CORRECTION article

Front. Malar., 16 May 2025

Sec. Vectors

Volume 3 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmala.2025.1612068

Corrigendum: PRONet Duo insecticide-treated net incorporated with chlorfenapyr and bifenthrin is superior to Interceptor® G2 nets against pyrethroid-resistant Anopheles gambiae sensu lato: a randomized experimental hut trial in Côte d’Ivoire and Tanzania using non-inferiority design

  • 1. Vector Control Product Testing Unit (VCPTU), Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences, Ifakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo, Tanzania

  • 2. Vector Control Product Evaluation Centre (VCPEC), Institut Pierre Richet/Institut National de Santé Publique, Bouaké, Côte d’Ivoire

  • 3. Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom

  • 4. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland

  • 5. University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland

  • 6. The Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology (NM-AIST), Tengeru, Tanzania

In the published article, there was an error in Table 1 as published. The mistake was in the description of the active ingredients of Interceptor® G2 which was incorrectly described as containing Alpha cypermethrin 4.8g/kg (200 mg/m2) and Chlorfenapyr 2.4 g/kg (100 mg/m2). The corrected Table 1 and its caption appear below.

Table 1

Net TypeFibreActive IngredientRoleManufacturer
PRONet DuoHigh density polyethylene (HDPE) incorporated 120 denierBifenthrin 7g/kg
Chlorfenapyr 8g/kg
Investigational itemVKA Polymers India
Interceptor® G2Multifilament polyester
Coated 100 denier
Alpha cypermethrin 2.4 g/kg (100 mg/m2)
Chlorfenapyr 4.8 g/kg (200 mg/m2)
Active comparatorBASF SE, Germany
MAGNet®HDPE incorporated
150 denier
Alpha cypermethrin 5.8g/kgStandard comparatorVKA Polymers, India
Negative controlPolyester netUntreated TanzaniaNegative controlA to Z, Tanzania
Negative controlPolyethylene netUntreated Côte d’IvoireNegative controlVKA Polymers, India

Description of net products used in the experiment.

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Statements

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Summary

Keywords

Anopheles gambiae, Anopheles coluzzii, Anopheles arabiensis, non-inferiority, chlorfenapyr, bifenthrin, PRONet Duo, Interceptor® G2

Citation

Assenga AA, Ahoua Alou LP, Camara S, Koffi AA, N’Guessan R, Kamande DS, Ngonyani S, Kibondo UA, Odufuwa OG, Ntabaliba WS, Lekundayo RG, Abilah F, Madumla EP, Muganga JB, Moore J and Moore SJ (2025) Corrigendum: PRONet Duo insecticide-treated net incorporated with chlorfenapyr and bifenthrin is superior to Interceptor® G2 nets against pyrethroid-resistant Anopheles gambiae sensu lato: a randomized experimental hut trial in Côte d’Ivoire and Tanzania using non-inferiority design. Front. Malar. 3:1612068. doi: 10.3389/fmala.2025.1612068

Received

15 April 2025

Accepted

30 April 2025

Published

16 May 2025

Volume

3 - 2025

Edited and reviewed by

Louisa Alexandra Messenger, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, United States

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Alphonce A. Assenga,

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics