Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

PERSPECTIVE article

Front. Med.

Sec. Regulatory Science

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1563950

How Life-Cycle Real-World Evidence Can Bridge Evidentiary Gaps in Precision Oncology

Provisionally accepted
Emanuel  KrebsEmanuel Krebs1Deirdre  WeymannDeirdre Weymann1,2Tania  BubelaTania Bubela2,3Dean  RegierDean Regier1,4*
  • 1BC Cancer Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  • 2Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada
  • 3Aga Khan University, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
  • 4University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Precision oncology uses omics-based diagnostic technologies to inform histology-agnostic cancer treatment. To date, health system implementation remains limited owing to high uncertainty in regulatory and reimbursement evidence submissions. In this perspective, we describe a life-cycle approach to the evaluation of precision oncology technologies that addresses evidentiary uncertainty and is grounded in real-world evidence (RWE) derived using data routinely collected by healthcare systems. We consider the role for RWE in international regulatory and reimbursement decision-making, review common biases for observational precision oncology evaluations, make specific recommendations for RWE study design and analysis, and specify healthcare system requirements for data collection. We then explore how decision-grade real-world data can support the generation of decision-grade RWE, ultimately enabling real-world life-cycle assessment for precision oncology.

Keywords: Real-world evidence (RWE), real-world data (RWD), Life-cycle a ssessment, causal inference, Regulatory Science, Decision Making, Regulatory acceptance and use, precision oncology

Received: 20 Jan 2025; Accepted: 31 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Krebs, Weymann, Bubela and Regier. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Dean Regier, BC Cancer Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, V5Z 1L3, British Columbia, Canada

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.