Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Lang. Sci.

Sec. Psycholinguistics

Language Structure Shapes Visual Cognition: The Effect of Zoom-In Versus Zoom-Out Presentation on Visual Preferences

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Sophia University, Chiyoda, Tokyo, Japan
  • 2Nagoya Daigaku, Nagoya, Japan

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Introduction: This study provides initial evidence that grammatical structure in language can shape cognitive preferences for sequential visual stimuli. Linguists classify languages as head-initial or head-final based on their syntactic headedness. Building on this typology, we propose two cognitive styles: head-initial or "zoom-out" cognition, which tends to process more specific, detailed information before focusing on broader perspectives, and head-final or "zoom-in" cognition, which focuses on information from comprehensive to specific. We hypothesized that people's cognitive styles (zoom-in versus zoom-out) are contingent on their language type (zoom-in or zoom-out language), which determines their cognitive preferences for the order of sequential visual stimuli. Methods: We conducted three experiments (N = 823) involving speakers of zoom-in and zoom-out languages to test our hypotheses using a single sequential visual item and questionnaire-based assessments of processing fluency. This design allowed us to isolate the cognitive effect while acknowledging limits on generalizability. Results: Across studies, speakers of zoom-in (zoom-out) languages tended to experience higher processing fluency and more favorable evaluations when sequential visual stimuli were presented in a zoom-in (zoom-out) style. Discussion: These findings offer preliminary evidence linking language structure to visual cognition and highlight opportunities for future research on cross-linguistic variation in cognitive style.

Keywords: cognitive style, culture, Grammatical Structure, Language, Processing fluency, visual stimuli

Received: 04 Jun 2025; Accepted: 17 Dec 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Sugitani, Togawa and Karasawa. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Yoko Sugitani

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.