Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

CLINICAL TRIAL article

Front. Med.

Sec. Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesiology

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1561512

This article is part of the Research TopicAdvancements in Diagnostic and Management Strategies for Gynecological PathologiesView all 16 articles

The Effect of Stellate Ganglion Block on Postoperative Recovery Quality in Peri-menopausal Women Undergoing Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Department of Anesthesiology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
  • 2Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective: This study aims to observe whether right-sided stellate ganglion block (SGB) before surgery can improve early postoperative recovery quality in peri-menopausal women undergoing elective gynecological laparoscopic surgery.Methods: Ninety-four peri-menopausal women, who meet the inclusion criteria, scheduled for gynecological laparoscopic surgery were selected (Trial Registration: ChiCTR2200057907, March 21, 2022). They were randomly assigned into two groups (Group S and Group C) . Group S received right-sided SGB under ultrasound guidance, combined with tracheal intubation and general anesthesia, with an injection of 4 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine. Group C underwent only ultrasound scanning combined with tracheal intubation and general anesthesia. The primary outcome was postoperative recovery quality at 24 hours, assessed using the 40-item Quality of Recovery (QoR-40) questionnaire. Secondary outcomes included: 1) Heart rate (HR) and Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP); 2) Resting pain scores; 3) Recovery of gastrointestinal function postoperatively; 4) Postoperative adverse reactions within 24 hours.Results: At 24h postoperative, Group S had a higher QoR-40 total score compared to Group C with a corrected mean difference of 12.50. Significant differences in HR were noted at T3, T5, and T6, and in MAP at T2, T4, T6, and T7. The resting pain scores at 4, 8, and 12 hours postoperatively differed significantly between the two groups. 4) Compared with Group C, Group S had a shorter time to first flatus and a shorter time to the first return of bowel sounds. The incidence of postoperative abdominal distension was lower in Group S compared to the Group C. 5) The incidence of postoperative nausea, vomiting, headache, shoulder pain, and throat pain was lower in Group S than Group C, with statistically significant differences.Preoperative single-session stellate ganglion block improves 24-hour postoperative recovery in peri-menopausal women undergoing gynecological laparoscopic surgery by alleviating pain, stabilizing hemodynamics, promoting gastrointestinal recovery, and reducing postoperative adverse reactions.

Keywords: Ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion block, postoperative recovery quality, peri-menopausal, Gynecological laparoscopic surgery, Gynecology and obstetrics

Received: 16 Jan 2025; Accepted: 15 May 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Yuan, Tang, Xie, Qiu, Yupeng, Ke, Zheng, Zeng and Wu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Kai Zeng, Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
Xiaodan Wu, Department of Anesthesiology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.