ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Med.
Sec. Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesiology
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1603778
This article is part of the Research TopicState of the Art in Acute Care Surgery: Application, Innovation, and Future PerspectivesView all 8 articles
Introduction of ultrasound-guided axillary vein approach for central venous catheterization in severely injured trauma patients: characteristics and concerns
Provisionally accepted- 1Haiyan People's Hospital, Zhejiang, China
- 2Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The ultrasound-guided axillary vein approach for central venous catheterization (UAVC) demonstrates high success rates and low complications; however, its utilization in trauma care settings remains limited. This study aimed to characterize UAVC practices in a trauma intensive care unit (TICU) at a tertiary teaching hospital, specifically investigating optimal catheter positioning, procedure-related complications, and risk factors associated with catheter inaccurate placement and venous thromboembolism (VTE) development. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on trauma patients who underwent UAVC between October 2021 and April 2023. This analysis was based on electronic medical records. Details of patients, procedures, and instances of catheter misplacement were carefully documented. The immediate complications after UAVC, including pneumothorax, hemothorax, hematoma, arteriovenous fistula, arterial dissection, and skin infection, were recorded. Moreover, late-onset complications such as VTE and catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) were also noted. Logistic regression was utilized to determine the independent risk factors for non-optimal catheter tip placement and VTE. Results: A total of 132 UAVC cases were analyzed, with 113 (85.6%) performed by resident physicians and no immediate complications observed. The VTE incidence was 27.3%, particularly higher in elderly patients (≥ 65 years, 43.4%), and fever during TICU stay was noted in 55.3% of cases. Catheterrelated infections occurred at a rate of 3.38 per 1000 catheter days, with eight cases (6.06%) of catheter misplacement. Accurate placement was achieved in 29.8% of 121 patients, predominantly on the right side (40.4%). Factors influencing inaccurate placement included patient age [odds ratios (OR) 1.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.10], obesity (OR 9.31,, and left-side placement (OR 133.04,, while patient age (>54 years), fever, and ventilation duration (>6.6 days) were associated with VTE development.In severely injured trauma patients, UAVC is associated with a high incidence of VTE and a low rate of optimal catheter tip positioning. Our findings underscore the necessity of standardized protocols to refine catheter tip placement and warrant further investigation through randomized controlled trials.
Keywords: Axillary Vein, Central venous catheterization, Venous Thromboembolism, Multiple Trauma, ultrasound
Received: 14 Apr 2025; Accepted: 04 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Gu, Xu, Jiang, Lu, Wang and Zhao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Shan-Xiang Xu, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
Shou-Yin Jiang, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.