ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Med.
Sec. Ophthalmology
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1504560
This article is part of the Research TopicDifferences Between Emmetropic and Myopic Eyes: Implications for Myopia Development, its Progression, and Ocular HealthView all 11 articles
Differences in perceived chromatic aberration between emmetropic and myopic eyes using adaptive optics
Provisionally accepted
- Daza de Valdés Institute of Optics, Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The study of polychromatic visual perception is challenging due to the number of entangled factors involved in the process, from the cues within visual information from the outside world, to the ocular optics, the retinal properties, and neural adaptation processes in the brain.In this study, we used an adaptive optics (AO)-based polychromatic visual simulator to investigate the perception of combined optical cues and its dependence on refractive error. Subjective best focus was obtained as the average of 3 repeated measurements for 1) polychromatic and five monochromatic wavelengths in the visible (450-670 nm); 2) three different visual stimuli (conventional binary sunburst, natural outdoor image, natural indoor image); and 3) under natural aberrations (no-AO) and corrected aberrations (AO) conditionsRepeatability was determined as the standard deviation across repetitions. Chromatic difference of focus (CDF) was calculated for Green-Blue (G-Blue, 550-470 nm) and Green-Red (G-Red, 550-700 nm). Longitudinal chromatic aberration (LCA) was estimated using a polynomial regression fit of the best subjective focus curves as a function of the wavelength. Nine young adults (28±6 years) with different refractive profiles (6 myopic and 3 emmetropic) participated in this study.CDF showed different trends in the G-Red and the G-Blue regions, especially for the binary stimulus and after AO-correction of aberrations. However, in the myopic group, CDF was similar in absolute value for G-Blue and G-Red (0.61±0.34 and 0.73±0.58, respectively, p>0.05 Mann-Withney U test), whereas, in the emmetropic group, the chromatic difference was greater for G-Blue than for G-Red (0.58±0.32 D and 0.22±0.38 D, respectively, p<0.05 Mann-Withney U test). There was no effect of correcting natural aberrations. LCA does not vary with refractive error. Overall, the results of this study suggest that the refractive profile may influence how visual information with specific chromatic properties is perceived and processed, potentially shaping visual mechanisms involved in chromatic defocus perception.
Keywords: Myopia, Chromatic defocus, Longitudinal chromatic aberration, Blur perception, Refractive error, Adaptive optics, monochromatic high-order aberrations
Received: 30 Sep 2024; Accepted: 18 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Rodriguez-Lopez, Dotor-Goytia, Moreno and Vinas-Pena. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Victor Rodriguez-Lopez, Daza de Valdés Institute of Optics, Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Madrid, 28006, Madrid, Spain
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.