SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Med.
Sec. Nephrology
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1567359
Clinical practice guidelines for acute kidney injury: a systematic review of the methodological quality
Provisionally accepted
- 1Peking University Third Hospital, Haidian, Beijing Municipality, China
- 2Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, Shandong Province, China
- 3State Grid Shandong Electric Power Company, Jinan, Shandong Province, China
- 4Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objective: Hospitalized patients, particularly those in the ICU, face a significant risk of acute kidney injury (AKI). Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) that outline diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for AKI can be valuable tools for healthcare professionals, but their effectiveness hinges on their quality. The research aims to conduct a systematic review focusing on the methodological and reporting quality of CPGs addressing acute kidney injury.Design: A systematic review of CPGs for the management of acute kidney injury in adult patients.Data resources: PubMed and other related databases were systematically searched from January 2012 to January 2023 to collect clinical guidelines and expert consensus on acute kidney injury. After summarizing the basic information, the methodological and reporting quality of the included guidelines or expert consensus was evaluated using the AGREE II and RIGHT tools. Results: A total of 8 CPGs from 6 countries and regions were included in this study, and the period was 2012-2023. In terms of methodological quality, 1 guideline was a level strongly recommended, and 6 were level B, generally recommended guidelines. While the evaluated guidelines demonstrated moderate overall reporting completeness, critical deficiencies persist in contextual transparency and quality assurance protocols, necessitating prioritized remediation in future iterations.Conclusions: Our appraisal identifies the 2012 KDIGO guideline as the highest-quality AKI guidance framework currently available, which has driven global standardization of diagnostic criteria and management protocols. Our analysis reveals critical gaps in the practical applicability and transparency of current clinical practice guidelines, particularly regarding implementation strategies tailored to different populations, such as aging populations. Future iterations must prioritize demographic inclusivity, with explicit recommendations addressing the diagnostic challenges and management complexities of AKI among different populations.
Keywords: Systematic review, Clinical Practice Guidelines, evidence-based, Acute renal failure, Acute Kidney Injury
Received: 06 Feb 2025; Accepted: 14 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Li, Wu, Wu, Fu, Xu, Zhai and Chen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Junfei Chen, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.