categorical distinctions of musical expertise, we know little about how patterns of activity relate to interindividual differences in musical sophistication. Musical sophistication is a construct that includes a wide range of musical expertise, e.g., singing abilities, and is not exclusive to those who have received formal training (). Moreover, task fMRI studies of gradient musical sophistication are hard to realize given the difficulty of finding musical tasks with graded difficulty. Instead, rs-fMRI may offer insights on how individual levels of musical expertise relate to brain activity.
Resting state-fMRI activity is thought to reflect the history of co-activation of functionally connected regions (). Differences in co-activation illustrated by rs-fMRI between experts and non-experts may be reflective of the activities in which the experts under study have expertise. These differences can be both positive and negative. Co-activation during rest may be greater for experts, interpreted as better connectivity in experts, or greater for non-experts, interpreted as better efficiency and selectivity in experts through automatization of tasks.
Indeed, both patterns are reported in past work. Some studies have revealed increased rs-fMRI activity in the insula of “expert” musicians—often defined as students majoring in music—(; ), a brain area thought to serve as a link between sensory, motor, and interoceptive areas (). Other work suggests that musicians show decreased brain activity and thus more selective activation of the striatal network (). Similarly, past comparisons of experts and non-experts in motor domains have identified functional modifications of areas involved in motor execution and attentional control shown both as increases and decreases of rs-fMRI activity ().
Our aim is to extend this research and clarify how rs-fMRI activity relates to interindividual levels of musical sophistication in young adults. Musical sophistication as conceptualized for the Goldsmiths Musical Sophistication Index (Gold-MSI) () contains five aspects: Active engagement, perceptual abilities, musical training, singing abilities, and emotions. Active engagement assesses how much time and money a respondent invests in music and music-related activities. Perceptual abilities and singing abilities refer to how easily a respondent can perceive music, e.g., hear mistakes or differences between performances, and how well a respondent can sing. Some respondents are highly attuned to the emotions conveyed by music; this is conceptualized as the emotions aspect of musical sophistication. Musical training is measured by asking respondents to estimate past training on instruments and in music theory, as well as time spent practicing. General musical sophistication encompasses all aspects.
To assess how these interindividual levels of musical sophistication relate to the connectivity of sensory, motor, and interoceptive areas, we selected 15 regions of interest (ROI) based on recent meta-analytic work (; ). These ROIs were identified in this meta-analytic work as the core region of eight clusters related to performance in music perceptual tasks, five clusters related to performance in music production tasks, and four clusters related to performance in music imagery related tasks. The ROIs are listed in Table 1.
Table 1
| Seed region | |
|---|---|
| Sensory | L Superior temporal gyrus (anterior) |
| R Superior temporal gyrus (anterior) | |
| L Superior temporal gyrus (posterior) | |
| R Superior temporal gyrus (posterior) | |
| L Heschl’s gyrus | |
| R Heschl’s gyrus | |
| Motor | L Precentral gyrus |
| R Precentral gyrus | |
| L Superior parietal | |
| L Middle frontal gyrus | |
| L Cerebellum (lobule III) | |
| Interoceptive | L Putamen |
| R Putamen | |
| L Insula | |
| L Thalamus |
Seeds included in seed-voxel analyses, organized by process.
The ROIs include the bilateral auditory cortices. A large number of studies have concluded that the activity and structure of the bilateral auditory cortices relates to performance in music perceptual tasks, for example, in pitch perception (), the differentiation between different modes of music (), or melodic contour perception (). Thus, we hypothesized that the connectivity of these areas would relate to the music perceptual abilities aspect of musical sophistication. We further hypothesized that the connectivity of the included motor areas would relate to the music training aspect of musical sophistication, given the body of literature demonstrating the effects of music training on such areas (e.g., , ).
The bilateral putamen, the left insula, and the left thalamus, grouped in Table 1 under interoceptive areas, have been implicated in a number of different studies: Their activity is known to be modulated by music and performing arts training for example (; ; ; ; ), making relationships to the training aspect of musical sophistication as well as differences between participants with a performing arts background and those without likely. Most recently for example, insular connectivity was related to singing training ().
Not all performing arts require the production of music, yet all do involve the perception of auditory stimuli and the movement of one’s body, i.e., musicians move their bodies to produce music, dancers move their bodies to music, and actors move their bodies while delivering speech. Thus, connectivity differences of sensory and motor areas are also likely between participants with a performing arts background and those without.
In summary, we hypothesized that the connectivity of sensory, motor, and interoceptive brain areas relates to interindividual levels of differing aspects of musical sophistication. We further explored whether or not the connectivity of these areas is modulated through formal performing arts training by studying students receiving formal performing arts training and those who are not. As we expected that participants who receive performing arts training to have higher musical sophistication, we controlled for this factor when investigating group differences in connectivity.
2. Methods
2.1. Participants
We recruited 76 participants, of whom 38 were receiving performing arts training, through enrolment in instrumental music, singing, and/or acting classes at university level. The other participants were recruited from language classes offered at the same university and from a group of varsity runners. These classes were selected so as to ensure participants were also engaging regularly with structured auditory input and/or motor sequences as part of their university experience. Participants were excluded if they were younger than 18 or older than 40, had a major psychiatric diagnosis, neurological disease or damage or contraindications to MRI.
One participant was excluded from analysis due to an incidental finding on MRI scanning and another participant was excluded from analysis due to excessive head motion in the scanner. Thus, we analyzed data from n = 74 participants, of whom 37 were receiving performing arts training. Of our participants included in the analyses, 42 self-identified as female, and 32 as male. The average age of our participants was M = 20.84 years, SD = 2.98 years. On average, participants who were receiving performing arts training reported M = 10.69 years, SD = 5.05 years of past formal music training. Participants who were not receiving performing arts training reported M = 4.29 years, SD = 4.11 years of past formal music training. Of the participants included in the analyses, 15 were enrolled in music classes but no acting classes, 17 were enrolled in music and acting classes, and 5 were enrolled in acting but no music classes.
2.2. Data collection
Participants provided self-assessments of their musical sophistication using the Gold-MSI (). The Gold-MSI provides a continuous measure of general musical sophistication as well as continuous measures of five different aspects of musical sophistication: active engagement, perceptual abilities, musical training, singing abilities, and emotions.
MRI data were obtained in a 3 T Philips Elition MRI scanner. We collected a high-resolution T1 scan from each participant (TR = 7.4 ms, TE = 3.7 ms, flip angle θ = 6°, FOV = 256 mm, 160 slices, 1 mm thickness, scan time = 3.2 min). Rs-fMRI was recorded with a single shot EPI sequence (TR = 2,000 ms, TE = 30 ms, flip angle θ = 90°, voxel dimension = 3 mm3 with 1 mm gap, 36 slices, FOV = 240 mm × 240 mm, scan time = 8.2 min). During the resting state functional MRI scan, participants were instructed to keep their eyes on a fixation cross and to stay awake.
2.3. Data analysis
Gold-MSI data were processed using the templates provided by the instrument’s authors (). Reverse-coded items are rescored before individual item answer scores are added together for each subscale.
All f/MRI data were processed using the CONN toolbox (CONN v.17) (). Standard preprocessing (including motion correction, co-registration, and resampling) was conducted using SPM12 functions integrated in the CONN toolbox (). Specifically, functional data were corrected for motion using the SPM12 realign and unwarp procedure with default settings, with any scans that exceeded 5.0 mm mean framewise displacement excluded from further analyses.
Functional images were co-registered to their corresponding T1-weighted structural images. Using SPM12 unified segmentation and normalization procedures, structural images were normalized to SPM’s Montreal Neurological Institute 2-mm T1 template by an affine transformation and non-linear registration, with the same estimated non-linear transformation then applied to the functional data. Functional and anatomical data were then resampled into 2 and 1 mm isotropic voxels, respectively, and functional data was spatially smoothed with a Gaussian kernel (FWHM = 6 mm).
To remove the effects of nuisance covariates, noise components were then regressed out of the fMRI data, along with white matter signal, and cerebrospinal fluid signal at the individual-level (). The temporal signals in the 4-dimensional volume were linearly detrended and band-pass filtered (0.01–0.08 Hz) to remove undesired components.
In line with our research objectives, 15 ROIs were identified a priori based on recent meta-analytic work (; ) which assessed brain activity subserving music processing. In particular, ROIs were related to music perception, music production, and music imagery, encompassing frontal, posterior parietal, and temporal regions, as well as medial regions (e.g., localized to the cingulate, thalamus). A complete list of ROIs is presented in Table 1.
Seed-to-voxel connectivity maps were generated across the whole brain at the participant level, using our ROIs. Functional networks generated from each individual seed were investigated separately (i.e., resulting in 15 separate analyses, and not averaged over seed regions within each network). The mean BOLD time course from each seed was extracted, with correlation coefficients calculated with the time course of each voxel throughout the whole brain, with resultant correlation maps generated. The resulting coefficients obtained seed-to-voxel analyses were Fisher z-transformed and extracted for the purposes of group-level analyses and brain-to-musical sophistication correlation analyses. All second-level analyses were performed in CONN and used a significance threshold of p < 0.05 (two-tailed), FDR-corrected for multiple comparisons.
To determine how rs-fMRI is modulated by musical sophistication, separate regressions were conducted on resultant connectivity with Gold-MSI scores entered as predictor variables. To determine how rs-fMRI is modulated by performance arts training, between-group comparisons for those who received formal performing arts training (n = 37) vs. those who did not (n = 37) were conducted on the participant-level correlation matrices.
In instances where between-group effects resulted for seeds showing an association between Gold-MSI scales and rs-fMRI, post hoc comparisons were conducted to determine if such a group effect could be explained by differences in musical sophistication. Specifically, between-group comparisons were conducted on the participant-level correlation matrices with the relevant Gold-MSI scale scores included as a covariate so as to account for differences musical sophistication across participants.
To summarize, we assessed (1) correlations of connectivity and musical sophistication, (2) effects of performing arts training and whether these effects may be explained by variations in musical sophistication. While it is possible that increased Type 1 error will arise given the number of seeds included in our analyses and large numbers of statistical (i.e., multiple) comparisons performed, all of our results are corrected for multiple comparisons within each seed using the fairly conservative method of family-wise error (FWE). However, acknowledging this possibility, we believe this “exploratory” work is valuable for the field given that our study includes a large sample size relative to the field, and limited work has been conducted employing measures of functional connectivity to further our understanding of how performing arts training impacts the brain.
3. Results
3.1. Musical sophistication
Average Gold-MSI scores for each subscale are reported in Table 2 along their corresponding percentiles in the norming sample reported by the instrument’ authors (). Violin plots are shown in Figure 1 overlaid with boxplots. We performed independent samples t-tests to investigate differences between groups. While participants in the performing arts group had higher Gold-MSI scores, ps < 0.001, many participants in the no performing arts training also had high Gold-MSI scores. We report the results of the independent samples t-tests in Table 2.
Table 2
| Performing arts training | No performing arts training | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M (SD) | percentile | M (SD) | Percentile | t(72) | p | |
| General sophistication | 97.89 (10.28) | 76 | 71.54 (17.33) | 32 | 7.95 | <0.001 |
| Active engagement | 54.81 (5.85) | 90 | 35.51 (8.30) | 28 | 6.17 | <0.001 |
| Perceptual abilities | 54.92 (4.68) | 69 | 44.86 (7.84) | 23 | 6.70 | <0.001 |
| Musical training | 37.38 (4.67) | 78 | 22.30 (8.87) | 36 | 9.15 | <0.001 |
| Singing abilities | 36.08 (4.14) | 66 | 32.41 (4.62) | 48 | 3.60 | <0.001 |
| Emotions | 37.54 (7.43) | 68 | 28.41 (7.24) | 8 | 5.36 | <0.001 |
Average Gold-MSI scores, corresponding percentiles, and results from independent samples t-tests.
Figure 1
3.2. Connectivity associated with musical sophistication
Table 3 reports the results of our analyses pertaining to Gold-MSI measures as the predictor variable on seed-to-voxel connectivity, organized by seed. Overall, we measured connectivity of 10 seeds associated with musical sophistication, spanning each of our Gold-MSI measures.
Table 3
| Seed region | Gold-MSI measure | Cluster location | MNI coordinates | Cluster size | Relationship | p-FWE corrected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sensory | ||||||
| L Superior temporal gyrus (anterior) | Perception | L Frontal pole | −38 46 22 | 137 | Negative | 0.032 |
| R Superior temporal gyrus (posterior) | Active | L Superior frontal gyrus | −20 34 46 | 130 | Negative | 0.037 |
| R Frontal pole | 10 60 4 | 1,132 | Negative | <0.001 | ||
| R Middle temporal gyrus (posterior) | 40 18 –42 | 457 | Negative | <0.001 | ||
| Motor | ||||||
| L Precentral Gyrus | Emotion | L Lateral occipital cortex (superior) | −24 −68 46 | 133 | Negative | 0.030 |
| R Postcentral gyrus | 14–44 58 | 124 | Negative | 0.041 | ||
| R Precentral gyrus | 8 –20 62 | 136 | Negative | 0.027 | ||
| General | L precentral gyrus (midline) | −2 −24 74 | 293 | Negative | <0.001 | |
| Training | R Lateral occipital cortex (inferior) | 2 –32 56 | 261 | Negative | <0.001 | |
| R Lateral occipital cortex (inferior) | 52 –72 12 | 197 | Negative | 0.004 | ||
| R Precentral gyrus | Emotion | L Lateral occipital cortex (superior) | −26 −66 40 | 187 | Negative | 0.006 |
| L Postcentral gyrus* | 8 –20 62 | 312 | Negative | <0.001 | ||
| R Postcentral gyrus | 14 –42 58 | 124 | Negative | 0.041 | ||
| Training | L Precentral gyrus (midline) | −4 −18 72 | 140 | Negative | 0.025 | |
| L Cerebellum | Emotion | R Insula | 38 –6 2 | 134 | Negative | 0.013 |
| Interoceptive | ||||||
| L Insula | Emotion | L Parietal operculum | −54 −24 16 | 176 | Negative | 0.005 |
| R Frontal operculum | 46 20 0 | 122 | Negative | 0.036 | ||
| L Putamen | General | L Lingual gyrus | −4 −74 8 | 338 | Positive | <0.001 |
| R Lingual gyrus | 16 –54 −4 | 209 | Positive | 0.002 | ||
| Active | R Caudate | 20 18 10 | 163 | Negative | 0.008 | |
| Perception | L Lingual gyrus | −4 −74 8 | 138 | Positive | 0.020 | |
| R Lingual gyrus | 14 –54 −6 | 215 | Positive | 0.002 | ||
| Singing | L Lingual gyrus | −4 −80 −6 | 124 | Positive | 0.033 | |
| Training | R Lingual gyrus | 14 –54 −6 | 160 | Positive | 0.010 | |
| R Putamen | General | L Lingual gyrus | −4 −74 8 | 134 | Positive | 0.022 |
| Singing | L Frontal pole | −42 42 22 | 126 | Negative | 0.029 | |
| L Lingual gyrus | −12 −72 −2 | 239 | Positive | <0.001 | ||
| L Thalamus | General | L Frontal pole | −38 50 24 | 142 | Negative | 0.024 |
Effect of Gold-MSI scales on resting state functional connectivity seed-to-voxel relationships across all participants.
*While the peak voxel of this cluster was localized in the right hemisphere, the majority of this cluster was localized over L Postcentral gyrus.
The Gold-MSI measure assessing general musical sophistication was shown to be associated with connectivity related to four seeds. In particular, scores were negatively correlated with decreased connectivity between the left precentral gyrus and bilateral precentral gyrus, pFWE < 0.001. Scores were positively correlated with connectivity related to bilateral putamen (with clusters localized over lingual areas, pFWEs < 0.05, shown in Figure 2), and the left thalamus (with a cluster over the left frontal pole, pFWE = 0.024).
Figure 2
The Gold-MSI measure assessing active engagement was shown to be associated with connectivity related to the superior temporal gyrus, with clusters localized over the left superior frontal gyrus, pFWE = 0.037, right frontal pole, pFWE < 0.001, and right middle temporal gyrus, pFWE < 0.001, shown in Figure 3. This Gold-MSI measure was shown to be associated also with connectivity related to the left putamen with a cluster over the right caudate, pFWE = 0.008.
Figure 3
The Gold-MSI measure assessing perceptual ability was shown to be associated with connectivity related to the left superior temporal gyrus (with a cluster over the left frontal pole, pFWE = 0.032) and left putamen (with clusters localized over bilateral lingual gyri, pFWEs < 0.05).
The Gold-MSI measure assessing musical training was shown to be associated with connectivity related to bilateral precentral gyri (with clusters localized over right lateral occipital cortex, pFWEs < 0.05, and left precentral gyrus although spanning the midline, pFWE = 0.025). This measure was also associated with connectivity between the left putamen and right lingual gyrus, pFWE = 0.010.
The Gold-MSI measure assessing singing abilities was shown to be associated with connectivity related to the bilateral putamen, between clusters localized over the left frontal pole, pFWE = 0.029 and left lingual gyrus, pFWEs < 0.05.
The Gold-MSI measure assessing emotions was shown to be associated with connectivity with connectivity related to bilateral precentral gyri (with clusters localized over left lateral occipital cortex, pFWEs < 0.05, right precentral gyrus, pFWE = 0.027, and bilateral postcentral gyri, pFWEs < 0.05, shown in Figure 4). This measure was also associated with connectivity between the left cerebellum and a cluster localized over the left insula, pFWE = 0.013, and between the left insula and clusters localized over left parietal operculum, pFWE = 0.005, and right frontal operculum, pFWE = 0.036.
Figure 4
3.3. Connectivity associated with performing arts training
Results of our analyses pertaining to between-group analyses are reported in Table 4. Between group analyses revealed that performance arts training modulated connectivity related to three seeds: left precentral gyrus, and bilateral posterior superior temporal gyrus. In particular, connectivity was decreased between the left posterior superior temporal gyrus and bilateral precentral gyri, pFWE < 0.001, between the right posterior superior temporal gyrus and regions encompassing the right middle temporal gyrus, pFWE = 0.010, and right frontal pole, pFWE = 0.021, and between the left precentral gyrus and bilateral precentral gyri, pFWE = 0.004, for participants who received performing arts training.
Table 4
| Seed | Cluster location | MNI coordinates | Cluster size | p-FWE corrected | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Effect of performing arts training (formal vs. no formal training) | |||||
| Sensory | |||||
| L Superior temporal gyrus (posterior) | R Precentral gyrus (midline) | 6 –20 64 | 296 | <0.001 | |
| R Superior temporal gyrus (posterior) | R Frontal pole | 8 64 –2 | 148 | 0.021 | |
| R Middle temporal gyrus | 60 2 –30 | 173 | 0.010 | ||
| Motor | |||||
| L Precentral gyrus | L Precentral gyrus (midline) | −8 −26 58 | 196 | 0.004 | |
| Post hoc analyses related to group comparisons with Gold-MSI scales included as covariate | |||||
| Gold-MSI Active† | R Superior temporal gyrus (posterior) | – | – | – | – |
| Gold-MSI General* | L Precentral gyrus | – | – | – | – |
Resting state functional connectivity seed-to-voxel relationships resulting from group-level comparisons.
Connectivity differences between performing arts training groups of the right posterior superior temporal gyrus and the left precentral gyrus thus resemble connectivity of these areas which relate to interindividual differences in the Gold-MSI scales measuring active engagement and general sophistication, respectively. Thus, we included Gold-MSI scores as covariates in post hoc analyses of the group differences. These analyses revealed that differences between groups were independent of differences in musical sophistication.
4. Discussion
Our results show that the resting-state connectivity of sensory, motor, and interoceptive brain areas, as identified in recent meta-analytic work (; ), relates to interindividual levels of musical sophistication. Overall, the uncovered co-activation patterns suggest that lower levels of musical sophistication are associated with greater connectivity of sensory and motor areas specifically. Similarly, our results also show greater connectivity of sensory and motor areas for participants who were not receiving performing arts training compared to their peers who were.
4.1. Discriminant validity of the Gold-MSI
Given the large number of participants who were enrolled in music classes at the time of the study, it is perhaps surprising that the connectivity differences between the groups of participants were most similar to those related to interindividual differences of general sophistication and active engagement rather than the music training aspect of the Gold-MSI. Post hoc analyses of the group differences which included the Gold-MSI scores as covariates showed that between-group differences were not explained by differences in musical sophistication in the general public and thus point toward performing arts-training specific effects.
Current training in the performing arts and musical sophistication may thus be associated with greater efficiency of the superior temporal gyri and the precentral gyri (see Tables 3, 4), while music training as an aspect of musical sophistication, which is primarily based on assessment of past training, may be more readily associated with connectivity between the precentral gyri and the right lateral occipital cortex, as well as the left putamen and the right lingual gyrus (see also below for a discussion on the relationship between expertise and the lingual gyri).
Closer inspection of our results further reveals that connectivity of sensory areas is associated with particular subscales of the Gold-MSI, namely those measuring active engagement and perceptual ability. In contrast, connectivity of motor areas is associated with the subscales of the Gold-MSI assessing musical training, emotions, and general sophistication. These results support the discriminant validity of the Gold-MSI subscales.
4.2. Mechanisms of musical sophistication
Further, we suggest potential mechanisms through which these aspects of musical sophistication may arise. As expected, music perceptual ability correlated with connectivity of the auditory cortex. Specifically, music perceptual ability correlated with connectivity patterns of the left anterior superior temporal gyrus. This result may shed further light on the specialization of the anterior superior temporal gyrus for processing complex musical sounds ().
Connectivity of the right posterior superior temporal gyrus in contrast correlated with scores on the active engagement subscale, corroborating findings on its relevance for a number of music processing functions, particularly in musicians (; ). It should be noted that the performing arts training group scored particularly high on this subscale (see Table 2), and indeed, that the group comparison suggested that performing arts training further modulated connectivity of this brain area (see Table 4). Our results thus suggest that active engagement is modulated through connectivity in sensory areas (see Figure 3).
As hypothesized, connectivity of the motor cortex covaried with individual differences in music training. Specifically, connectivity between the left precentral gyrus with the right inferior lateral occipital cortex, and connectivity between the right precentral gyrus and the contralateral precentral gyrus correlated with scores on the training subscale. Our results thus add to the body of literature demonstrating the effects of music training on sensorimotor areas (e.g., , ).
Additionally, our results suggest that the emotional engagement with music is modulated through connectivity in motor areas (see Figure 4). Connectivity of the left and right precentral gyrus with clusters located right precentral, bilateral postcentral gyri, as well as the left superior lateral occipital cortex, and connectivity between the left cerebellum and right insula correlated with scores on the emotions subscale. Our results thus support other research showing the involvement of motor areas in the processing of emotions in music (; ), in particular, the involvement of the cerebellum in the processing of emotions in auditory input (; ). Further, they suggest that there are links between motor areas and aesthetic experiences in general ().
4.3. Individual differences in musical sophistication
Individual differences in all subscales of the Gold-MSI were associated with connectivity of interoceptive and integrative areas, including the left insula, bilateral putamen, and thalamus (see Figure 2). Each of these areas have been implicated in studies on internal generation of musical structure or music imagery: For example, the putamen is thought to play a role in the internal generation of musical beat (), while the thalamus and the basal ganglia are implicated in studies of musical imagery (; ; ).
Insula activity is known to be modulated by music and performing arts training (; ; ; ; ). Our results add to this previous literature and support the idea that the insula and operculum may integrate mental imagery () with interoceptive and emotional information during music performance (), given the insula’s suspected role in linking information from diverse functional systems in the brain ().
Our results further suggest that singing abilities, as conceptualized for the Gold-MSI, are related to connectivity of the bilateral putamen. The bilateral putamen have been implicated in a number of studies on the processing of vocal auditory stimuli (; ; ). Thus, future research on the modulation of brain activity through singing training may consider including these areas as ROIs.
Overall, our results then suggest that the ability to internally represent musical structure or the ability to imagine music may determine individual levels of musical sophistication. However, the Gold-MSI does not directly characterize one’s use of music imagery. Further work will be necessary to explore how mental imagery modulates the effects of performing arts training or vice versa as well as the structural underpinnings of these patterns of connectivity.
4.4. Expertise and the lingual gyri
Our results further suggest that it may be the ability to internally represent musical sequences that determines individual levels of musical sophistication. Here, the connectivity of the putamen to the bilateral lingual gyri is positively associated with different aspects of musical sophistication. This increased striatal functional connectivity with lingual gyri has been previously observed in musicians compared to non-musicians and is thought to relate to individual expertise in reading musical notation given the lingual gyrus’ role in higher order pattern recognition ().
Expertise is also reflected by activity of the lingual gyri in music () and sport (; ). For instance, improved motor performance on a sport-related task (e.g., dart throwing, table tennis) is linked to decreased activity of the lingual gyri during both mental rehearsal of the same task () and perceptual priming using stimuli related to the same task ().
However, it should be noted that the connectivity of some of the included seeds was not associated with musical sophistication, including Heschl’s gyri. This may come as a surprise given that structural and functional differences of Heschl’s gyri between participants with and without music training are well-documented (; ; ; ; ). These results thus help further delineate between music training and musical sophistication which are overlapping but not identical concepts (). Future work should also investigate the relationship between individual differences in musical sophistication and variation in white matter tracts supporting the function of Heschl’s gyri.
A major limitation of our study is the possibility of increased Type 1 error given the number of seeds included in our analyses and large numbers of statistical comparisons performed even though all of our results were corrected for multiple comparisons within each seed. It is also important to consider the different subtypes of performing arts training. As we recruited generally from performing arts classes future work is needed to investigate specific effects of music training or particular effects of acting training. However, we believe that our work is impactful given that it includes a relatively large sample size, with multiple control conditions. Thus, it may serve to help generate new hypotheses. It also extends past work conducted using functional connectivity measures to further understanding of how performing arts training impacts the brain.
5. Conclusion
In conclusion, we assessed (1) correlations of resting-state functional brain connectivity and musical sophistication, and (2) the effects of performing arts training. We found that overall, the connectivity of sensory and motor areas may be associated with individual levels of specific aspects of musical sophistication. Further, we discovered that individual levels of musical sophistication also correlate with differences in the connectivity of interoceptive and integrative areas. Lastly, performing arts training may be associated with connectivity of sensory and motor areas over and above individual differences in this connectivity associated with musical sophistication. In the future, analyses may also consider structural differences of these areas.
Statements
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by the University of British Columbia Office of Research Ethics. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author contributions
A-XC, NMY, NH, JW, and LB conceptualized the study. A-XC and NMY collected the data. A-XC and SK carried out the data analysis and wrote the first draft. All authors contributed to the manuscript.
Funding
This project was supported through the Peter Wall Institute for Advanced Studies. A-XC was supported through a postdoctoral fellowship through the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. SK was supported via a salary award through Michael Smith Health Research BC.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the help of Grace Hu and Minqi Xu during data collection.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
AiM.LouiP.MorrisT. P.Chaddock-HeymanL.HillmanC. H.McAuleyE.et al. (2022). Musical experience relates to insula-based functional connectivity in older adults. Brain Sci.12:1577. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12111577
2
Angulo-PerkinsA.AubéW.PeretzI.BarriosF. A.ArmonyJ. L.ConchaL. (2014). Music listening engages specific cortical regions within the temporal lobes: differences between musicians and non-musicians. Cortex59, 126–137. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.07.013
3
CantouP.PlatelH.DesgrangesB.GroussardM. (2018). How motor, cognitive and musical expertise shapes the brain: focus on FMRI and EEG resting-state functional connectivity. J. Chem. Neuroanat.89, 60–68. doi: 10.1016/j.jchemneu.2017.08.003
4
CeravoloL.FrühholzS.PierceJ.GrandjeanD.PéronJ. (2021). Basal ganglia and cerebellum contributions to vocal emotion processing as revealed by high-resolution FMRI. Sci. Rep.11:10645. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90222-6
5
CriscuoloA.Pando-NaudeV.BonettiL.VuustP.BratticoE. (2022). An ALE meta-analytic review of musical expertise. Sci. Rep.12:11726. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14959-4
6
FooF.King-StephensD.WeberP.LaxerK.ParviziJ.KnightR. T. (2016). Differential processing of consonance and dissonance within the human superior temporal gyrus. Front. Hum. Neurosci.10:154. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00154
7
FrischS.KotzS. A.von CramonD. Y.FriedericiA. D. (2003). Why the P600 is not just a P300: the role of the basal ganglia. Clin. Neurophysiol.114, 336–340. doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00366-8
8
GaserC.SchlaugG. (2003). Brain structures differ between musicians and non-musicians. J. Neurosci.23, 9240–9245. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-27-09240.2003
9
GrahnJ. A.RoweJ. B. (2009). Feeling the beat: premotor and striatal interactions in musicians and nonmusicians during beat perception. J. Neurosci.29, 7540–7548. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2018-08.2009
10
Guerra-CarrilloB.MackeyA. P.BungeS. A. (2014). Resting-state FMRI: a window into human brain plasticity. Neuroscientist20, 522–533. doi: 10.1177/1073858414524442
11
GujingL.HuiH.XinL.LirongZ.YutongY.Ye GuofengL. Jing et al. (2019). Increased insular connectivity and enhanced empathic ability associated with dance/music training. Neural Plast.2019:9693109. doi: 10.1155/2019/9693109
12
GuoZ.LiA.LinY. (2017). “Neural efficiency” of Athletes' brain during visuo-spatial task: an FMRI study on table tennis players. Front. Behav. Neurosci.11:72. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00072
13
HerholzS. C.HalpernA. R.ZatorreR. J. (2012). Neuronal correlates of perception, imagery, and memory for familiar tunes. J. Cogn. Neurosci.24, 1382–1397. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00216
14
HopyanT.LaughlinS.DennisM. (2010). Emotions and their cognitive control in children with cerebellar tumors. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc.16, 1027–1038. doi: 10.1017/S1355617710000974
15
HydeK. L.LerchJ.NortonA.ForgeardM.WinnerE.EvansA. C.et al. (2009). The effects of musical training on structural brain development: a longitudinal study. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.1169, 182–186. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04852.x
16
JiangL.ZhangR.TaoL.ZhangY.ZhouY.CaiQ. (2023). Neural mechanisms of musical structure and tonality, and the effect of musicianship. Front. Psychol.14:1092051. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1092051
17
KarpatiF. J.GiacosaC.FosterN. E. V.PenhuneV. B.HydeK. L. (2015). Dance and the brain: a review. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.1337, 140–146. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12632
18
KirschL. P.UrgesiC.CrossE. S. (2016). Shaping and reshaping the aesthetic brain: emerging perspectives on the neurobiology of embodied aesthetics. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.62, 56–68. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.12.005
19
KleberB.FribergA.ZeitouniA.ZatorreR. (2017). Experience-dependent modulation of right anterior insula and sensorimotor regions as a function of noise-masked auditory feedback in singers and nonsingers. Neuroimage147, 97–110. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.11.059
20
KleberB.VeitR.MollC. V.GaserC.BirbaumerN.LotzeM. (2016). Voxel-based morphometry in opera singers: increased Gray-matter volume in right somatosensory and auditory cortices. Neuroimage133, 477–483. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.03.045
21
KraeutnerS. N.CuiA.-X.BoydL. A.BoeS. G. (2022). Modality of practice modulates resting state connectivity during motor learning. Neurosci. Lett.781:136659. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2022.136659
22
KungS.-J.ChenJ. L.ZatorreR. J.PenhuneV. B. (2013). Interacting cortical and basal ganglia networks underlying finding and tapping to the musical beat. J. Cogn. Neurosci.25, 401–420. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00325
23
KurthF.ZillesK.FoxP. T.LairdA. R.EickhoffS. B. (2010). A link between the systems: functional differentiation and integration within the human insula revealed by meta-analysis. Brain Struct. Funct.214, 519–534. doi: 10.1007/s00429-010-0255-z
24
LuoC.ShipengT.PengY.GaoS.LiJ.DongL.et al. (2014). Long-term effects of musical training and functional plasticity in salience system. Neural Plast.2014:180138, 1–13. doi: 10.1155/2014/180138
25
MüllensiefenD.GingrasB.MusilJ.StewartL. (2014). The musicality of non-musicians: an index for assessing musical sophistication in the general population. PLoS One9:e89642. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089642
26
NeumannN.LotzeM.EickhoffS. B. (2016). Cognitive expertise: an ALE meta-analysis. Hum. Brain Mapp.37, 262–272. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23028
27
Pando-NaudeV.PatyczekA.BonettiL.VuustP. (2021). An ALE meta-analytic review of top-down and bottom-up processing of music in the brain. Sci. Rep.11:20813. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-00139-3
28
PennyW.FristonK.AshburnerJ.KiebelS.NicholsT.. (2007). Statistical parametric mapping: the analysis of functional brain images. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
29
PereiraC. S.TeixeiraJ.FigueiredoP.XavierJ.CastroS. L.BratticoE. (2011). Music and emotions in the brain: familiarity matters. PLoS One6:e27241. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027241
30
PutkinenV.Nazari-FarsaniS.SeppäläK.KarjalainenT.SunL.KarlssonH. K.et al. (2021). Decoding music-evoked emotions in the auditory and motor cortex. Cereb. Cortex31, 2549–2560. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhaa373
31
RajeshA.NoiceT.NoiceH.JahnA.DaughertyA. M.HellerW.et al. (2021). Can a Theater acting intervention enhance inhibitory control in older adults? A brain-behavior investigation. Front. Hum. Neurosci.15:583220. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.583220
32
RehfeldK.LüdersA.HökelmannA.LessmannV.KaufmannJ.BrigadskiT.et al. (2018). Dance training is superior to repetitive physical exercise in inducing brain plasticity in the elderly. PLoS One13:e0196636. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196636
33
SchneiderP.Michael SchergH.DoschG.SpechtH. J.GutschalkA.RuppA. (2002). Morphology of Heschl's gyrus reflects enhanced activation in the auditory cortex of musicians. Nat. Neurosci.5, 688–694. doi: 10.1038/nn871
34
SuarezR. O.GolbyA.WhalenS.SatoS.TheodoreW. H.KuftaC. V.et al. (2010). Contributions to singing ability by the posterior portion of the superior temporal gyrus of the non-language-dominant hemisphere: first evidence from subdural cortical stimulation, Wada testing, and FMRI. Cortex46, 343–353. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.04.010
35
TaddeoS.SchulzM.AndermannM.RuppA. (2022). Neuromagnetic representation of melodic contour processing in human auditory cortex. Front. Hum. Neurosci.16:909159. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.909159
36
TanakaS.KirinoE. (2016a). Functional connectivity of the dorsal striatum in female musicians. Front. Hum. Neurosci.10:178. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00178
37
TanakaS.KirinoE. (2016b). Functional connectivity of the precuneus in female university students with long-term musical training. Front. Hum. Neurosci.10:328. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00328
38
ThomassonM.BenisD.VoruzP.SajA.VérinM.AssalF.et al. (2022). Crossed functional specialization between the basal ganglia and cerebellum during vocal emotion decoding: insights from stroke and Parkinson’s disease. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci.22, 1030–1043. doi: 10.3758/s13415-022-01000-4
39
van VugtF. T.HartmannK.AltenmüllerE.MohammadiB.MarguliesD. S. (2021). The impact of early musical training on striatal functional connectivity. Neuroimage238:118251. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118251
40
Whitfield-GabrieliS.Nieto-CastanonA. (2012). Conn: a functional connectivity toolbox for correlated and anticorrelated brain networks. Brain Connect.2, 125–141. doi: 10.1089/brain.2012.0073
41
ZamoranoA. M.CifreI.MontoyaP.RiquelmeI.KleberB. (2017). Insula-based networks in professional musicians: evidence for increased functional connectivity during resting state FMRI. Hum. Brain Mapp.38, 4834–4849. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23682
42
ZamoranoA. M.ZatorreR. J.VuustP.FribergA.BirbaumerN.KleberB. (2023). Singing training predicts increased insula connectivity with speech and respiratory sensorimotor areas at rest. Brain Res.1813:148418. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2023.148418
43
ZhangW.ZhaoF.QinW.MaL. (2018). Altered spontaneous regional brain activity in the insula and visual areas of professional traditional Chinese Pingju opera actors. Front. Neurosci.12:450. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00450
Summary
Keywords
resting-state fMRI, musical sophistication, music training, functional connectivity, music perception, music production, music imagery
Citation
Cui A-X, Kraeutner SN, Motamed Yeganeh N, Hermiston N, Werker JF and Boyd LA (2023) Resting-state brain connectivity correlates of musical sophistication. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 17:1195996. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1195996
Received
29 March 2023
Accepted
15 September 2023
Published
29 September 2023
Volume
17 - 2023
Edited by
Julia C. Basso, Virginia Tech, United States
Reviewed by
Mohammad Mehdi Mehrabinejad, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran; M. Florencia Assaneo, New York University, United States; Oscar Casanova, University of Zaragoza, Spain
Updates
Copyright
© 2023 Cui, Kraeutner, Motamed Yeganeh, Hermiston, Werker and Boyd.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Anja-Xiaoxing Cui, anja.cui@univie.ac.at
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.