Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

CASE REPORT article

Front. Med., 11 July 2025

Sec. Infectious Diseases: Pathogenesis and Therapy

Volume 12 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1584216

An acute Q fever with vessel vasculitis: case report


Shijun Guo*Shijun Guo1*Quanle LiuQuanle Liu1Jiaqi YanJiaqi Yan2Jin WangJin Wang1Yingran ZhongYingran Zhong3Feng GaoFeng Gao1Yuejia ZhongYuejia Zhong1
  • 1Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
  • 2Second Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
  • 3Yuexiu District Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China

Background: Q fever (QF) is a relatively rare zoonotic infectious disease, and complications such as vasculitis and endocarditis are uncommon but severe. This article reports a case of acute QF complicated by vasculitis.

Case presentation: The patient presented with a week of recurrent fever. Upon admission, inflammatory markers and liver transaminases were elevated, and a weak positive result for Chlamydia pneumoniae Immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies was detected. After treatment with levofloxacin and doxycycline, the fever persisted. Blood metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) suggested Coxiella species, raising suspicion for acute QF. The antibiotics were switched to moxifloxacin, but fever continued. Autoimmune tests showed positive antinuclear antibodies, and multiple blood cultures were negative. Further positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) revealed inflammatory changes at the bifurcation of the right internal and external carotid arteries, as well as the ascending aorta, pulmonary arteries, and descending aorta, suggesting QF complicated by vasculitis. Treatment with methylprednisolone led to gradual resolution of the fever, and rechecked autoimmune antibodies turned negative. The patient did not experience further fever after discharge.

Conclusion: Currently, early recognition and diagnostic techniques for QF still require further improvement. As an infectious disease, timely treatment and vaccination for QF remain key areas of focus for future healthcare professionals.

Background

Q fever (QF) is a zoonotic infectious disease caused by Coxiella burnetii infection (1). The primary mode of transmission is the inhalation of aerosolized particles containing the pathogen, with domestic animals, wildlife, and ticks being the main hosts (2). Clinically, QF commonly presents with fever, headache, and muscle pain, but lacks specificity. The fever typically lasts for 1–3 weeks. Common sites of infection include the lungs, liver, and endocardium, and it can lead to multi-organ failure (3). This article reports a case of acute QF complicated by vasculitis.

Case presentation

A 66-year-old male was admitted on January 15, 2022, due to recurrent fever for 1 week, presenting with chills, fatigue, and a fluctuating body temperature between 37.5°C and 38.5°C, with higher fever in the afternoon. He also experienced headache, dizziness, and diarrhea for 1 day, with 10 episodes of loose, foul-smelling stools. His vital signs were measured as follows: temperature 36.6°C, heart rate 108 beats/min, respiratory rate 20 breaths/min, and blood pressure 165/91 mmHg. Physical examination revealed normal cardiopulmonary and abdominal findings. He had no oral ulcers, joint pain, cough, sputum production, abdominal pain, diarrhea, or urinary symptoms such as frequency, urgency, or dysuria. Upon inquiring about his medical history, we learned that he had a history of asthma, gallstones, and right parotid gland surgery. He works as an engraver and lives at the foot of Baiyun Mountain in Guangzhou, where he has frequent contact with birds.

After admission, we conducted relevant tests. The results were as follows: complete blood count showed white blood cells at 7.38 × 109/L, with neutrophils making up 71.2%; procalcitonin was 1.96 ng/L; alanine aminotransferase (ALT) was 116 U/L; aspartate aminotransferase (AST) was 92 U/L; total bilirubin was 12.4 μmol/L; direct bilirubin was 4.0 μmol/L; coagulation tests showed fibrinogen at 4.17 g/L, and D-dimer was 2.8 mg/L. Chest computed tomography (CT) did not show any abnormalities. Abdominal CT indicated mild fatty liver and gallstones with accompanying cholecystitis. Respiratory viral antigen testing showed weakly positive Immunoglobulin M(IgM) antibodies for Chlamydia pneumoniae, while Q fever rickettsia IgM antibodies were negative.

Therefore, based on the clinical evidence, both cholecystitis and atypical pneumonia are considered possible diagnoses, though the causative pathogen remains unidentified. An empirical antibiotic therapy has been initiated accordingly. Therefore, for treatment, we administered levofloxacin 0.5 g once daily via intravenous drip for infection control and added doxycycline 0.1 g every 12 h orally on January 17 to cover atypical pathogens. Despite this, the patient continued to experience recurrent fever. On January 19, we performed metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS, Table 1), which suggested Coxiella species with a sequence count of 540, leading to a diagnosis of acute Q fever. Consequently, we switched the antibiotic from levofloxacin to moxifloxacin 0.4 g every day intravenously for infection management.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. mNGS of the patient.

Despite our active antimicrobial treatment, the patient continued to experience daily fever, with body temperature fluctuating between 36°C and 40.4°C. A follow-up chest X-ray on January 24 showed bilateral lower lung inflammation with a small amount of pleural effusion. During hospitalization, the antibiotic regimen was as follows: levofloxacin 0.5g once daily via intravenous drip (01.15–01.18), doxycycline 0.1g every 12 h orally (01.17–02.01), and moxifloxacin 0.4g once daily via intravenous drip (01.19–02.01). Bone marrow aspiration showing reactive proliferative changes in the bone marrow suggests that inflammation persists. A follow-up blood mNGS on January 30 (Table 1) was negative. Transesophageal echocardiography revealed no vegetation, ruling out infective endocarditis. Autoimmune tests for 16 items showed positive antinuclear antibodies (1:100 titer), ribosomal P protein antibodies 129 AU/ml, anti-SSB antibodies 115 AU/ml, anti-Jo-1 antibodies 148 AU/ml, and anti-nucleolar antigen antibodies 162 AU/ml, with the remaining items negative.

The patient continued to experience recurrent fever, and multiple blood cultures remained negative. The cause of fever remains undetermined. On February 4, a positron emission tomography/computedtomography (PET/CT) scan was performed, which revealed inflammatory changes at the bifurcation of the right internal and external carotid arteries, as well as the ascending aorta, pulmonary arteries, and descending aorta, suggesting QF complicated by vasculitis (Figure 1). Therefore, we started treatment with methylprednisolone 40mg once daily via intravenous drip (02.09–02.14). Later, autoimmune tests for 16 items showed positive antinuclear antibodies (1:100 titer), with all other items negative. After steroid treatment, the fever subsided, and the patient was stable. Re-examination of inflammatory markers and liver function tests on February 9 all showed normal results (white blood cells was 10.38 × 109/L; procalcitonin was 0.09 ng/L; ALT was 18 U/L; AST was 16 U/L.). The patient’s condition remained stable and was discharged on February 14. A follow-up on February 15 showed positive QF rickettsia IgM antibodies in respiratory viral testing. The patient had no further fever after discharge. During the 2-week follow-up period, no fever or other discomfort symptoms were observed.

FIGURE 1
Three medical imaging panels show comparative scans. Panel (a) highlights the ascending aorta with arrows pointing at specific areas. Panel (b) displays the bifurcation of the right internal and external carotid arteries, marked by arrows. Panel (c) shows pulmonary arteries, with arrows indicating focal points. Each panel contains multiple scan views.

Figure 1. PET/CT of the patient (2022.02.04). Multiple nodular and strip-shaped hypermetabolic lesions were observed at the bifurcation of the right internal and external carotid arteries, as well as in the ascending aorta, pulmonary arteries, and descending aorta. There were also strip-shaped and nodular hypermetabolic lesions in the pericardium. (a) The arrows indicate hypermetabolic foci in the ascending aorta. (b) The arrows point to hypermetabolic foci at the bifurcation of the right internal and external carotid arteries. (c) The arrows highlight hypermetabolic foci in the pulmonary arteries.

Discussion

In this case, several aspects need to be considered: first, the etiological and pathological mechanisms of QF complicated by vasculitis and its identification; second, the microbiological diagnostic methods for QF to ensure accurate recognition and timely diagnosis; and third, the treatment and preventive measures for QF complicated by vasculitis.

Currently, there are few case reports worldwide regarding QF complicated by vasculitis, and the related mechanisms remain unclear. Coxiella burnetii is a strictly intracellular bacterium and the pathogen responsible for QF, which is a zoonotic disease. It is commonly found in the secretions or excretions of domestic animals such as cattle, sheep, and poultry, as well as in wild rodents and migratory birds, which are also highly infectious (4). Ticks serve as both the parasitic host and the reservoir host, and they are vectors for transmission between animals. The disease is typically transmitted via the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts (5). Humans can contract the infection by inhaling aerosolized particles containing the pathogen, with even low doses being sufficient to cause infection. Common symptoms include fever, muscle aches, and elevated transaminases.

Coxiella burnetii enters host cells through internalization and reproduces within vesicles formed by phagosomes. It then enters the bloodstream via cell lysis, which can lead to diseases affecting multiple systems (6). Studies have shown that Coxiella burnetii can proliferate extensively in arterial endothelial cells and, in severe cases, cause arterial occlusion (7). Additionally, a nationwide survey in France found that Coxiella infection can induce small-vessel mixed cryoglobulinemic vasculitis, medium-vessel vasculitis, and granulomatous large-vessel vasculitis (7), causing varying degrees of damage to the systemic vasculature. PET/CT scans are mainly used to assess vascular involvement in QF patients (8). Chronic Coxiella infection typically involves localized infection, with common sites including the vasculature and endocardium. A study involving 40 QF patients found that 32 of them had aortic inflammation, indicating that the aorta is one of the common sites of infection in QF (9). In this case, PET/CT confirmed aortic inflammatory changes. Furthermore, the autoimmune antibodies produced in the blood are often associated with chronic Coxiella infection (10). The patient’s first autoimmune test for 16 items revealed multiple positive autoimmune antibodies, but after treatment, many of these antibodies turned negative, indirectly supporting this association.

The incubation period for QF is approximately 2–3 weeks (11). Therefore, the Coxiella burnetii IgM antibodies were negative when the patient presented, which posed a challenge for early identification and diagnosis. Since Coxiella burnetii is an intracellular bacterium, blood cultures are typically negative. So the definitive diagnosis of the pathogen often relies on nucleic acid and serological tests (12). Commonly used serological methods include the complement fixation test (CFT), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (EIA), and immunofluorescence assay (IFA), with IFA being the gold standard for detecting Coxiella burnetii antibodies (13). However, in China, testing for phase I and phase II Coxiella antibodies has not yet been implemented, and currently, Q fever rickettsia IgM is the available serological test. IgM antibodies are the first antibodies secreted during the immune response (14) and can be produced quickly after infection, with a positive result often indicating recent infection. IgM typically becomes negative within 2–4 weeks. Previously, diagnosing QF posed challenges, including delays in results and low positivity rates. In recent years, mNGS has become a new tool for the rapid detection of infectious disease pathogens, significantly improving the diagnostic rate for some hidden infectious diseases (13, 15). PET/CT is also one of the diagnostic methods for unexplained fever (16). In this case, aortic inflammation was subtle and was ultimately diagnosed through PET/CT. In 2022, a case (17) was reported involving a febrile patient from China, who remained undiagnosed and untreated for 3 weeks until mNGS detected Coxiella burnetii genomic sequences in the patient’s blood. This case further underscores the critical role of diagnostic methods and clinicians’ awareness in timely disease management. Although diagnostic methods for the pathogen have increased, the diagnosis of QF still requires comprehensive analysis of epidemiological history, clinical symptoms, and serological testing. As the disease can affect multiple systems and involves cross-disciplinary concerns, this emphasizes the importance of multidisciplinary consultations when necessary.

The first-line treatment for QF is antimicrobial therapy, with tetracyclines being the preferred class. Doxycycline 100mg twice daily is commonly used, with a treatment course typically lasting 2 weeks. For patients with vasculitis, corticosteroid therapy can achieve good therapeutic effects. In this case, after 6 days of treatment with methylprednisolone, the patient’s fever gradually subsided, and no further fever was observed after discharge, resulting in a satisfactory treatment outcome. However, for infectious diseases, prevention is better than treatment. Vaccination is the most effective preventive measure (18). Currently, research and development of vaccines for QF are increasing, but their safety still needs further investigation. As studies on Coxiella species-specific responses progress both domestically and internationally, the availability of a QF vaccine is anticipated in the future.

There are some limits in the report. In this case, the diagnosis was solely based on IgM antibody detection for Coxiella burnetii using IFA, without performing antibody titer determination. Additionally, since China currently lacks testing capabilities for Coxiella burnetii phase I and phase II antibodies, this has somewhat limited our understanding of the patient’s immune response. Additionally, the patient was only followed up for 2 weeks after discharge. The short follow-up period precludes assessment of long-term outcomes or late adverse effects. Publication bias may exist as this case was selected due to its unusual presentation, which may not reflect typical clinical scenarios.

Conclusion

Although the incidence of QF is relatively low and most patients have a good prognosis, serious complications such as vasculitis and endocarditis should not be overlooked. Early identification through serological testing and clinical symptoms, along with timely intervention, is crucial. At the same time, as an infectious disease, the prevention and treatment of QF remain key areas for future research.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in this article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

Ethical approval was not required for the studies involving humans because this case has obtained the patient’s informed consent, and the informed consent form has been signed. Clinical trial number: not applicable. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The human samples used in this study were acquired from a by- product of routine care or industry. Written informed consent to participate in this study was not required from the participants or the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin in accordance with the national legislation and the institutional requirements. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article. This case has obtained the patient’s informed consent, and the informed consent form has been signed.

Author contributions

SG: Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. QL: Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. JY: Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. JW: Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. YZ: Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. FG: Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. YZ: Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.

Acknowledgments

We thank all the authors for their hard work.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The authors declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Abbreviations

ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; CFT, complement fixation test; CT, computed tomography; EIA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; IFA, immunofluorescence assay; IgM, immunoglobulin M; mNGS, metagenomic next-generation sequencing; PET/CT, positron emission tomography/computed tomography; QF, Q fever.

References

1. Eldin C, Mélenotte C, Mediannikov O, Ghigo E, Million M, Edouard S, et al. From Q Fever to Coxiella burnetii infection: A paradigm change. Clin Microbiol Rev. (2017) 30:115–90. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00045-16

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. España PP, Uranga A, Cillóniz C, Torres A. Q Fever (Coxiella Burnetii). Semin Respir Crit Care Med. (2020) 41:509–21. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1710594

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Hamad G, Ranmuthugala G. Q fever awareness in Australia: A scoping review. Aust N Z J Public Health. (2023) 47:100099. doi: 10.1016/j.anzjph.2023.100099

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Zhang P, Wang Y, Sun X. Etiological and epidemiological characteristics of Q fever and its prevention and control. China Anim Quarantine. (2021) 38:81–6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-944X.2021.01.017

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Mohamad Alahmad MA, Hammoud KA. Inpatient Q fever frequency is on the rise. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. (2023) 2023:4243312. doi: 10.1155/2023/4243312

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Hirschmann J. The discovery of Q fever and its cause. Am J Med Sci. (2019) 358:3–10. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2019.04.006

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Beydon M, Rodriguez C, Karras A, Cez A, Rafat C, Jourde-Chiche N, et al. Bartonella and Coxiella infections presenting as systemic vasculitis: Case series and review of literature. Rheumatology. (2022) 61:2609–18. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab691

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Ramos J, Santos D, Dias P. Large-vessel vasculitis and Q fever correlation. Eur J Case Rep Intern Med. (2024) 11:004110. doi: 10.12890/2023_004110

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Botelho-Nevers E, Fournier P, Richet H, Fenollar F, Lepidi H, Foucault C, et al. Coxiella burnetii infection of aortic aneurysms or vascular grafts: Report of 30 new cases and evaluation of outcome. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. (2007) 26:635–40. doi: 10.1007/s10096-007-0357-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Melenotte C, Million M, Raoult D. New insights in Coxiella burnetii infection: Diagnosis and therapeutic update. Expert Rev Anti-Infect Ther. (2020) 18:75–86. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2020.1699055

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Xu Q, Han W, Cai Y, Yin Y, Guo Y, Chen H, et al. A case report of the metagenomic next-generation sequencing for timely diagnosis of a traveler with nonspecific febrile Q fever. Heliyon. (2024) 10:e33649. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33649

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Sun X, Zhu L, Chen W. Research progress on diagnostic techniques for Q fever. China Anim Quarantine. (2019) 36:57–60. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-944X.2019.05.011

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Dai Y, Ma X. Application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing technology in clinical etiology diagnosis. J Clin Lab Med. (2021) 39:1–5. doi: 10.13602/j.cnki.jcls.2021.01.01

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Gutiérrez-Bautista J, Tarriño M, González A, Olivares Durán M, Cobo F, Reguera J, et al. Comparison of an enzyme linked-immunosorbent assay and a chemiluminescent immunoassay with an immunofluorescence assay for detection of phase II IgM and IgG antibodies to Coxiella burnetii. Microorganisms. (2024) 12:552. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12030552

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Liu W, Xia H, Tao Z. The use of metagenomic sequencing technology to diagnose infectious diseases. Chin J Pathog Biol. (2021) 16:614–8. doi: 10.13350/j.cjpb.210523

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Diseases. Expert consensus on diagnosis and treatment of fever without investigation. Chin J Infect Dis. (2017) 35:641–55. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6680.2017.11.001

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Li D, Liu H, Liu M, Chang C, Zhao X, Yu H, et al. Delayed diagnosis of acute Q fever, China. Emerg Infect Dis. (2022) 28:2580–2. doi: 10.3201/eid2812.221118

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Xiong X, Jiao J, Wen B. Q fever vaccines. Chin J Zoon. (2018) 34:171–4. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2694.2018.00.008

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: Q fever, vessel vasculitis, case report, NGS, PET/CT

Citation: Guo S, Liu Q, Yan J, Wang J, Zhong Y, Gao F and Zhong Y (2025) An acute Q fever with vessel vasculitis: case report. Front. Med. 12:1584216. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1584216

Received: 27 February 2025; Accepted: 11 June 2025;
Published: 11 July 2025.

Edited by:

Alan G. Goodman, Washington State University, United States

Reviewed by:

Xiaoqin Mo, Central South University, China
Suresh Babu Sayana, Government Medical College Bhadradri Kothagudem, India
Svjetlana Grgić, University Clinical Hospital Mostar, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Copyright © 2025 Guo, Liu, Yan, Wang, Zhong, Gao and Zhong. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Shijun Guo, ODI2NTE5MTdAcXEuY29t; bHl1bnRhbzIwMjNAMTYzLmNvbQ==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.