Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Med.

Sec. Pulmonary Medicine

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1578282

The RACOON Viral Pneumonia Score for structured reporting of preexisting, acute and post-pneumonic findings on chest CT

Provisionally accepted
Thorsten  PersigehlThorsten Persigehl1Philipp  FerversPhilipp Fervers1Andreas  BucherAndreas Bucher2Peter  IsfortPeter Isfort3,4David  MaintzDavid Maintz1Tobias  PenzkoferTobias Penzkofer5Marwin  SähnMarwin Sähn3Thomas  VoglThomas Vogl2Jonathan  KottlorsJonathan Kottlors1Felix  DoellingerFelix Doellinger5*
  • 1Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cologne, Germany
  • 2Goethe University Frankfurt, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
  • 3University Hospital Aachen, Department of Radiology, Aachen, Germany
  • 4Hospital Friederikenstift, Department of Radiology, Hannover, Germany
  • 5Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Radiology, Berlin, Germany

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: The multi-dimensional RACOON Viral Pneumonia Score (RVPS) was developed to compensate for the main weaknesses of the established one-dimensional chest CT scores: first, to quantify the severity of pneumonia and, second, to qualitatively monitor infectious lung disease from acute stage to post-pneumonic sequelae.Objectives: This research focusses on the original development and evaluation of applicability and inter-reader reliability of the RVPS. Methods: Within the Radiological Cooperative Network (RACOON) the scoring system was developed in several expert meetings and tested in this proof-of-concept study with 8,525 observations. In the subset of inter-reader validation (7,800 observations), eight blinded radiologists applied the RVPS and evaluated the following CT findings for each lung lobe individually: (I) pure ground glass opacities (GGO), (II) GGO and interstitial thickening, (III) consolidations, (IV) linear opacities and reticulations, (V) fibrotic-like changes. The extent of each pathology was scored 0-5 points and the total involvement was calculated. Inter-reader variability was assessed using Kendall's W.Results: This study presents the RVPS as a comprehensive tool for inter-reader reliable evaluation, longitudinal monitoring, and structured documentation of the extent as well as quality of chest CT findings in infectious lung disease. Conclusions: This study presents the RVPS as a comprehensive tool for inter-reader reliable evaluation, longitudinal monitoring, and structured documentation of the extent as well as quality of chest CT findings in infectious lung disease.The Racoon Viral Pneumonia Score (RVPS) is a multidimensional instrument for structured, quantitative and qualitative assessment of (post-)pneumonia CT findings. The RVPS proved robust in multi-center inter-reader evaluation. The RVPS may facilitatesfacilitate the application of artificial intelligence (AI) and represents a tool for pandemic preparedness.

Keywords: computed tomography, COVID-19, Pandemic preparedness, Pneumonia, Structured Reporting

Received: 17 Feb 2025; Accepted: 09 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Persigehl, Fervers, Bucher, Isfort, Maintz, Penzkofer, Sähn, Vogl, Kottlors and Doellinger. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Felix Doellinger, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Radiology, Berlin, Germany

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.