Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Insect Sci.

Sec. Insect Health and Pathology

Volume 5 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/finsc.2025.1673140

This article is part of the Research TopicSpread of Pest and Diseases of Pollinators in a Changing WorldView all articles

Exploring curcumin and rosmarinic acid as potential antidotes for pesticide-induced harm to honey bees

Provisionally accepted
Saeed  Mohamadzade NaminSaeed Mohamadzade Namin1Tekalign  BegnaTekalign Begna2Youngrak  KangYoungrak Kang2Daniel  BisratDaniel Bisrat3Arezoo  NajarpoorArezoo Najarpoor2Delgermaa  UlziibayarDelgermaa Ulziibayar2Mohammad  VatanparastMohammad Vatanparast4Chuleui  JungChuleui Jung2*
  • 1Oregon State University, Corvallis, United States
  • 2GyeongKuk National University, Andong, Republic of Korea
  • 3Addis Ababa University, addis ababa, Ethiopia
  • 4julius Kuhn institute, Quedlinburg, Germany

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Honey bees are essential pollinators in global food production, however, their populations are increasingly threatened by insecticides. Protecting bees from these chemical stressors is critical not only for ecosystem stability but also for agricultural sustainability. Natural dietary molecules, such as curcumin (CU) and rosmarinic acid (RA), have demonstrated antioxidant and detoxification-promoting properties in other organisms and may offer a promising approach to enhancing honey bee resilience to pesticide exposure. but face significant threats from agrochemical exposure, particularly carbaryl. This study examines the potential of curcumin (CU) and rosmarinic acid (RA) to mitigate pesticide-induced harm in honey bees. In acute toxicity tests, newly emerged bees and foragers were topically exposed to lethal doses of acetamiprid (1.04 µg/bee for newly emerged and 15.3 µg/bee for forager), carbaryl (0.06 µg/bee for newly emerged and 0.51 µg/bee for forager), and flupyradifurone (15.6 µg/bee for newly emerged and 24.1 µg/bee for forager), followed by post-feeding with CU and RA at 50, 100, and 200 ppm for 48h. Additionally, the effects of CU and RA at 100 ppm were tested under chronic oral intoxication through continuous pesticideinsecticide feeding. CU100 significantly reduced mortality in pesticideinsecticide-exposed bees, except those foragers exposed to acetamiprid, while RA showed variable detoxification effects, with RA100 and RA200 particularly improving survival in carbaryl-exposed bees and RA50 enhancing survival of 0.06 µg/bee for newly emerged and 0.51 µg/bee for forager-exposed newly-emerged bees. Chronic toxicity assessments confirmed CU100's superior protective effect over RA100, especially in carbaryl-exposed groups. Gene expression analysis revealed that CU and RA modulated detoxification-related genes, enhancing honey bee resilience by upregulating key detoxification genes in the head and abdomen. These findings suggest that CU and RA offer potential benefits in reducing pesticideinsecticide toxicity in honey bees. However, further research is needed to assess their effects across different life stages, environmental conditions, and colony dynamics, as well as

Keywords: Apis mellifera, insecticide, Pollinator health, Phenolic compound, detoxification, Toxicity

Received: 25 Jul 2025; Accepted: 29 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Namin, Begna, Kang, Bisrat, Najarpoor, Ulziibayar, Vatanparast and Jung. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Chuleui Jung, cjung@gknu.ac.kr

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.