Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Med.

Sec. Hepatobiliary Diseases

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1579879

This article is part of the Research TopicHot Topics in Diabetes and Steatotic Liver DiseaseView all 10 articles

Association Between eGDR and MASLD and Liver Fibrosis: A Cross-Sectional Study Based on NHANES 2017-2023

Provisionally accepted
Wenjing  PengWenjing Peng1Zeyu  LiZeyu Li2*Nian  FuNian Fu1*
  • 1Affiliated Nanhua Hospital, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan Province, China
  • 2Department of Thyroid Surgery, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: This study aimed to investigate the association between estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR) and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), as well as liver fibrosis, using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2017-2023 dataset.Methods: Data from 7,855 participants in the NHANES 2017-2023 dataset were analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to assess the association between eGDR and MASLD, as well as liver fibrosis, adjusting for potential confounders. Generalized additive models (GAM) were used to explore non-linear relationships, stratified by age, hypertension, diabetes, CVD, and BMI. A two-piecewise linear regression model was used to examine threshold effects. Subgroup analyses were conducted to assess effect modification. Mediation analysis was performed to determine the role of the atherogenic index of plasma (AIP). Sensitivity analysis was performed to test the robustness of the results.Results: In the fully adjusted model, higher eGDR was inversely associated with MASLD (OR = 0.62) and liver fibrosis (OR = 0.50; both P < 0.0001). Participants in higher eGDR quartiles (Q2–Q4) had progressively lower odds of MASLD (Q2: OR = 0.56, Q3: OR = 0.25, Q4: OR = 0.13) and liver fibrosis (Q2: OR = 0.24, Q3: OR = 0.06, Q4: OR = 0.05) compared to Q1 (all P < 0.0001). A non-linear relationship with threshold effects at an eGDR value of 3.25 was observed for MASLD. Subgroup analyses revealed that the inverse association between eGDR and MASLD was more pronounced in individuals without diabetes. Additionally, smoothing curve fitting showed that the dose-response relationship between eGDR and both MASLD and liver fibrosis differed by metabolic and clinical status. Mediation analysis suggested that AIP partially mediated the association between eGDR and MASLD, accounting for approximately 10.6% of the total effect. Sensitivity analyses excluding extreme eGDR values confirmed the robust inverse associations with MASLD and liver fibrosis.Conclusions: This study found a significant non-linear inverse association between eGDR and both MASLD and liver fibrosis, with a threshold effect observed for MASLD. The association was stronger in non-diabetic individuals and partially mediated by AIP. Moreover, the dose-response relationships varied across metabolic and clinical subgroups.

Keywords: eGDR, MASLD, Insulin Resistance, diabetes, NHANES, Cross-sectional study

Received: 19 Feb 2025; Accepted: 06 May 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Peng, Li and Fu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Zeyu Li, Department of Thyroid Surgery, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
Nian Fu, Affiliated Nanhua Hospital, University of South China, Hengyang, 421002, Hunan Province, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.