ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Med.
Sec. Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1495335
This article is part of the Research TopicMaternal-Fetal Interface Formation and Pregnancy OutcomeView all 15 articles
Incidence, Risk factors, and quality of life of low back pain after cesarean delivery and vaginal delivery at Dilla University General Hospital. A Prospective cohort study
Provisionally accepted- 1College of Health science and Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Wolkite University, Wolkite, Ethiopia
- 2College of Health and Medical Science, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dilla University, Dilla, SNNPR, Ethiopia
- 3College of Health and Medical Science, Department of Anesthesiology, Dilla University, Dilla, SNNPR, Ethiopia
- 4Dilla university college of healthy science and medicine, department of Anesthesiology, Dilla, Ethiopia
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: Low back pain after delivery is a common and often debilitating condition that is frequently underdiagnosed and poorly managed. It is defined as discomfort or stiffness in the lower back. This study aimed to assess the incidence, risk factors, and quality of life associated with low back pain following vaginal and cesarean deliveries at Dilla University General Hospital in South Ethiopia from November 2021 to November 2022.Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted on 129 pregnant mothers at Dilla University General Hospital. Demographic data and obstetric history were recorded before delivery.Postpartum data on the presence and severity of back pain were collected at multiple intervals from the first 24 hours up to six months. The severity of back pain and quality of life were assessed by a numerical rating scale and the Short Form-36 health-related quality of life survey, respectively.Risk factors for postpartum low back pain were identified as significant at p < 0.05.Results: The incidence of low back pain was significantly higher in the cesarean delivery group compared to the vaginal delivery group from the second postpartum day to the fourth week (p < 0.05), but there were no significant differences between the groups on the first postpartum day or after a month. Most participants in both groups reported mild low back pain during follow-up.Body mass index over 30 kg/m² (AOR = 3.01 [1.92-5.43], p = 0.013) and post-term gestation (AOR = 1.79 [1.23-7.75], p = 0.025) were identified as risk factors. Mothers who delivered via spontaneous vaginal delivery had a higher quality of life score (79.13 ± 7.06) compared to those who had a cesarean delivery (73.12 ± 3.46), with a p-value of 0.006 and an effect size of 0.48. Conclusion: Cesarean delivery is linked to a higher incidence of postpartum low back pain compared to spontaneous vaginal delivery from the second day to the fourth week after childbirth.A higher body mass index and post-term gestation were identified as risk factors. Additionally, the impact of low back pain on the quality of life accentuates the need for comprehensive postpartum care.
Keywords: Low Back Pain, Post-partum low back pain, Quality life, Risk factors, and Ethiopia
Received: 12 Sep 2024; Accepted: 30 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Barega, Hemba, Delde, Girma, Milkiyas, Dima, Assen and Eanga. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Muhiddin Tadesse Barega, College of Health science and Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Wolkite University, Wolkite, Ethiopia
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.