Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Med.

Sec. Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1573573

Risk factors for adverse maternal and fetal outcomes in SLE patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Provisionally accepted
Hang  LiuHang Liu1,2Meifei  LiMeifei Li1,2MeiJiao  WangMeiJiao Wang1,2Minzhe  RenMinzhe Ren1,2Jiaying  FuJiaying Fu1,2Ying  CaiYing Cai1,2Zhiyu  LiZhiyu Li3ZHAO  TingZHAO Ting1,2Jing  SunJing Sun4*Zhijun  XieZhijun Xie1,4*
  • 1Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China
  • 2College of Basic Medical Science, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China
  • 3Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hangzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
  • 4The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Zhejiang University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective: The goal of this meta-analysis is to designate the risk factors for unfavorable maternal and fetal outcomes in SLE pregnancies by means of a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Methods: The odds ratios (ORs) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using either a fixed-effects model or a random-effects model. The I2 statistic was used to assess heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis, Egger's test, the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS), and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system were also performed. Results: Eleven papers with 1,790 SLE patients who were pregnant were examined in the meta-analysis out of 2,467 citations that were screened. The meta-analysis's findings indicated that the onset of SLE is associated with an increased risk of preterm birth (OR: 2.85; 95% CI: 2.04, 3.99). Hypertension is associated with an increased risk of composite pregnancy outcomes (OR: 4.56; 95% CI: 2.42, 8.53), preterm birth (OR: 2.20; 95% CI: 1.53, 3.17) and preeclampsia (OR: 10.11; 95% CI: 1.83, 55.89). Renal involvement is associated with an increased risk of composite pregnancy outcomes (OR: 3.09; 95% CI: 1.66, 5.72) and preterm birth (OR: 1.65; 95% CI: 1.22, 2.23). Anti-dsDNA is associated with an increased risk of preterm birth (OR: 1.83; 95% CI: 1.13, 2.92) and pregnancy loss (OR: 2.64; 95% CI: 1.09, 6.40). Drug therapy is associated with a decreased risk of composite pregnancy outcomes (OR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.31, 0.85), preterm birth (OR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.48, 0.89) and pregnancy loss (OR: 0.42; 95% CI: 0.21, 0.84). Sensitivity analysis demonstrated how solid our results are. Egger's test revealed no discernible publication bias. Conclusion: The onset of SLE, hypertension, renal involvement, drug therapy, and serological factors have a predictive effect on the occurrence of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes in SLE pregnancies. Strengthening preconception risk assessment for SLE patients plays an important role in reducing pregnancy risks and improving the quality of life during pregnancy.

Keywords: Meta-analysis, SLE, Risk factors, Composite APOs, preterm

Received: 13 Feb 2025; Accepted: 29 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Liu, Li, Wang, Ren, Fu, Cai, Li, Ting, Sun and Xie. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Jing Sun, The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Zhejiang University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
Zhijun Xie, The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Zhejiang University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.