Abstract
Intestinal-type adenocarcinoma (ITAC) of the nasal cavity is a rare, aggressive tumor that presents unique therapeutic challenges, particularly in cases of recurrent disease with intracranial extension. We present the case of a 54-year-old male with recurrent ITAC who demonstrated a remarkable response to a novel triple-therapy approach. This patient lacked the typical risk factors, such as occupational exposure to wood or leather dust, making this case particularly unusual. After failing conventional treatments and experiencing multiple recurrences with progressive intracranial invasion, the patient received an innovative combination of immunotherapy (Toripalimab), targeted therapy (Anlotinib), and chemotherapy (S-1). This unprecedented therapeutic combination resulted in significant tumor volume reduction (from 53.9 × 42.7 mm to 38.9 × 18.8 mm) and marked improvement in neurological symptoms, particularly diplopia. To our knowledge, this represents the first case report of successful implementation of this specific triple therapy regimen for recurrent ITAC with intracranial extension.
Introduction
Intestinal-type adenocarcinoma (ITAC) of the nasal cavity is an exceedingly rare malignant tumor, mainly occurring in the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. This type of adenocarcinoma is often associated with occupational exposure to wood and leather dust (1), as well as specific genetic mutations such as TP53 (2). Histopathologically, ITAC resembles colorectal adenocarcinomas but exhibits unique molecular characteristics that complicate its diagnosis and treatment (3). ITAC presents unique therapeutic challenges, particularly in cases of recurrence with intracranial extension.
While conventional treatments, including surgery and radiotherapy, remain the standard of care, management of recurrent disease lacks standardized protocols. Given the rarity and complexity of ITAC, particularly in cases with intracranial extension, finding new treatments is critical. Here, we present a case involving a novel therapeutic combination of immune checkpoint inhibition, targeted therapy, and chemotherapy to treat recurrent ITAC. This report includes detailed histological, molecular, and radiological evidence supporting this treatment strategy, alongside a comprehensive review of current therapeutic approaches. This case emphasizes the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to managing this rare and persistent malignancy (4, 5).
Case report
A 54-year-old male with no significant medical history presented in October 2016 with intermittent epistaxis and right nasal obstruction. The patient had no known occupational exposure to wood or leather dust, nor a history of smoking or alcohol use.
In October 2017, a biopsy at Jiangxi Provincial People’s Hospital revealed adenocarcinoma. Further evaluation at the Otolaryngology Hospital affiliated with Fudan University confirmed the diagnosis of ITAC in the right nasal cavity (pT2N0M0, Stage II). Gastroenteroscopy ruled out a primary gastrointestinal source, and Epstein–Barr virus testing excluded nasopharyngeal carcinoma. A PET-CT scan at Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital identified a localized right nasal adenocarcinoma with no evidence of systemic metastasis.
The patient underwent endoscopic resection of the right nasal tumor in October 2017. Postoperative pathology confirmed ITAC, achieving negative margins (R0 resection), followed by adjuvant radiotherapy (total dose: 60 Gy in 30 fractions).
The patient remained disease-free until December 2020, when nasopharyngoscopy revealed complete obstruction of the right nasal cavity with friable, pale tissue prone to bleeding. MRI demonstrated an enhancing mass (52.1 × 28.6 mm) in the right nasal cavity extending to the nasopharynx (Figure 1A). Comprehensive systemic imaging ruled out other primary tumors.The patient underwent extensive tumor resection with arbitrary flap plasty. Postoperative MRI confirmed partial removal of the mass (Figure 1B). Histopathological examination revealed invasive glandular tubular patterns with marked nuclear pleomorphism, frequent mitoses, and a high Ki-67 proliferative index (30%), indicating strong proliferative activity. No evidence of lymphovascular invasion or perineural invasion was observed (Figures 2A–C). Immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis showed CK20 positivity, CK7 negativity, strong CDX2 expression, and microsatellite stability (MSS) (Figures 2D,E). PD-L1 expression was negative, and p53 analysis revealed wild-type expression. HER2 was weakly positive in 40% of tumor cells. Postoperative pathology confirmed ITAC. The tumor was staged as rT3N0M0, Stage II. From January 12 to February 20, 2021, the patient received postoperative radiotherapy (60 Gy in 28 fractions) to the residual lesion and original tumor bed area, achieving stable disease (SD).
Figure 1
Figure 2
In September 2021, MRI revealed tumor recurrence with invasion into the frontal lobe and anterior brain, accompanied by cerebral edema (Figure 1C). The patient received six cycles of pembrolizumab, cisplatin, and capecitabine, achieving stable disease. However, during pembrolizumab maintenance therapy, the tumor progressed.
In March 2023, the patient presented with diplopia and fatigue. MRI revealed significant tumor enlargement (53.9 × 42.7 mm), accompanied by extensive intracranial invasion (Figures 1D,E). The progress of the patient was considered according to the results of the examination and general discussion. The diagnosis confirmed recurrent malignant tumor of the right nasal cavity (stage T4N0M0 IV). Following multidisciplinary team (MDT) consultation, a novel triple therapy regimen was initiated: Immunotherapy: Toripalimab 240 mg qd (D1-14, Q3W), targeted therapy: Anlotinib 12 mg qd (D1-14, Q3W), Chemotherapy: S-1 60 mg bid (D1-14, Q3W).
During treatment, the patient developed fever and hiccups, which may be related to the treatment regimen. After symptomatic treatment such as physical cooling, antiemesis, antihiccup and sodium supplementation, the symptoms were effectively controlled and the tolerance of treatment was ensured.
After seven cycles of triple therapy, MRI demonstrated a marked reduction in tumor size (38.9 × 18.8 mm) and improvement in cerebral edema (Figures 1F,G). The patient reported significant symptom relief, including resolution of diplopia. For post-treatment management, patients should undergo weekly blood routine examinations and biochemical assays to assess hematological and biochemical parameters, and timely symptomatic treatment should be provided for abnormalities such as cell reduction or electrolyte imbalance. Regular imaging tests are recommended to assess tumor response and detect recurrence. Follow-up imaging in August 2023 showed slight tumor enlargement accompanied by increased bilateral frontal lobe edema (Figures 1H,I), but the patient remained clinically stable. The triple therapy regimen was well-tolerated, with no grade 3–4 adverse events reported. Furthermore, we developed a comprehensive patient treatment timeline that systematically delineates the therapeutic interventions and clinical progression (Figure 1J).
Discussion
The presented case of ITAC of the nasal cavity emphasizes the complexity and aggressive nature of this rare malignancy. In the context of relevant literature, the treatment methods and recurrence of nasopharyngeal enteric adenocarcinoma were summarized (Table 1). The purpose is to offer clinicians with important findings into the diagnosis and treatment of this rare disease.
Table 1
| Author | Year | Age | Gender | Diagnosis | Organism | Treatment | Recurrence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Belli et al. (17) | 2014 | 31 | Male | High-grade intestinal-type adenocarcinoma | Nasal cavity | Endoscopic excision | No recurrence after 3 years |
| Izzo et al. (19) | 2016 | 84 | Male | Sinonasal adenocarcinoma | Nasal cavity | Chemoradiotherapy | Not specified |
| Moor et al. (20) | 2004 | 76 | Female | Mucinous intestinal-type adenocarcinoma | Sinonasal tract | Transfacial nasoethmoidectomy, reconstruction | No recurrence after 20 months |
| Clausa et al. (21) | 2019 | 68 | Male | Sinonasal intestinal-type adenocarcinoma | Sinonasal tract with intracranial invasion | Cisplatin-5-fluorouracyl | Not specified |
Case reports on ITAC of the nasal cavity.
Nasal cavity and paranasal sinus carcinomas constitute approximately 0.2 to 0.5% of all malignant tumors in the human body, with the majority being squamous cell carcinomas (6). Intestinal-type sinonasal adenocarcinoma is a rare subtype of epithelial tumors of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses, accounting for only 8 to 25% of all malignant sinonasal tumors (7). This type of tumor typically originates from the inferior or middle nasal concha and is often associated with prolonged occupational exposure to wood dust (8). According to the International Agency for Research on Cancer, prior and ongoing exposure to certain toxic chemical and physical substances plays a central role in the pathogenesis of this type of cancer. This case involves a rare occurrence of nasal cavity adenocarcinoma in a patient who had no prior exposure to known risk factors.
ITAC’s develop especially in men, demonstrated by a male: female ratio of 21:1, and the mean onset is between 60 and 65 years of age (9). This tumor exhibits histological characteristics similar to colorectal adenocarcinoma. But has distinct molecular features, including overexpression of certain biomarkers like CK20 and CDX2, which can aid in diagnosis (10). ITAC is the primary subtype of nasal cavity adenocarcinoma. Its most common symptoms include epistaxis, unilateral nasal obstruction, and rhinorrhea, making it difficult to distinguish from chronic sinusitis. ITAC is especially difficult due to its nonspecific symptoms, which often lead to delayed diagnosis and mismanagement.
ITAC is characterized by extensive tumor invasion into adjacent structures, including the eyes, optic nerves, optic chiasm, frontal and temporal lobes, and brainstem, while lymphatic or hematogenous metastasis is relatively rare. The standard treatment consists of complete surgical resection combined with postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy (11). Although the use of endoscopic endonasal surgery has somewhat improved outcomes, the overall prognosis remains poor, with a 5-year overall survival rate of 68% and a local recurrence rate of 30% (12–14). Among recurrences, 88% are local, and about 9% are distant metastases (9). In this case, a 54-year-old male patient was initially diagnosed with ITAC and underwent surgery and radiotherapy but experienced multiple recurrences over several years, stressing the persistent nature of ITAC and the challenges in achieving long-term remission. Adjuvant radiotherapy can reduce the risk of local recurrence, while the integration of systemic therapies, such as chemotherapy, targeted therapy, or immunotherapy, may further improve local control, decrease distant metastases, and enhance survival in cases of unresectable disease.
To further refine therapeutic strategies, molecular and immunohistochemical (IHC) analyses provide critical findings into the tumor’s biological characteristics and potential therapeutic targets. In this case, IHC revealed strong staining for villin, CK20 positivity, CK7 negativity, and strong CDX2 expression, confirming the diagnosis of ITAC. A Ki-67 proliferative index of 30% indicated high tumor proliferation. Microsatellite instability (MSI) testing confirmed microsatellite stability (MSS), while p53 analysis showed partial positivity with wild-type expression, suggesting no significant p53 mutations. PD-L1 expression was negative, complicating the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors.
It is unclear how the specific choice of immunotherapy is related to histological histotype and whether there is a molecular profile that underlies the therapeutic choice. In our case, despite the absence of predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy efficacy, such as PD-L1 positivity or mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency, the tumor’s aggressiveness and limited systemic options justified exploring immunotherapy. Studies suggest that combining PD-1 inhibitors with radiotherapy may improve outcomes in MSS colorectal cancers, providing a rationale for their application in MSS ITAC (15). The successful response observed in our patient, despite negative PD-L1 expression and microsatellite stability, suggests that traditional biomarkers alone may not fully predict immunotherapy efficacy in ITAC. This stressing the need for further research to identify more precise molecular profiles that could better predict treatment response in these rare tumors. Weak HER2 positivity was observed in 40% of tumor cells, but it is not currently considered a viable therapeutic target. Additionally, while MUC2, a marker of intestinal differentiation, was not assessed, its evaluation could aid future diagnostics. Recent research has identified tumor budding (TB) as a critical prognostic factor in ITAC. High TB (>4 buds) is associated with poor outcomes, including increased recurrence and reduced survival. Incorporating TB evaluation into clinical practice could help identify high-risk patients who may benefit from more aggressive or innovative therapeutic approaches (16). Notably, a novel triple therapy regimen combining Toripalimab, Anlotinib, and S-1 demonstrated promising efficacy in controlling both local disease and intracranial extension, suggesting potential synergistic effects among these agents and offering a new avenue for treatment in advanced ITAC. To advance the understanding and clinical application of triple therapy (immunotherapy, targeted therapy, and chemotherapy) in sinonasal malignancies, future efforts should prioritize conducting prospective clinical trials to establish its efficacy and safety.
The recurrence of ITAC in the nasal cavity observed in this case emphasizes the malignancy’s aggressive nature and its propensity for high recurrence, as well documented in the literature. Despite the initial aggressive treatment, including surgical resection and radiotherapy, the recurrence in our patient stressing the limitations of these conventional approaches for achieving long-term disease control (17). This aligns with the findings of Hoeben et al., who emphasize the importance of exploring molecular-targeted therapies to enhance treatment efficacy (12). Recent research has focused on molecular pathways such as EGFR, MET, and H-RAS, which may offer targets for new therapies (18).
Conclusion
This case presents a promising therapeutic strategy to manage aggressive recurrent ITAC with intracranial extension. Triple therapy, which combines immunotherapy, targeted therapy, and chemotherapy, successfully offers a fresh treatment option for patients who have few alternatives. Our team plans to further explore this approach through prospective clinical trials to confirm its effectiveness in a broader patient group.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by Ethics Committee of Jiangxi Cancer Hospital. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The human samples used in this study were acquired from primarily isolated samples as part of a previous study for which ethical approval was obtained. Written informed consent for participation was not required from the participants or the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin in accordance with the national legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.
Author contributions
YC: Conceptualization, Visualization, Writing – original draft. JX: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft. CY: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft. HS: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft. LL: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft. DP: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft. XZ: Supervision, Writing – review & editing. WC: Supervision, Writing – review & editing. FL: Supervision, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1.
Vander PoortenVJorissenM. A comprehensive update on intestinal- and non-intestinal-type adenocarcinomas. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. (2020) 84:137–53. doi: 10.1159/000457934
2.
FreitasMBCostaMCoelhoAFPereiraPRLealMSarmentoCet al. Sinonasal adenocarcinoma: Clinicopathological characterization and prognostic factors. Cureus. (2024) 16:e56067. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56067
3.
FranchiAPalombaAMiligiLRanucciVInnocentiDRDSimoniAet al. Intestinal metaplasia of the sinonasal mucosa adjacent to intestinal-type adenocarcinoma. A morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular study. Virchows Arch. (2015) 466:161–8. doi: 10.1007/s00428-014-1696-1
4.
LiGShiYLiuQZhangHXueKSongXet al. Sinonasal intestinal-and non-intestinal-type adenocarcinoma in China: a retrospective study of 14 cases. Acta Otolaryngol. (2023) 143:185–90. doi: 10.1080/00016489.2023.2175032
5.
RiobelloCSánchez-FernándezPCabalVNGarcía-MarínRSuárez-FernándezLVivancoBet al. Aberrant signaling pathways in sinonasal intestinal-type adenocarcinoma. Cancers. (2021) 13:5022. doi: 10.3390/cancers13195022
6.
BatsakisJG. Tumors of the head and neck: Clinical and pathological considerationsWilliams & Wilkins (1979).
7.
TomasettiMReMMonacoFGaetaniSRubiniCBertiniAet al. MiR-126 in intestinal-type sinonasal adenocarcinomas: exosomal transfer of MiR-126 promotes anti-tumour responses. BMC Cancer. (2018) 18:1–12. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4801-z
8.
BigagliEMaggioreGCinciLD'AmbrosioMLocatelloLGNardiCet al. Low levels of miR-34c in nasal washings as a candidate marker of aggressive disease in wood and leather exposed workers with sinonasal intestinal-type adenocarcinomas (ITACs). Transl Oncol. (2022) 25:101507. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2022.101507
9.
CantuGSoleroCLMarianiLLo VulloSRiccioSColomboSet al. Intestinal type adenocarcinoma of the ethmoid sinus in wood and leather workers: a retrospective study of 153 cases. Head Neck. (2011) 33:535–42. doi: 10.1002/hed.21485
10.
El AyoubiAPoizatFGarrelRCostesVGuerrierBEssakalliLet al. Sinonasal adenocarcinomas reviewed. Prognostic value of WHO 2005 histological classification. Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac. (2009) 126:175–81. doi: 10.1016/j.aorl.2009.06.001
11.
BossiPSabaNFVermorkenJBStrojanPPalaLde BreeRet al. The role of systemic therapy in the management of sinonasal cancer: a critical review. Cancer Treat Rev. (2015) 41:836–43. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2015.07.004
12.
HoebenAvan de WinkelLHoebersFKrossKDriessenCSlootwegPet al. Intestinal-type sinonasal adenocarcinomas: the road to molecular diagnosis and personalized treatment. Head Neck. (2016) 38:1564–70. doi: 10.1002/hed.24416
13.
CampSvan GervenLPoortenVVNuytsSHermansRHaubenEet al. Long-term follow-up of 123 patients with adenocarcinoma of the sinonasal tract treated with endoscopic resection and postoperative radiation therapy. Head Neck. (2016) 38:294–300. doi: 10.1002/hed.23900
14.
De GaboryLMaunouryAMaurice-TisonSAbdulkhaleqHMDarrouzetVBébéarJPet al. Long-term single-center results of management of ethmoid adenocarcinoma: 95 patients over 28 years. Ann Surg Oncol. (2010) 17:1127–34. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-0933-3
15.
XiaFWangYWangHShenLXiangZZhaoYet al. Randomized phase ii trial of immunotherapy-based total neoadjuvant therapy for proficient mismatch repair or microsatellite stable locally advanced rectal cancer (torch). J Clin Oncol. (2024) 42:3308–18. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.02261
16.
PuccioSAzzarelloGMaffeisVLaurinoLMairaniEConteFet al. Tumor budding, p53, and DNA mismatch repair markers in Sinonasal intestinal-type adenocarcinoma: a retrospective study supports the adverse prognostic impact of tumor budding. Cancers. (2024) 16:1895. doi: 10.3390/cancers16101895
17.
BelliSTaskinUCaglarATetikkurtUS. Primary intestinal-type adenocarcinoma of the nasal cavity: a case report. West Indian Med J. (2014) 63:678–80. doi: 10.7727/wimj.2013.220
18.
RampinelliVFerrariMNicolaiP. Intestinal-type adenocarcinoma of the sinonasal tract: an update. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. (2018) 26:115–21. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000445
19.
IzzoLIzzoSCelloPDVollonoLViolanteOGradiniRet al. Sinonasal adenocarcinoma in a patient without exposure to risk factors case report and review of the literature. Ann Ital Chir. (2016) 5:1–4.
20.
MoorJCMoorJWScottPMitchellDA. Mucinous intestinal type adenocarcinoma of the sinonasal tract secondary to passive wood dust inhalation: case report. J Craniofac Surg. (2004) 32:228–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2004.03.002
21.
ClausJJorissenMVander PoortenVNuytsSHermansRCasteelsIet al. Clinically relevant response to cisplatin-5-fluorouracyl in intestinal-type sinonasal adenocarcinoma with loss of vision: a case report. Case Rep Oncol. (2019) 12:277–81. doi: 10.1159/000499602
Summary
Keywords
intestinal-type adenocarcinoma, nasal cavity, immunotherapy, targeted therapy, recurrence, case report
Citation
Chen Y, Xu J, Yu C, Shi H, Luo L, Peng D, Zhang X, Chen W and Le F (2025) Aggressive recurrent intestinal-type adenocarcinoma of the nasal cavity: a case report and literature review. Front. Med. 12:1510225. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1510225
Received
12 October 2024
Accepted
28 March 2025
Published
15 April 2025
Volume
12 - 2025
Edited by
Maria Cossu Rocca, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), Italy
Reviewed by
Livia Maccio, Santa Chiara Hospital, Italy
Apurva Patel, Gujarat Cancer & Research Institute, India
Updates
Copyright
© 2025 Chen, Xu, Yu, Shi, Luo, Peng, Zhang, Chen and Le.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Xiaofang Zhang, xf2029@163.comWen Chen, 156149619@qq.comFei Le, lefeincu@163.com
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.