Abstract
Introduction:
Neuroimaging has expanded our understanding of pediatric brain disorders in which white matter organization and connectivity are crucial to functioning. Paralleling the known pathobiology of many neurodevelopmental disorders, traumatic brain injury (TBI) in childhood can alter trajectories of brain development. Specifically, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) studies in TBI have demonstrated white matter (WM) abnormalities that suggest microstructural disruptions that may underlie atypical neurodevelopment. The neurocognitive correlates of these previous findings will be explored in this study.
Methods:
Indicators of WM organization were collected in 44 pediatric patients with moderate/severe TBI and 76 controls over two post-injury time points: T1 (8–20 weeks) and T2 (54–96 weeks). Our previous work identified two TBI subgroups based on information processing differences: one with slower interhemispheric transfer times (IHTT) of visual information than controls and another with comparable IHTT. We extend this prior work by evaluating neurocognitive trajectories associated with divergent WM structure post-injury in slow and normal IHTT TBI subgroups.
Results:
At T1, both TBI subgroups performed significantly worse than controls on a norm-referenced working memory index (WMI), but only the Normal IHTT TBI subgroup significantly improved over the 12-month follow-up period (p = 0.014) to match controls (p = 0.119). In contrast, the Slow IHTT TBI subgroup did not show any recovery in working memory performance over time and performed more poorly than the control group (p < 0.001) at T2. Improvement in one of the two WMI subtests was associated with DTI indicators of WM disorganization in CC tracts to the precentral, postcentral, frontal, and parietal cortices. IHTT and WM mean diffusivity predicted 79% of the variance in cognitive recovery from T1 to T2 when also accounting for other known predictors of TBI recovery.
Discussion:
In the year following TBI, some pediatric patients experienced persisting working memory disturbance while others exhibited recovery; stratification was based on an event-related potential marker. More or less improvement in neurocognition was also associated with the degree of WM disorganization. IHTT, measured post-acutely after TBI, and progression of WM disorganization over time predicted neurocognitive trajectories at the chronic timeframe - potentially representing a prognostic biomarker.
Introduction
The development of typical brain anatomy and physiology is an intricate process of generating diverse cell types and assembling them into highly organized functional circuits that underlie cognitive and emotional functioning. Whereas neurogenesis and neuronal migration occur in the first year of human life, processes such as axonogenesis, synaptogenesis, and myelination of white matter (WM) continue through early adulthood () and changes in WM structure via activity-dependent myelination continue throughout the lifespan (; ). Using tract-based spatial analysis, revealed that working memory functioning relies on WM organization, with the strongest effect in the corpus callosum (CC), which was also suggested to contribute to age-related differences in working memory. Myelinated WM tracts, particularly in the CC, are vulnerable to axonal shearing and traumatic axonal injury, or TAI (). Despite typical early neurodevelopment, significant disruptions to the developmental trajectory can occur throughout a child’s life. One such disruption, and the focus of this manuscript, is pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI), which occurs during active neurodevelopment and can significantly alter neurotypical trajectories (). TBI is associated with WM disorganization, partly due to TAI, that impacts efficient brain function and WM maturation ().
Working memory, which is a common concern after TBI (; ), is a capacity that develops throughout childhood through WM microstructure maturation () and is foundational for a broader range of high order cognitive abilities such as reasoning, comprehension, problem-solving, and academic achievement (; ). Functional difficulties for children across settings are precipitated by behavioral or learning problems potentially exacerbated by deficits in working memory, although the understanding of specific relationships between WM microstructure and different aspects of working memory is currently limited ().
Advances in Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) tractography have enabled the study of anatomically defined regions and behavioral parameters of functionality like neurocognition (). For example, a developmental study of 296 children from the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study revealed moderate support for associations between DTI indicators, such as mean diffusivity (MD) and fractional anisotropy (FA), within specific WM tracts (e.g., genu of CC) and visuospatial working memory, but not verbal working memory (). According to , the absence or damage to myelin in WM tracts is not a key factor for anisotropic diffusion to exist () and does not appear to be a condition that changes FA; however, myelin pathology may be important for changes in MD since water displacement is greater in the perpendicular direction, rather than parallel, to axon bundles. Furthermore, increased MD values were proposed to be associated with myelin lesions and cognitive impairment in patients with demyelinating WM disorders (). Alternative to the findings above, both verbal and non-verbal memory were associated with FA and other diffusivity metrics in the WM tract that connect the frontal, parietal, temporal, and occipital lobes in healthy adults aged 25 to 82 years-old (). Indeed, the available developmental studies have been inconclusive in regard to regional specificity with WM tract microstructure and working memory (; ; ).
As a complement to WM microstructural organization, a functional CC measure of interhemispheric transfer time (IHTT) has been suggested to mediate associations between microstructure and outcomes in patients following pediatric TBI (; ). IHTT refers to the latency of information presented to one visual field that is then registered in the contralateral hemisphere, which can be more directly measured using electroencephalography (EEG) scalp recordings of visual event-related potentials (). In a pediatric sample following moderate-to-severe TBI, a bimodal distribution of children was revealed, one with IHTT comparable to controls and the other with significantly slower IHTT. These IHTT subgroups were further characterized to have divergent trajectories of CC microstructural recovery over one-year post-injury (). While the pediatric neuroimaging literature has revealed persisting structural differences as a result of TBI, no clear connection between functional and cognitive outcomes has been presented ().
The present study
We evaluated the longitudinal trend of neurocognitive functioning as measured by verbal working memory, which is affected by WM organization and critically important for learning. We examined whether longitudinal changes in verbal working memory paralleled that of our previous finding in DTI microstructure (). To evaluate the evolution of WM diffusion and working memory disturbances, participants were first assessed in the post-acute stage (< 6 months) and then their measurements were correlated with long-term outcomes (> 6 months), as per empirical convention (). After a TBI in childhood, recovery has been proposed to be most pronounced after the first- and second years following injury (). In a 5-year longitudinal prospective cohort, also revealed microstructural changes in the CC between baseline and up to two years following injury with stability between two and five years; moreover, diffusivity indicators in the genu and body of the CC were associated with neurocognitive symptoms (e.g., amnesia, dyspraxia, aphasia). Furthermore, based on our previous work (; ), we evaluated whether IHTT predicted cognitive performance over time and evaluated the correlation between cognitive scores and microstructural indices of WM damage in verbal working memory neural networks, such as the frontoparietal network (; ). This helped address the question of how well IHTT predicts chronic outcomes. These results provided insight into the neural mechanisms underlying verbal working memory and highlight the importance of WM organization in cognitive performance.
Materials and methods
Participants
There were 125 participants evaluated at Timepoint 1 (T1) and 90 participants evaluated at Timepoint (T2). For sample demographics, refer to Table 1. Of the seventy-five participants who completed both visits, 30 were patients with TBI who were initially evaluated 8-20 weeks post-injury (T1) and again 54-96 weeks post-injury (T2). Patients were recruited from pediatric intensive care units from Los Angeles County (UCLA Medical Center and Harbor-UCLA Medical Center) and a Los Angeles based-rehabilitation hospital. Patients were included in this study if they met the following criteria: (1) moderate to severe non-penetrating TBI (intake or post-resuscitation GCS score between 3 and 12, or higher GCS score with confirmed abnormalities on clinical imaging); (2) 8–18 years of age at injury; (3) normal visual acuity or vision corrected with contact lenses/eyeglasses; and (4) English skills sufficient to understand instructions and participate in the neurocognitive measures. Patients with a pre-trauma history of neurological, developmental, or psychiatric disorders (including prior head injury) or MR-incompatible metal implants were excluded. Typically developing controls were recruited from the community through flyers, magazines, and school postings using the same inclusion and exclusion criteria, where appropriate.
TABLE 1
| TBI | |||
| Slow IHTT | Normal IHTT | TD Controls | |
| T1 (n = 120); T2 (n = 90) | 19 | 25 | 76 |
| Sex (M/F) | 12/7 | 20/5 | 41/35 |
| Age (SD), in years: T1 | 14.37 (2.15) | 14.75 (3.42) | 15.00 (2.93) |
| Age (SD), in years: T2 | 15.30 (2.63) | 16.21 (3.14) | 15.83 (2.88) |
| Years of Parent Education | 13.05 (3.61)* | 13.72 (3.53) | 15.28 (3.37)* |
| GCS score on hospital arrival (SD) | 8.84 (4.11) | 8.63 (4.44) | – |
| Weeks (SD) Since Injury: T1 | 12.10 (4.74) | 13.46 (5.11) | – |
| Weeks (SD) Since Injury: T2 | 65.87 (8.28) | 67.67 (7.68) | – |
| TBI | |||
| Slow IHTT | Normal IHTT | TD Controls | |
| Both T1/T2 (N = 75) | 16 | 14 | 45 |
| Sex (M/F) | 11/5 | 10/4 | 27/18 |
| Age (SD), in years: T1 | 14.70 (1.99) | 15.06 (3.19) | 15.11 (2.59) |
| Age (SD), in years: T2 | 15.73 (2.00) | 16.12 (3.15) | 16.27 (2.63) |
| Years of Parent Education | 12.94 (3.87)* | 14.36 (4.09) | 16.07 (3.05)* |
| GCS score on hospital arrival (SD) | 9.13 (4.06) | 8.77 (4.49) | – |
| Weeks (SD) Since Injury: T1 | 12.13 (4.69) | 12.67 (5.67) | – |
| Weeks (SD) Since Injury: T2 | 65.87 (8.28) | 68.32 (8.00) | – |
Demographic information for the TBI sample and TD controls over time.
*p < 0.05; TBI, traumatic brain injury; TD, typically developing; GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale; IHTT, interhemispheric transfer time; SD, standard deviation; T1, post-acute (M = 12.38 weeks, SD = 5.08); T2 = chronic (M = 67.01 weeks, SD = 8.11); Slow IHTT and Normal IHTT were derived based on the bimodal distribution of two subgroups of children with TBI: one group with speeds greater than 1.5 standard deviations lower than typically developing controls and a second group within 1.5 standard deviations of the normative speed ().
Measures
Neuroimaging and electrophysiological evaluations
Mean diffusivity was computed from DTI within prominent WM tracts through the CC to assess microstructural organization. Participants were scanned on 3T Siemens Trio MRI scanners with whole brain anatomical and 66-gradient DWI (2mm3 voxel size, b = 1000 s/mm2; see full description ). Automated multi-atlas tract extraction was applied on DWI to measure MD in six CC tracts (Figure 1), as detailed in a prior study (). For a functional indicator of WM organization, visual event-related potentials (ERP) were recorded using linked-ears references as opposed to mid-frontal reference points to derive a more valid estimate of IHTT. The IHTT task was performed and two TBI subgroups (i.e., Slow IHTT, Normal IHTT) were identified based on ERP speeds compared to controls as per previously published protocol (see ; for details). Stimuli were presented to one visual field, and an ERP was measured in the primary visual cortex on the ipsilateral hemisphere then to the homologous site in the contralateral hemisphere; IHTT is difference in latency between the ERP components between the two hemispheres.
FIGURE 1
Neurocognitive evaluations
Participants completed standardized tests to evaluate their verbal working memory abilities via the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, 4th edition, or the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, 3rd edition, depending on their age at evaluation. Working memory was measured with the Working Memory Index (WMI), which is norm-referenced by age. The WMI constituted two tasks, Digit Span (DS) and Letter-Number Sequencing (LNS). DS involved repeating a series of digits spoken by an examiner in two ways with subsequent trials increasing in one additional digit until a maximum capacity is reached: first, the participant is to repeat digits in the same order spoken; second, the participant is to repeat digits in the reverse order from what was spoken. For the LNS task, an examiner would speak a series of both digits and letters with subsequent trials increasing in additional characters and participants must first say the numbers in ascending order and then the letters in alphabetical order.
Procedure
The overall study was approved by the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) institutional review board and the institutional review boards of each facility from which patients were recruited. Participants underwent electrophysiological and neurocognitive evaluations on the same day, or on rare occasions, within at most a 2-week span. The average MRI scan interval was 1.1 years (range 0.4 to 1.9 years).
Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics 29.0. Analyses reported include independent samples t-tests, Pearson correlations, linear regression, and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) tests. Age, sex, injury characteristics, and years of parent education were used as covariates. According to the social-cognitive-ecological model (
When considering the randomness of attrition, no notable demographic differences were observed between those who remained in the sample versus those who did not. The available data was subjected to Little’s MCAR test to confirm mechanism of missingness, X2 = 40.61, p = 0.618; additionally, missingness was sparse. Pairwise deletion was deemed appropriate to manage missing data. Changes in the measurements of interest from T1 to T2 were evaluated by using percent delta (T2 – T1/ T1). After screening scatterplots and boxplots, a single outlier was identified for DS delta (Z = +3.15, p < 0.01). The scores were reasonable in natural progression and did not represent extreme scores at either T1 or T2, so the participant datum was retained to minimize data loss. Benjamini-Hochberg correction was applied to the presented significance values in the main analyses to control the False Discovery Rate while optimizing power to detect true effects (
Results
For the full sample at T1, using only age and binary sex as covariates, WMI performance was significantly worse for both the Slow IHTT (p < 0.001) and Normal IHTT (p = 0.015) groups compared to the control group. Over time, only the Normal IHTT group (p = 0.014) improved in working memory performance from T1 to T2 to the point where their performance no longer differed from controls (Figure 2). In contrast, the Slow IHTT TBI subgroup did not show any recovery in working memory performance by T2 (p = 0.565) and remained significantly lower as compared to the control group (p < 0.001) with the Normal IHTT group in the intermediary and non-significant from both control (p = 0.119) and Slow IHTT (p = 0.110) groups. The control group’s WMI performance stayed consistent from T1 to T2 (p = 0.719). WMI is constituted by two tasks, DS and LNS, and is separated below. See Table 2 for overall statistics for WMI, DS, and LNS factored by IHTT.
FIGURE 2

Changes in WMI performance from post-acute (T1) to chronic (T2) for the two subgroups of pediatric patients with TBI stratified by IHTT and the typically developing control group with data at both timepoints (N = 75). WMI is based on standard scores with a mean of 100 and SD of 15. Error bars represent the 95% confidence intervals of the mean. The covariates appearing in the model are evaluated at the following values: Age at T1 = 15.01, Sex = 0.36. WMI, working memory index; T1, 8–20 weeks post injury; T2, 54–96 weeks post injury; TBI, traumatic brain injury; IHTT, interhemispheric transfer time.
TABLE 2
| TBI | |||
| Slow IHTT | Normal IHTT | TD Controls | |
| Working Memory Index (WMI) | |||
| Mean (SD) | 92.22 (15.33) | 98.46 (12.31) | 108.36 (12.97) |
| Digit Span (DS) | |||
| Mean (SD) | 8.66 (2.71) | 9.43 (3.30) | 11.07 (2.47) |
| Letter Number Sequencing (LNS) | |||
| Mean (SD) | 8.78 (2.81) | 10.14 (1.73) | 11.99 (2.39) |
Overall statistics for the neurocognitive measure of working memory stratified by IHTT groups.
IHTT, interhemispheric transfer time; TBI, traumatic brain injury; TD, typically developing; SD, standard deviation. WMI is based on standard scores with a mean of 100 and SD of 15. DS and LNS are based on scaled scores with a mean of 10 and SD of 3.
Years of parent education and GCS score at hospital admission were added as additional covariates to evaluate WMI within the TBI group only (Slow IHTT and Normal IHTT subgroups combined), which revealed a significant Group x Time interaction effect, F(1, 23) = 5.48, p = 0.028, ηp2 = 0.192 (Table 3). The Slow IHTT group (p = 0.766) did not exhibit the same degree of improvement in WMI performance as the Normal IHTT group (p = 0.002) from T1 to T2. There were non-significant main effects of Time (p = 0.753) or IHTT group (p = 0.446). A similar pattern was observed for DS. There was also a significant Group x Time interaction for DS scores from T1 to T2 within the TBI group, F(1, 23) = 6.27, p = 0.020, ηp2 = 0.214 (Table 4). The Slow IHTT group (p = 0.577) at T1 (M = 8.99, SE = 0.88) did not exhibit the same degree of improvement at T2 (M = 8.68, SE = 0.71) in DS scaled scores as the Normal IHTT group (p = 0.008) from T1 (M = 8.48, SE = 0.98) to T2 (M = 10.24, SE = 0.79). A full sample Group x Time ANCOVA (N = 75) on DS scaled scores also revealed longitudinal changes in verbal working memory that paralleled that of our previous finding in DTI microstructure (see
TABLE 3
| Group | Timepoint | (SE) | Δ (T1-T2) | Δ (T1) | Δ (T2) |
| Slow IHTT (A) | T1 | 92.90 (4.05) | −0.66 | −0.45 (A–B) | −8.22 (A–B) |
| T2 | 93.56 (3.58) | ||||
| Normal IHTT (B) | T1 | 93.35 (4.51) | −8.42 *** | ||
| T2 | 101.78 (3.99) |
Descriptive comparisons for WMI performance in TBI subgroups stratified by IHTT at T1 and T2.
***p < 0.01; = mean; SE = standard error; Δ = mean change. WMI, working memory index; TBI, traumatic brain injury; IHTT, interhemispheric transfer time; T1, post-acute (M = 12.38 weeks, SD = 5.08); T2 = chronic (M = 67.01 weeks, SD = 8.11).
TABLE 4
| Group | Timepoint | (SE) | Δ (T1-T2) | Δ (T1) | Δ (T2) |
| Slow IHTT (A) | T1 | 8.99 (0.88) | 0.31 | 0.51 (A–B) | −1.55 (A–B) |
| T2 | 8.68 (0.71) | ||||
| Normal IHTT (B) | T1 | 8.48 (0.98) | −1.76** | ||
| T2 | 10.24 (0.79) |
Descriptives for DS scaled scores in TBI subgroups stratified by IHTT at T1 and T2.
**p < 0.05; , mean; SE, standard error; Δ, mean change. DS, digit span; TBI, traumatic brain injury; IHTT, interhemispheric transfer time; T1, post-acute (M = 12.38 weeks, SD = 5.08); T2 = chronic (M = 67.01 weeks, SD = 8.11).
FIGURE 3

Changes in DS performance from post -acute (T1) to chronic (T2) for the two subgroups of pediatric patients with TBI stratified by IHTT and the typically developing control group with data at both timepoints (N = 75). DS is based on scaled scores with a mean of 1O and SD of 3. Error bars represent the 95% confidence intervals of the mean. The covariates appearing in the model are evaluated at the following values: Age at T1 = 15.01, Sex = 0.36. DS = digit span; T1 = 8–20 weeks post injury; T2 = 54–96 weeks post injury; TBI, traumatic brain injury; IHTT, interhemispheric transfer time.
The differential improvement between groups for DS delta over time was correlated with MD delta in most, but not all, of the evaluated CC tracts. For only the TBI group (Slow IHTT and Normal IHTT subgroups combined; n = 30), DS delta was negatively correlated with MD delta over time in CC tracts to the precentral (r = −0.468, p = 0.043), postcentral (r = −0.598, p = 0.007), frontal (r = −0.577, p = 0.010), and parietal cortices (r = −0.495, p = 0.031), but not the temporal (p = 0.243) nor occipital cortices (p = 0.073). Average IHTT speeds for patients with TBI at T1 were positively correlated with MD delta in CC tracts to the precentral (r = 0.493, p = 0.042) and postcentral (r = 0.470, p = 0.042) cortices, but not the frontal (p = 0.298), parietal (p = 0.099), temporal (p = 0.243), nor occipital (p = 0.073) cortices. Furthermore, no significant correlations were revealed in the TBI group between LNS delta and MD delta in the CC tracts to the precentral (p = 0.970), postcentral (p = 0.801), frontal (p = 0.811), parietal (p = 0.883), temporal (p = 0.978), or occipital (p = 0.947) cortices. For the control group, no significant associations were revealed between DS delta and MD delta in the CC tracts to the precentral (p = 0.637), postcentral (p = 0.466), frontal (p = 0.618), parietal (p = 0.393), temporal (p = 0.230), or occipital (p = 0.890) cortices.
IHTT predicted cognitive performance over time in pediatric patients with TBI (n = 19). Ordinary least squares regression models regressed DS delta performance on IHTT speed at T1 and MD delta in CC tracts associated with functional verbal working memory networks (
TABLE 5
| R | R2 | R2adjusted | B [95% CI] | β | t | |
| 0.888 | 0.788 | 0.682 | ||||
| Years of parent education | −0.05 [−0.10, 0.01] | −0.35 | −1.92 | |||
| Age at T1 | −0.09 [−0.184, 0.01] | −0.44 | −2.04 | |||
| Sex | −0.32 [−0.76, 0.13] | −0.26 | −1.56 | |||
| GCS (Admission) | 0.02 [−0.03, 0.06] | 0.12 | 0.84 | |||
| IHTT Average at T1 | −0.03 [−0.04, −0.01] | −0.68 | −4.24** | |||
| Δ MD CC to Frontal Cortex | −4.67 [−9.21, −0.13] | −0.40 | −2.24* | |||
| F(6, 12) = 7.43, p = 0.002 | ||||||
Linear regression model predicting more or less improvement (percent delta) in DS scores from T1 to T2 with IHTT speeds at T1 and percent delta of MD in CC projection to the frontal cortex with covariates for the TBI group (n = 19).
*p < 0.05
**p < 0.01. DS, digit span; T1, post-acute (M = 12.38 weeks, SD = 5.08); T2 = chronic (M = 67.01 weeks, SD = 8.11); IHTT, interhemispheric transfer time; MD, mean diffusivity; CC, corpus callosum; TBI, traumatic brain injury.
As a post-hoc analysis on the full sample with IHTT data at both timepoints (n = 41), another Group x Time ANCOVA with only age and binary sex at T1 as covariates revealed that IHTT normalized for the Slow IHTT TBI group at T2 (n = 12). There was also random attrition for the Normal IHTT TBI (n = 11) and control (n = 18) groups. Little’s MCAR test confirmed the mechanism of missingness, X2 = 1.28, p = 0.527; pairwise deletion was deemed appropriate for management of missing data. There was a significant interaction effect, F(2, 36) = 9.06, p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.355. At T1, the Slow IHTT group was significantly slower than both the control group (p < 0.001) and the Normal IHTT group (p < 0.001). Over time, the Normal IHTT group (p = 0.110) did not exhibit the same improvement in speed as the Slow IHTT (p < 0.001) and control (p = 0.029) groups (Figure 4). At T2, both TBI subgroups were not different from each other (p = 0.795), but the Slow IHTT (p = 0.025) and Normal IHTT (p = 0.047) groups were both slower than the typically developing control group (Table 6).
FIGURE 4

Progression of IHIT speeds from post-acute (T1) to chronic (T2) for the two subgroups of pediatric patients with TBI stratified by IHIT and the typically developing control group with data at both timepoints (n = 41). Error bars represent the 95% confidence intervals of the mean. The covariates appearing in the model are evaluated at the following values: Age at T1 = 14.96, Sex = 0.29. IHTT, interhemispheric transfer time; T1 = 8–20 weeks post injury; T2 = 54–96 weeks post injury; TBI, traumatic brain injury.
TABLE 6
| Group | Timepoint | (SE) | Δ (T1–T2) | Δ (T1) | Δ (T2) |
| Slow IHTT (A) | T1 | 23.54 (1.91) | 10.81*** | 15.83*** (A–B) | 0.88 (A–B) |
| T2 | 12.02 (2.36) | ||||
| Normal IHTT (B) | T1 | 7.71 (1.95) | −4.13 | −2.36 (B–C) | 6.32** (B–C) |
| T2 | 11.85 (2.41) | ||||
| Control (C) | T1 | 10.07 (1.55) | 4.54** | −13.47*** (C–A) | −7.20** (C–A) |
| T2 | 5.53 (1.91) |
Descriptives for IHTT speeds stratified by group over time.
**p < 0.05
***p < 0.01; IHTT, interhemispheric transfer time; , mean; SE, standard error; Δ, mean change. T1, post-acute (M = 12.38 weeks, SD = 5.08); T2 = chronic (M = 67.01 weeks, SD = 8.11).
Discussion
The current longitudinal DTI study in pediatric patients with moderate-to-severe TBI assessed the evolution of mean diffusivity (MD) from the post-acute to the chronic timeframe and evaluated their correlations with long-term neurocognitive outcomes. Indicators of WM organization, both functional and microstructural, were IHTT and MD in CC tracts to frontoparietal regions, which have been proposed as the working memory neural network (
Initial working memory performance within two to five months post-injury was significantly poorer for children with TBI compared to non-injured peers, however patients who exhibited normal (relative to controls) IHTT exhibited notable cognitive recovery over time, comparable with non-injured peers. Longer IHTT at initial measurement was correlated with less improvement in working memory, as well as increased MD in CC tracts to the precentral, postcentral, frontal, and parietal cortices. Improvements were observed only in the pediatric patients who exhibited Normal IHTT at initial measurement, which may reflect the more favorable WM organization relative to the patients with slow IHTT. Increased MD in the evaluated CC tracts from T1 to T2 were strongly associated with slower IHTT speeds at T1 and less improvement in DS performance over time. Normal development of working memory relies on prominent WM tracts like the CC (
The non-injured control group stayed consistent across the presented measurements of working memory but exhibited change in IHTT. There was a significant improvement in speed from initial measurement to follow-up that likely reflects a healthy developmental process, which was also observed for the Slow IHTT TBI subgroup. The Normal IHTT group was not different from the control group in terms of interhemispheric speed at initial measurement but did not exhibit the same significant improvement that their typically developing peers exhibited at follow-up. IHTT normalized for the Slow IHTT group to match the Normal IHTT group, and both TBI subgroups were significantly slower than the control group at follow-up, suggesting that the prognostic utility of this biomarker is time sensitive even though the effects of neurologic trauma may persist into the chronic period.
Interhemispheric brain communication has been proposed to not only transfer necessary information between the brain, but also contribute significantly to the development of integrated lateralized functions (
The strengths of the current study include a complex research design (mixed-model factorial). We were able to track changes in WM CC organization and working memory within and between two subgroups of children with brain trauma to study the one-year trajectory of recovery following TBI in a sample engaged in active neurodevelopment. Moreover, the matched control group enabled comparisons of these trajectories to typical development. Another strength of the current study was repeated measurements of interdisciplinary assessments (e.g., MRI, EEG, neurocognition) to comprehensively approach characterizing the relationship between WM disorganization and neurocognition in pediatric moderate-to-severe TBI.
To better understand causality, future longitudinal studies should investigate changes between IHTT, WM organization, and working memory at more frequent assessments longitudinally to characterize how these changes progress. The current study was limited to evaluating linear trends as there were only two points of data collection which limits our capacity to evaluate the extent that symptoms following medically or clinically complicated pediatric TBI may wax and wane, and if there is instability, to what extent would this variability be associated with the indicators of WM disorganization presented above. Additionally, IHTT as a biomarker still needs to be replicated in an independent sample to further support the model proposed above, which measures pathobiology to potentially make outcome predictions at the patient-level (
This study is also limited by modest sample size, which emphasized the need to minimize data loss in the management of missingness and restricted the number of outcomes that could be evaluated in conjunction with the current findings. For example, measures of academic performance and parent- or self-endorsements of functional independence may have generated additional insights about how affected endophenotypes may manifest in a child’s life. Future developmental studies should incorporate increased sample sizes from a wider range of backgrounds to appropriately evaluate the potential of additional environmental and psychosocial influences (e.g., census-level indicators of neighborhood health, multidimensional measures of parenting behavior, adverse childhood experiences) to predict neurocognitive outcomes beyond sex, age, and years of parent education. Contemporary models of neurodevelopmental disorders need to consider the heterogeneity of symptoms, cumulative risk factors over time, and the influence of environmental predispositions (
Evaluating functional and microstructural indicators of WM organization early in recovery are potential prospective methods to improve the risk-stratification problem following acute TBI. Thus, exploring whether interventions aimed at improving changes in WM microstructure (e.g., cognitive training, neuromodulation) can lead to improvements in working memory may be beneficial, preemptively targeting children with slower IHTT. A recent evidence-based review of 16 randomized controlled trials focused on cognitive rehabilitation interventions post-moderate to severe TBI revealed level 2 evidence for improvements in self-regulation in response to problem-solving therapy involving clear thinking components and level 1b evidence for using mobile devices as compensatory strategies in the Cognitive Applications for Life Management (CALM) program to improve anger, aggressive behaviors, and subjective distress (
Lastly, there may be several other mechanisms that underlie differences observed in white matter disorganization that were not measured directly in the current study. In addition to the axonal shearing forces and significant atrophy of WM tracts after initial injury (
Statements
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) institutional review board. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation in this study was provided by the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin.
Author contributions
DI: Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. TB: Writing – review and editing. ED: Writing – review and editing. KB: Writing – review and editing. MC: Writing – review and editing. AS: Writing – review and editing. AB: Writing – review and editing. CG: Writing – review and editing. RA: Writing – review and editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This research was supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Grant #HD061504.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
AmyotF.ArciniegasD. B.BrazaitisM. P.CurleyK. C.Diaz-ArrastiaR.GandjbakhcheA.et al (2015). A review of the effectiveness of neuroimaging modalities for the detection of traumatic brain injury.J. Neurotrauma321693–1721.
2
BabikianT.MerkleyT.SavageR.GizaC.LevinH. (2015). Chronic aspects of pediatric traumatic brain injury: Review of the literature.J. Neurotrauma321849–1860.
3
BeaulieuC. (2002). The basis of anisotropic water diffusion in the nervous system–a technical review.NMR Biomed.15435–455. 10.1002/nbm.782
4
BrincatS. L.DonoghueJ. A.MahnkeM. K.KornblithS.LudgvistM.MillerE. K. (2021). Interhemispheric transfer of working memories.Neuron109:1055–1066.e4. 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.01.016
5
ChaiW. J.HamidA. I. A.AbdullahJ. M. (2018). Working memory from the psychological and neurosciences perspectives: A review.Front. Psychol.9:401. 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00401
6
ConklinH. M.SalorioC. F.SlomineB. S. (2008). Working memory performance following paediatric traumatic brain injury.Brain Injury22847–857.
7
de FariaO.GonsalvezD. G.NicholsonXiaoJ. (2019). Activity-dependent central nervous system myelination throughout life.J. Neurochem.148447–461. 10.1111/jnc.14592
8
DennisE. L.JinY.Villalon-ReinaJ. E. (2015). White matter disruption in moderate/severe pediatric traumatic brain injury: Advanced tract-based analyses.Neuroimage Clin.7493–505.
9
DennisE. L.RashidF.EllisM. U.BabikianT.VlasovaR. M.Villalon-ReinaJ. E.et al (2017). Diverging white matter trajectories in children after traumatic brain injury: The RAPBI study.Neurology881392–1399.
10
DinkelJ.DrierA.KhalilzadehO.PerlbargV.CzerneckiV.GuptaR.et al (2014). Long-term white matter changes after severe traumatic brain injury: A 5-year prospective cohort.Am. J. Neuroradiol.3523–29. 10.3174/ajnr.A3616
11
DubrowE. F.BoxerP.HuesmannL. R. (2009). Long-term effects of parents’ education on children’s educational and occupational success: Mediation by family interactions, child aggression, and teenage aspirations.Merrill Palmer Q.55224–249. 10.1353/mpq.0.0031
12
EllisM. U.MarionS. D.McArthurD. L.BabikianT.GizaC. C.KernanC. L.et al (2016). The UCLA Study of children with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: Event-related potential measure of interhemispheric transfer time.J. Neurotrauma33990–996.
13
Ewing-CobbsL.HasanK. M.PrasadM. R.KramerL.BachevalierJ. (2006). Corpus callosum diffusion anisotropy correlates with neuropsychological outcomes in twins disconcordant for traumatic brain injury.AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol.27879–881.
14
Flores-SandovalC.ReasellR.MacKensizeH. M.McIntyreA.BaruaU.MehtaS.et al (2024). Evidence-based review of randomized controlled trials of interventions for mental health management post-moderate to severe traumatic brain injury.J. Head Trauma Rehabil.39342–358. 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000984
15
GizaC. C.HovdaD. A. (2014). The new neurometabolic cascade of concussion.Neurosurgery75S24–S33.
16
GlueckD. H.MandelJ.Karimpour-FardA.HunterL.MullerK. E. (2008). Exact calculations of average power for the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure.Int. J. Biostat.41–18. 10.2202/1557-4679.1103
17
GormanS.BarnesM. A.SwankP. R.PrasadM.Ewing-CobbsL. (2011). The effects of pediatric traumatic brain injury on verbal and visual-spatial working memory.J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc.1829–38.
18
GuerraN. G.HuesmannL. R. (2004). A cognitive-ecological model of aggression.Int. Rev. Soc. Psychol.17177–203.
19
GuerrieroR. M.SchlaggarB. L. (2017). An important step toward a functional biomarker in pediatric TBI recovery and outcome.Neurology881386–1387. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003822
20
Huntemer-SilveiraA.PatilN.BricknerM. A.ParrA. M. (2021). Strategies for oligodendrocyte and myelin repair in traumatic CNS injury.Front. Cell. Neurosci.14:619707. 10.3389/fncel.2020.619707
21
KhodosevichK.SellgrenC. M. (2022). Neurodevelopmental disorders – high-resolution rethinking of disease modeling.Mol. Psychiatry2834–43. 10.1038/s41380-022-01876-1
22
KrogsrudS. K.FjellA. M.TamnesC. K.GrydelandH.Due-TønnessenP.BjørnerudA.et al (2018). Development of white matter microstructure in relation to verbal and visuospatial working memory – A longitudinal study.PLoS One13:e0195540. 10.1371/journal.pone.0195540
23
LiX.SalamiA.Avelar-PepreiraB.BackmanL.PerssonJ. (2022). White-matter integrity and working memory: Links to aging and dopamine-related genes.eNeuro91–15. 10.1523/ENEURO.0413-21.2022
24
MeadorK. J.BakerG. A.BrowningN.Clyton-SmithJ.CohenM. J.KalayjianL. A.et al (2012). Relationship of child IQ to parental IQ and education in children with fetal antiepileptic drug exposure.Epilepsy Behav.21147–152. 10.1016/j.yebeh.2011.03.020
25
MillerG. A.ChapmanJ. P. (2001). Misunderstanding analysis of covariance.J. Abnorm. Psychol.11040–48. 10.1037//0021-843x.110.1.40
26
MollK. (2024). Editorial: Thinking outside the box – enhancing causal models of neurodevelopmental disorders.J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry Allied Discip.65257–259. 10.1111/jcpp.13928
27
MolteniE.PaganiE.StrazzerS.ArrigoniF.BerettaE.BoffaG.et al (2019). Fronto-temporal vulnerability to disconnection in paediatric moderate and severe traumatic brain injury.Eur. J. Neurol.261183–1190.
28
MoranL. M.BabikianT.Del PieroL.EllisM. U.KernanC. L.NewmanN.et al (2016). The UCLA study of predictors of cognitive functioning following moderate/severe pediatric traumatic brain injury.J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc.22512–219.
29
ØstbyY.TamnesC. K.FjellA. M.WalhovdK. B. (2011). Morphometry and connectivity of the fronto-parietal verbal working memory network in development.Neuropsychologia493854–3862. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.10.001
30
PreziosaP.PaganiE.MorelliM. E.MassimillianoC.MartinelliV.PirroF.et al (2017). DT MRI microstructural cortical lesion damage does not explain cognitive impairment in MS.Multip. Scler. J.231918–1928. 10.1177/1352458516689147
31
RavignaniA.LumacaM.KotzS. A. (2022). Interhemispheric brain communication and the evolution of turn-taking in mammals.Front. Ecol. Evol.10:916956. 10.3389/fevo.2022.916956
32
RobertsR. M.MathiasJ. L. (2014). Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) findings following pediatric non-penetrating TBI: A meta-analysis.Dev. Neuropsychol.39600–637. 10.1080/87565641.2014.973958
33
Sampaio-BaptistaC.Johansen-BergH. (2017). White matter plasticity in the adult brain.Neuron961239–1251. 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.11.026
34
SankalaiteS.HuizingaM.WarreynP.DwandeleerJ.BaeyensD. (2023). The association between working memory, teacher-student relationship, and academic performance in primary school children.Front. Psychol.14:1240741. 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1240741
35
SassonE.DonigerG. M.PasternakO.TarraschR.AssarY. (2013). White matter correlates of cognitive domains in normal aging with diffusion tensor imaging.Front. Neurosci.7:1–13. 10.3389/fnins.2013.00032
36
SesmaH. W.SlomineB. S.DingR.McCarthyM. L. (2008). Executive functioning in the first year after pediatric traumatic brain injury.Pediatrics121e1686–e1695.
37
SidarosA.EngbergA. W.SidarosK.LiptrotM. G.HerningM.PetersenP.et al (2008). Diffusion tensor imaging during recovery from severe traumatic brain injury and relation to clinical outcome: A longitudinal study.Brain131559–572. 10.1093/brain/awm294
38
SousaS. S.AmaroE.CregoA.GonçalvesÓF. (2018). Developmental trajectory of the prefrontal cortex: A systematic review of diffusion tensor imaging studies.Brain Imaging Behav.121197–1210. 10.1007/s11682-017-9761-4
39
TamonH.FujinoJ.ItahashiT.FrahmL.ParlatiniV.AokiY. Y.et al (2024). Shared and specific neural correlates of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder: A meta-analysis of 243 task-based functional MRI studies.Am. J. Psychiatry181541–552. 10.1176/appi.ajp.20230270
40
ThomasonM. E.RaceE.BurrowsB.Whitfield-GabrieliS.GloverG. H.GabrieliJ. D. E. (2009). Development of spatial and verbal working memory capacity in the human brain.J. Cogn. Neurosci.21316–332. 10.1162/jocn.2008.21028
41
TrebleA.HasanK. M.IftikharA.StuebingK. K.KramerL. A.CoxC. S.et al (2013). Working memory and corpus callosum microstructural integrity after pediatric traumatic brain injury: A diffusion tensor tractography study.J. Neurotrauma301609–1619. 10.1089/neu.2013.2934
42
VerhelstH.GiraldoD.LindenC. V.VingerhoetsG.JeurissenB.CaeyenberghsK. (2019). Cognitive training in young patients with traumatic brain injury: A fixel-based analysis.Neurorehabil. Neural Repair33813–823.
43
VestergaardM.MadsenK. S.BaareÂW. F. C.SkimmingeA.EjersboL. R.RamsøyT. Z.et al (2011). White matter microstructure in superior longitudinal fasciculus associated with spatial working memory performance in children.J. Cogn. Neurosci.232135–2146. 10.1162/jocn.2010.21592
44
WuT. C.WildeE. A.BiglerE. D. (2011). Longitudinal changes in the corpus callosum following pediatric traumatic brain injury.Dev. Neurosci.32361–373.
45
YeatesK. O.TaylorH. G.WadeS. L.DrotarD.StacinT.MinichN. A. (2002). Prospective study of short- and long-term neuropsychological outcomes after traumatic brain injury in children.Neuropsychology16514–523.
Summary
Keywords
white matter organization, frontoparietal network, precentral cortex, postcentral cortex, moderate/severe pediatric TBI, diffusion tensor imaging, interhemispheric transfer time, working memory
Citation
Ignacio DA, Babikian T, Dennis EL, Bickart KC, Choe M, Snyder AR, Brown A, Giza CC and Asarnow RF (2024) The neurocognitive correlates of DTI indicators of white matter disorganization in pediatric moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 18:1470710. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1470710
Received
29 July 2024
Accepted
04 October 2024
Published
31 October 2024
Volume
18 - 2024
Edited by
Hongjian Pu, University of Pittsburgh, United States
Reviewed by
Salil Soman, Harvard Medical School, United States
Chieh-En (Jane) Tseng, Harvard Medical School, United States
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2024 Ignacio, Babikian, Dennis, Bickart, Choe, Snyder, Brown, Giza and Asarnow.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Daniel A. Ignacio, daniel.ignacio@stjoe.org
†Present address: Daniel A. Ignacio, Providence Medical Center’s St. Jude Brain Injury Network (HI CARES), Fullerton, CA, United States
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.