Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Med.

Sec. Pulmonary Medicine

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1589406

This article is part of the Research TopicThe Novel Insight into Managements of Undiagnosed Pleural EffusionView all 4 articles

`1 Development and Validation of a Prediction Model Based on a Nomogram for Tuberculous Pleural Effusion

Provisionally accepted
Suli  LiuSuli Liu1Yao  YangYao Yang1Dongmei  WangDongmei Wang1Lijuan  GaoLijuan Gao1Jiangyue  QinJiangyue Qin1Yanqiu  WuYanqiu Wu1Diandian  LiDiandian Li1Xiaohua  LiXiaohua Li2Mei  ChenMei Chen3Hao  WangHao Wang1Yongchun  ShenYongchun Shen1*Fuqiang  WenFuqiang Wen1Fangying  ChenFangying Chen4
  • 1West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
  • 2Sixth People's Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
  • 3Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
  • 4Tibet Third People's Hospital, Tibet, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Diagnosing tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE) is challenging. There is a lack of cross-sectional lateral comparisons among TPE prediction models.We aimed to develop and validate a novel TPE prediction model and compare its diagnostic performance with that of existing models.Patients with pleural effusion were included in the training, testing, and external validation sets. Variable selection strategies included LASSO and logistic regression. The discriminability, calibration, and clinical efficacy of the prediction model were estimated in the three sets. The performance of the model was compared with that of two existing prediction models.Fever, tuberculosis interferon-gamma release assays, pleural adenosine deaminase, the pleural mononuclear cell ratio, the ratio of pleural lactate dehydrogenase to pleural adenosine deaminase, pleural carcinoembryonic antigen, and pleural cytokeratin 19 fragment were selected to establish the prediction model. The AUCs were 0.931 (0.903 -0.958), 0.856 (0.753-0.959), and 0.925 (0.867-0.984) in the training, testing, and external validation sets, respectively. The AUCs of the two existing prediction models were 0.793 (0.737-0.850) and 0.854 (0.816-0.892). The calibration curves revealed that this model had good consistency.Decision curve analysis revealed the acceptable clinical benefit of this model. `3 Conclusion: Compared with the existing models, the TPE prediction model developed in this study demonstrated good diagnostic performance.

Keywords: Tuberculosis, Tuberculous pleural effusion, Clinical prediction model, diagnosis, Nomogram `4 1. Introduction

Received: 07 Mar 2025; Accepted: 26 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Liu, Yang, Wang, Gao, Qin, Wu, Li, Li, Chen, Wang, Shen, Wen and Chen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Yongchun Shen, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.