Abstract
The entorhinal cortex (EC) and hippocampal (HC) connectivity is the main source of episodic memory formation and consolidation. The entorhinal–hippocampal (EC-HC) connection is classified as canonically glutamatergic and, more recently, has been characterized as a non-canonical GABAergic connection. Recent evidence shows that both EC and HC receive inputs from dopaminergic, cholinergic, and noradrenergic projections that modulate the mnemonic processes linked to the encoding and consolidation of memories. In the present review, we address the latest findings on the EC-HC connectivity and the role of neuromodulations during the mnemonic mechanisms of encoding and consolidation of memories and highlight the value of the cross-species approach to unravel the underlying cellular mechanisms known. Furthermore, we discuss how EC-HC connectivity early neurodegeneration may contribute to the dysfunction of episodic memories observed in aging and Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Finally, we described how exercise may be a fundamental tool to prevent or decrease neurodegeneration.
1 Introduction
Formation and consolidation of new memories are critical brain functions that arise on the limbic system (MacDonald et al., 2011; Manns and Eichenbaum, 2006) and require the association of salient spatial, temporal, and contextual sensory elements within an environment (Basu et al., 2016; Fortin et al., 2004). Those properties rely on the appropriate function and connectivity between the entorhinal cortex (EC) and the hippocampal area (HC), as a reciprocal entorhinal cortex–hippocampal loop where EC sends and receives projections from HC (Basu and Siegelbaum, 2015; Witter et al., 2017). The interaction between EC and HC promotes a sequential organization that leads to the formation and consolidation of episodic memories of people, places, objects, events, and locations in space (Basu et al., 2016; Basu and Siegelbaum, 2015; Brun et al., 2008; Buzsáki and Moser, 2013; Igarashi et al., 2014; Ye et al., 2018). An understanding of this connectivity at molecular, cellular, circuitry, and functional levels could provide insights into the formation and consolidation of new memories. Additionally, given that the EC is one of the first brain regions to exhibit neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease (Igarashi, 2023), identifying the properties of the connectivity between EC and HC could also provide insights into disease mechanisms.
In this review, we focus on the role of neuromodulators in entorhinal cortex–hippocampal functional connectivity during the encoding and consolidation of memories. We highlight the value of animal research to unravel the underlying cellular mechanisms of encoding and consolidation of new memories. We discuss how neurodegeneration of the entorhinal cortex–hippocampal connectivity during aging may contribute to Alzheimer’s disease dysfunction and how exercise may prevent or decrease this neurodegeneration.
2 Entorhinal cortex–hippocampal architecture
The EC serves as the main input and output of the HC area and works as the nodal point for other cortical areas (Basu and Siegelbaum, 2015; Canto et al., 2008; Witter et al., 2017). The EC is located in the medial temporal lobe and is surrounded by the olfactory cortex, amygdala, parasubiculum, and perirhinal cortex (Canto et al., 2008). Neuroanatomical evidence from studies in rodents suggests that EC is subdivided into two major subregions, the medial- (MEC) and lateral entorhinal cortex (LEC) (Canto et al., 2008; Witter et al., 2017), which convey mainly spatial and non-spatial features, respectively, into the HC (Knierim et al., 2013; Witter et al., 2017). For many years, researchers assumed that the connectivity of the human EC was similar to that observed in rodents. It wasn’t until recently that the use of ultra-high-resolution fMRI confirmed the functional division of human EC into two subregions, the anterior–lateral and posterior–medial regions with object-related and spatial preferences, respectively, in line with the animal literature (Maass et al., 2015; Navarro Schröder et al., 2015; Schultz et al., 2015). Thus, the functional connectivity of the human EC closely parallels the anatomical connectivity patterns of the rodent and non-human primate EC.
Anatomically, MEC is highly innervated by the presubiculum and postrhinal cortex (in rodents; parahippocampal cortex in primates) and processes spatial information. The MEC cells exhibit spatial and directional firing patterns, such as the widely studied grid cells, heading direction cells, speed cells, and border cells (Fyhn et al., 2004; Hafting et al., 2005; Kropff et al., 2015; Moser et al., 2008; Sasaki et al., 2015; Solstad et al., 2008). By contrast, LEC is vastly innervated by the olfactory bulb and perirhinal cortex. The LEC neurons respond to non-spatial features of the environment such as odors, objects, and timing (Basu and Siegelbaum, 2015; Deshmukh and Knierim, 2011; Wan et al., 1999; Sasaki et al., 2015; Tsao et al., 2013, 2018; Zhu et al., 1995). While MEC is traditionally thought to be highly innervated by the presubiculum and postrhinal cortex and LEC from the olfactory bulb and perirhinal cortex, this prevailing concept has been recently challenged using tract tracing. This new technique revealed that the postrhinal cortex preferably targets the LEC instead of the MEC, thus converging postrhinal and perirhinal projections on LEC layer II (Doan et al., 2019).
This complex anatomical connectivity suggests that MEC and LEC cannot be understood simply as a spatial-non-spatial dichotomy, but rather as a potential site of integration for information about a multitude of different environmental features relevant to spatial location. Indeed, it has been proposed that MEC may be involved in path integration based on a global frame of references using internal self-motion cues and external inputs about the environment. Thus, MEC may provide the hippocampus with information on the spatial context of an experience. The LEC may process information about individual item features and locations based on a local landmark of reference using external sensory inputs, providing the hippocampus with information about the content of an experience (Knierim et al., 2013; Keene et al., 2016). Whether this complex anatomical and functional organization of EC takes place in humans is still largely unknown. However, a thorough anatomical and functional characterization of EC subfields may not only advance our understanding of human memory processing but also have important clinical implications in neurodegenerative diseases.
Within laminar classification, both the LEC and the MEC are mainly sectioned into five well-defined layers (layers I, II, III, IV, and V), with an extra layer VI that has not been completely studied. Nevertheless, this distribution is consistent and remains among different species, including rodents, non-human primates, and humans (Braak and Braak, 1992; Ohara et al., 2018, 2021; Witter et al., 2017). Additionally, connectivity with HC is widely different across layers.
The most superficial layers II and III are thought to provide the main input to the HC, whereas deeper layers V and VI receive the outputs from HC and subiculum (Ohara et al., 2018, 2021; Roy et al., 2017; Witter et al., 2017). Functional studies in humans show that during the performance of a memory task, the superficial layers of the EC have significantly greater activation associated with task-related encoding conditions, whereas the deep layers show significantly greater activation associated with task-related retrieval conditions (Maass et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2023). Future functional studies examining alterations in task-related encoding and retrieval will be key in understanding the early pathology accumulation in the EC layers during the progress of AD-related memory impairment.
The use of molecular markers, electrophysiological, and anatomical tools has allowed the identification of neurons with layer-specific features and distinct molecular phenotypes. In rodents, in layer II of MEC, there is a robust presence of pyramidal neurons and large multipolar neurons denominated stellate cells (SCs), while in LEC, there is a presence of pyramidal neurons, medium-sized multipolar cells, and large-sized denominated fan cells (FCs) (Witter et al., 2017). Neurochemically, there are two types of neurons in layer II of both subregions of EC: calbindin-and reelin-expressing cells that are distinctively organized. Calbindin is a member of the calcium-binding proteins and has a critical role in preventing neuronal death as well as maintaining calcium homeostasis, whereas reelin is a glycoprotein implicated in synaptic plasticity (Schmidt, 2012; Stranahan et al., 2013). In rodents’ MEC, calbindin+ and reelin+ cells appear to be grouped in patches, whereas in LEC the two cell types are confined to two separate sublayers, reelin cells in layer IIa and calbindin cells in layer IIb. Reelin+ neurons located in both MEC and LEC project to the dentate gyrus (DG) and CA3 area, whereas calbindin+ neurons project to the area CA1, the contralateral EC, olfactory bulb, and the piriform cortex (Fuchs et al., 2016; Kitamura et al., 2014; Ray et al., 2014; Witter et al., 2017).
On the other hand, the HC is located in the temporal lobe and is a multilayered structure composed primarily of densely packed neurons. Similar to EC, the HC is subdivided into regions classified as the DG, the proper HC that consists of Cornu Ammonis areas 1–3 (CA1, CA2, and CA3), and the subiculum (sub) (Amaral and Witter, 1989). In humans, the HC is a widely elongated structure, whereas in rodents, it is large but less elongated with a cashew-similar form (Knierim, 2015; Zemla and Basu, 2017). Nevertheless, it is believed their function and basic structures are maintained among mammals, including rodents and humans.
The DG is thought to contribute to the formation of new episodic memories, novelty, and pattern separation (Bakker et al., 2008; Goodrich-Hunsaker et al., 2008; Rolls, 2016; Leutgeb et al., 2007). Anatomically, the DG consists of three distinct layers, an outer molecular layer, a middle granule cell layer, and an inner polymorphic layer or hilus. The principal cells of the DG are the granule cells that, packed together, give shape to the granule cell layer. The molecular layer is subdivided into three segments, the middle and outer molecular layers that receive the afferent projections from MEC and LEC, respectively, and the inner molecular layer that receives inputs primarily from the GABAergic interneurons, mossy cells, and subcortical modulatory inputs such as the medial septum and diagonal band of Broca (Amaral et al., 2007). The axons of the granule cells, known as mossy fibers, project to the dendrites of CA3 pyramidal neurons.
The DG is one of the few brain areas that continuously generate new granule cells throughout life in mammalian species, a physiological phenomenon denominated “adult neurogenesis” which is highly reproducible in rodent models (Ming and Song, 2005; Vivar and van Praag, 2013), whereas in humans, it is still under debate (Sorrells et al., 2018; Snyder, 2019; Moreno-Jiménez et al., 2021). The neural stem cells that give rise to the new granule cells are located in the subgranular zone. These new granule cells are integrated into the hippocampal network and exhibit enhanced excitability and plasticity compared to developmentally generated granule cells (Schmidt-Hieber et al., 2004; Ge et al., 2007; Ming and Song, 2005). Continuous addition of easily excitable new granule cells to the DG suggests a unique contribution to memory function, with neurogenesis as a mechanism underlying efficient cortical storage of new memories and pattern separation (Kitamura et al., 2009; Clelland et al., 2009; Creer et al., 2010; Sahay et al., 2011; Nakashiba et al., 2012; Kempermann, 2022).
In the HC, the layers of the CA areas are divided according to the localization of cell bodies, axons, and dendrite localizations. The somata of the pyramidal cells constitute the stratum pyramidale (SP). The stratum oriens (SO) contains the basal dendrites of the pyramidal cells, whereas the stratum lucidum (SL) is composed of the axons from DG granular cells, which project straight to CA3 basal dendrites. The stratum radiatum (SR) is confirmed by the apical dendrites of the pyramidal cells and is the area where axons from CA3 pyramidal cells project to CA1 via the Schaffer collaterals (SC). Finally, the stratum lacunosum moleculare (SLM) is the layer where the most distal dendrites are located and where the EC of the MEC and LEC inputs are reached (Amaral and Witter, 1989; Basu and Siegelbaum, 2015; Witter et al., 2000) (Figure 1).
Figure 1
In addition to the classical role of the principal excitatory neurons to shape episodic memory formation, recent evidence has increased attention to the function of GABAergic interneurons (GABAergic INs) in modulating the EC-HC circuitry function. In physiological conditions, they work to maintain the excitation–inhibition balance by shaping, acquiring, and transforming the information of the glutamatergic neurons through synaptic transmission and plasticity (McBain and Fisahn, 2001). In the cortex, GABAergic INs constitute around 10–20% of all neurons, whereas in the hippocampus, they are around 10–15% (Bezaire and Soltesz, 2013; Pelkey et al., 2017). They are classified according to their morphology, molecular markers and neurochemical content, intrinsic properties, developmental origin, and function (Petilla Interneuron Nomenclature Group, 2008; Harris et al., 2018; Klausberger and Somogyi, 2008; Le Magueresse and Monyer, 2013; Pelkey et al., 2017). A recent classification is in terms of their neurochemical content, with the presence of calcium-binding proteins and molecular markers such as parvalbumin (PV), calbindin (CB) and calretinin (CR), cholecystokinin (CCK), somatostatin (SST), vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), neuropeptide Y (NPY), and neuron-derived neurotrophic factor (NDNF) (Hernández-Frausto et al., 2023; Klausberger and Somogyi, 2008; McBain and Fisahn, 2001). Thus, the cytoarchitecture of the EC-HC circuit is orchestrated not only for the influence of principal cells but also for the important role of GABAergic INs in maintaining the excitation–inhibition balance of the circuit.
3 Information flow in the entorhinal cortex–hippocampal circuit
3.1 Canonical pathways—glutamatergic inputs
The processing of multimodal sensory information in the EC and HC is required for episodic memory formation. The general canonical model of the EC-HC circuit posits that HC receives multisensory inputs from EC layers II and III directly to the CA1 area and DG. The first and most studied is the trisynaptic pathway (EC layer II → DG → CA3 → CA1), where the granule cells receive direct excitatory projections from MEC and LEC layer II. However, transynaptic tracing studies show that particularly adult-born granule cells receive direct innervation preferentially from the LEC layer II and the perirhinal cortex rather than from the MEC (Vivar et al., 2013). It suggests that new granule cells may be more specialized in the processing of incoming environmental information than developmentally generated granule cells that are innervated similarly by both LEC and MEC. Indeed, disruption of adult-born granule cell circuitry by LEC-perirhinal cortex lesion led to deficits in fine discrimination (Vivar et al., 2013).
Next, the dentate granule cells route the processed information via mossy fibers to the CA3 area, connecting the proximal portion of pyramidal cells´ dendrites. The CA3 pyramidal neurons then project their axons called “Schaffer collateral” to the medial portion of CA1 pyramidal cells´ dendrites. Finally, CA1 pyramidal cells and subiculum neurons send back processed information to layer V of EC and other brain structures (van Strien et al., 2009; Basu and Siegelbaum, 2015; Witter et al., 2000).
The HC uses sparse population activity to process information in memory, recruiting only a small proportion of neurons simultaneously (Buzsáki and Moser, 2013). This process is supported by DG, which sends sensory information to the HC, decorrelating these inputs into non-overlapping patterns and allowing sparse hippocampal activation (Treves and Rolls, 1994; Knierim and Neunuebel, 2016). Thus, DG-CA3 connectivity allows the distinction of new memories from older ones and similarly enables contextual and spatial representations, pattern separation, and the encoding and retrieval of episodic memories (Knierim and Neunuebel, 2016). Meanwhile, CA3 recurrent synaptic connections appear necessary for pattern completion and memory recall (Guzman et al., 2016). Recent evidence shows that dentate adult-born granule cells support sparser hippocampal population activity. By combining triple ensemble recordings in DG, CA3, and CA1, McHugh et al. showed that adult-born granule cells (4–7 weeks old), with enhanced activity responses to novelty and strong modulation by theta oscillations, increase the sparsity of hippocampal population patterns. Contrarily, adult-born neuron suppression reduces the hippocampal sparsity, inducing the increment of principal cell firing rate in DG, CA3, and CA1 and impairing novel object recognition (McHugh et al., 2022). Thus, effective mnemonic processing of new information may require high-firing neurons with preferential input from LEC to promote sparse hippocampal population activity.
The second pathway is the direct or disynaptic pathway to CA1 (EC layer III → CA1). In this pathway, glutamatergic neurons from LEC and MEC layer III send their axonal projections directly to the distal portion of CA1 pyramidal cells (Amaral and Witter, 1989; Deshmukh and Knierim, 2011; Ohara et al., 2018; Suh et al., 2011). These inputs are not homologous among the LEC and MEC. Anatomical tracing studies together with in vitro electrophysiology, two-photon microscopy spine imaging, and optogenetics in rodents have shown that direct inputs from MEC and LEC are distinct in CA1 through the transverse axis, with densest MEC projections in proximal CA1 and LEC denser to distal CA1 (Masurkar et al., 2017). Moreover, the direct MEC inputs to CA1 preferentially excite deep pyramidal neurons in the proximal axis, whereas direct LEC inputs preferentially excite superficial pyramidal neurons more distally located (Masurkar et al., 2017). This differential connectivity may lead to a mechanism where spatial and non-spatial memory are preferentially targeted (Figure 1).
3.2 Non-canonical pathways—GABAergic inputs
Recent evidence suggests that GABAergic neurons in the EC not only act locally to maintain the excitation–inhibition balance through inhibition or disinhibition of microcircuits as we described above. The GABAergic neurons also send long-range GABAergic projections (LRGPs) to synchronize activity across longer distances to coordinate and act typically as a disinhibitory local circuit, as they usually target local GABAergic IN (Basu et al., 2016; Caputi et al., 2013; Hernández-Frausto et al., 2023; Melzer et al., 2012; Melzer and Monyer, 2020). Similar to the canonical-glutamatergic inputs, LRGPs from the LEC and MEC project through two pathways to CA1 either indirectly, crossing first DG → CA3 pyramidal neurons to finalize in CA1 pyramidal neurons, or directly to CA1 pyramidal neurons (EC → CA1) (Basu et al., 2016; Melzer et al., 2012). Although the pathways of projections are well described, the specific location of these GABAergic IN in MEC and LEC layers remains elusive. According to the HC distribution, these non-canonical GABAergic inputs are not homologous through the transverse axis in CA1. While the densest projections from MEC are located mostly in proximal CA1, the LEC projections are equally dense among the proximal–distal CA1 axis (Basu et al., 2016; Melzer et al., 2012). In line with their function, anatomical retrograde labeling studies show that LRGPs from EC project into the HC (Germroth et al., 1989). Specifically, the LRGPs from MEC are mostly located in dorsal and intermediate HC. LRGPs’ axons originate from PV+ interneurons and other undetermined GABAergic subtypes that modulate local GABAergic neuron theta synchrony in the HC (Melzer et al., 2012). Furthermore, the LRGPs from LEC are highly connected to CCK+ interneurons in CA1. They are highly activated by behaviorally salient cues such as water rewards and air puffs and are important for novelty and contextual salience discrimination (Basu et al., 2016). Thus, the canonical and non-canonical pathways of the entorhinal cortico-hippocampal circuit may contribute differentially to the processing of multisensory information and collectively encode them as long-term memories (Figure 1). Although these pathways have been described in rodents and are relatively conserved across mammals, human studies are still needed to determine the specificity of the canonical-glutamatergic and non-canonical GABAergic pathways (Bergmann et al., 2016).
4 Entorhinal cortex–hippocampal circuit neuromodulation in health
While the EC-HC circuit has been studied across its own glutamatergic and GABAergic pathways, both structures are also highly innervated from different cortical and subcortical brain regions. The EC-HC circuit receives massive neuromodulatory fibers from cholinergic, noradrenergic, and dopaminergic inputs highly involved in the functionality of episodic memory formation and recall. Here, we will describe the specificities of the neuromodulatory inputs received and their role in shaping episodic memory formation and recall.
4.1 Acetylcholine
Acetylcholine (ACh) plays an important role in learning and memory, having a differential role in the encoding and consolidation of memories, showing high levels of activity during memory encoding and low levels of activity in memory consolidation (Haam et al., 2018; Bartus et al., 1982). Across mammal species, specifically in humans and rodents, the EC receives profuse cholinergic innervation from the medial septum (MS) and the diagonal band of Broca (DBB) that underlies working memory, spatial processing, and episodic memory (Heys et al., 2012; De Lacalle et al., 1994). The ACh exerts differential effects depending on the EC circuit. For example, ACh influences the intrinsic firing pattern of MEC layer V stellate cells, which generates graded persistent activity. This activation mechanism constitutes an elementary mechanism for working memory (Egorov et al., 2002). Whereas in grid cells, the activation of muscarinic receptors modulates their periodic spatial tuning, which may provide a coordinate system for navigation behavior and memory formation (Newman et al., 2014). Similar to EC, the HC is highly innervated by MS and DBB (De Lacalle et al., 1994; Haam and Yakel, 2017). These inputs to HC play a role in generating and pacing theta-band oscillations during novelty detection, exploration, and the formation and consolidation of episodic memory (Haam and Yakel, 2017). In rodents, stimulation of MS cholinergic neurons induces changes in the HC interneuron firing activity, with the concomitantly decreased firing of principal cells (Dannenberg et al., 2015). Moreover, MS cholinergic neurons modulate HC theta-band oscillations in vivo (Dannenberg et al., 2015). Within the hippocampal area, computational modeling and experimental studies show that ACh facilitates afferent projections of the perforant path into CA1, acting as the active modulator during encoding mechanisms of external pathways while inhibiting the local intrinsic pathways that are part of memory consolidation, such as the back projections from HC to EC (Hasselmo, 1999; Newman et al., 2012; Haam et al., 2018). Thus, circuits that carry extrinsic information are preferentially activated, while the intrinsic projections are toned down.
Although few studies compare the influence of ACh in the EC-HC circuitry loop, Haam et al. analyzed the cholinergic projections from MS into CA1. They observed a prominent innervation of ACh projections onto OLM interneurons, which in turn decreased the activity of the excitatory output of the HC. Furthermore, it was shown that in deep layers of EC, the inactivation of ACh projections is critical for proper memory formation (Haam et al., 2018). More recently, Palacios-Filardo et al. (2021) tested the hypothesis that the release of ACh into the hippocampus has a stronger connection in the direct EC to CA1 pathway over the local pathway of Schaffer Collateral (SC). They found that the release of ACh decreases SC and EC excitatory inputs similarly, but with higher sensitivity of EC inputs to cholinergic modulation, resulting in an increased excitation–inhibition ratio.
4.2 Noradrenaline
Noradrenaline (NA)-containing fibers originated in the locus coeruleus (LC) that innervate wide cortical and subcortical structures. It is known that the LC neurons respond to novel or salient events (Segal and Bloom, 1974; Bacon et al., 2020; Breton-Provencher and Sur, 2019; Breton-Provencher et al., 2021). In the HC, all subregions receive dense noradrenergic innervation mainly from the LC (Walling et al., 2012; Wagatsuma et al., 2018). The inactivation of the LC inputs into the HC induces the impairment in memory and learning, whereas stimulation of LC fibers reorganizes place cell representations and enhances memory in the HC (Compton et al., 1995; Kaufman et al., 2020). However, in the EC, the noradrenergic modulation is less known. Studies in rodents show that the application of NA induces hyperpolarization and decreases the excitability of the EC superficial layers neurons, with no effects on neuronal excitability in the deep layers (Xiao et al., 2009). Stress studies are known to elicit spatial memory deficits, inducing LC NA release on EC to increase the frequency and amplitude of spike-driven inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) in MEC layer II cells (Hartner and Schrader, 2018). These effects are primarily mediated by α1 and α2 adrenergic receptors and β-adrenergic receptors in EC (Boyajian et al., 1987; Unnerstall et al., 1984). Interestingly, when NA modulation of the entorhinal cortico-hippocampal circuit was evaluated, results showed that NA influences mainly LEC rather than MEC inputs to DG and CA1 (Ito and Schuman, 2012), suggesting that NA may allow differential encoding of non-spatial information in the HC by controlling LEC inputs. Given the impact of noradrenergic modulation in the entorhinal cortico-hippocampal circuit, further studies are needed to understand the modulatory noradrenergic mechanisms underlying the formation and consolidation of new memories.
4.3 Dopamine
Memory encoding and consolidation processes have been linked with dopaminergic signaling for a long time. In humans, dopamine (DA) neurons from the ventral tegmental area (VTA) project to the hippocampus (Ruiz-Tejada et al., 2022). However, it is still unclear how DA influences the entorhinal cortico-hippocampal circuit. A recent study in rodents found that dopaminergic inputs from VTA are important for the modulation of memory encoding in LEC (Lee et al., 2021). The specific inhibition of fan cells in LEC impaired the learning of new associations while sparing the retrieval of pre-learned memory. Moreover, the inhibition of LEC DA signals disrupted the associative encoding of fan cells and impaired learning performance (Lee et al., 2021). Thus, the DA regulation in LEC may contribute to representing cognitive maps of abstract task rule domains.
In the HC, especially the dorsal region, DA neurotransmission is critical for episodic memory (Kempadoo et al., 2016; Takeuchi et al., 2016; Wilmot et al., 2024). The VTA is the presumed source of DA in the dorsal HC. However, recent evidence shows that axons from LC neurons release DA in the dorsal HC to enhance selective attention and spatial object recognition via the dopamine D1/D5 receptors (Kempadoo et al., 2016; Chowdhury et al., 2022). Additionally, DA influx from the VTA into the HC is critical for novelty, as a predictor error, and for spatial long-term memory retrieval with the facilitation of LTP (Broussard et al., 2016; Chowdhury et al., 2022; Huang and Kandel, 2006; Broussard et al., 2012; Lisman and Grace, 2005; Navakkode et al., 2010; Velazquez-Delgado et al., 2024). The LC (the noradrenergic principal hub) also sends dopaminergic projections to the dorsal portion of CA1, which has a principal role in contextual memory linking. The DA from LC modulates the excitability of CA1 pyramidal neurons for memory ensembles and the stability of these ensembles, leading to a link in the neuromodulatory system that affects memory linking without memory formation (Chowdhury et al., 2022).
Thus, DA modulation at EC and HC levels may favor the memory encoding and consolidation process. In addition, evidence of the DA-modulatory EC-HC connectivity shows that DA influences mainly LEC inputs to DG and CA1, similar to NA (Ito and Schuman, 2012), supporting the role of LEC and DA modulation on memory encoding (Lee et al., 2021). Therefore, DA may provide a differential regulation of two information streams (spatial and non-spatial) from the EC to the HC.
Altogether, this suggests that massive ACh, NA, and DA inputs to the entorhinal cortico-hippocampal circuit differentially modulate this circuit, highlighting the selective modulation of LEC projections to DG and CA1. Nevertheless, it is important to note that most of the recent studies are based on rodent models and non-human primate research, and while they allow us to improve our understanding of the formation and consolidation of new memories, they create a starting point for future research in humans. Moreover, this information has been generated by studying the canonical pathway; however, it is still largely unknown how the non-canonical pathway modulation may impact the encoding of new memories. Therefore, studies are needed to understand the role of these inputs in the encoding of new memories in humans and to determine whether the cross-species counterpart analyses are comparable (Figure 2).
Figure 2
5 Entorhinal cortex–hippocampal circuit during aging and disease
During aging, there is a significant decline in episodic memory that is observed from middle age and is accelerated by the carriage of the ε4 allele of the apolipoprotein E (APOE) gene (Salthouse, 2019; Beydoun et al., 2021; Dohm-Hansen et al., 2024). Age-associated cognitive impairment has been described in multiple species, including rats, macaque monkeys, and humans (Gallagher and Rapp, 1997). These cognitive alterations are accompanied by structural, cellular, molecular, and functional changes that disrupt the cortico-hippocampal circuitry (Stranahan and Mattson, 2010; Zhao et al., 2022). Anatomical changes in EC and HC have been associated with age-related declines in memory performance. Specifically in the EC, its shrinking has been linked to a memory performance decline in adults who are at increased risk of developing dementia, elderly, and concurrent AD patients (de Toledo-Morrell et al., 2000; Dickerson et al., 2001; Du et al., 2003; Olsen et al., 2017). Moreover, in healthy adults, mild shrinkage of the EC may be a sensitive predictor of memory decline (Rodrigue and Raz, 2004). In the HC, a reduction in the volume is also associated with a decrease in memory performance in humans and animal models (Driscoll et al., 2006; Hardcastle et al., 2020; O’Shea et al., 2016; Persson et al., 2012; Schuff et al., 1999).
Studies in humans, non-human primates, and rodents have shown that the thinning of the EC and HC during normal aging is not related to neuronal loss; instead, it may be associated with neuronal size or a reduced complexity of dendritic and axonal interactions in the neuropil (Freeman et al., 2008; Merrill et al., 2000, 2001). Within the EC, neurons in layer II are particularly susceptible to harmful consequences of aging, mild cognitive impairment, and AD (Stranahan and Mattson, 2010). Interestingly, in postmortem tissue from individuals ≥80 years old with exceptional episodic memory, called SuperAgers, the soma size of EC neurons (stellate cells) from layer II is larger compared to individuals 20–30 years younger (Nassif et al., 2022). The selective vulnerability of the EC cell population to neurofibrillary tangle (NFT) formation during normal aging and early stages of AD (Braak and Braak, 1985, 1991) was not observed in SuperAgers individuals. NFT burden in SuperAgers was unusually low in EC, with approximately three times fewer NFTs compared with normal elderly across the entire EC (Gefen et al., 2021). Thus, the integrity of EC layer II may be a biological substrate of exceptional memory in old age.
Interestingly, early alterations throughout aging have been observed first in LEC. For instance, reelin, a glycoprotein implicated in synaptic plasticity and expressed by EC layer II neurons, is reduced in an age-dependent manner in LEC but not in MEC, which correlates with cognitive decline in rodents and monkeys (Long et al., 2020; Stranahan et al., 2011). Moreover, long-term potentiation (LTP) induced in the LEC-DG synapses is also impaired in 8-to 12-month-old rats and mice, an alteration that is accompanied by the reduction of TrkB receptor levels and the increment of synaptophysin levels (Froc et al., 2003; Amani et al., 2021). This selective alteration in EC is also observed in human subjects. Postmortem studies show tau accumulation in LEC before being observed in MEC (Braak and Braak, 1985). Furthermore, in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment, there is a reduction in the volume and activation of LEC, but not in MEC, which correlates with impaired performance on a memory task (Tran et al., 2022). A detailed evaluation of the anterolateral EC (alEC; LEC in rodents) and posteromedial EC (pmEC; MEC in rodents) in older adults, using high-resolution imaging, showed hypoactivity of alEC, but not pmEC, which was associated with behavioral deficits on an object pattern separation task (Reagh et al., 2018). Altogether, this suggests that LEC, rather than MEC, undergoes early structural and functional changes associated with impaired memory function during the aging process. Therefore, early evaluation of LEC function may help to identify early signs of cognitive decline during aging.
In the HC, cellular, molecular, structural, and functional age-dependent alterations are also observed, however, some of them seem to be unique to specific hippocampal regions. For instance, synaptic loss in the HC highly correlates with cognitive decline during aging and AD (Burke and Barnes, 2010; Colom-Cadena et al., 2020), nevertheless, it seems to be region-specific. Specifically, age-related synaptic loss is observed in EC-GD synapses in rats (Geinisman et al., 1992) and in older adults with memory function decline (Yassa et al., 2010, 2011b). Similarly, synaptic loss is observed in EC-CA3 synapses but not in EC-CA1 or Schaffer collateral-CA1 synapses (Smith et al., 2000; Geinisman et al., 2004; Buss et al., 2021), suggesting a lower age-dependent susceptibility to synapses loss in CA1 area.
In DG, in addition to synaptic loss, adult neurogenesis may be an additional factor underlying cognitive decline during aging. Studies in mammals, including non-human primates, and humans show an age-dependent decrease in adult neurogenesis (Kuhn et al., 1996; Aizawa et al., 2009; Amrein et al., 2011; Spalding et al., 2013; Boldrini et al., 2018; Moreno-Jiménez et al., 2021), which correlates with cognitive decline in rodents and non-human primates (Aizawa et al., 2009). Whether this occurs in humans, is still under debate, we need methodological approaches that allow us to evaluate this process across the lifespan.
The processing of memory formation likely requires coordinated patterns of neuronal activity among brain regions. Balanced excitation and inhibition are crucial for adjusting neural input/output relationships between regions. However, this balance is altered by aging in DG/CA3 regions. Specifically, there is an DG/CA3 increased activity associated with age-dependent memory loss in humans and rodents (Wilson et al., 2005; Patrylo et al., 2007; Miller et al., 2008; Yassa et al., 2011a). This hyperexcitability is likely the result of reduced inhibitory input into the CA3 auto-associative recurrent collateral network and the reduction from DG (Wilson et al., 2005; Buss et al., 2021), which coupled with the synaptic loss of EC-CA3 synapses (Smith et al., 2000) may underly the mechanism for the learning deficit observed during aging.
Meanwhile, in CA1, which resists synapse loss, mechanisms such as Ca2+ signaling may also contribute to age-related cognitive impairment. Specifically, it has been shown that aged CA1 pyramidal cells have higher Ca2+ conductivity due to the higher density of L-type Ca2+ channels, which may lead to disrupted Ca2+ homeostasis, contributing to age-associated synaptic plasticity and cognitive deficits (Thibault and Landfield, 1996; Foster and Norris, 1997; Veng et al., 2003; Pereda et al., 2019).
Thus, the variety of alterations in the EC-HC circuitry, some of them region-specific, are likely to contribute to the reduction in hippocampal synaptic plasticity leading to age-related cognitive decline. The participation of neuromodulators in the alteration of the EC-HC circuit during aging, mainly in regions with more vulnerability such as LEC, CA3, and DG, is largely unknown. Therefore, studies analyzing the participation of cortical and subcortical brain regions modulating the EC-HC are needed for a better understanding of the underlying mechanism of age-related cognitive decline.
In the HC, synaptic loss highly correlates with cognitive decline during AD (Colom-Cadena et al., 2020). This cognitive decline is thought to be due to the loss of afferents from EC layer II neurons that span to the outer molecular layer of the DG (Scheff et al., 2006). In neurodegeneration, such as AD, there is a significant neuronal dysfunction with neuronal death and pathophysiological changes (Choonara et al., 2009; Lamptey et al., 2022). In AD, the entorhinal–hippocampal circuit is one of the first circuits impaired in preclinical stages of the disease before cognitive impairments are visible (Igarashi et al., 2014; Nakazono et al., 2018; Jun et al., 2020; Hernández-Frausto et al., 2023; Igarashi, 2023). More than 60% of patients with AD show impaired spatial memory formation and recall. Interestingly, the entorhinal–hippocampal circuit is highly susceptible to accumulation of amyloid-β aggregates, NTFs, intracellular tau, and axonal degeneration from early periods (Hope et al., 1994). Moreover, consistent with different mouse models of AD, there are early signs of neurodegeneration observed as an impairment of grid cell formation in MEC. This early sign correlates with a spatial memory impairment linked to hippocampal function (Ahnaou et al., 2017; Igarashi, 2023; Jun et al., 2020; Klein et al., 2016; Mackenzie-Gray Scott et al., 2022; Price et al., 2001; Scheff et al., 2007; Takahashi et al., 2010; Ulm et al., 2021).
In line with this observation, not only the entorhinal cortico-hippocampal circuitry is highly susceptible to amyloid deposition and tau aggregates. Evidence shows that cholinergic, noradrenergic, and dopaminergic fiber nubs also present signs of degeneration in the early stages of AD. Indeed, ACh dysfunction is one of the first theories linked to AD because MS and cholinergic neurons are particularly vulnerable to tau aggregates and neurodegeneration, both of them influencing the entorhinal–hippocampal processing as we discussed previously (Chen Z. R. et al., 2022; Igarashi, 2023; Salimi-Nezhad et al., 2023). Similar to the entorhinal–hippocampal circuit, the LC area has been gaining interest among the scientific community due to the high susceptibility to neurodegeneration in the early periods of AD. The tau accumulation in the LC and the noradrenergic input loss into the EC-HC circuitry may lead to the early signs of tauopathy observed in AD (Chen Y. et al., 2022; Igarashi, 2023). In recent years, the dopaminergic system has taken an increased interest as a promising target to alleviate cognitive deficits during AD course. An early and progressive dysfunction of VTA has been observed in AD. Furthermore, it has been observed that the neuronal degeneration of VTA induces hippocampal hyperexcitability in a mouse model of AD. However, due to its novel finding in AD progression, future studies are needed to unmask the contribution to the EC-HC connectivity function (Igarashi, 2023; Nobili et al., 2017; Shaikh et al., 2023; Spoleti et al., 2024) (Figure 2).
Altogether, this suggests that structural, cellular, and molecular alterations of the EC and HC lead to modifications in the circuitry that contribute to a decline in episodic memory during aging and AD (Figure 3). Moreover, alterations in cortical and subcortical brain regions that modulate the EC-HC circuit may also contribute to cognitive decline. Further studies are needed to determine the contribution of these alterations to the decline in episodic memory during aging and AD and thus prevent, as in SuperAgers, or delay cognitive decline.
Figure 3
6 Physical exercise to prevent the entorhinal–hippocampal circuit neurodegeneration
By preventing or delaying cognitive decline, we may be able to restrict the time with dementia or AD and perhaps escape from it. Evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses supports the beneficial effects of physical exercise (PE) on cognitive functions in healthy young adults and old subjects with or without cognitive impairment (Blondell et al., 2014; Kelly et al., 2014; Ludyga et al., 2016; Gomes-Osman et al., 2018). While some studies fail to demonstrate PE effects on cognition (Barnes et al., 2013; Sink et al., 2015). The variability in the exercise cognitive effects may be influenced by the differences in duration, exercise training regimen, fitness level, and precise cognitive outcome measures, among other parameters. Despite these differences, it has been shown that regular PE provides a wide range of health benefits affecting nearly all organ systems, inducing the improvement of health or reducing the risk of disease (Booth et al., 2012; MoTrPAC Study Group, Lead Analysts, and MoTrPAC Study Group, 2024).
Physical exercise elicits functional and structural changes throughout the brain. Among specific brain regions, the HC seems to be the key region responsive to PE (Barha et al., 2020; Firth et al., 2018), probably because of its plasticity and susceptibility to age-related atrophy (Fjell et al., 2014) or because most of the research has focused on it due to the HC role in memory functions. However, brain areas such as the EC (Glutamate/GABA), MS/DBB (ACh/GABA), VTA (DA), and LC (NA/DA), which innervate and modulate the HC processing, also experience PE-induced modifications (Ahmad et al., 2009; Segal et al., 2012; Hall and Savage, 2016; Whiteman et al., 2016; Medrano et al., 2021) that may jointly contribute to mediate the positive effects of PE in memory functions. For example, long-term PE increases muscarinic receptor density and high-affinity choline uptake in the HC and the number of cells expressing choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) in the horizontal DBB (Ang et al., 2006; Fordyce and Farrar, 1991), which may modulate the integration of the information in the entorhinal cortico-hippocampal circuit to improve memory functions. Moreover, it has been shown a positive correlation between cardio-respiratory fitness and the volume of the EC and memory performance (Whiteman et al., 2016). However, if we take into account the PE-induced modifications to the first-or second-order presynaptic areas innervating the HC, such as the perirhinal cortex that innervates LEC or prefrontal cortex that innervates LC and VTA (Hopkins and Bucci, 2010; Byun et al., 2024), we may realize PE may indeed induce beneficial effects to nearly the whole brain. How the second-or third-order presynaptic areas to HC modulate the information processing under exercise conditions is still unknown. This information may help to understand the circuits involved in age-dependent decline in memory function and identify very early signs of cognitive deterioration during the aging process, which also contribute to identifying possible therapeutic strategies to improve memory function.
So far, studies in rodents show that in the HC, PE induces molecular, cellular, structural, and functional modifications that are mediated by changes in neurotransmitter levels, blood flow, upregulation of growth factors such as brain-derived nerve growth factor (BDNF), and the increment of dentate adult-born neurons (see, for review, Duzel et al., 2016; Voss et al., 2013, 2019; Vivar et al., 2013). Moreover, PE increases dendritic complexity and the number of dendritic spines in the DG (Eadie et al., 2005), CA1, and EC (Stranahan et al., 2007). Meanwhile, in humans, chronic PE increases cerebral blood volume, hippocampal volume, and perfusion, modifications that are associated with greater BDNF serum levels and improved memory functions (Burdette et al., 2010; Erickson et al., 2011; Pereira et al., 2007; Voss et al., 2019). Additionally, acute PE or even a short bout of mild PE improves DG-mediated pattern separation, memory flexibility, and an increase in functional connectivity between hippocampal DG/CA3 and cortical regions in humans (Suwabe et al., 2017a,b, 2018).
Dentate adult neurogenesis is highly responsive to environmental and physiological factors. Particularly, PE increases cell proliferation and adult neurogenesis and increases memory performance in rodents (van Praag et al., 1999; Uda et al., 2006). Furthermore, 1 month of PE reorganizes the circuitry in which adult-born granule cells are integrated (Vivar et al., 2016). It includes the increment of connectivity from EC (LEC and caudomedial EC), MS, and supramammilary nucleus (Vivar et al., 2016). Moreover, when PE is extended to more than 6 months, the circuitry of “old” adult-born granule cells (6–9 months old) born during early adulthood showed additional modifications. Specifically, PE increased the inputs from hippocampal INs to “old” adult-born granule cells (Vivar et al., 2023), which may reduce aging-related hippocampal hyperexcitability (Wilson et al., 2005). PE also prevented the loss of adult-born granule cell innervation from the perirhinal cortex and increased the input from the subiculum and EC (Vivar et al., 2023), brain areas that are essential for contextual and spatial memory. Therefore, long-term PE could maintain the wiring of adult-born granule cells born during early adulthood, which may function as a cognitive reserve during the aging process. Whether the circuit of granule cells born during development is modified by PE is still unknown. However, this evidence supports the idea that PE may also induce modifications to brain areas innervating the HC, which may contribute to memory function improvement and preservation during aging.
7 Conclusion
Recent evidence supports the idea that the EC in the LEC and/or MEC portion and the HC area receive robust inputs from neuromodulators such as acetylcholine, noradrenaline, and dopamine brain centers playing an important function in memory processing. It remains unclear how these neuromodulator centers can indirectly modulate the entorhinal cortico-hippocampal circuit through the canonical-glutamatergic or non-canonical GABAergic pathways in non-pathological conditions. Furthermore, due to the importance of the entorhinal cortico-hippocampal circuit in aging and AD pathogenesis, it is important to understand the underlying mechanisms of memory processes and its modulation in early periods of aging and before the onset of the AD pathogenesis as a possible target to stop or prevent the progression of the cognitive impairments. Finally, PE may be used as a tool to prevent and/or delay cognitive decline. The growing number of studies in human and animal models support the beneficial effects of PE on memory processing. Physical exercise induces a marked reduction of risk of neurodegeneration and prevents functional and anatomical deterioration. A link between neuromodulation and PE in the entorhinal cortico-hippocampal circuit, as a possible instrument to prevent and decrease neurodegeneration, remains unidentified.
Statements
Author contributions
MH-F: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Resources, Validation. CV: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Resources, Validation.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. MH-F was supported by REC Scholar Program of NYU Alzheimer’s Disease Center (ADRC) P30 AG066512 and the Alzheimer’s Association grant 23AARFD-1026841. CV was supported by the Consejo Nacional de Humanidades, Ciencias y Tecnologías grant CF-2023-I-1706.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
AhmadS. O.ParkJ. H.Stenho-BittelL.LauY. S. (2009). Effects of endurance exercise on ventral tegmental area neurons in the chronic 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine and probenecid-treated mice. Neurosci. Lett.450, 102–105. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.11.065
2
AhnaouA.MoecharsD.RaeymaekersL.BiermansR.ManyakovN. V.BottelbergsA.et al. (2017). Emergence of early alterations in network oscillations and functional connectivity in a tau seeding mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease pathology. Sci. Rep.7, 14189–14114. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-13839-6
3
AizawaK.AgeyamaN.YokoyamaC.HisatsuneT. (2009). Age-dependent alteration in hippocampal neurogenesis correlates with learning performance of macaque monkeys. Exp. Anim.58, 403–407. doi: 10.1538/expanim.58.403
4
AmaniM.LauterbornJ. C.LeA. A.CoxB. M.WangW.QuintanillaJ.et al. (2021). Rapid aging in the perforant path projections to the rodent dentate gyrus. J. Neurosci.41, 2301–2312. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2376-20.2021
5
AmaralD. G.ScharfmanH. E.LavenexP. (2007). The dentate gyrus: fundamental neuroanatomical organization (dentate gyrus for dummies). Prog. Brain Res.163, 3–22. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(07)63001-5
6
AmaralD. G.WitterM. P. (1989). The three-dimensional organization of the hippocampal formation: a review of anatomical data. Neurosci.31, 571–591. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(89)90424-7
7
AmreinI.IslerK.LippH. P. (2011). Comparing adult hippocampal neurogenesis in mammalian species and orders: influence of chronological age and life history stage. Eur. J. Neurosci.34, 978–987. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07804.x
8
AngE. T.DaweG. S.WongP. T.MoochhalaS.NgY. K. (2006). Alterations in spatial learning and memory after forced exercise. Brain Res.1113, 186–193. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.07.023
9
BaconT. J.PickeringA. E.MellorJ. R. (2020). Noradrenaline release from locus coeruleus terminals in the hippocampus enhances excitation-spike coupling in CA1 pyramidal neurons via β-adrenoceptors. Cereb. Cortex30, 6135–6151. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhaa159
10
BakkerA.KirwanC. B.MillerM.StarkC. E. (2008). Pattern separation in the human hippocampal CA3 and dentate gyrus. Science319, 1640–1642. doi: 10.1126/science.1152882
11
BarhaC. K.BestJ. R.RosanoC.YaffeK.CatovJ. M.Liu-AmbroseT. (2020). Sex-specific relationship between long-term maintenance of physical activity and cognition in the health ABC study: potential role of hippocampal and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex volume. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.75, 764–770. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glz093
12
BarnesD. E.Santos-ModesittW.PoelkeG.KramerA. F.CastroC.MiddletonL. E.et al. (2013). The mental activity and eXercise (MAX) trial: a randomized controlled trial to enhance cognitive function in older adults. JAMA Intern. Med.173, 797–804. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.189
13
BartusR. T.DeanR. L.BeerB.LippaA. S. (1982). The cholinergic hypothesis of geriatric memory dysfunction. Science217, 408–414. doi: 10.1126/science.7046051
14
BasuJ.SiegelbaumS. A. (2015). The corticohippocampal circuit, synaptic plasticity, and memory. Cold spring Harb. Perspect. Biol.7, 1–27. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a021733
15
BasuJ.ZarembaJ. D.CheungS. K.HittiF. L.ZemelmanB. V.LosonczyA.et al. (2016). Gating of hippocampal activity, plasticity, and memory by entorhinal cortex long-range inhibition. Science351:aaa5694-1-aaa5694-15. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf2878
16
BergmannE.ZurG.BershadskyG.KahnI. (2016). The organization of mouse and human cortico-hippocampal networks estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. Cereb. Cortex26, 4497–4512. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhw327
17
BeydounM. A.WeissJ.BeydounH. A.HossainS.MaldonadoA. I.ShenB.et al. (2021). Race, APOE genotypes, and cognitive decline among middle-aged urban adults. Alzheimers Res. Ther.13:120. doi: 10.1186/s13195-021-00855-y
18
BezaireM. J.SolteszI. (2013). Quantitative assessment of CA1 local circuits: knowledge base for interneuron-pyramidal cell connectivity. Hippocampus23, 751–785. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22141
19
BlondellS. J.Hammersley-MatherR.VeermanJ. L. (2014). Does physical activity prevent cognitive decline and dementia?: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. BMC Public Health14:510. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-510
20
BoldriniM.FulmoreC. A.TarttA. N.SimeonL. R.PavlovaI.PoposkaV.et al. (2018). Human hippocampal neurogenesis persists throughout aging. Cell Stem Cell22, 589–599.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2018.03.015
21
BoothF. W.RobertsC. K.LayeM. J. (2012). Lack of exercise is a major cause of chronic diseases. Compr. Physiol.2, 1143–1211. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c110025
22
BoyajianC. L.LoughlinS. E.LeslieF. M. (1987). Anatomical evidence for alpha-2 adrenoceptor heterogeneity: differential autoradiographic distributions of [3H]rauwolscine and [3H]idazoxan in rat brain. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.241, 1079–1091.
23
BraakH.BraakE. (1985). On areas of transition between entorhinal allocortex and temporal isocortex in the human brain. Normal morphology and lamina-specific pathology in Alzheimer's disease. Acta Neuropathol.68, 325–332. doi: 10.1007/BF00690836
24
BraakH.BraakE. (1991). Morphologische veränderungen der menschlichen endhirnrinde bei demenz [morphological changes in the human cerebral cortex in dementia]. J. Hirnforsch.32, 277–282
25
BraakH.BraakE. (1992). The human entorhinal cortex: normal morphology and lamina-specific pathology in various diseases. Neurosci. Res.15, 6–31. doi: 10.1016/0168-0102(92)90014-4
26
Breton-ProvencherV.DrummondG. T.SurM. (2021). Locus coeruleus norepinephrine in learned behavior: anatomical modularity and spatiotemporal integration in targets. Front. Neural Circuits15:638007. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2021.638007
27
Breton-ProvencherV.SurM. (2019). Active control of arousal by a locus coeruleus GABAergic circuit. Nat. Neurosci.22, 218–228. doi: 10.1038/s41593-018-0305-z
28
BroussardJ. I.JensonD.DaniJ. A. (2012). Dopaminergic influence over hippocampal synaptic plasticity and function. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol.2:e108. doi: 10.4172/2161-1459.1000e108
29
BroussardJ. I.YangK.LevineA. T.TsetsenisT.JensonD.CaoF.et al. (2016). Dopamine regulates aversive contextual learning and associated in vivo synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus. Cell Rep.14, 1930–1939. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.01.070
30
BrunV. H.LeutgebS.WuH. Q.SchwarczR.WitterM. P.MoserE. I.et al. (2008). Impaired spatial representation in CA1 after lesion of direct input from entorhinal cortex. Neuron57, 290–302. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.11.034
31
BurdetteJ. H.LaurientiP. J.EspelandM. A.MorganA.TelesfordQ.VechlekarC. D.et al. (2010). Using network science to evaluate exercise-associated brain changes in older adults. Front. Aging Neurosci.2:23. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2010.00023
32
BurkeS. N.BarnesC. A. (2010). Senescent synapses and hippocampal circuit dynamics. Trends Neurosci.33, 153–161. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2009.12.003
33
BussE. W.CorbettN. J.RobertsJ. G.YbarraN.MusialT. F.SimkinD.et al. (2021). Cognitive aging is associated with redistribution of synaptic weights in the hippocampus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA118:e1921481118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1921481118
34
BuzsákiG.MoserE. I. (2013). Memory, navigation and theta rhythm in the hippocampal-entorhinal system. Nat. Neurosci.16, 130–138. doi: 10.1038/nn.3304
35
ByunK.HyodoK.SuwabeK.FukuieT.HaM. S.DamrongthaiC.et al. (2024). Mild exercise improves executive function with increasing neural efficiency in the prefrontal cortex of older adults. Geroscience46, 309–325. doi: 10.1007/s11357-023-00816-3
36
CantoC. B.WouterloodF. G.WitterM. P. (2008). What does the anatomical organization of the entorhinal cortex tell us?Neural Plast.2008:381243. doi: 10.1155/2008/381243
37
CaputiA.MelzerS.MichaelM.MonyerH. (2013). The long and short of GABAergic neurons. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.23, 179–186. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2013.01.021
38
ChenY.ChenT.HouR. (2022). Locus coeruleus in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review. Alzheimers Dement (N Y)8:e12257. doi: 10.1002/trc2.12257
39
ChenZ. R.HuangJ. B.YangS. L.HongF. F. (2022). Role of cholinergic signaling in Alzheimer's disease. Molecules27:1816. doi: 10.3390/molecules27061816
40
ChoonaraY. E.PillayV.Du ToitL. C.ModiG.NaidooD.NdesendoV. M. K.et al. (2009). Trends in the molecular pathogenesis and clinical therapeutics of common neurodegenerative disorders. Int. J. Mol. Sci.10, 2510–2557. doi: 10.3390/ijms10062510
41
ChowdhuryA.LuchettiA.FernandesG.FilhoD. A.KastellakisG.TzilivakiA.et al. (2022). A locus coeruleus-dorsal CA1 dopaminergic circuit modulates memory linking. Neuron110, 3374–3388.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2022.08.001
42
ClellandC. D.ChoiM.RombergC.ClemensonG. D.Jr.FragniereA.TyersP.et al. (2009). A functional role for adult hippocampal neurogenesis in spatial pattern separation. Science325, 210–213. doi: 10.1126/science.1173215
43
Colom-CadenaM.Spires-JonesT.ZetterbergH.BlennowK.CaggianoA.DeKoskyS. T.et al. (2020). The clinical promise of biomarkers of synapse damage or loss in Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Res. Ther.12:21. doi: 10.1186/s13195-020-00588-4
44
ComptonD. M.DietrichK. L.SmithJ. S.DavisB. K. (1995). Spatial and non-spatial learning in the rat following lesions to the nucleus locus coeruleus. Neuroreport7, 177–182. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199512000-00043
45
CreerD. J.RombergC.SaksidaL. M.van PraagH.BusseyT. J. (2010). Running enhances spatial pattern separation in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA107, 2367–2372. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0911725107
46
DannenbergH.PabstM.BraganzaO.SchochS.NiediekJ.BayraktarM.et al. (2015). Synergy of direct and indirect cholinergic septo-hippocampal pathways coordinates firing in hippocampal networks. J. Neurosci.35, 8394–8410. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4460-14.2015
47
De LacalleS.LimC.SobrevielaT.MufsonE. J.HershL. B.SaperC. B. (1994). Cholinergic innervation in the human hippocampal formation including the entorhinal cortex. J. Comp. Neurol.345, 321–344. doi: 10.1002/cne.903450302
48
De Toledo-MorrellL.GoncharovaI.DickersonB.WilsonR. S.BennettD. A. (2000). From healthy aging to early Alzheimer's disease: in vivo detection of entorhinal cortex atrophy. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.911, 240–253. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb06730.x
49
DeshmukhS. S.KnierimJ. J. (2011). Representation of non-spatial and spatial information in the lateral entorhinal cortex. Front. Behav. Neurosci.5:69. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2011.00069
50
DickersonB. C.GoncharovaI.SullivanM. P.ForchettiC.WilsonR. S.BennettD. A.et al. (2001). MRI-derived entorhinal and hippocampal atrophy in incipient and very mild Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol. Aging22, 747–754. doi: 10.1016/s0197-4580(01)00271-8
51
DoanT. P.Lagartos-DonateM. J.NilssenE. S.OharaS.WitterM. P. (2019). Convergent projections from perirhinal and postrhinal cortices suggest a multisensory nature of lateral, but not medial, entorhinal cortex. Cell Rep.29, 617–627.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.09.005
52
Dohm-HansenS.EnglishJ. A.LavelleA.FitzsimonsC. P.LucassenP. J.NolanY. M. (2024). The 'middle-aging' brain. Trends Neurosci.47, 259–272. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2024.02.001
53
DriscollI.HowardS. R.StoneJ. C.MonfilsM. H.TomanekB.BrooksW. M.et al. (2006). The aging hippocampus: a multi-level analysis in the rat. Neuroscience139, 1173–1185. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.01.040
54
DuA. T.SchuffN.ZhuX. P.JagustW. J.MillerB. L.ReedB. R.et al. (2003). Atrophy rates of entorhinal cortex in AD and normal aging. Neurology60, 481–486. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000044400.11317.ec
55
DuzelE.van PraagH.SendtnerM. (2016). Can physical exercise in old age improve memory and hippocampal function?Brain139, 662–673. doi: 10.1093/brain/awv407
56
EadieB. D.RedilaV. A.ChristieB. R. (2005). Voluntary exercise alters the cytoarchitecture of the adult dentate gyrus by increasing cellular proliferation, dendritic complexity, and spine density. J. Comp. Neurol.486, 39–47. doi: 10.1002/cne.20493
57
EgorovA. V.HamamB. N.FransénE.HasselmoM. E.AlonsoA. A. (2002). Graded persistent activity in entorhinal cortex neurons. Nature420, 173–178. doi: 10.1038/nature01171
58
EricksonK. I.VossM. W.PrakashR. S.BasakC.SzaboA.ChaddockL.et al. (2011). Exercise training increases size of hippocampus and improves memory. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA108, 3017–3022. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1015950108
59
FirthJ.StubbsB.VancampfortD.SchuchF.LagopoulosJ.RosenbaumS.et al. (2018). Effect of aerobic exercise on hippocampal volume in humans: a systematic review and meta-analysis. NeuroImage166, 230–238. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.11.007
60
FjellA. M.McEvoyL.HollandD.DaleA. M.WalhovdK. B.Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (2014). What is normal in normal aging? Effects of aging, amyloid and Alzheimer's disease on the cerebral cortex and the hippocampus. Prog. Neurobiol.117, 20–40. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2014.02.004
61
FordyceD. E.FarrarR. P. (1991). Physical activity effects on hippocampal and parietal cortical cholinergic function and spatial learning in F344 rats. Behav. Brain Res.43, 115–123. doi: 10.1016/s0166-4328(05)80061-0
62
FortinN. J.WrightS. P.EichenbaumH. (2004). Recollection-like memory retrieval in rats is dependent on the hippocampus. Nature431, 188–191. doi: 10.1038/nature02853
63
FosterT. C.NorrisC. M. (1997). Age-associated changes in ca(2+)-dependent processes: relation to hippocampal synaptic plasticity. Hippocampus7, 602–612. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1063(1997)7:6<602::AID-HIPO3>3.0.CO;2-G
64
FreemanS. H.KandelR.CruzL.RozkalneA.NewellK.FroschM. P.et al. (2008). Preservation of neuronal number despite age-related cortical brain atrophy in elderly subjects without Alzheimer disease. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol.67, 1205–1212. doi: 10.1097/NEN.0b013e31818fc72f
65
FrocD. J.EadieB.LiA. M.WodtkeK.TseM.ChristieB. R. (2003). Reduced synaptic plasticity in the lateral perforant path input to the dentate gyrus of aged C57BL/6 mice. J. Neurophysiol.90, 32–38. doi: 10.1152/jn.00105.2003
66
FuchsE. C.NeitzA.PinnaR.MelzerS.CaputiA.MonyerH. (2016). Local and distant input controlling excitation in layer II of the medial entorhinal cortex. Neuron89, 194–208. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.11.029
67
FyhnM.MoldenS.WitterM. P.MoserE. I.MoserM. B. (2004). Spatial representation in the entorhinal cortex. Science305, 1258–1264. doi: 10.1126/science.1099901
68
GallagherM.RappP. R. (1997). The use of animal models to study the effects of aging on cognition. Annu. Rev. Psychol.48, 339–370. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.48.1.339
69
GeS.YangC. H.HsuK. S.MingG. L.SongH. (2007). A critical period for enhanced synaptic plasticity in newly generated neurons of the adult brain. Neuron54, 559–566. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.05.002
70
GefenT.KawlesA.Makowski-WoidanB.EngelmeyerJ.AyalaI.AbbassianP.et al. (2021). Paucity of entorhinal cortex pathology of the Alzheimer's type in super agers with superior memory performance. Cereb. Cortex31, 3177–3183. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhaa409
71
GeinismanY.de Toledo-MorrellL.MorrellF.PersinaI. S.RossiM. (1992). Age-related loss of axospinous synapses formed by two afferent systems in the rat dentate gyrus as revealed by the unbiased stereological dissector technique. Hippocampus2, 437–444. doi: 10.1002/hipo.450020411
72
GeinismanY.GaneshinaO.YoshidaR.BerryR. W.DisterhoftJ. F.GallagherM. (2004). Aging, spatial learning, and total synapse number in the rat CA1 stratum radiatum. Neurobiol. Aging25, 407–416. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2003.12.001
73
GermrothP.SchwerdtfegerW. K.BuhlE. H. (1989). GABAergic neurons in the entorhinal cortex project to the hippocampus. Brain Res.494, 187–192. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(89)90162-5
74
Gomes-OsmanJ.CabralD. F.MorrisT. P.McInerneyK.CahalinL. P.RundekT.et al. (2018). Exercise for cognitive brain health in aging: a systematic review for an evaluation of dose. Neurol. Clin. Pract.8, 257–265. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000460
75
Goodrich-HunsakerN. J.HunsakerM. R.KesnerR. P. (2008). The interactions and dissociations of the dorsal hippocampus subregions: how the dentate gyrus, CA3, and CA1 process spatial information. Behav. Neurosci.122, 16–26. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.122.1.16
76
GuzmanS. J.SchlöglA.FrotscherM.JonasP. (2016). Synaptic mechanisms of pattern completion in the hippocampal CA3 network. Science353, 1117–1123. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf1836
77
HaamJ.YakelJ. L. (2017). Cholinergic modulation of the hippocampal region and memory function. J. Neurochem.142, 111–121. doi: 10.1111/jnc.14052
78
HaamJ.ZhouJ.CuiG.YakelJ. L. (2018). Septal cholinergic neurons gate hippocampal output to entorhinal cortex via oriens lacunosum moleculare interneurons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA115, E1886–E1895. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1712538115
79
HaftingT.FyhnM.MoldenS.MoserM. B.MoserE. I. (2005). Microstructure of a spatial map in the entorhinal cortex. Nature436, 801–806. doi: 10.1038/nature03721
80
HallJ. M.SavageL. M. (2016). Exercise leads to the re-emergence of the cholinergic/nestin neuronal phenotype within the medial septum/diagonal band and subsequent rescue of both hippocampal ACh efflux and spatial behavior. Exp. Neurol.278, 62–75. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2016.01.018
81
HardcastleC.O'SheaA.KraftJ. N.AlbizuA.EvangelistaN. D.HausmanH. K.et al. (2020). Contributions of hippocampal volume to cognition in healthy older adults. Front. Aging Neurosci.12:593833. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2020.593833
82
HarrisK. D.HochgernerH.SkeneN. G.MagnoL.KatonaL.GonzalesC. B.et al. (2018). Classes and continua of hippocampal CA1 inhibitory neurons revealed by single-cell transcriptomics. PLoS Biol.16:e2006387. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2006387
83
HartnerJ. P.SchraderL. A. (2018). Interaction of norepinephrine and glucocorticoids modulate inhibition of principle cells of layer ii medial entorhinal cortex in male mice. Front. Synaptic Neurosci.10:3. doi: 10.3389/fnsyn.2018.00003
84
HasselmoM. E. (1999). Neuromodulation: acetylcholine and memory consolidation. Trends Cogn. Sci.3, 351–359. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01365-0
85
Hernández-FraustoM.BilashO. M.MasurkarA. V.BasuJ. (2023). Local and long-range GABAergic circuits in hippocampal area CA1 and their link to Alzheimer's disease. Front. Neural Circuits.17:1223891. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2023.1223891
86
HeysJ. G.SchultheissN. W.ShayC. F.TsunoY.HasselmoM. E. (2012). Effects of acetylcholine on neuronal properties in entorhinal cortex. Front. Behav. Neurosci.6:32. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2012.00032
87
HopeT.TillingK. M.GedlingK.KeeneJ. M.CooperS. D.FairburnC. G. (1994). The structure of wandering in dementia. Int. J. Ger. Psych.9, 149–155. doi: 10.1002/gps.930090209
88
HopkinsM. E.BucciD. J. (2010). BDNF expression in perirhinal cortex is associated with exercise-induced improvement in object recognition memory. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem.94, 278–284. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2010.06.006
89
HuangY. Y.KandelE. R. (2006). Age-related enhancement of a protein synthesis-dependent late phase of LTP induced by low frequency paired-pulse stimulation in hippocampus. Learn. Mem.13, 298–306. doi: 10.1101/lm.166906
90
IgarashiK. M. (2023). Entorhinal cortex dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease. Trends Neurosci.46, 124–136. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2022.11.006
91
IgarashiK. M.LuL.ColginL. L.MoserM. B.MoserE. I. (2014). Coordination of entorhinal-hippocampal ensemble activity during associative learning. Nature510, 143–147. doi: 10.1038/nature13162
92
ItoH. T.SchumanE. M. (2012). Functional division of hippocampal area CA1 via modulatory gating of entorhinal cortical inputs. Hippocampus22, 372–387. doi: 10.1002/hipo.20909
93
JunH.BramianA.SomaS.SaitoT.SaidoT. C.IgarashiK. M. (2020). Disrupted place cell remapping and impaired grid cells in a knockin model of Alzheimer's disease. Neuron107, 1095–1112.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.06.023
94
KaufmanA. M.GeillerT.LosonczyA. (2020). A role for the locus coeruleus in hippocampal ca1 place cell reorganization during spatial reward learning. Neuron105, 1018–1026.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.12.029
95
KeeneC. S.BladonJ.McKenzieS.LiuC. D.O'KeefeJ.EichenbaumH. (2016). Complementary functional organization of neuronal activity patterns in the perirhinal, lateral entorhinal, and medial entorhinal cortices. J. Neurosci.36, 3660–3675. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4368-15.2016
96
KellyM. E.LoughreyD.LawlorB. A.RobertsonI. H.WalshC.BrennanS. (2014). The impact of exercise on the cognitive functioning of healthy older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ageing Res. Rev.16, 12–31. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2014.05.002
97
KempadooK. A.MosharovE. V.ChoiS. J.SulzerD.KandelE. R. (2016). Dopamine release from the locus coeruleus to the dorsal hippocampus promotes spatial learning and memory. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA113, 14835–14840. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1616515114
98
KempermannG. (2022). What is adult hippocampal neurogenesis good for?Front. Neurosci.16:852680. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.852680
99
KitamuraT.PignatelliM.SuhJ.KoharaK.YoshikiA.AbeK.et al. (2014). Island cells control temporal association memory. Science343, 896–901. doi: 10.1126/science.1244634
100
KitamuraT.SaitohY.TakashimaN.MurayamaA.NiiboriY.AgetaH.et al. (2009). Adult neurogenesis modulates the hippocampus-dependent period of associative fear memory. Cell139, 814–827. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.10.020
101
KlausbergerT.SomogyiP. (2008). Neuronal diversity and temporal dynamics: the unity of hippocampal circuit operations. Science321, 53–57. doi: 10.1126/science.1149381
102
KleinA. S.DonosoJ. R.KempterR.SchmitzD.BeedP. (2016). Early cortical changes in gamma oscillations in Alzheimer's disease. Front. Syst. Neurosci.10:83. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2016.00083
103
KnierimJ. J. (2015). The hippocampus. Curr. Biol.25, R1116–R1121. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.10.049
104
KnierimJ. J.NeunuebelJ. P. (2016). Tracking the flow of hippocampal computation: pattern separation, pattern completion, and attractor dynamics. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem.129, 38–49. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2015.10.008
105
KnierimJ. J.NeunuebelJ. P.DeshmukhS. S. (2013). Functional correlates of the lateral and medial entorhinal cortex: objects, path integration and local-global reference frames. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci.369:20130369. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0369
106
KropffE.CarmichaelJ. E.MoserM. B.MoserE. I. (2015). Speed cells in the medial entorhinal cortex. Nature523, 419–424. doi: 10.1038/nature14622
107
KuhnH. G.Dickinson-AnsonH.GageF. H. (1996). Neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus of the adult rat: age-related decrease of neuronal progenitor proliferation. J. Neurosci.16, 2027–2033. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-06-02027.1996
108
LampteyR. N. L.ChaulagainB.TrivediR.GothwalA.LayekB.SinghJ. (2022). A review of the common neurodegenerative disorders: current therapeutic approaches and the potential role of nanotherapeutics. Int. J. Mol. Sci.23:1851. doi: 10.3390/ijms23031851
109
Le MagueresseC.MonyerH. (2013). GABAergic interneurons shape the functional maturation of the cortex. Neuron77, 388–405. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.01.011
110
LeeJ. Y.JunH.SomaS.NakazonoT.ShiraiwaK.DasguptaA.et al. (2021). Dopamine facilitates associative memory encoding in the entorhinal cortex. Nature598, 321–326. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03948-8
111
LeutgebJ. K.LeutgebS.MoserM. B.MoserE. I. (2007). Pattern separation in the dentate gyrus and CA3 of the hippocampus. Science315, 961–966. doi: 10.1126/science.1135801
112
LismanJ. E.GraceA. A. (2005). The hippocampal-VTA loop: controlling the entry of information into long-term memory. Neuron46, 703–713. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.05.002
113
LongJ. M.PerezE. J.RobertsJ. A.RobertsM. T.RappP. R. (2020). Reelin in the years: decline in the number of reelin immunoreactive neurons in layer II of the entorhinal cortex in aged monkeys with memory impairment. Neurobiol. Aging87, 132–137. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2019.12.010
114
LudygaS.GerberM.BrandS.Holsboer-TrachslerE.PühseU. (2016). Acute effects of moderate aerobic exercise on specific aspects of executive function in different age and fitness groups: a meta-analysis. Psychophysiology53, 1611–1626. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12736
115
MaassA.BerronD.LibbyL. A.RanganathC.DüzelE. (2015). Functional subregions of the human entorhinal cortex. eLife4:e06426. doi: 10.7554/eLife.06426
116
MaassA.SchützeH.SpeckO.YonelinasA.TempelmannC.HeinzeH. J.et al. (2014). Laminar activity in the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex related to novelty and episodic encoding. Nat. Commun.5:5547. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6547
117
MacDonaldC. J.LepageK. Q.EdenU. T.EichenbaumH. (2011). Hippocampal "time cells" bridge the gap in memory for discontiguous events. Neuron71, 737–749. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.07.012
118
Mackenzie-Gray ScottC. A.PelkeyK. A.CaccavanoA. P.AbebeD.LaiM.BlackK. N.et al. (2022). Resilient hippocampal gamma rhythmogenesis and parvalbumin-expressing interneuron function before and after plaque burden in 5xFAD Alzheimer's disease model. Front. Synaptic Neurosci.14:857608. doi: 10.3389/fnsyn.2022.857608
119
MannsJ. R.EichenbaumH. (2006). Evolution of declarative memory. Hippocampus16, 795–808. doi: 10.1002/hipo.20205
120
MasurkarA. V.SrinivasK. V.BrannD. H.WarrenR.LowesD. C.SiegelbaumS. A. (2017). Medial and lateral entorhinal cortex differentially excite deep versus superficial CA1 pyramidal neurons. Cell Rep.18, 148–160. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.12.012
121
McBainC. J.FisahnA. (2001). Interneurons unbound. Nat. Rev. Neurosci.2, 11–23. doi: 10.1038/35049047
122
McHughS. B.Lopes-Dos-SantosV.GavaG. P.HartwichK.TamS. K. E.BannermanD. M.et al. (2022). Adult-born dentate granule cells promote hippocampal population sparsity. Nat. Neurosci.25, 1481–1491. doi: 10.1038/s41593-022-01176-5
123
MedranoM. C.HurelI.MesguichE.RedonB.StevensC.GeorgesF.et al. (2021). Exercise craving potentiates excitatory inputs to ventral tegmental area dopaminergic neurons. Addict. Biol.26:e12967. doi: 10.1111/adb.12967
124
MelzerS.MichaelM.CaputiA.EliavaM.FuchsE. C.WhittingtonM. A.et al. (2012). Long-range-projecting GABAergic neurons modulate inhibition in hippocampus and entorhinal cortex. Science335, 1506–1510. doi: 10.1126/science.1217139
125
MelzerS.MonyerH. (2020). Diversity and function of corticopetal and corticofugal GABAergic projection neurons. Nat. Rev. Neurosci.21, 499–515. doi: 10.1038/s41583-020-0344-9
126
MerrillD. A.ChibaA. A.TuszynskiM. H. (2001). Conservation of neuronal number and size in the entorhinal cortex of behaviorally characterized aged rats. J. Comp. Neurol.438, 445–456. doi: 10.1002/cne.1327
127
MerrillD. A.RobertsJ. A.TuszynskiM. H. (2000). Conservation of neuron number and size in entorhinal cortex layers II, III, and V/VI of aged primates. J. Comp. Neurol.422, 396–401. doi: 10.1002/1096-9861(20000703)422:3<396::aid-cne6>3.0.co;2-r
128
MillerS. L.CeloneK.DePeauK.DiamondE.DickersonB. C.RentzD.et al. (2008). Age-related memory impairment associated with loss of parietal deactivation but preserved hippocampal activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA105, 2181–2186. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0706818105
129
MingG. L.SongH. (2005). Adult neurogenesis in the mammalian central nervous system. Annu. Rev. Neurosci.28, 223–250. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.051804.101459
130
Moreno-JiménezE. P.Terreros-RoncalJ.Flor-GarcíaM.RábanoA.Llorens-MartínM. (2021). Evidences for adult hippocampal neurogenesis in humans. J. Neurosci.41, 2541–2553. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0675-20.2020
131
MoserE. I.KropffE.MoserM. B. (2008). Place cells, grid cells, and the brain's spatial representation system. Annu. Rev. Neurosci.31, 69–89. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.31.061307.090723
132
MoTrPAC Study Group, Lead Analysts, and MoTrPAC Study Group (2024). Temporal dynamics of the multi-omic response to endurance exercise training. Nature629, 174–183. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06877-w
133
NakashibaT.CushmanJ. D.PelkeyK. A.RenaudineauS.BuhlD. L.McHughT. J.et al. (2012). Young dentate granule cells mediate pattern separation, whereas old granule cells facilitate pattern completion. Cell149, 188–201. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.046
134
NakazonoT.JunH.Blurton-JonesM.GreenK. N.IgarashiK. M. (2018). Gamma oscillations in the entorhinal-hippocampal circuit underlying memory and dementia. Neurosci. Res.129, 40–46. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2018.02.002
135
NassifC.KawlesA.AyalaI.MinogueG.GillN. P.ShepardR. A.et al. (2022). Integrity of neuronal size in the entorhinal cortex is a biological substrate of exceptional cognitive aging. J. Neurosci.42, 8587–8594. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0679-22.2022
136
NavakkodeS.SajikumarS.SacktorT. C.FreyJ. U. (2010). Protein kinase Mzeta is essential for the induction and maintenance of dopamine-induced long-term potentiation in apical CA1 dendrites. Learn. Mem.17, 605–611. doi: 10.1101/lm.1991910
137
Navarro SchröderT.HaakK. V.Zaragoza JimenezN. I.BeckmannC. F.DoellerC. F. (2015). Functional topography of the human entorhinal cortex. eLife4:e06738. doi: 10.7554/eLife.06738
138
NewmanE. L.ClimerJ. R.HasselmoM. E. (2014). Grid cell spatial tuning reduced following systemic muscarinic receptor blockade. Hippocampus24, 643–655. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22253
139
NewmanE. L.GuptaK.ClimerJ. R.MonaghanC. K.HasselmoM. E. (2012). Cholinergic modulation of cognitive processing: insights drawn from computational models. Front. Behav. Neurosci.6:24. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2012.00024
140
NobiliA.LatagliataE. C.ViscomiM. T.CavallucciV.CutuliD.GiacovazzoG.et al. (2017). Dopamine neuronal loss contributes to memory and reward dysfunction in a model of Alzheimer's disease. Nat. Commun.8:14727. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14727
141
O’SheaA.CohenR. A.PorgesE. C.NissimN. R.WoodsA. J. (2016). Cognitive aging and the hippocampus in older adults. Front. Aging Neurosci.8:298. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2016.00298
142
OharaS.OnoderaM.SimonsenØ. W.YoshinoR.HiokiH.IijimaT.et al. (2018). Intrinsic projections of layer vb neurons to layers Va, III, and II in the lateral and medial entorhinal cortex of the rat. Cell Rep.24, 107–116. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.06.014
143
OharaS.YoshinoR.KimuraK.KawamuraT.TanabeS.ZhengA.et al. (2021). Laminar organization of the entorhinal cortex in macaque monkeys based on cell-type-specific markers and connectivity. Front. Neural Circuits.15:790116. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2021.790116
144
OlsenR. K.YeungL. K.Noly-GandonA.D'AngeloM. C.KacolljaA.SmithV. M.et al. (2017). Human anterolateral entorhinal cortex volumes are associated with cognitive decline in aging prior to clinical diagnosis. Neurobiol. Aging57, 195–205. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2017.04.025
145
Palacios-FilardoJ.UdakisM.BrownG. A.TehanB. G.CongreveM. S.NathanP. J.et al. (2021). Acetylcholine prioritises direct synaptic inputs from entorhinal cortex to CA1 by differential modulation of feedforward inhibitory circuits. Nat. Commun.12:5475. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25280-5
146
PatryloP. R.TyagiI.WillinghamA. L.LeeS.WilliamsonA. (2007). Dentate filter function is altered in a proepileptic fashion during aging. Epilepsia48, 1964–1978. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.01139.x
147
PelkeyK. A.ChittajalluR.CraigM. T.TricoireL.WesterJ. C.McBainC. J. (2017). Hippocampal GABAergic inhibitory interneurons. Physiol. Rev.97, 1619–1747. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00007.2017
148
PeredaD.Al-OstaI.OkorochaA. E.EastonA.HartellN. A. (2019). Changes in presynaptic calcium signalling accompany age-related deficits in hippocampal LTP and cognitive impairment. Aging Cell18:e13008. doi: 10.1111/acel.13008
149
PereiraA. C.HuddlestonD. E.BrickmanA. M.SosunovA. A.HenR.McKhannG. M.et al. (2007). An in vivo correlate of exercise-induced neurogenesis in the adult dentate gyrus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA104, 5638–5643. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0611721104
150
PerssonJ.PudasS.LindJ.KauppiK.NilssonL. G.NybergL. (2012). Longitudinal structure-function correlates in elderly reveal MTL dysfunction with cognitive decline. Cereb. Cortex22, 2297–2304. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhr306
151
Petilla Interneuron Nomenclature Group (2008). Petilla terminology: nomenclature of features of GABAergic interneurons of the cerebral cortex. Nat. Rev. Neurosci.9, 557–568. doi: 10.1038/nrn2402
152
PriceJ. L.KoA. I.WadeM. J.TsouS. K.McKeelD. W.MorrisJ. C. (2001). Neuron number in the entorhinal cortex and CA1 in preclinical Alzheimer disease. Arch. Neurol.58, 1395–13402. doi: 10.1001/archneur.58.9.1395
153
RayS.NaumannR.BurgalossiA.TangQ.SchmidtH.BrechtM. (2014). Grid-layout and theta-modulation of layer 2 pyramidal neurons in medial entorhinal cortex. Science343, 891–896. doi: 10.1126/science.1243028
154
ReaghZ. M.NocheJ. A.TustisonN. J.DelisleD.MurrayE. A.YassaM. A. (2018). Functional imbalance of anterolateral entorhinal cortex and hippocampal dentate/CA3 underlies age-related object pattern separation deficits. Neuron97, 1187–1198.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.01.039
155
RodrigueK. M.RazN. (2004). Shrinkage of the entorhinal cortex over five years predicts memory performance in healthy adults. J. Neurosci.24, 956–963. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4166-03.2004
156
RollsE. T. (2016). Pattern separation, completion, and categorisation in the hippocampus and neocortex. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem.129, 4–28. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2015.07.008
157
RoyD. S.KitamuraT.OkuyamaT.OgawaS. K.SunC.ObataY.et al. (2017). Distinct neural circuits for the formation and retrieval of episodic memories. Cell170, 1000–1012.e19. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.07.013
158
Ruiz-TejadaA.NeisewanderJ.KatsanosC. S. (2022). Regulation of voluntary physical activity behavior: a review of evidence involving dopaminergic pathways in the brain. Brain Sci.12:333. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12030333
159
SahayA.ScobieK. N.HillA. S.O'CarrollC. M.KheirbekM. A.BurghardtN. S.et al. (2011). Increasing adult hippocampal neurogenesis is sufficient to improve pattern separation. Nature472, 466–470. doi: 10.1038/nature09817
160
Salimi-NezhadN.MissaultS.Notario-ReinosoA.HassaniA.AmiriM.KelirisG. A. (2023). The impact of selective and non-selective medial septum stimulation on hippocampal neuronal oscillations: a study based on modeling and experiments. Neurobiol. Dis.180:106052. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2023.106052
161
SalthouseT. A. (2019). Trajectories of normal cognitive aging. Psychol. Aging34, 17–24. doi: 10.1037/pag0000288
162
SasakiT.LeutgebS.LeutgebJ. K. (2015). Spatial and memory circuits in the medial entorhinal cortex. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.32, 16–23. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2014.10.008
163
ScheffS. W.PriceD. A.SchmittF. A.DeKoskyS. T.MufsonE. J. (2007). Synaptic alterations in CA1 in mild Alzheimer disease and mild cognitive impairment. Neurology68, 1501–1508. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000260698.46517.8f
164
ScheffS. W.PriceD. A.SchmittF. A.MufsonE. J. (2006). Hippocampal synaptic loss in early Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment. Neurobiol. Aging27, 1372–1384. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2005.09.012
165
SchmidtH. (2012). Three functional facets of calbindin D-28k. Front. Mol. Neurosci.5:25. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2012.00025
166
Schmidt-HieberC.JonasP.BischofbergerJ. (2004). Enhanced synaptic plasticity in newly generated granule cells of the adult hippocampus. Nature429, 184–187. doi: 10.1038/nature02553
167
SchuffN.AmendD. L.KnowltonR.NormanD.FeinG.WeinerM. W. (1999). Age-related metabolite changes and volume loss in the hippocampus by magnetic resonance spectroscopy and imaging. Neurobiol. Aging20, 279–285. doi: 10.1016/s0197-4580(99)00022-6
168
SchultzH.SommerT.PetersJ. (2015). The role of the human entorhinal cortex in a representational account of memory. Front. Hum. Neurosci.9:628. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00628
169
SegalM.BloomF. E. (1974). The action of norepinephrine in the rat hippocampus. II. Activation of the input pathway. Brain Res.72, 99–114. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(74)90653-2
170
SegalS. K.CotmanC. W.CahillL. F. (2012). Exercise-induced noradrenergic activation enhances memory consolidation in both normal aging and patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment. J. Alzheimers Dis.32, 1011–1018. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2012-121078
171
ShaikhA.AhmadF.TeohS. L.KumarJ.YahayaM. F. (2023). Targeting dopamine transporter to ameliorate cognitive deficits in Alzheimer's disease. Front. Cell. Neurosci.17:1292858. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2023.1292858
172
SinkK. M.EspelandM. A.CastroC. M.ChurchT.CohenR.DodsonJ. A.et al. (2015). Effect of a 24-month physical activity intervention vs health education on cognitive outcomes in sedentary older adults: the LIFE randomized trial. JAMA314, 781–790. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.9617
173
SmithT. D.AdamsM. M.GallagherM.MorrisonJ. H.RappP. R. (2000). Circuit-specific alterations in hippocampal synaptophysin immunoreactivity predict spatial learning impairment in aged rats. J. Neurosci.20, 6587–6593. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-17-06587.2000
174
SnyderJ. S. (2019). Recalibrating the relevance of adult neurogenesis. Trends Neurosci.42, 164–178. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2018.12.001
175
SolstadT.BoccaraC. N.KropffE.MoserM. B.MoserE. I. (2008). Representation of geometric borders in the entorhinal cortex. Science322, 1865–1868. doi: 10.1126/science.1166466
176
SorrellsS. F.ParedesM. F.Cebrian-SillaA.SandovalK.QiD.KelleyK. W.et al. (2018). Human hippocampal neurogenesis drops sharply in children to undetectable levels in adults. Nature555, 377–381. doi: 10.1038/nature25975
177
SpaldingK. L.BergmannO.AlkassK.BernardS.SalehpourM.HuttnerH. B.et al. (2013). Dynamics of hippocampal neurogenesis in adult humans. Cell, 153, 1219–1227. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.002
178
SpoletiE.La BarberaL.CauzziE.De PaolisM. L.SabaL.MarinoR.et al. (2024). Dopamine neuron degeneration in the ventral tegmental area causes hippocampal hyperexcitability in experimental Alzheimer's disease. Mol. Psychiatry29, 1265–1280. doi: 10.1038/s41380-024-02408-9
179
StranahanA. M.ErionJ. R.Wosiski-KuhnM. (2013). Reelin signaling in development, maintenance, and plasticity of neural networks. Ageing Res. Rev.12, 815–822. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2013.01.005
180
StranahanA. M.HabermanR. P.GallagherM. (2011). Cognitive decline is associated with reduced reelin expression in the entorhinal cortex of aged rats. Cereb. Cortex21, 392–400. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhq106
181
StranahanA. M.KhalilD.GouldE. (2007). Running induces widespread structural alterations in the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex. Hippocampus17, 1017–1022. doi: 10.1002/hipo.20348
182
StranahanA. M.MattsonM. P. (2010). Selective vulnerability of neurons in layer II of the entorhinal cortex during aging and Alzheimer's disease. Neural Plast.2010:108190. doi: 10.1155/2010/108190
183
SuhJ.RivestA. J.NakashibaT.TominagaT.TonegawaS. (2011). Entorhinal cortex layer III input to the hippocampus is crucial for temporal association memory. Science334, 1415–1420. doi: 10.1126/science.1210125
184
SuwabeK.ByunK.HyodoK.ReaghZ. M.RobertsJ. M.MatsushitaA.et al. (2018). Rapid stimulation of human dentate gyrus function with acute mild exercise. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA115, 10487–10492. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1805668115
185
SuwabeK.HyodoK.ByunK.OchiG.FukuieT.ShimizuT.et al. (2017a). Aerobic fitness associates with mnemonic discrimination as a mediator of physical activity effects: evidence for memory flexibility in young adults. Sci. Rep.7:5140. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04850-y
186
SuwabeK.HyodoK.ByunK.OchiG.YassaM. A.SoyaH. (2017b). Acute moderate exercise improves mnemonic discrimination in young adults. Hippocampus27, 229–234. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22695
187
TakahashiH.BrasnjevicI.RuttenB. P.Van Der KolkN.PerlD. P.BourasC.et al. (2010). Hippocampal interneuron loss in an APP/PS1 double mutant mouse and in Alzheimer's disease. Brain Struct. Funct.214, 145–160. doi: 10.1007/s00429-010-0242-4
188
TakeuchiT.DuszkiewiczA. J.SonnebornA.SpoonerP. A.YamasakiM.WatanabeM.et al. (2016). Locus coeruleus and dopaminergic consolidation of everyday memory. Nature537, 357–362. doi: 10.1038/nature19325
189
ThibaultO.LandfieldP. W. (1996). Increase in single L-type calcium channels in hippocampal neurons during aging. Science272, 1017–1020. doi: 10.1126/science.272.5264.1017
190
TranT. T.SpeckC. L.GallagherM.BakkerA. (2022). Lateral entorhinal cortex dysfunction in amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Neurobiol. Aging112, 151–160. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2021.12.008
191
TrevesA.RollsE. T. (1994). Computational analysis of the role of the hippocampus in memory. Hippocampus4, 374–391. doi: 10.1002/hipo.450040319
192
TsaoA.MoserM. B.MoserE. I. (2013). Traces of experience in the lateral entorhinal cortex. Curr. Biol.23, 399–405. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.01.036
193
TsaoA.SugarJ.LuL.WangC.KnierimJ. J.MoserM. B.et al. (2018). Integrating time from experience in the lateral entorhinal cortex. Nature561, 57–62. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0459-6
194
UdaM.IshidoM.KamiK.MasuharaM. (2006). Effects of chronic treadmill running on neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus of adult rat. Brain Res.1104, 64–72. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.05.066
195
UlmB. S.BorcheltD. R.MooreB. D. (2021). Remodeling Alzheimer-amyloidosis models by seeding. Mol. Neurodegener.16:8. doi: 10.1186/s13024-021-00429-4
196
UnnerstallJ. R.KopajticT. A.KuharM. J. (1984). Distribution of alpha 2 agonist binding sites in the rat and human central nervous system: analysis of some functional, anatomic correlates of the pharmacologic effects of clonidine and related adrenergic agents. Brain Res.319, 69–101. doi: 10.1016/0165-0173(84)90030-4
197
van PraagH.ChristieB. R.SejnowskiT. J.GageF. H. (1999). Running enhances neurogenesis, learning, and long-term potentiation in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA96, 13427–13431. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.23.13427
198
van StrienN. M.CappaertN. L.WitterM. P. (2009). The anatomy of memory: an interactive overview of the parahippocampal-hippocampal network. Nat. Rev. Neurosci.10, 272–282. doi: 10.1038/nrn2614
199
Velazquez-DelgadoC.Perez-BecerraJ.CalderonV.Hernandez-OrtizE.Bermudez-RattoniF.Carrillo-ReidL. (2024). Paradoxical boosting of weak and strong spatial memories by hippocampal dopamine uncaging. eNeuro11:ENEURO.0469-23.2024. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0469-23.2024
200
VengL. M.MeschesM. H.BrowningM. D. (2003). Age-related working memory impairment is correlated with increases in the L-type calcium channel protein alpha1D (Cav1.3) in area CA1 of the hippocampus and both are ameliorated by chronic nimodipine treatment. Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res.110, 193–202. doi: 10.1016/s0169-328x(02)00643-5
201
VivarC.PetersonB.PintoA.JankeE.van PraagH. (2023). Running throughout middle-age keeps old adult-born neurons wired. eNeuro.10:ENEURO.0084-23.2023. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0084-23.2023
202
VivarC.PetersonB. D.van PraagH. (2016). Running rewires the neuronal network of adult-born dentate granule cells. NeuroImage131, 29–41. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.031
203
VivarC.PotterM. C.van PraagH. (2013). All about running: synaptic plasticity, growth factors and adult hippocampal neurogenesis. Curr. Top. Behav. Neurosci.15, 189–210. doi: 10.1007/7854_2012_220
204
VivarC.van PraagH. (2013). Functional circuits of new neurons in the dentate gyrus. Front. Neural Circuits7:15. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2013.00015
205
VossM. W.SotoC.YooS.SodomaM.VivarC.van PraagH. (2019). Exercise and hippocampal memory systems. Trends Cogn. Sci.23, 318–333. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.01.006
206
VossM. W.VivarC.KramerA. F.van PraagH. (2013). Bridging animal and human models of exercise-induced brain plasticity. Trends Cogn. Sci.17, 525–544. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.08.001
207
WagatsumaA.OkuyamaT.SunC.SmithL. M.AbeK.TonegawaS. (2018). Locus coeruleus input to hippocampal CA3 drives single-trial learning of a novel context. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA115, E310–E316. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1714082115
208
WallingS. G.BrownR. A.MiyasakaN.YoshiharaY.HarleyC. W. (2012). Selective wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) uptake in the hippocampus from the locus coeruleus of dopamine-β-hydroxylase-WGA transgenic mice. Front. Behav. Neurosci.6:23. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2012.00023
209
WanH.AggletonJ. P.BrownM. W. (1999). Different contributions of the hippocampus and perirhinal cortex to recognition memory. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.19, 1142–1148. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-03-01142.1999
210
WhitemanA. S.YoungD. E.BudsonA. E.SternC. E.SchonK. (2016). Entorhinal volume, aerobic fitness, and recognition memory in healthy young adults: a voxel-based morphometry study. NeuroImage126, 229–238. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.049
211
WilmotJ. H.DinizC. R. A. F.CrestaniA. P.PuhgerK. R.RoshgadolJ.TianL.et al. (2024). Phasic locus coeruleus activity enhances trace fear conditioning by increasing dopamine release in the hippocampus. eLife12:RP91465. doi: 10.7554/eLife.91465
212
WilsonI. A.IkonenS.GallagherM.EichenbaumH.TanilaH. (2005). Age-associated alterations of hippocampal place cells are subregion specific. J. Neurosci.25, 6877–6886. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1744-05.2005
213
WitterM. P.DoanT. P.JacobsenB.NilssenE. S.OharaS. (2017). Architecture of the entorhinal cortex a review of entorhinal anatomy in rodents with some comparative notes. Front. Syst. Neurosci.11:46. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2017.00046
214
WitterM. P.WouterloodF. G.NaberP. A.Van HaeftenT. (2000). Anatomical organization of the parahippocampal-hippocampal network. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.911, 1–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb06716.x
215
XiaoZ.DengP. Y.RojanathammaneeL.YangC.GrisantiL.PermpoonputtanaK.et al. (2009). Noradrenergic depression of neuronal excitability in the entorhinal cortex via activation of TREK-2 K+ channels. J. Biol. Chem.284, 10980–10991. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M806760200
216
YassaM. A.LacyJ. W.StarkS. M.AlbertM. S.GallagherM.StarkC. E. (2011a). Pattern separation deficits associated with increased hippocampal CA3 and dentate gyrus activity in nondemented older adults. Hippocampus21, 968–979. doi: 10.1002/hipo.20808
217
YassaM. A.MattfeldA. T.StarkS. M.StarkC. E. (2011b). Age-related memory deficits linked to circuit-specific disruptions in the hippocampus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA108, 8873–8878. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1101567108
218
YassaM. A.MuftulerL. T.StarkC. E. (2010). Ultrahigh-resolution microstructural diffusion tensor imaging reveals perforant path degradation in aged humans in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA107, 12687–12691. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1002113107
219
YeJ.WitterM. P.MoserM. B.MoserE. I. (2018). Entorhinal fast-spiking speed cells project to the hippocampus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA115, E1627–E1636. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1720855115
220
ZemlaR.BasuJ. (2017). Hippocampal function in rodents. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.43, 187–197. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2017.04.005
221
ZhangK.ChenL.LiY.PaezA. G.MiaoX.CaoD.et al. (2023). Differential laminar activation dissociates encoding and retrieval in the human medial and lateral entorhinal cortex. J. Neurosci.43, 2874–2884. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1488-22.2023
222
ZhaoR.GrunkeS. D.WoodC. A.PerezG. A.ComstockM.LiM. H.et al. (2022). Activity disruption causes degeneration of entorhinal neurons in a mouse model of Alzheimer's circuit dysfunction. eLife11:e83813. doi: 10.7554/eLife.83813
223
ZhuX. O.BrownM. W.AggletonJ. P. (1995). Neuronal signalling of information important to visual recognition memory in rat rhinal and neighbouring cortices. Eur. J. Neurosci.7, 753–765. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1995.tb00679.x
Summary
Keywords
entorhinal cortex, hippocampus, neuromodulation, episodic memory, Alzheimer’s disease, exercise, aging
Citation
Hernández-Frausto M and Vivar C (2024) Entorhinal cortex–hippocampal circuit connectivity in health and disease. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 18:1448791. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1448791
Received
13 June 2024
Accepted
03 September 2024
Published
20 September 2024
Volume
18 - 2024
Edited by
Valentina Bruno, University of Turin, Italy
Reviewed by
Adaikkan Chinnakkaruppan, Indian Institute of Science, India
Cristian Morales, University of Chile, Chile
Updates
Copyright
© 2024 Hernández-Frausto and Vivar.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Melissa Hernández-Frausto, Melissa.HernandezFrausto@nyulangone.orgCarmen Vivar, cvivar@fisio.cinvestav.mx
†ORCID: Melissa Hernández-Frausto, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6300-8988
Carmen Vivar, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5242-1091
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.