Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Med.

Sec. Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesiology

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1516874

Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block versus Intrathecal Anesthesia for Achilles Tendon Rupture Repair Surgery: A Mono-Centric Retrospective Comparative Study

Provisionally accepted
Gao  SiGao Si1Liwei  WangLiwei Wang1Minzhi  DengMinzhi Deng2Yihan  SunYihan Sun2Yuan  CaoYuan Cao1Jixing  FanJixing Fan1Tengjiao  ZhuTengjiao Zhu1Yun  TianYun Tian1Changyi  WuChangyi Wu1*Yang  LvYang Lv1*
  • 1Peking University Third Hospital, Haidian, China
  • 2Health Science Centre, Peking University, Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

AbstractBackground: To compare the anesthetic and analgesic effects of popliteal sciatic nerve block and intrathecal anesthesia in acute Achilles tendon rupture patients undergoing surgery. Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 115 patients with acute Achilles tendon rupture who underwent surgery at Peking University Third Hospital between May and November 2023. After excluding cases lost to follow-up or declining participation, 96 patients were ultimately enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups based on the different anesthesia methods they received: the popliteal sciatic nerve block group (BG) and the spinal anesthesia group (SAG). The anesthesia effects intraoperatively were compared between the two groups using puncture satisfaction, immediate complications of puncture, anesthesia operation time, and puncture pain evaluation. Postoperative analgesic and anesthesia recovery effects were compared between the two groups using visual analogue scale (VAS), analgesic satisfaction score, sleep score, and time to complete sensory recovery. Ankle joint mobility was used to compare postoperative motor recovery between the two groups. Results: Statistical analysis revealed that in terms of anesthesia effectiveness, the BG had a shorter anesthesia operation time (1.95±0.40min) than the SAG (7.44±1.90min), and the BG (5.4%) had fewer immediate puncture complications than the SAG (25.0%). Regarding analgesic effectiveness, the BG (4.10±0.09) had higher analgesic satisfaction compared to the SAG (3.14±0.11), and within 48 hours postoperatively, wound VAS scores in the BG were consistently lower than those in the SAG. Postoperatively, the time for complete sensory recovery in the affected lower limb in the BG (9.29±0.41h) was significantly longer than that in the SAG (6.09±0.42h). Conclusion: Compared to intrathecal anesthesia, the use of popliteal sciatic nerve block in Achilles tendon repair surgery resulted in shorter anesthesia operation time, fewer immediate puncture complications, higher patient satisfaction with analgesia, and longer duration of analgesic effect. Popliteal sciatic nerve block may be preferred for reduced complications and prolonged analgesia.

Keywords: spinal anesthesia, Popliteal sciatic nerve block, Achilles tendon Rupture repair surgery, Analgesia, Postoperative Complications

Received: 03 Jan 2025; Accepted: 27 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Si, Wang, Deng, Sun, Cao, Fan, Zhu, Tian, Wu and Lv. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Changyi Wu, Peking University Third Hospital, Haidian, China
Yang Lv, Peking University Third Hospital, Haidian, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.