- 1Department of Laboratory, Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China
- 2Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China
- 3Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China
Objective: To study the correlation between Life’s Essential 8 (LE8) and the occurrence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) among US adults, as well as the association between LE8 and all-cause and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality among individuals with COPD.
Methods: Data from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2005–2018 year) were analyzed. The correlation between LE8 scores and the prevalence of COPD was evaluated using logistic regression models. Additionally, the Cox proportional hazards model was applied to investigate how LE8 scores relate to the risk of mortality from all causes and cardiovascular diseases. To ensure the robustness of the findings, sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses were performed.
Results: In the overall population, an inverse relationship was observed between a 10-point increase in LE8 score and the risk of COPD [OR = 0.78, 95%CI (0.75 ~ 0.82), p < 0.001]. Those diagnosed with COPD experienced a 65% increased rate of all-cause mortality and 5% higher rate of mortality due to cardiovascular diseases compared to the non-COPD group. Within the COPD patient cohort, an inverse relationship was similarly observed between a 10-point increase in the LE8 score and the risk of all-cause mortality [HR = 0.87, 95%CI (0.8 ~ 0.95), p = 0.002]. However, no significant association was found between the LE8 score and CVD mortality [HR = 0.83, 95%CI (0.68 ~ 1.02), p = 0.073]. In further exploration through subgroup analysis, no statistically significant interactions were found, suggesting consistency across different demographic or clinical subgroups.
Conclusion: Higher LE8 adherence is linked to lower COPD prevalence and all-cause mortality, yet no clear link to CVD mortality was found. This highlights the need for more extensive research to clarify LE8’s role in CVD outcomes.
Introduction
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a prevalent respiratory condition marked by ongoing respiratory issues and a gradual decline in airflow (1). COPD ranks as the foremost cause of disability and the third leading cause of mortality in the United States, this prevalent condition not only diminishes the quality of life for those affected but also imposes a considerable economic strain on the healthcare system, underscoring the imperative for enhanced clinical interventions and preventive measures (2). Between 1990 and 2017, there was a notable increase in the global prevalence of COPD, rising by 5.9% (3). The World Health Organization (WHO) has projected that by the year 2040, the annual death toll attributed to COPD could soar to 4.4 million individuals (4, 5). The natural course and prognosis of COPD are influenced by various clinical factors, about 30% of COPD patients die from heart-related problems (6). COPD patients are at an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), which exacerbates their prognosis (7). COPD and CVD share several common risk factors, including smoking and a sedentary lifestyle (8). Therefore, identifying modifiable risk factors is crucial for preventing COPD complications and reducing mortality.
The American Heart Association’s “Life’s Essential 8” (LE8) score, an update to the initial cardiovascular health (CVH) metrics, has been linked to a reduced risk of chronic disease (9–11), and all-cause mortality (12). A nonlinear dose–response relationship was found between LE8 and COPD in adults (13). However, its relationship with long-term mortality in COPD patients aged 40 years and above remains understudied.
This study seeks to address this gap by examining the connection between the updated LE8 metrics and the risk of all-cause and CVD mortality among COPD patients in the United States. The overarching goal is to identify a holistic prevention strategy that could potentially enhance survival rates and improve outcomes for the COPD patient population.
Methods
Data sources
The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), led by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), uses a complex sampling method to gather data from a representative sample of the US civilian population. The survey collects detailed information on demographics, diet, socioeconomic status, and health, along with blood samples at mobile centers. Its standardized protocols for data collection ensure high reproducibility and comparability across studies. All NHANES data are public, and the methodology is detailed in their guidelines. The study was approved by the NCHS ethics board, and all participants gave informed consent. As a publicly available, de-identified dataset, no additional ethical approval or authorization was required for this secondary analysis.
This research follows the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guidelines for observational studies to ensure clear and rigorous reporting (14).
Study design and population
The study analyzed data from seven NHANES cycles spanning 2005–2018, initially considering 26,282 participants aged 40 and above. Exclusions were made for pregnant participants (21), those missing follow-up data (69), and data on LE8 components (7,929), demographics (1,516), CVD history (1), alcohol consumption (1,127), depression scores (99), and CKD history (108). After applying these criteria, the study included 14,350 individuals without COPD and 1,062 with COPD (shown in Figure 1).

Figure 1. Flow diagram of the screening and enrollment of study participants. COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; PIR, poverty income ratio; CVD, cardiovascular disease; CKD, chronic kidney disease. Data are from the NHANES (2005–2018)-linked mortality file.
Definitions of LE8
The LE8 score is determined by eight key health indicators: four behaviors—diet, physical activity, nicotine exposure, and sleep—and four health factors, including body mass index, blood lipids, blood glucose, and blood pressure. The specific calculations for these LE8 metrics, tailored to NHANES data, have been published and are available in Supplementary Table S1 (15, 16). The dietary aspect of the study was assessed utilizing the criteria set by the Healthy Eating Index (HEI) 2015 (17). Comprehensive details regarding the HEI-2015’s components and its scoring guidelines are provided in Supplementary Table S2.
Physical activity (PA) was measured by self-reported weekly time spent in moderate to vigorous exercise. Nicotine exposure was evaluated through self-reported smoking and use of nicotine delivery systems, considering both personal use and passive exposure from household smokers. Sleep health was determined by self-reported nightly sleep duration. During physical exams, blood pressure, height, and weight were directly measured, with Body Mass Index (BMI) calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters. Blood samples were analyzed in central labs for blood lipids, plasma glucose, and hemoglobin A1c levels. Self-reported use of medications for hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, and diabetes was also recorded.
The eight CVH metrics, each scored from 0 to 100, were averaged to determine the overall LE8 score. The aggregated CVH score categorized individuals into high (80–100), moderate (50–79), and low (0–49) cardiovascular health levels (15).
Definition of COPD
Referring to previous studies (18–20), it can be diagnosed as COPD by fulfilling any of the following criteria: (1) A ratio of Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) to Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) of less than 0.7 after the use of bronchodilators; (2) Positive responses to questions from the MCQ questionnaires “mcq160g” or “mcq160p” regarding a previous diagnosis of emphysema; (3) Being over 40 years old, having a history of smoking or chronic bronchitis, and long-term use of medications such as selective phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors, mast cell stabilizers, leukotriene modifiers, and inhaled corticosteroids.
Assessment of outcomes
Adult participants’ mortality data from NHANES were sourced until December 31, 2019, through the National Death Index (NDI). The follow-up period ranged from the interview date to the date of death for deceased participants or until the end of 2019 for those still living. We used the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition (ICD-10), to identify all-cause mortality, encompassing any reason for death, and CVD mortality, categorized under heart diseases with codes I00–I09, I11, I13, and I20–I51 (21).
Covariates
Potential covariates in this study were identified through questionnaires and measurements. Age was divided into three groups: 40–49, 50–59, and 60 years or older. Race/ethnicity categories included Mexican American, non-Hispanic black, non-Hispanic white, other Hispanic, and others. Marital status encompassed married, never married, living with a partner, and other statuses such as widowed, divorced, or separated. Education levels were categorized as less than high school, high school or equivalent, and above high school. The poverty income ratio (PIR) was divided into low income (below 1.3), middle income (1.3–3.5), and high income (above 3.5). Self-reported CVD history included conditions such as heart failure, coronary heart disease, angina, heart attack, or stroke (22). The Chronic kidney disease (CKD) was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 mL/min per 1.73m2 or albuminuria ≥30 mg/g, or both (23). The eGFR was determined using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) formula based on serum creatinine levels (24). And albuminuria was calculated as the ratio of urine albumin to creatinine. Drinking status was self-reported and categorized as never, former, mild, moderate, or heavy (16). Mental health was measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9); participants who scored ≥10 was considered to have depression (25).
Statistical analysis
Participant characteristics at the start of the study were stratified by levels of CVH. For continuous variables with a normal distribution, we reported the mean values along with their standard deviations. Skewed continuous variables were described using medians and interquartile ranges. Categorical variables were depicted through counts and frequencies presented as percentages. The Chi-square test was employed to identify significant differences in categorical variables across various levels of CVH, while the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was applied to assess variations in continuous variables.
A multivariable logistic regression analysis assessed the link between LE8 scores and the risk of developing COPD. Additionally, a Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to study how COPD relates to the risk of all-cause and CVD mortality and to determine the influence of LE8 scores on mortality within the COPD group. The LE8 score was considered both as a continuous variable, with calculations for a 10-point increase represented by odds ratios (OR) or hazard ratios (HR), and as a categorical variable with classifications of low, moderate, and high CVH. The analysis proceeded through three models: Model 1 served as the basic model without any adjustments. Model 2 included adjustments for age, sex, race/ethnicity, and marital status. Model 3 expanded the adjustments to encompass educational level, poverty income ratio (PIR), history of CVD and CKD, drinking habits, and depression status.
To identify possible interactions, we conducted stratified analyses based on several factors: age groups (below 65 years and 65 years and older), gender (male and female), PIR categories (up to 1.3, between 1.3 and 3.5, and above 3.5), and the presence or absence of CVD and CKD history.
To ensure the reliability of our results, we conducted further sensitivity analyses. Initially, we removed participants who died within the first 2 years of the study to reduce the possible influence of reverse causality. Next, we incorporated LE8 scores into the regression models based on quartile distribution and reassessed their correlation with all-cause and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality among COPD patients.
R Statistical Software (Version 4.2.2. The R Foundation) and the Free Statistics Analysis Platform (Version 1.9) were applied to all analyses. Statistical significance was set at a p-value of less than 0.05 for all tests.
Results
Baseline characteristics
The study enrolled 15,412 adults aged 40 and older, among whom 1,062 had COPD, resulting in 337 deaths, including 62 due to CVD. Participants had a mean age of 59.4 years and a mean total CVH score of 63.9 points. Men made up 48.8% of the study population.
Higher CVH scores were associated with being younger, female gender, higher education levels, non-Hispanic white race, higher income, better kidney function (eGFR), and a lower urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR). Participants with higher CVH scores also tended to consume alcohol in moderation and had no history of CVD, depression, or CKD. Further details are provided in Table 1.
Association of LE8 scores with the risk of COPD
Table 2 displays the rates of COPD in relation to LE8 scores and the correlation between these scores and the prevalence of COPD. Each increment of 10 points in the LE8 score correlated with a 22% reduced likelihood of COPD in the adjusted model (Model 3), with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.78 and a 95% confidence interval (CI) ranging from 0.75 to 0.82. When categorized, both moderate and high levels of CVH showed a lower prevalence of COPD compared to low CVH levels, with moderate CVH having an OR of 0.56 (95% CI: 0.48–0.65) and high CVH having an OR of 0.28 (95% CI: 0.21–0.38).
Association of LE8 scores with all-cause and CVD mortality
Table 3 details mortality rates for individuals with COPD, contrasting all-cause and CVD mortality with those without the condition and examining the impact of different CVH levels on these rates. Across the entire study group, COPD was associated with significantly higher all-cause mortality rates (HR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.47–1.86) in the adjusted analysis, but this did not translate to an increased risk for CVD mortality (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.80–1.37).
Among COPD patients, a 10-point increase in the LE8 score corresponded to a 13% decrease in all-cause mortality risk (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.80–0.95). Moreover, higher CVH levels were linked to reduced all-cause mortality, with moderate and high CVH levels showing respective hazard ratios of 0.80 (95% CI, 0.63–1.01) and 0.44 (95% CI, 0.23–0.83) when compared to the low CVH group. Notably, no clear pattern of increased CVD mortality risk was associated with varying levels of CVH (moderate CVH: HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.39–1.18; high CVH: HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.16–2.02).
Stratified and sensitivity analysis
Stratified analyses, depicted in Figures 2A,B, showed no significant interaction effects, with all interaction p-values exceeding 0.05.

Figure 2. Subgroup analysis of the association between the Life’s Essential 8 scores and mortality from all-causes (A) and cardiovascular disease mortality (B). HRs were calculated as per 10 points increase in the LE8 score. Each stratification was adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, marital status, educational level, PIR, CVD history, CKD history, drinking status, and depression. HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.
The robustness of our findings was upheld in sensitivity analyses. Excluding participants who died within the first 2 years post-enrollment did not significantly alter the observed reduction in all-cause and CVD mortality risks associated with higher LE8 scores, as evidenced in Supplementary Table S3. Consistent results were found when re-analyzing the data using LE8 score quartiles, as detailed in Supplementary Table S4.
Discussion
This study utilized data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) spanning 2005–2018 to explore the correlation between LE8 scores and the risk of developing COPD among US adults, as well as the relationship between LE8 scores and all-cause and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality among individuals with COPD. The findings revealed an inverse association between LE8 scores and the risk of COPD, as well as a correlation between higher LE8 scores and reduced all-cause mortality risk in COPD patients. However, no significant association was found between LE8 scores and CVD mortality risk. Stratified and sensitivity analyses confirmed the reliability of our findings.
Evidence increasingly suggests that adherence to a healthy lifestyle, including regular physical activity and a high-quality diet, is beneficial for individuals with COPD. Physical activity not only reduces mortality risks and cardiovascular strain but also extends life expectancy (26). Moreover, a nutritious diet is linked to improved lung function and a lower risk of developing COPD (27). Previous studies on COPD have often concentrated on single factors, neglecting a comprehensive approach to patient care. The LE8 score, introduced by the American Heart Association (AHA), offers a holistic assessment that encompasses four health behaviors—diet, physical activity, nicotine exposure, and sleep health—and four health factors—body mass index, blood lipids, blood glucose, and blood pressure. This tool is designed to facilitate the evaluation of ideal health status in clinical settings and to inform rehabilitation strategies for patients with COPD. Our study investigated the correlation between the LE8 score and COPD incidence. Even after adjusting for various covariates, our findings remained significant, indicating that a higher LE8 score is linked to a reduced risk of developing COPD, which underscores the importance of a multifaceted approach to health in mitigating COPD risks.
A cohort study of the Chinese population aged 18–40 years indicates that levels of LE8 have an inverse gradient association with all-cause mortality (28). A negative linear correlation was also discovered among adults in the United States (29, 30). Among U.S. cancer survivors and type 2 diabetes mellitus, there was an inverse relationship between higher LE8 and the reduced risk of death from all causes and CVD (31–33). While in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the inverse relationship was robust for all-cause mortality but not for CVD mortality (34). Similarly, our study reveals a significant correlation between increased LE8 score and all-cause mortality in COPD, but not with cardiovascular mortality, which we speculate may be related to the relatively small sample size for CVD specific mortality. Unlike the aforementioned study, our research focuses on patients with COPD who are over the age of 40. Our study offers significant guidance for the rehabilitation of COPD patients, uniquely establishing a link between the LE8 score and both COPD prevalence and all-cause mortality rates. The insights gained could be instrumental for the prevention and management of COPD among adults in the United States.
While our findings highlight the protective role of LE8 in a U.S. cohort, cultural and healthcare disparities may influence the generalizability of these associations. For example, smoking prevalence, dietary patterns and healthcare access differ markedly between the U.S. and other regions may modulate the relationship between LE8 metrics and COPD outcomes, underscoring the need for region-specific validations.
The observed inverse association between LE8 scores and COPD outcomes may be attributed to several potential mechanisms. Adherence to the LE8 metrics, which encompass healthy behaviors such as regular physical activity, a balanced diet, and adequate sleep, likely modulates systemic inflammation, a key factor in COPD pathogenesis (35). Moreover, improved cardiopulmonary reserve resulting from better cardiovascular health could enhance overall resilience and reduce mortality risk in COPD patients (36). Future research should further explore these pathways to elucidate the precise mechanisms underlying the observed associations.
This study has several limitations. First, its observational design precludes causal inference, and residual confounding may persist despite multivariable adjustments. Second, self-reported data on behaviors (e.g., physical activity, smoking) are susceptible to recall bias. Third, NHANES lacks detailed COPD severity classifications and exacerbation histories, which may modulate LE8’s associations with outcomes. Our analysis focused on U.S. adults, and cultural, lifestyle, and healthcare system differences may limit direct applicability to other populations. Future studies should validate these findings in additional regions cohorts. Which will address regional disparities in risk factor profiles and healthcare systems. The limited number of cardiovascular disease-specific mortality events resulted in low statistical power, which reduced our ability to detect the association between LE8 scores and cardiovascular disease mortality. Future studies with larger sample sizes or longer follow-up periods are needed to validate these findings. Despite these limitations, our use of a large, nationally representative cohort and rigorous statistical methods provides valuable insights into LE8’s role in COPD prevention.
Conclusion
The study shows that higher LE8 scores correlate with a lower risk of COPD and decreased all-cause mortality in affected individuals, highlighting the value of improved cardiovascular health in COPD management. Further research is needed to clarify LE8’s impact on COPD outcomes.
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author contributions
YS: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. DH: Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. YL: Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Software, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. NH: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82374379).
Acknowledgments
We are grateful for the hard work and valuable contributions of all the authors of this article. We thank the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) for providing access to NHANES data, which enabled this cross-national analysis. We also acknowledge the contributions of researchers worldwide whose published work informed our methodological framework.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2025.1530493/full#supplementary-material
References
1. Labaki, WW, and Rosenberg, SR. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ann Intern Med. (2020) 173:ITC17. doi: 10.7326/AITC202008040
2. Adeloye, D, Song, P, Zhu, Y, Campbell, H, Sheikh, A, Rudan, I, et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence of, and risk factors for, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in 2019: a systematic review and modelling analysis. Lancet Respir Med. (2022) 10:447–58. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00511-7
3. GBD Chronic Respiratory Disease Collaborators. Prevalence and attributable health burden of chronic respiratory diseases, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017. Lancet Respir Med. (2020) 8:585–96. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30105-3
4. Alaee, M, Arias, P, Sjödin, A, and Bergman, A. An overview of commercially used brominated flame retardants, their applications, their use patterns in different countries/regions and p33ossible modes of release. Environ Int. (2003) 29:683–9. doi: 10.1016/S0160-4120(03)00121-1
5. Rabe, KF, and Watz, H. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Lancet. (2017) 389:1931–40. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31222-9
6. McGarvey, LP, John, M, Anderson, JA, Zvarich, M, and Wise, RA. Ascertainment of cause-specific mortality in COPD: operations of the TORCH clinical endpoint committee. Thorax. (2007) 62:411–5. doi: 10.1136/thx.2006.072348
7. Balbirsingh, V, Mohammed, AS, Turner, AM, and Newnham, M. Cardiovascular disease in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a narrative review. Thorax. (2022) 77:939–45. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2021-218333
8. Maclay, JD, and Mac Nee, W. Cardiovascular disease in COPD: mechanisms. Chest. (2013) 143:798–807. doi: 10.1378/chest.12-0938
9. Zhang, Y, Ning, N, Fan, X, Huang, R, Ye, Y, He, Y, et al. Age-dependent interaction between Life's essential 8 and chronic kidney disease: a national cross-sectional analysis. Prev Med. (2023) 177:107763. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107763
10. Cai, Z, Liu, Z, Zhang, Y, Ma, H, Li, R, Guo, S, et al. Associations between Life's Essential 8 and abdominal aortic calcification among middle-aged and elderly populations. J Am Heart Assoc. (2023) 12:e031146. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.031146
11. He, P, Zhang, Y, Ye, Z, Li, H, Liu, M, Zhou, C, et al. A healthy lifestyle, Life's essential 8 scores and new-onset severe NAFLD: a prospective analysis in UK biobank. Metabolism. (2023) 146:155643. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2023.155643
12. Ma, H, Wang, X, Xue, Q, Li, X, Liang, Z, Heianza, Y, et al. Cardiovascular health and life expectancy among adults in the United States. Circulation. (2023) 147:1137–46. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.062457
13. Liu, Y, Li, W, Tang, J, and Gao, S. Association of life's essential 8 with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a population-based analysis of NHANES 2007-2018. BMC Public Health. (2024) 24:3144. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20534-5
14. von Elm, E, Altman, DG, Egger, M, Pocock, SJ, Gøtzsche, PC, and Vandenbroucke, JP. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. (2007) 370:1453–7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X
15. Lloyd-Jones, DM, Allen, NB, Anderson, CAM, Black, T, Brewer, LC, Foraker, RE, et al. Life's Essential 8: updating and enhancing the American Heart Association's construct of cardiovascular health: a presidential advisory from the American Heart Association. Circulation. (2022) 146:e18–43. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001078
16. Lloyd-Jones, DM, Ning, H, Labarthe, D, Brewer, L, Sharma, G, Rosamond, W, et al. Status of cardiovascular health in US adults and children using the American Heart Association's new "Life's Essential 8" metrics: prevalence estimates from the National Health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES), 2013 through 2018. Circulation. (2022) 146:822–35. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.060911
17. Krebs-Smith, SM, Pannucci, TRE, Subar, AF, Kirkpatrick, SI, Lerman, JL, Tooze, JA, et al. Update of the healthy eating index: HEI-2015. J Acad Nutr Diet. (2018) 118:1591–602. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.05.021
18. Liu, H, Tan, X, Liu, Z, Ma, X, Zheng, Y, Zhu, B, et al. Association between diet-related inflammation and COPD: findings from NHANES III. Front Nutr. (2021) 8:732099. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.732099
19. Xiao, Y, Zhang, L, Liu, H, and Huang, W. Systemic inflammation mediates environmental polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons to increase chronic obstructive pulmonary disease risk in United States adults: a cross-sectional NHANES study. Front Public Health. (2023) 11:1248812. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1248812
20. Han, L, and Wang, Q. Associations of brominated flame retardants exposure with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a US population-based cross-sectional analysis. Front Public Health. (2023) 11:1138811. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1138811
21. Kim, D, Konyn, P, Sandhu, KK, Dennis, BB, Cheung, AC, and Ahmed, A. Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease is associated with increased all-cause mortality in the United States. J Hepatol. (2021) 75:1284–91. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.07.035
22. Dang, K, Wang, X, Hu, J, Zhang, Y, Cheng, L, Qi, X, et al. The association between triglyceride-glucose index and its combination with obesity indicators and cardiovascular disease: NHANES 2003-2018. Cardiovasc Diabetol. (2024) 23:8. doi: 10.1186/s12933-023-02115-9
23. KDIGO. 2021 clinical practice guideline for the Management of Glomerular Diseases. Kidney Int. (2021) 100:S1–s276. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2021.05.021
24. Levey, AS, Stevens, LA, Schmid, CH, Zhang, Y(L), Castro, AF III, Feldman, HI, et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. (2009) 150:604–12. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-9-200905050-00006
25. Levis, B, Benedetti, A, and Thombs, BD. Accuracy of patient health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for screening to detect major depression: individual participant data meta-analysis. BMJ. (2019) 365:l1476. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l1476
26. Shu, CC, Lee, JH, Tsai, MK, Su, TC, and Wen, CP. The ability of physical activity in reducing mortality risks and cardiovascular loading and in extending life expectancy in patients with COPD. Sci Rep. (2021) 11:21674. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-00728-2
27. de Castro Mendes, F, Ducharme-Smith, K, Mora-Garcia, G, Alqahtani, SA, Ruiz-Diaz, MS, Moreira, A, et al. Household food insecurity, lung function, and COPD in US adults. Nutrients. (2021) 13:2098. doi: 10.3390/nu13062098
28. Xing, A, Tian, X, Wang, Y, Chen, S, Xu, Q, Xia, X, et al. 'Life's essential 8′ cardiovascular health with premature cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality in young adults: the Kailuan prospective cohort study. Eur J Prev Cardiol. (2023) 30:593–600. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwad033
29. Ma, R, Song, J, and Ding, Y. Associations between Life's essential 8 and post-stroke depression and all-cause mortality among US adults. Eur J Med Res. (2024) 29:229. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-01834-3
30. Yi, J, Wang, L, Guo, X, and Ren, X. Association of Life's essential 8 with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality among US adults: a prospective cohort study from the NHANES 2005-2014. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. (2023) 33:1134–43. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2023.01.021
31. López-Bueno, R, Yang, L, Calatayud, J, Andersen, LL, and del Pozo Cruz, B. Dose-response association between cardiovascular health and mortality in cancer survivors. Curr Probl Cardiol. (2024) 49:102176. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2023.102176
32. Fan, C, Zhu, W, He, Y, and Da, M. The association between Life's Essential 8 and all-cause, cancer and non-cancer mortality in US Cancer survivors: a retrospective cohort study of NHANES. Prev Med. (2024) 179:107853:107853. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.107853
33. Shen, R, Guo, X, Zou, T, and Ma, L. Associations of cardiovascular health assessed by life's essential 8 with diabetic retinopathy and mortality in type 2 diabetes. Prim Care Diabetes. (2023) 17:420–8. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2023.08.001
34. Kong, X, and Wang, W. Association between Life's essential 8 and all-cause or cardiovascular-specific mortality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. (2024) 42:1459–66. doi: 10.55563/clinexprheumatol/ppsp71
35. Obling, N, Backer, V, Hurst, JR, and Bodtger, U. Nasal and systemic inflammation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Respir Med. (2022) 195:106774. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2022.106774
Keywords: Life’s Essential 8, all-cause mortality, CVD mortality, COPD, NHANES
Citation: Shi Y, Huang D, Liu Y and Huang N (2025) Association of Life’s Essential 8 with the prevalence and mortality of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Front. Med. 12:1530493. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1530493
Edited by:
Pin-Kuei Fu, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, TaiwanReviewed by:
Yan Wang, Shandong Second Medical University, ChinaSamuel Huang, Virginia Commonwealth University, United States
Pengfei Zhu, Merck Sharp and Dohme (China) Ltd., China
Copyright © 2025 Shi, Huang, Liu and Huang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Ning Huang, YW1hbmRhNjc4QHNpbmEuY29t
†These authors have contributed equally to this work