REVIEW article
Front. Insect Sci.
Sec. Insect Systematics
Volume 5 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/finsc.2025.1613264
State of the Ant: how broad is our recent knowledge of Neotropical ant behavior?
Provisionally accepted- 1Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute (Panama), Panama City, Panama
- 2Sistema Nacional de Investigación (SNI), Secretaría Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (SENACYT), Panamá, Panama
- 3Estación Científica Coiba AIP, Panama, Panama
- 4Programa Centroamericano de Maestría en Entomolgía, Universidad de Panamá, Panamá, Panama
- 5Department of Biological Sciences, College of Sciences and Mathematics, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, United States
- 6Instituto de Investigaciones Científicas y Servicios de Alta Tecnología, Panama City, Panama
- 7Smithsonian Libraries (SI), Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
- 8Rocky Mountain Research Station, Forest Service (USDA), Fort Collins, Colorado, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Over the years, most scholarly published papers have studied vertebrates, despite invertebrates' higher species diversity and number of individuals. This has led to an inaccurate representation of global biodiversity patterns in scientific publications. Furthermore, the bias for studying vertebrates is also evident when comparing studies conducted in the tropics vs. temperate zones. We investigated whether similar taxonomic and geographical biases are maintained in recent years when studying the behavior of Neotropical ants. We searched for papers published between 2015 and 2022 with the words "ant" OR "ants" OR formicidae; tropic* OR neotropic* and behav* AND tropic* OR neotropic*. We found that recently published papers studying ants cover only ~10% of the Neotropical ant species, with a primary focus on economically damaging and/or invasive ants. Our results revealed that studies on ant behavior in the Neotropics are dominated by four species, which represent less than 0.15% of the ant species in the Neotropics, and that 50% of the focal species were mentioned only once or twice in studies regarding behavior. Moreover, recent ant behavior studies cover only approximately 8% of the Neotropical ant biodiversity. We found that the Neotropical countries where most ants have been collected for behavioral studies are Brazil, Panama, and Costa Rica. In contrast, other Central American countries are absent from the recent ant literature. Our results reveal concerning patterns of taxonomic and geographical inequity in the study of Neotropical ant behavior, despite its potential role in managing ant invasions and ensuring effective conservation measures. We highlight the need to broaden behavioral studies in the Neotropics and urge researchers to investigate relatively unknown ant species, and include understudied countries with limited scientific resources to fill this critical gap in current ant research.
Keywords: Formicidae, Neotropical ants, geographical bias, Taxonomic bias, ant review
Received: 16 Apr 2025; Accepted: 20 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Quesada-Hidalgo, González, Gálvez, Marting, Castillo, Aguilar, Cox, Smith and Amador-Vargas. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Rosannette Quesada-Hidalgo, Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute (Panama), Panama City, Panama
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.