In the published article, there was an error. The genotypes used in the study were imputed to 1000 Genomes v1.3, not to Haplotype Reference Consortium (HRC) panel (pre-release 2015) as stated.
A correction has been made to Methods, Avon longitudinal study of parents and children population cohort, paragraph number three. This sentence previously stated:
“These data were jointly phased using SHAPEIT2 (Delaneau et al., 2013), which uses relationship information to improve phasing accuracy, and imputed to the Haplotype Reference Consortium (HRC) panel (pre-release 2015)”.
The corrected sentence appears below:
“These data were jointly phased using SHAPEIT2 (Delaneau et al., 2013), which uses relationship information to improve phasing accuracy, and imputed to the 1,000 Genomes v1.3.”
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Statements
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
DelaneauO.ZaguryJ.MarchiniJ. (2013). Improved whole-chromosome phasing for disease and population genetic studies. Nat. Methods10, 5–6. 10.1038/nmeth.2307
Summary
Keywords
coordination, development, dyspraxia, neurodevelopment, GWAS, ALSPAC, developmental coordination disorder, motor coordination
Citation
Mountford HS, Hill A, Barnett AL and Newbury DF (2024) Corrigendum: Genome-wide association study of motor coordination. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 18:1360116. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1360116
Received
22 December 2023
Accepted
10 January 2024
Published
23 January 2024
Volume
18 - 2024
Edited and reviewed by
Catherine Purcell, Cardiff University, United Kingdom
Updates
Copyright
© 2024 Mountford, Hill, Barnett and Newbury.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Hayley S. Mountford hmountford@brookes.ac.uk
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.