Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Med.

Sec. Family Medicine and Primary Care

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1589888

This article is part of the Research TopicChallenges and Innovations in Healthcare Management and Long-Term Care for an Aging SocietyView all 12 articles

Low lean mass and all-cause mortality risk in the middle-aged and older population: a dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies

Provisionally accepted
Juan  LiJuan Li1,2Xiaoling  LiuXiaoling Liu3qing  Yangqing Yang3Wenying  HuangWenying Huang4Zhibin  NieZhibin Nie1*Ya-Hai  WangYa-Hai Wang1*
  • 1Nanchang Normal College of Applied Technology, Nanchang, China
  • 2College of Arts and Physical Education, Nanchang, China
  • 3Wuhan Sixth Hospital, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China
  • 4Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective: The accelerated aging process has raised substantial public health concerns regarding the health of the middle-aged and older population. The aim of our study was to investigate the association between low lean mass and the risk of all-cause mortality in older people, with the goal of promoting a long lifespan and reducing public health burdens.Methods: Three databases (PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus) were searched for articles before May 22, 2025. The quality of the included articles was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). A meta-analysis was conducted using a random effects model. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression analysis were performed based on research characteristics. A dose-response analysis was performed to assess the specific association between lean mass and the risk of all-cause mortality. Sensitivity analysis was conducted using a leave-one-out meta-analysis. Publication bias analysis was conducted using Begg's and Egger's tests, as well as a funnel plot.Result: In total, 11 studies involving 130,079 participants were included in the metaanalysis of the association between low lean mass and the risk of all-cause mortality in the middle-aged and older population, all of which the included studies were of high quality. The average overall study quality score was 8 points. The random effects model analysis results showed that the pooled RR of all-cause mortality risk in the middleaged and older population was 1.30 (95% CI, 1.16 to 1.47, P < 0.001) across the lowest to normal lean mass category. There was an inverse nonlinear dose-response relationship between lean mass and the risk of all-cause mortality (P < 0.001).Low lean mass was significantly associated with 30% higher risk of allcause mortality in the middle-aged and older population. These findings highlighted low lean mass as an important risk factor for mortality in middle-aged and older population, warranting its integration into clinical assessments. Future research should establish causality through longitudinal studies and randomized trials, while refining diagnostic cutoffs for diverse populations.

Keywords: LEAN MASS, All-cause mortality, middle-aged and older population, metaanalysis, prospective cohort studies

Received: 08 Mar 2025; Accepted: 09 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Li, Liu, Yang, Huang, Nie and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Zhibin Nie, Nanchang Normal College of Applied Technology, Nanchang, China
Ya-Hai Wang, Nanchang Normal College of Applied Technology, Nanchang, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.