ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Med.
Sec. Healthcare Professions Education
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1580234
Aspects of power sensitivity among social workers and social work students: A comparative study
Provisionally accepted
- 1HAWK University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Göttingen, Lower Saxony, Germany
- 2Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Lower Saxony, Germany
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The asymmetrical nature of the relationship between social workers and their clients may lead to abuse of power due to a human trait or corruption. A high level of power sensitivity is thus crucial to counteract power abuse. Ideally, this topic should be covered during studies, as the risk of corruption rises with everyday working life. In this study, we aimed to assess basic and specific aspects of power sensitivity both for 271 students and 414 professionals, covering (1) general differences for the total sample, (2) differences between both groups and (3) differences between subgroups (semesters, professional years, field of profession; ratings from 0-100%). While importance of power sensitivity (94.7%) and professional ethics/principles (91.9%) were rated higher than all other items (p < .001), a stark difference was found between the participants' own vs. the anticipated professional groups' power sensitivity (73.9% vs. 53.4%, p < .001). A hypothetical individual change for the worse through the power as social worker was rated significantly lower than all other items on the respective scale (61.5%, p < .001). Professionals rated the experience of stereotypical ideas and prejudices towards clients (78.5%, 75.2%) to be significantly stronger than students (69.4%, 67.4% all p < .001). For students, power sensitivity generally increased with semesters (p < .001), while it remained stable over professional years for social workers. Differences between fields of profession did not reach significance. In summary, both students and professionals emphasized the importance of power sensitivity, but seemed to show a self-serving bias if they compared themselves to their groupconsidering a possible corruption effect, this may at least be interpreted as problematic. We discuss room for improvement in terms of sensitization, whether in the context of further training (professionals) or curricula (students).
Keywords: Power sensitivity, constructive use of power, destructive use of power, Social work professionals, Social Work Students, self-serving bias
Received: 24 Feb 2025; Accepted: 31 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Misamer, Bartels and Belz. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Michael Belz, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, 37075, Lower Saxony, Germany
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.